IQ

[Anonymous No.6928331]

I've seen several hot opinions here. Let's check whether they are worthwhile.

My score: 159.

https://www.raventest.net/raven-test.html

[Anonymous No.6928345]

>>6928331
>no screenshot
And you expect us to just take your word for it? It really makes that 150 suspect

[Anonymous No.6928403]

>>6928345
I'm working in incoginto mode due to exceeded time in my stay-focused plugin and hence my history don't have the page with the result saved. If you insist I may as well take the test tomorrow once again. You may not believe me now but why not give it a try? It took me only about 10-20 minutes.

[Anonymous No.6928472]

>>6928331
>"the best and most popular intelligence test of all time" - Wikipedia
Obviously a scam site.

[Anonymous No.6928488]

>>6928331
You have to pay to see the results? Are you fucking kidding me?

It was a quality test--good mental exercise--but there's no way in hell I'm going to pay money to see my score.

[Anonymous No.6928514]

>>6928488
>You have to pay to see the results?
You are not obliged to pay. Just share the result as 'only me' on facebook. But as I can already see you don't have to take the test.

[Anonymous No.6928525]

>>6928514
>money or facebook
Lel. See >>6928472
Don't understand why there isn't a "commercial advertising" button anymore.

[Anonymous No.6928526]

IQ trolling belongs on >>>/sci/

[Anonymous No.6928537]

too many questions, and most of them are too easy

the first 45 are just searching if you are totally retarded or not

[Anonymous No.6928548]

>paying for your results
I spent half an hour on this shit
First 30 are easy patterns, in the 40s you get nearly unrecognizable "patterns" that take up the majority of your time. Last 20 are slightly harder than the 30s, but easier than the 40s

[Anonymous No.6928553]

>>6928514
Tell me where is the share on facebook button

[Anonymous No.6928558]

60 was the only one where I had to think a little bit.

The test is not a scam though, it has been widely used before the site was even made.

[Anonymous No.6928569]

>>6928558
>The best and most popular test of all time - Wikipedia

lel

[Anonymous No.6928593]

>>6928548

It's because they're not patterns, they're a summation of symbols. You were looking for the wrong thing.

[Anonymous No.6928601]

>>6928558
Looks like I actually got 162... cool

>>6928569
Yeah, that's very stupid on their part. Using Wikipedia as a trustful site for that kind of stuff.

[Anonymous No.6928606]

>>6928593
Of course they all were patterns you fucktard

[Anonymous No.6928609]

Couldnt make: 56, 57, 60

What the hell...

[Anonymous No.6928613]

>>6928553
Copy and paste the url into your status update part of facebook, and it should update with a little thumbnail like in the pic

[Anonymous No.6928615]

>>6928553
Idk what happened then, sry. I had the option for sharing the page to obtain the result and m8.ini here >>6928558 seems to have used that, too.

[Anonymous No.6928641]

>>6928613
Thanks man.

In my defense I'm pretty tired this afternoon.

>mfw selecting pictures of kayaks is more taxing than the first 40 questions of the IQ test

[Anonymous No.6928646]

>>6928641
oops, pic

[Anonymous No.6928652]

>>6928609
Ok, 145 im a retard

but can i see witch were the incorrect ones?

[Anonymous No.6928653]

>>6928558
>60 was the only one where I had to think a little bit.
Seconding this. However I don't know the answer for 60. and guessed.

As a genius be that kind and share withl us your opinions on:
>Starting with Greeks
>DFW
and let's finally close these topics once and for all.

[Anonymous No.6928664]

>95

lol damn

[Anonymous No.6928668]

>>6928652
>but can i see witch were the incorrect ones?
No you can't - that's the point of verifiability of outcomes of IQ tests you retard.

[Anonymous No.6928675]

The number of genius scores in this thread shows how fundamentally flawed this particular test is.

[Anonymous No.6928681]

Pretty sure I got every one except the final question - had no idea and started to sweat. How do I see my score? The facebook thing didn't work...

[Anonymous No.6928685]

>>6928675
Not necessarily the night shift is elite of this board.

[Anonymous No.6928696]

>>6928653
>>6928681
N° of Inner Circles - N° of Outer Circles = N° of Circles at the end of whatever there were more Inner or Outer Circles.

>>6928653
I don't know, I don't read, lol
Well, I actually started reading some weeks ago, mostly Sophie's World. It does start with the greeks though, and it has been good to start this way so far.
Never heard of DFW, but I'm all in for innovation in the arts in case you wonder.

>>6928675
It's not flawed, people are genuinely stupid enough to get 100 points on average. I love people though.

[Anonymous No.6928697]

>>6928653
The same applies to you >>6928646 anon.

[Anonymous No.6928706]

>>6928681
Here's my result

[Anonymous No.6928715]

>>6928696
Thank you for the answer anon, here's Van Gogh for you as a reward.

[Anonymous No.6928721]

>>6928653
Basic subtraction

3 + (-4) = (-1)
2 + 1 = 3
5 + (-3) = 2

[Anonymous No.6928730]

>result is 148- Genius

yeah that's horseshit lmao

[Anonymous No.6928731]

>>6928715
You are welcome, anon.
(Van Gogh is overrated btw)

[Anonymous No.6928733]

>>6928721
But who would've thought of that

[Anonymous No.6928734]

Highest I've ever gotten is 149, lowest I've ever gotten is 138. The tests are kind of bullshit but I am one of the smartest people I know.

[Anonymous No.6928737]

>>6928721
i just rationalized that the innies and the outies cancelled each other out

[Anonymous No.6928741]

>tfw genuis

not even surprised to be honest tbh

[Anonymous No.6928742]

>>6928721
>being able to get this

[Anonymous No.6928743]

>>6928331
IQ doesnt measure intelligence, Hawking has a big IQ and his opinions are bullshit

[Anonymous No.6928744]

>>6928734
>The tests are kind of bullshit
Why? They accurately measure what they are trying to represent (which is not intelligence, but logical thinking)

[Anonymous No.6928751]

Credentialed geniuses (screenshot) in this thread are kindly encouraged to give their opinions on:
>Starting with Greeks
>DFW.
Thank you.

[Anonymous No.6928755]

>>6928331
>take an IQ test online
>homepage appeals to people who don't understand the difference between 'smart' and high aptitude
>unusually high scores given to all users
I wonder why it tries to trick you into sharing it on Facebook, eh?

[Anonymous No.6928781]

>>6928331
I actually took a "real" test in a psychiatrist's office when I was 18. I was doing bad in school and my parents were pissed. I would always tell them they thought I was smarter than I actually was. I scored a 165. They never fucking let it go. I don't have the test results, they're at my parents house somewhere otherwise I'd post. But goddamn it took me by suprise. I suck at math. Graduated highschool with a 3.0 gpa. Doing about the same in college. High IQ really doesn't mean shit unless you have a good work ethic.

[Anonymous No.6928783]

>>6928744

I mean, if the tests actually worked like they're supposed to I should get the same score every time, no? The fact that my IQ deviates by like ten points between tests makes it seem kind of bullshit.

[Anonymous No.6928784]

>>6928751

>>6928741 here
dave F. W. is pretty cool

[Anonymous No.6928787]

>>6928742
not him but my thought process was like this

i look at both the columns and the rows for a pattern, in the first column we see 3 outies and 2 outies becoming 5 outies

in the second column we see 4 innies and 1 outie becoming 3 innies

in the first row we see 3 outies and 4 innies becoming 1 innie

in the second row we see 2 outies and 1 outie becoming 3 outies

so the pattern here is that the innies and the outies cancel each other out

for the third row we have 5 outies and 3 innies
and for the third column we have 1 innie and 3 outies, both of which lead to 2 outies

[Anonymous No.6928790]

>>6928755
>>unusually high scores given to all users
Why to even bother sharing the result below 140? I bet that only a few of thousands posted their result. And majority even didn't know how to obtain the result without paying.

[Anonymous No.6928795]

>>6928781
Also I got into an argument with my dad once, and called him stupid and used my high IQ as leverage against him. The old man got a stick so far up his ass about it he went and got his IQ tested as well. We have a really competitive relationship. Motherfucker tested at 185 and joined some high IQ society. I always knew he was smart by goddamn.

[Anonymous No.6928801]

>>6928781
I took a real one of those as well after I was diagnosed with something (pic related). The results for the test were inconclusive.

[Anonymous No.6928805]

>>6928783
Different tests give different scores, that's fucking obvious. They all give around the same scores for each person though. Also, some tests might be capped (like this one).

>>6928795
lol

[Anonymous No.6928810]

>>6928795
This hurts to read. Nice one, anon.

[Anonymous No.6928815]

>>6928795

>using your IQ as leverage in an argument
>joining a high IQ society

pretty much proof that IQ =/= intelligence

[Anonymous No.6928817]

>>6928801
>>6928801
AUTISM
A
O
L
I
N

[Anonymous No.6928823]

>>6928790
>thousands
Where do you think you are?

[Anonymous No.6928830]

>>6928781

You got high IQ because only retards get his IQ tested in the psychiatrist

[Anonymous No.6928834]

>>6928815
Trust me I regret it to this day. They were always on my back about how my grades were not reflective of a high IQ individual. I got resentful and tried to use it against them. It backfired horribly.
To be completely honest, my father is probably the smartest individual I've ever met. He used to teach policy and strategic studies at the Naval Academy and was a combat pilot before that. I've never been able to one-up him intellectually. Fucker is too sharp.

[Anonymous No.6928842]

>>6928830
Yeah! If you were intelligent you would've gotten it tested on a Facebook service for a nominal fee! Fucking plebs.

[Anonymous No.6928843]

>>6928801
You were diagnosed with being Tao Lin?

[Anonymous No.6928854]

thanks for telling me you gotta pay for this shit op

waste of time

>implying i have a facebook

[Anonymous No.6928864]

That IQ test has the accuracy of a personality quiz that your aunt keeps taking on Facebook.

This is officially a cringe thread.

[Anonymous No.6928868]

>>6928854
just make a fake account and paste the link, you don't even have to post it

[Anonymous No.6928878]

This test is popular because it gives good scores and easy tests. Everyone leaves thinking they are a genius and recommend it to others. You don't have a 159 IQ. It's a clever scam but nothing more. Anyone with a '159 IQ' would have figured this out.

/thread

[Anonymous No.6928879]

>>6928864
Nnnyyup.
I was gonna say these guys >>6928795 >>6928801 redeemed the thread but they fit as cringe.

[Anonymous No.6928882]

I like how some site is giving everyone high scores so they'll share it to Facebook and increase the site's traffic. Why am I not surprised that /lit/ falls for it.

[Anonymous No.6928901]

>>6928733
>>6928742
that one was easy

test seems to be sorta accurate, simmiliar to what I got at the mensa, but at online Tests I'm never really thinking for more than 10sec, maybe because of adhd and I was jerking off while doing it. after all. nice experience tho

[Anonymous No.6928904]

>>6928878
we know it's bullshit just let us jerk each other off a little OK

[Anonymous No.6928905]

>>6928878
>>6928882
And yes, again,
>"the best and most popular intelligence test of all time" - Wikipedia

>>>/lit/ NA time confirmed for morons.

[Anonymous No.6928915]

>>6928403
Y...yeah guys i was umm using incognito because of my study plugin

i...iii swear guys I'm totally telling the truth

[Anonymous No.6928918]

>>6928878
I have taken IQ tests in many sites (sites verified by high IQ communities), and they all give me around 160 points.
Also, there were people who had no idea how to do the number 60...
Learn about the Dunning–Kruger effect. You might identify with it.
Also, this guy >>6928901
got 123. That's not a weird score for an experienced internet user.

[Anonymous No.6928928]

>>6928915
it's pretty fucking easy to get 160 on this shitty test dude

[Anonymous No.6928932]

>>6928882
I don't think anyone is actually posting their results. All you have to do is paste the link and it previews an image with your "score" on it, then you can just delete the link

I don't know who would want to actually share this shit with their friends, everyone would accuse you of being a narcissist

[Anonymous No.6928944]

>friendly reminder that there is no correct way to measure IQ in a person
>how can you even come close to accurately measuring IQ
>falling for this meme test
>having to post your score on Facebook


>>>/buzzfeed/

[Anonymous No.6928961]

So is the answer to the first question the fourth option? Just want to see if I'm right. I doubt that I have a high IQ, and don't want to take this to confirm my suspicions.