[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 57 KB, 379x579, 11811416_468082000020069_8295693740236911929_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6951469 No.6951469 [Reply] [Original]

I'm legit depressed because I didn't add anything to 'the legacy of totalitarianism in a tundra'. I don't think it's possible to write a more conceptually important book in the current cultural moment.

>> No.6951494

>>6951469

Suicide is no longer fashionable, nor is becoming addicted to painkillers.

Your only option is to become a minor Twitter personality and collect disability.

>> No.6951507

>>6951494
Truly, a fate worse than death

>> No.6951526

We should make another book tbh

>> No.6951533

About what? We already have three or four books, there's absolutely no point shitposting further.

>> No.6951544

>>6951469
lit should write a book every 3 years as Internet culture or general discourse may subtly change

>> No.6951558

>>6951544
Good idea.

By the way, what was the deal with Tundra? Was it written in Google docs? How did they prevent loads of shit from being deleted?

>> No.6951568

>>6951494
>thinks I care about being fashionable
I don't care about you or this board. I am a free man.

>> No.6951581

>>6951544
Pynchon did it with "Bleeding Edge" already.

>> No.6951585

>>6951469
you did add something to it, ur aninymoos arnt ya?

>> No.6951591

>>6951558
Tons of shit was deleted

>> No.6951594

>>6951568

Are you?

>>6951544

3 years is too wide an interval? 18 months.

>> No.6951635

Wait?

Did some faggot profit from this?

>> No.6951636

>>6951591
Oh right. So people were just chill with that, then?

>> No.6951641

>>6951585
but how

>> No.6951650

>>6951636
Some guy, I think maybe the owner of the original documents? would revert changes after mass deletions I think. Or at least that's what happened at the beginning. I hopped off that train after the second 'chapter'.

>> No.6951656

>>6951469
Yeah, that's a shame, but then again you are presently actively contributing to the slow descent of this board into a shitposting heaven, so cheer up !

>> No.6951667

Tundra books and derivatives I know about:

>Tundra I:
http://legacy.litwritesabook.com/public/totalitarian.pdf

>Miami:
http://expirebox.com/download/5e9548ef3e976fd166fe60f2598c44d6.html

>Kolsti:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/263266929/Authoritarian-in-the-Everglades

>Tokyo Drift:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RtSPyz_R2qxlmUNfKCgYKQjXP1UYB_p8PTvIugBWXM8/edit

>Bequeathment of Democracy in the Saharas:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/254403218/The-Bequeathment-of-Democracy-in-the-Saharas#scribd

There are other works besides "Bequeathment" that have followed as a consequence, but I did not archive them. What now, 4chan? This is as close to a magnum opus the hivemind will ever achieve and, admittedly, it is shit with exceptionally brilliant bits tossed here and there.

>> No.6951679

>>6951667
Congratulations.

If any of them can be considered culturally significant---and they can't---then it's the original.

>> No.6951688

>>6951641
imagine all the anonymous on each individual board, tripfags not included, as a single entity either thinking or talking to itself; since it's all anonymous after all, and the story is just a lens to that moment in time, realize the entire anonymous entity was part of that story and that, that story doesn't exist in the way it once did and in the next story it creates you'll have been part of that or some poetic bullshit and then you'll die and you'll be part of no more lenses or stories

>> No.6951721

>>6951688
Thank you.

>> No.6951726

Post your favorite Tundra excerpt.

>> No.6951734

has anyone's who's not 4chan weighed in on these books? do they have any outside relevance at all or are they just an epic /lit/ meme?

>> No.6951740

Can we start a new thing? We could do a play or something? Or whatever, I don't even care, I just wanna contribute some shit to something.

>> No.6951742

>>6951734
someone should send zizek a copy, maybe that'll bring us interest

>> No.6951765

>>6951740
On the one hand, nothing apart from the first Tundra can really be considered original and important, but on the other hand if you analyse the whole thing from like a posthumanist/postinternet/postmodern perspective, then originality doesn't exist/matter.

>> No.6951769

>>6951740

We could do what they did in the 1920s and start a small journal or pamphlet with a short circulation life. We could call it something like Disjunction or Dystopian Particulars.

>> No.6951773

>>6951769
No no, something more subtle and to the point. Like "Defunct" or summat.

>> No.6951776

>>6951769
>>6951773
So like a short story/poem collection or something? I'm down with it.

>> No.6951777

>>6951773
Defunct?

>> No.6951787

>>6951777
I like it.

>> No.6951788

>>6951776
I think restricting it to specific forms kind of defeats the whole point of crowd created internet based content

>> No.6951790

>>6951777
>>6951776
>>6951773

I like Defunct as a title myself. Will it be ruthlessly political or ruthlessly apolitical?

>> No.6951793

>>6951788
Why ?

>> No.6951795

I think it is sincere where it is less warranted.

>> No.6951796

>>6951790
Why not some sections that are hella political, some that are apolitical, and what not?

>> No.6951801

this post: >>6951795 was meant for >>6951790

>> No.6951805

>>6951790
Either. All

>>6951793
Well, because one of the most important aspects of this whole thing is that it's in a format that is pretty much new, ie internet crowd created whatever, so sticking to traditionalist forms, to me at least, doesn't make sense.

>> No.6951817

>>6951805
>>6951801
So do you folks want me to set up a google doc now?

>> No.6951822

>>6951790
>>6951787
>>6951773
Yo yo yo, Defunct is already a magazine. Think we need something more uniquely 4chan. Like 'The Postmeme Thought Machine'

>> No.6951826
File: 3 KB, 160x90, bane.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6951826

>>6951817

Of course!

>> No.6951827

>>6951822
So what if "Defunct" is used?

>> No.6951832

>>6951822
>>6951827
>>6951826
So we're using defunct? Radical. I'll post the link in a moment.

I will archive it all periodically to avoid any mass deletion.

>> No.6951835

>>6951827
People only want to contribute if they can get measly internet glory from being easily googlable, otherwise it has no purpose.

Did you think anyone legitimately wanted to create something ?

>> No.6951840

>>6951835
>>6951827
Well, guess it doesn't matter, just thought someone might mind, but if people are cool with it then I genuinely don't care

>> No.6951842

>>6951835

We can always commandeer the name, it appears they were last active Spring 2014.

>> No.6951855

DEFUNCT IS COMTH

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KZ584OkI9P__04a73Gf4DFaRD2NjqfUuqLTvWY5QsSk/edit?usp=sharing

>> No.6951864

>>6951855

So lets be clear about this, what EXACTLY is this thing?

>> No.6951870

I personally think /lit/'s collective stories have value, in the same way a woman suffering some neuroses on Freud's couch saying whatever retarded thoughts come to mind actually turn out to have value; in the same way free association has value.

>> No.6951871

>>6951864
>https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KZ584OkI9P__04a73Gf4DFaRD2NjqfUuqLTvWY5QsSk/edit?usp=sharing

A rough draft, a struggle for literary dominance among anonymous 4chan individuals.

>> No.6951902

Literally just lie and say you did.

>> No.6951956

>>6951855

>https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KZ584OkI9P__04a73Gf4DFaRD2NjqfUuqLTvWY5QsSk/edit?usp=sharing

GET IN HERE PEOPLE

>> No.6951974

>>6951956
Well, aidsfest ensued.

>> No.6952060

>>6951956
>https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KZ584OkI9P__04a73Gf4DFaRD2NjqfUuqLTvWY5QsSk/edit?usp=sharing

I haven't taken part in the writing of Tundra, or any other /lit/ masterpiece and I have very serious doubt, that anything worthwhile (for a reader) can come out of this kind of cooperation, but I think the process itself is very interesting.

A peculiar mix of chat, forum, literary outlet, meme cesspool and a kind of arts&crafts free for all, that has never been done before. I think we should start doing this regularly, just for the sake of the process, for ourselves, it's not like the outcome is goin to be valuable to anyone besides us.

>> No.6952101

>>6952060
We are the new futurists, united through le memenet.

>> No.6952119

>>6952101

Now... what do we do with this little package of concentrated madness?

>> No.6952144

>>6952101
Our movement needs to have a catchy name. Not Neo-Sincerity. No, the style is... synergistic yet chaotic.

>> No.6952157

>>6952144

An academic term for a multitude of individuals shitposting?

Anarcho-aggregation?
Collective Stream of Consciousness?

>> No.6952164

>>6951667
If Kolsti ever becomes a notable author or serial killer or anything, his book will become by far the most valuable. We should finish it and pack it with names and personal advertisements.

>> No.6952174

>>6952157
Meta-lit.

>> No.6952176

>>6952157
Collective consciousness, the first literary movement to dominate the 21st century.

>> No.6952177

>>6951656
you're on 4chan dude roflmao.

>> No.6952186

>>6952157
Anarcho-synergism.

>> No.6952200

Afrocentric neo-conforming troglodytes

>> No.6952202

>>6952186
>>6952176
ANARCHO SYNERGISM/COLLECTIVE CONSCIOUSNESS ARE THE BEST. I PARTICULARLY LIKE THE LATTER.

>> No.6952205

>>6952186
>>6952176

I like both of those.

Will do it... academics (or the robots that will replace them) will write about the Collective Consciousness/Anarcho-Syngergistic movement and probably make some assertion that it arose from the ideological fracturing of postmodernism and the rise of technologies and platforms like Twitter.

>> No.6952264

>>6952205
SOMEONE SEND THIS TO ZIZEK

>> No.6952285

ESSAY POSTED IN DOC:

A Brief Essay Concerning the Ineluctable Ontology of the Inception of Our Literary Movement: Anarcho-Synergism/Collective Consciousness:

IT CAN /B/ AGREED THAT ALL THAT EXISTS EXISTS ON 1 LEVEL AS INFORMATION. DATA POINTS IN A FUCKING MASSIVE HYPER-REAL SIMULATION. INFORMATION RELIES ON AN UNDERLYING SYSTEM OF LANGUAGE. AS SUCH, WHEN EXTENDED OVER AN EFFECTIVELY INFINITE PERIOD OF TIME, P. MUCH INFINITE PERMUTATIONS OF THE LANGUAGE CAN EXIST. WHAT I’M GETTING AT IS THAT EVERY CONTENT THAT CAN EXIST DOES EXIST ON LIKE A THEORETICAL LVL. SO BASICALLY ANYTHING THAT’S MADE IS JUST COLLAPSING THE QUANTUM POSSIBILITY OF WHAT’S GONNA GET SHITPOSTED NEXT. COLLECTIVE CONSCIOUSNESS. IT’S POSTHUMAN, YO. IT’S NOW YO. IT’S FRESH. EVERYONE THAT EXISTS IS CONTENT AS WELL AS THE CONTENT THAT EXISTS. U CAN SEE THIS MANIFEST IN THE FACT THAT WE’RE ALL ANONS ON 4CHAN. WHEN EVERYONE IS UPLOADED FROM THE CLOUD, DATA STREAMS OF YOUTUBE VIDEOS AND POSTS ABOUT CUCKS ON 4CHAN WILL B BASICALLY INDISTINGUISHABLE FROM 1ANOTHER. OR IF THEY’RE NOT INDISTINGUISHABLE, THEN THEIR DIFFERENCES WILL BE INCONSEQUENTIAL. WE WANT 2 MEMORIALIZE SOMETHING BEAUTIFUL ABOUT THIS DATACHAOS. IT’S BEAUTIFUL FUCK U.

>> No.6952290

>>6951469
We are having many keks right now

>> No.6952324

so now what?

>> No.6952328
File: 297 KB, 1663x1080, 1438702287680.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6952328

>>6952264
It's not even an actual 'thing' yet, hold your horses.

>> No.6952340

>>6952328
anonymous internet users are attempting to create of whole new kind of collective, international literature using never before seen tools and cultural awareness

if we were a bit more serious, this could've been a pretty interesting project, worth serious mentioning, if just as a concept

>> No.6952360

>>6952340
Though randomness, genuine funposting and absolute anonymity-induced ironic memespewing is what makes it realustic.

>> No.6952365

>>6951469
People are just deleting shit now it's pretty much ruined

>> No.6952387

>>6952365
Everything is archived, everything can be retrieved with a bit dedication. We just need people to calm down and stop powerplaying.

(It's going to end horribly...)

>> No.6952396

>>6952387
I think it could be a good concept, but only with a select few and a directive framework.

>> No.6952405

>>6952340
Only if it turns out to be quality, if not, it's no better than the trash we're getting pushed down our throat to accept as "art".

>> No.6952417

I don't see what's wrong with people not taking this seriously.

The vast majority of the populace doesn't take literature seriously. The fact that the work doesn't simply makes it more applicable to modern life.

Ultimately, our anonymity reveals the truth of the human condition; that humans are absurd creatures.

>> No.6952435

>>6952417
I agree with this post a lot

>> No.6952437

So is the file frozen?

>> No.6952466

>>6952405
I seriously hope you're not one of those
>hurr durr all modern art is shit
guys. Not saying that this doc has artistic value, but the concept is pretty promising either way. Besides, who's to say that something coherent is supposed to come out of a massive shit posting. It's like this 6 hour movie of a chair in a room. Nobody's going to watch that shit, but it's important that it has been made.

>> No.6952492

>>6951469
Wasn't TAR for this kind of shit? Whatever happened to it anyway?

>> No.6952507

>>6951581
Thinking of picking this up. Is it a fun read?

>> No.6952571

>>6952437
No.

>> No.6952591

>>6952571
Yeye it's not, I just had some issues with loading it.

>> No.6952612

Should I make a pastebin of the best parts so far?

>> No.6952632

>>6952612
Yeah, I guess. I don't see the point of doing so, since every change is automatically saved.

Go ahead, though.

>> No.6952646

http://pastebin.com/iutAk9jb

>> No.6952661

Why Defunct? It's a shit two syllable word. Am I missing something smug about it?

Why not "Postprevalence"
It's incredibly smug while still poking fun at ourselves as well as being both ironic and truthful

"Post" has unfathomable meaning in the sense of /lit/ connotation like Post-irony (our generation (as opposed to the ironic gen x)), post-modern, to post etc. Prevalence because post-pre interaction and as a commentary on the state of current 4chan. Have a look at the definitions:

prevalence (countable and uncountable, plural prevalences)

1 The quality or condition of being prevalent; wide extension.
2 (epidemiology) The total number of cases of a disease in a given statistical population at a given time, divided by the number of individuals in that population.

Prevalent definition:
prevalent (comparative more prevalent, superlative most prevalent)

1 Widespread or preferred. [quotations ▼]
2 Superior in frequency or dominant. [quotations ▼]

And here's the definitions for Valence

Etymology 1

1 (extract, preparation):, from Latin valentia (“strength, capacity”) (1425)
2 (combining capacity): from German Valenz (1884)

Alternative forms

1 valency (mostly UK):

Pronunciation

IPA(key): /ˈveJləns/

Noun

valence (plural valences)

1 (chemistry, medicine, obsolete outside compounds) An extract; a preparation, now especially one effective against a certain number of strains of a pathogen.

2 trivalent vaccine (one meant to be effective against three strains)

3 (chemistry) The combining capacity of an atom, radical or functional group determined by the number of electrons that it will lose, gain, or share when it combines with other atoms etc
4 (chemistry) The number of binding sites of a molecule, such as an antibody or antigen
5 (linguistics) The number of arguments that a verb can have, including its subject, ranging from zero (for the likes of "It rains") to three (for the likes of "He gives her a flower").
6 (psychology) A one-dimensional value assigned to an object, situation, or state, that can usually be positive or negative
7 (sociology) value


Mah maybe I am out of my mind.

>> No.6952674

>>6952661
Tryhard.

>> No.6952679

>>6952466
Not all modern art, just most of it. Most of what's in the galleries and museums.

>> No.6952690

Anarcho Synergism/Collective Conciousness; ASCC; pronounciation: ass

>> No.6952718

YO SWEATERX NOBODY CAN READ THE DOC NOW.

>> No.6952719

FUCK YOU SWEATERX

>> No.6952724

>>6952661
kolsti, is that u???

also what happened to the doc
it appeared it got locked.

>> No.6952725

>>6951558
There's a website where you can order the print on demand version.

>> No.6952726

THAT CHEEKY CUNT CUT US OFF

>> No.6952727

What's he up to now...

>> No.6952730

>>6952725
WHERE

>> No.6952736

HE STOLE OUR MEMES AND NOW HES GONNA SELL THEM

>> No.6952737

I WAS HAVING SO MUCH FUN

>> No.6952738

>>6952730
see >>6951667

>> No.6952739

Do people seriously think Kolsti is a good writer?

>> No.6952741

>>6952738
YEAH BUT WHERE'S THE ONE WE MADE

>> No.6952743

Guys, it's been an honor and a pleasure, to shitpost with you, in this first Collective consciousness. In memery of it, I think we should turn this phrase into a meme.

>> No.6952746

>>6952739
no, it's just him samefagging and the few slow anons who hopped on his samefag bandwagon because they didn't realize it was him

>> No.6952748

>>6952743
I HAVE A MICROSOFT WORD ARCHIVE OF PART OF THIS THREAD. IT DIDN'T CATCH THE END BITS, BUT THAT DOESN'T MATTER, BECAUSE TOWARDS THE END EVERYTHING SPIRALLED INTO A PIT OF CANCER.

>> No.6952754

>>6952743
It's Anarcho-synergism. Collective consciousness sounds like something you'd hear if you're into palmistry or something that involves talking to an orb.

>> No.6952756

>>6952748
I HAVE THE WHOLE THING. I SWEATERX/GOBLIN, WILL START A NEW THREAD INA MOMENT.

>> No.6952759

>>6952754

I look forward to vicious debates over which term is superior.

>> No.6952760

>>6952756
THANKS MAN. PROVIDE A LINK IN THIS THREAD WHEN U DO PLS. –LOVE KRAKEN

>> No.6952761

>>6952756
Why did you cut us off in the first place, you fuck?

>> No.6952764

>>6952743
what in the what happend to the doc?

>> No.6952767

>>6952754
>>6952759
WELL EVERYONE HAS BEEN SAYING COLLECTIVE CONSCIOUSNESS AND IT IS LESS WORDY THAN ANARCHO-SYNERGISM EVEN THOUGH ANARCHO-SYNERGISM IS PROBABLY A BETTER DESCRIPTION SO WHATEVER

>> No.6952769

>>6952759
Now this. This here. This is the actual memery.

>> No.6952772

>>6952756
IT WAS GOING BEAUTIFULLY GOBLIN/SWEATER))))))))))0

>> No.6952775

>>6952767
Says Caps-Lock Kraken.
We could just abbreviate it as "AS/CC," everybody gets it and nobody gets hurt.

>> No.6952778

>>6952764
>>6952761
>>6952760
I will provide a link, and i cut you off because, as was said, the fuckery had reached its zenith and it was time for it to end. Besides, it's more abrupt and is therefore more artsy becuase muh experimental.
>>6952772
it was, but it had to end. I love you, thanks for shitpostin.

>> No.6952781

>>6952767
>less wordy
as if that is at all a good reason not to use anarcho-synergism.
wait, isn't the proper term anarchic synergism?

>> No.6952786

Does anyone have a better idea of how to collaborate on a document? Github might work

>> No.6952787

>>6952772
>>6952764
>>6952761
I AM NOT SWEATERX, BUT IT IS OK. EVERYTHING IS OK. THIS IS NOT THE END. THIS IS ONLY THE BEGINNING.

>>6952775
THIS IS THE BEST IDEA, I THINK

>>6952781
NO ANARCHOSYNERGISM IS BETTER, GET CUCK'D LOOSER

>> No.6952789

>>6952778
I wasn't done reading it Goblin/Sweater)), so I can't tell you if the zenith of fuckery was reached. I'll take your word for it.

>> No.6952796

>>6952787
Anarcho-synergism implies a mixture of synergism and the political philosophy of anarchism, which is silly.

>> No.6952805

>>6952796
It doesn't necessitate the entailment of the political aspect of anarchy. Still, we can leave this to serious academicians if - and only if - this is somehow unique.

I don't ever trust it will, so it doesn't hurt whether it's anarcho- or anarchic. I like the tone of the former, plus I invented it. Don't regret it, really.

>> No.6952806

>>6952767
guys who won this so called "memester-collective" as we now have come to call it?

>> No.6952813

>>6952789
The zenith of fuckery was reached

OH ALSO, LOOK AT THIS YOU FUCKERS: >>6952808

>> No.6952828

>>6952813
i am so fucking glad we were all able to come together to meme as one great literary collective force for autism in this miserable normie world. I love you guys.

>> No.6952839

>>6952805
"i invented it"
and the first thing i see when i search for it is a Facebook group... Are you a Normi anon-senpai?

>> No.6952849

>hurr, we must invent portmanteau if we're going to give things a name.

>> No.6952922

>>6952775
This.

>> No.6952942

>>6952739
I do

>> No.6953299

>>6952849
>I hate fun

>> No.6953757

I CAN'T CONTRIBUTE AT ALL

WHERE IS THE MAN RUNNING THIS SO I CAN HISS AT HIM

>> No.6953894

>>6951742
someone do this i need new zizek memes

>> No.6954039

>>6953757

Hello, friend. It seems you're a tad too late to contribute to the prototype. Do not panic. We, a collaboration of five from the original post, have unanimously come to the conclusion that Defunct — and thus, AS/CC — is at an infancy yet to produce something of considerable merit, if possible. We're entertaining the idea of making Defunct official and available to all our Anonymous members out there on a biweekly basis.

We do value everyone's unrestrained input, but the perk comes with founding a regulative body of sorts (this proves within itself a controversial matter) that can weed out the iconoclasts from those with genuine interest without disrupting the ebbs and flows of consciousness or twisting it. We will attend to these issues before we ever consider hosting a second event. Anonymous' potential is vast, we do not doubt it. The safest route would, however, suppose we take precautionary measures from having any one person prevail or dominate the document. We are not administrators, forbid. Our primary function does not entail altering the work by any means to meet our end. We will work at any cost to preserve every word. Of course, our work begins in succession of the document coming to a halt, if a work is in progress we are as any other member of the hive-mind and never claim an upper hand.

Doubtless some may remain wary of the entire project, we completely understand. Though, we ask you to sympathize. The goal remains as it is, offering a space for emancipation: A place to vent, express and promote under the guise of an anonymous body with no particular agenda. An archived memory of our subculture, about who we are and what we individually represent. We may suggest from time to time a general template to follow, but deviance is welcome and certainly appreciated. There are no rules besides remaining germane and original for, after all, this is your content.

Do remain patient, there's more to come.

-V

>> No.6954111

>>6951734
its an epic /lit/ meme, have you even read it?

>> No.6954116

>>6951776
we need a name and a cover to spurr interest. it should be like a two year old project or something where only the best are included. Im sure we can write something at least better than the new Tao Lin tweet book

>> No.6954125

>>6954116
You're a bit (extremely) late dude. We're planning stuff, just wait for a few days.

>> No.6954135
File: 41 KB, 720x400, Grisha.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6954135

>>6954125
Is there room for another mind?

>> No.6954175
File: 153 KB, 768x1024, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6954175

>>6954116
The Spiritual Sequel—it's a play.

>> No.6954182

>>6954135
Soon. The Editors need to deliberate for a bit, and then it will recommence.

>> No.6954199

>>6954175
oh god my dick...

>> No.6954203

>>6954199
The duck-face though.

>> No.6954572
File: 89 KB, 861x533, 1367100814710.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6954572

>>6951469
I 'contributed' to both the Kolsti Everglades book and Tundra 3, and both of those died out before completion. I'd say you're ahead.

>> No.6954593

>>6954203
there is nothing inherently wrong with it, humans act silly infront of cameras

>> No.6955654

Bumping thread for suggestions about the next edition.

>> No.6955663

>>6951469
I came up with the title, "the legacy of totalitarianism in a tundra"
u jelly?

>> No.6955666

I actually wrote all of TLOTIAT

>> No.6955710

Now that the first edition of defunct is completed, whate are the future plans? A thread should be made some time before the actual project so more can be alerted.

>> No.6955737

>>6955710
>tfw we will have a hard time coming up with something as worthwhile as Defunct no matter what the plan/direction is

>> No.6955808

>>6955710
see >>6954039

>> No.6955825
File: 45 KB, 300x400, HSEvn6M.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6955825

>>6951742
he might plagiarize it but it'd still maybe be worth it?

>> No.6955904

>>6954572
The Kolsti book doesn't even count as collective consciousness because the best part was written by Kolsti himself.

>> No.6955926

>>6955904
Go 2 bed kolsti

>> No.6956268

>>6955904
Go to bed, goddammit.

>> No.6956379

>>6955926
Nah I mean the whole book is shit except like 600 words he wrote.

>> No.6956386

>>6956379
Sorry, I should have clarified: go to bed and stay there.

Sincerely,

/lit/

>> No.6956735

>>6956379
>>6956386
Sorry, I should have clarified further: go to bed and die.

Sincerely,

everyone