[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 47 KB, 792x612, 416616151.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6875374 No.6875374 [Reply] [Original]

Who is the Kubrick of philosophy?

>> No.6875386

Jaden Smith

>How Can Mirrors Be Real If Our Eye's Aren't Real?
>Do Androids Dream Of Electric Sheep?

>> No.6875388

>>6875374
What the fuck kind of question is this?

>> No.6875389

>>6875374
Deleuze

>> No.6875390

>>6875389
goddamn everything i hear about deleuze makes me wanna read him more. need to get around to that.

>> No.6875419

tarkovsky did it better

>> No.6875452

kubrick is a hack

>> No.6875460

>>6875390

You will learn to regret that curiosity my friend

>> No.6875463

>>6875460
w-why?

>> No.6875479

>>6875460

I sure did.

>> No.6875480

>>6875463

His work on cinema is interesting, but I'm referring to his collaborations with Guattari which are mindblowingly difficult. I'd argue Anti-Oedipus is the hardest book I've ever read in full

>> No.6875493

>>6875480
As bad as, say, Heidegger? I'm working through Being and Time right now and I am moving slowly, but still grasping it well enough. I actually have a bit of academic background in philosophy (a B.S. as a second major for fun) although I'll be the first to admit that I know jack shit.

>> No.6875497

>>6875493
B.A., not B.S., my bad

>> No.6875498

>>6875480
Is it hard because of the content or hard because it's filled with obfuscatory writing?

>> No.6875514

i wouldnt say it is deleuze. deleuze is well known but only among the people interested in humanities, whereas kubrick is known to people even outside cinema.

id say foucault.
deleuze is the truffaut.

zizek is the kurosawa.