[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 86 KB, 1400x1060, malcolm gladwell.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6967931 No.6967931 [Reply] [Original]

Post some middlebrow authors

>> No.6967933

>>6967931
gladwell is more like pop science so

>> No.6967934

Franzen.jpg

>> No.6967935

>>6967931
Dfw and delillo

>> No.6967937

>>6967931
David & Goliath was an enjoyable read.

>> No.6967941

>>6967933
how is that not middlebrow?

>> No.6967949

>>6967935
DeLillo is so middlebrow lol

>> No.6967955

>>6967949
He writes some very impressive prose thoguh

>> No.6967957

>>6967955
I'd put him in uppermiddlebrow tbh

>> No.6967959
File: 191 KB, 477x768, pepenazi.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6967959

Is The Economist middlebrow?

>> No.6967961

>>6967959
I'd say high-middlebrow

>> No.6967964

>>6967959
Its in the new yorker tier

>> No.6967969
File: 86 KB, 500x629, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6967969

>>6967959
It's news... So... No...

>> No.6967971

why do people title their works in the style of phrase, colon, long sentence explaining what you're going to get out of the book

>The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference
>Blink: The Power of Thinking Without Thinking
>David and Goliath: Underdogs, Misfits, and the Art of Battling Giants

I pretty much don't read any books titled like this.

>> No.6967974

>>6967971
It's been done for centuries and plenty of classics do it as well

>> No.6967977

>>6967971
but anon, they feature startling conclusions that fly in the face of intuition backed up by empirical data and novel experiments!

>> No.6967978

>>6967971
It's good for marketing and search engines
http://mitrailleuse.net/2015/01/11/the-rise-of-the-mega-title-how-gratuitous-list-filled-names-optimized-books-for-internet-age-sales-conquered-the-market-and-made-titles-more-boring/

>> No.6967981

>>6967971
man these titles reek of middlebrow

>> No.6968000
File: 19 KB, 364x337, fancy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6968000

>>6967981
absolutely and utterly revolting!

>> No.6968004

>>6968000
I agree, my fellow redditor! Not for us highbrow Andy Weir fans!

>> No.6968005
File: 185 KB, 1348x840, png.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6968005

This pic might give y'all some ideas.

>> No.6968014
File: 162 KB, 640x486, Murakami.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6968014

>> No.6968019
File: 4 KB, 106x132, box.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6968019

>>6968005
>implying jukebox isn't top-tier

>> No.6968020

>>6968005
Im upper middle brow tbh

Virginia Woolf would eat my soul

>> No.6968025
File: 3 KB, 89x102, chr.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6968025

>>6968005
>implying mail order overstuffed chair isn't top-tier

>> No.6968026

>>6968025
Always buy that one in The Sims

>> No.6968030

Franzen
Chabon
Sedaris
Foer
Eugenides
Eggers
Bryson

Basically any author that turns up in a lot of "best books" lists.

>> No.6968038

>>6968030
Ah, guess that makes Shakespeare middlebrow

>> No.6968044

>>6968005
Holy shit, I'm as middlebrow as it can get

>> No.6968045

>>6968030
Perfect but add Zadie

>> No.6968048

>>6968030
I know Foer at least should be lowbrow.

>> No.6968049

Anyone writing now who is black.

>> No.6968072
File: 52 KB, 560x342, mana.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6968072

>>6968005

>> No.6968186

>>6968005
Autism meets Spooks: the image

>> No.6968221

Pynchon.

>> No.6968247

Philip Roth

>> No.6968450

Joyce

>> No.6968478

>>6967974
Classics use semicolons, m8

>Moby-Dick; or, The Whale

>> No.6968505

>>6968005
What bothers me about the high-brow lit is that Naked Lunch and the cut-up trilogy are avant-garde novels, but are far too crude for the stereotypical high-brow snob

>>6968014
More like lower-middle-brow masquerading as upper-middle-brow

>> No.6968513

>>6968048
Foer wrote a nonfic book about how everyone should be vegan otherwise they are disgusting human beings. That's pretty middlebrow, as it appeals directly to the sort of hipster found in less-than-respectable schools - that type of hipster that pretends to be a real boho

>> No.6968555

>>6967931
nothing middlebrow bout corporate shills

>> No.6968577

>>6968005
>Upper Middle-Brow Games
Fuck those people, lost again.

>> No.6968581

>>6967964
the new yorker is far, far better than the economist, and i say that as a traditionalist conservative

>> No.6968602

>>6968513
I was thinking about quality rather than content. Franzen might be middlebrow, but he still blows that hack Foer out of the water in comparison.

>> No.6968607

>>6968038

Shakespeare is middlebrow, but not specifically middlebrow like those authors are.

>> No.6968638

Houellebecq

>> No.6968813

>>6968049
Ta-Nehisi Coates is like the God for middlebrow white progs

>> No.6968828

>>6968581
The two magazines aren't much alike though, so I don't know what there is to compare in terms of content or writing style.

>> No.6968835

>>6968581
Economist's obits are on point though.

>> No.6968915
File: 202 KB, 1381x874, Be happy – with Albert Camus.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6968915

>> No.6969008
File: 263 KB, 685x887, The-Volts-Hemingway-Sweater.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6969008

You know it's true.

>> No.6969276

>>6968581
>comparing shit and vomit

>> No.6969291

>>6968581
The Economist is basically "neoliberal agenda: the magazine".

>> No.6969309

>>6968005
how old is this? there are actually a lot of really good westerns now

>> No.6969812

>>6967961
There's no such thing.

>> No.6969826

God Tier: NYRM

Almost there tier: Harpers, N+1, Baffler, Dissent,

At least I can appear cultured on the subway tier: New Yorker

Shit tier: Jacobin

>> No.6969842

>>6969812
50,000 dollars a year != 200,000 dollars a year

>> No.6969845

>>6969291
That's because every educated adult in the real world is a neoliberal of some sort.

Grow up bruh

>> No.6969852

>>6969842

200,000 gorrillian dollars can't buy you critical thought, introspection and, above all, taste.

>> No.6969857
File: 16 KB, 300x389, PhilipDick.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6969857

>> No.6969991

>>6968555
Wot are you talking about, corporations live off middle brows

>> No.6969996

>>6969008
If anything he's one of the seemingly lowbrow authors (and appeals to low and middlebrow people) but who's actually highbrow

>> No.6970012

What are some good magazines /lit/

>> No.6970021

who are some highbrow authors?

>> No.6970066

>>6970012
Paris Review is the only one I bother looking at.

>> No.6970080

>>6970021
Extremely obscure postmodern authors like Gil Orlovitz

>> No.6970131

>>6968005

why is non fiction in the second slot? it can often be taken entirely at face value and therefore is a bastion for pseudo-intellectuals who think the acquisition of pure knowledge is a substitute for critical thinking

also all the slots that mention material goods shouldn't be there because someone truly high brow, not a dandy faggot, doesn't care about material things

>> No.6970138
File: 2 KB, 91x67, let.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6970138

>>6968005
>implying quartered iceberg lettuce isn't top-tier

>> No.6970147

>>6970131
Well, they still need some kind of Furniture and Useful Objects.

>> No.6970202

>>6969996
this

>> No.6970330

>>6968072
spooks.txt