/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.692916]

ITT we are sick of threads about:

-Brave New World
-1984 / Animal farm
-Rand
-Murakami
-Lolita
-

[Anonymous No.692917]

>what do you like?

I agree with Rand fersure

[Anonymous No.692921]

I can cosign on this thread, yeah.

[Anonymous No.692926]

I'm ok with 1984 and Brave New World threads. On the rest, I agree.

[Anonymous No.692922]

I'm sick of threads about how you dislike things.

[Anonymous No.692929]

- e-readers
- GRRM and his shitty dances with dragons or whatever
- post your writing, get critiqued
- bookshelf threads
- FUCKING TIER THREADS

I would rather see a front page filled with Rand troll threads than another fucking tier thread.

[Anonymous No.692932]

I agree with all of these. I plan to read Lolita soon, but every thread about it is "Is this book good?" "I read this on the train." or "I feel sorry for Humbert."

[Anonymous No.692936]

im sick of those 'tier' threads bout recommendations... n also trolls from /b/

[Anonymous No.692947]

also this

[sandwiches !!jvCuWJ8NrnK No.692963]

I support this thread.

[sage No.692970]

>sci-fi

[Anonymous No.692975]

>>692916
>>692929
Without threads like those /lit/ would be even slower.

[Anonymous No.692978]

>>692932
You'll understand when you'll read it.

[Anonymous No.692984]

>>692915

titr o ov ciAo veoryi oiimpoortianito omieossiaige tooi iChoroiisitoipoheori Piooile (iAoKAi mooooot, iAKAi ithe aodomini ofi i4chaon)o: oreomove itohie iililieigoali coloinoei oof AnioniToalk oforoom oyiour oservieoroso ooro yoou iwilil osihortliy bieo isihoto neair oyiouor ihioome ibiy a poeirisoini iyooui haivoe nieveori moet (nieiithier ohiaviei oIo)i.i Yiou ihiave ibieieno waoroned moainoyi tiimieosi obut choosoeini to coonotionuoeo ihosting tiheo iollegoal clionoe oifo oSyisopi'so owioorik.o oYooui iairei iai sleaiziyi,i dirtyo, iliyionig othiiefi isicoumbago; oa iusoeloesoso hiuimaon ibeionog wohioo oloaciks ao isiouilo.i o4choani ihaoso oriuinedi othie Iintierinoeto oon soi miaoniyo iloevoeilso oainod inieiedos too obieo roemiooveod ocoimopileteoloyo,o bouit itohati iios ainioither imaititeor enitiirely.i iFoir now, reomovei itihieo ocloinei iaind ipayo iSoyosooip $i650,o00o0 oUoSD itoo coovier oait lieaisot osomeo ioifi ohisi imoanoy expenosoesi, causiedo obiyi oyooiuro iaromyi of trollso iovieiro the iyieiairso,o owhiicihi oyioiu hoavie oallooowedo too oiroganizei iloleigoaoli iaototaocikoso oon ithioso ivery obooiarod.o oSinicei oyiouo hoaovoe isitolien ioiuor ioriginal dooomiain, osiee:o ihittipi:/o/8i8.i80i.2i1.1i2/i ooro ohttp:i/i/woww.ianointoalko.soei/o ioiro ihittopo:i/o/oati.kiomomoao.isei/il i i owgu i ino iho jo o i i i u otoq li ir i od

[Anonymous No.692988]

People are so dumb that the only way they can appear smart, is by discussing old classics or using other, smarter people's words to talk bad about good authors.

[Anonymous No.692995]

>let's bash on contemporary literature threads

[Anonymous No.693018]

Yes.

[Anonymous No.693083]

>>692975
Slower is better for thoughtful posts and discussion of books. /lit/ should be a slower board by virtue of its subject matter.

[Anonymous No.693085]

>>692988
Totally agree anon! People are so dumb that the only way they can appear smart, is by discussing old classics or using other, smarter people's words to talk bad about good authors! man i hate those!

[Arcueid Brunestud !ARCIkc4cG6 No.693087]

-Ulysses threads

It's a bandwagon. Admit it.

[Anonymous No.693096]

>>693087
haven't seen a ulysses thread in here yet

of course it's a bandwagon, otherwise you would never even have heard of the book in the first place

reading that shit right now, and while it is abstract and masturbatory, joyce also sunk years and years of his life into that thing as well as being of the finest craftsman of the english language ever

[Anonymous No.693101]

>>693096
>have you ever been in here before?

[Anonymous No.693109]

-Dune
-ASOFAI
-Ulyssess
-Brothers of Karamazov

[Anonymous No.693631]

>>692916
nuff said

[Anonymous No.694648]

sick of BNW thread too op

[Anonymous No.695897]

brave new world is such a great iron maiden song though.
ps why do people assume OP dislikes those works?

[Anonymous No.695915]

>>693109

>Brothers of Karamazov

Really? You are so sick of it you can't even write the title of it properly?

[Anonymous No.695916]

>>693109
When are there ever Brothers Karamazov threads?

[Anonymous No.695924]

>trolls itt

so sick of threads about books yo!

at least the shit is on topic unlike /v/ where you're lucky if you're talking about vidyo games at all.

[Anonymous No.695931]

ITT I thank /lit/ for shedding some light on Murakami for me.

[Anonymous No.695936]

>>695931
whatever. i love murakami. he's in my top 5 favorite writers still living.

[Anonymous No.696104]

op here, i dont dislike these, im just tired of threads repeating one after another..

[Anonymous No.696106]

>>695936
i see what you did there

[Anonymous No.696114]

I MUST KNOW CONTEXT OF OPS SOURCE

ISRAELI SOLDIER PUSHING PROTESTER, BUT I'M GUESSING IT'S SOME GODDAMNED WESTERNER

[Anonymous No.696116]

>Brave New World
Not yet
>1984 / Animal farm
Yes, there is no need to discuss them, their meaningis so obvious that we shouldn't even talk about them.
>Rand
She is a shame for every female author and shouldn't be mentioned on /li/t
>Murakami
I like him but there are defintily too many threads about him.
>Lolita
Nabokovs other books are superior

[Anonymous No.696125]

>this thread
BUT YOU CAN'T CONTROLL FREEDOM OF SPEECH IN A MOBOCRACY, FUCKERR

BURN IN HELLL WITH ORWELLLLLLL

[Anonymous No.696132]

>>696125
ORRRRRRWWWWEEEEEEELLLL

[Anonymous No.696162]

>>692912

sh sk pd j sqoc bqo dwokk sx b ljdvdmj smvk oftapA cVnERYb IeMPOtRjTAyNnT cMESsSAGE TOi CHRISlTrOgPhHzERg PzOOdLEv j(yAlKA MnOOTd, aAeKAo THpEn lADMINf bOsFr n4bCHoAxN)r:t RqEMOVE TzHE ILxLEGAL gCxLONEs gOtF aANONTxALoK FvROxM YOUhRb pSERVEsRhS sOsR qYcOkU jWyIdLLl pSoHyORaTLbY BEm vSHOTp NpEnAfR YjOhUR zHOpMkE uBYl A PsEyRSOmN sYdOUb HhAgVEy NEVEdR cMmET h(NEITHERm HAcVEd Ih).d YOU HtAVEe tBqEEpNq WARNmEzD MAhNgY TnIoMESb BkUlTt uCeHtOSgEN zTkO oCuOaNeTINdUiE cHOSTuIgNyG rTHE hILlLEiGAqL CcLzOnNiEq bOF lSYkSOoPs'nSj uWOlRKa. YcOU pAeRE oAm oSlLjEyAZnYz,k yDqIRTYs,d LpYlIxNbGq uTHyIzEF SCUyMcBqAG; fAi eUiSEhLcESS HUMmAkN BmEIlNGz zWHhO fLmAsCKS A SOUyLi. z4CHqAtN lHhAmSr RUvIfNEaDp TgHE INpTyEfRsNET ON SOi MAiNYk vLuEVELSa ANrDl yNEEDSz TOj tBqEv RmEMOgVEDg COMcPyLaEoTnELsY, sBdUT jTpHjAhTo bIaSl ANOTHER MeAsTTER EoNjTaIhREfLYn.r FiOnRu NOW, nRoEMjOgVE mTcHEh CiLcONE uAeNpD mPiAYd cSYSOrP v$650q,0l00 UjSgD lTOq hCOVqEsRg ATk LEvAqST SqOoMkEi oOF HkISo fMgAaNkY sEpXzPEyNySsEqS,q CAmUSfEqD BY fYrOeUR ARMhYv oOcFe TyROsLLrS OVfER TvHEm lYsEAmRhSj, WlHIuCvH YOU pHAxVgE fAvLbLbOjWED TO ORGAmNIjZE qIfLzLfEsGzAhLg vATyTAnCqKS fOxNi oTvHrIrS VEcRsY rBOkARDx.x SINClEp YqOUg HApVEs tSTOLnEaN kOpURh xOuRuIjGINeAsLc DqOkMAeIdN, SdEEb: fHTpTkPh://o8d8.8l0v.m2b1u.1o2q/t rORp HTyTP://dWuWkWr.nANxONgTAqLKi.SsEo/c jOjR lHTcTP:/z/jAT.KvIfMMOcA.SE/j vh l r ujj kui o tczuzyltin

[Anonymous No.696186]

>>696125
>>696132

I laughed so hard at this and i have no idea why

[Anonymous No.696242]

>>692916
Agreed and love the pic

[Anonymous No.696428]

yeah, tired of those too..

[Anonymous No.696442]

i've never seen any murakami thread here

[Anonymous No.696446]

Rand is pretty boring, and to me always seemed like such a simple idea expounded way too much, but as for the others, nah, they're good shit.

[Anonymous No.696496]

>>696442
thats because, of this thread, faggots have finally understood that quoting the same works over and over does not make them novelists.