[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 770 KB, 1272x2516, NSGermany-VS-Today.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6847126 No.6847126 [Reply] [Original]

what book is the epitome of "Prose for Prose sake (or Style over Substance)" and another book that is the epitome of "Substance over Style"

I need to prove my GF wrong. Help

>> No.6847144

>implying style isn't substance

>> No.6847176

>>6847126
>getting in arguments about literature without knowing enough about it to be able to think of your own examples

You see where you fucked up right?

>> No.6847190
File: 773 KB, 1240x869, 6041bee6b1a52fe6d6058a9a778115a1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6847190

>>6847126
>cities

;)

>> No.6847253 [SPOILER] 
File: 247 KB, 2000x1935, 1437270619266.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6847253

>Implying Justin Bieber isn't attractive
Oookay

>> No.6847262

Lolita obviously.

>> No.6847263

>>6847190

Dresden was immoral so was Hiroshima.

>> No.6847264
File: 46 KB, 600x413, 149616_117445368409655_1965054835_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6847264

>elementary lizard testing
Sure thing, buddy.
pic related

>> No.6847275
File: 241 KB, 349x396, le contemplating man3.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6847275

>>6847190
I actually doubt too much, if possible.
Maybe it's something to do with the way we interpret it.

>> No.6847313
File: 157 KB, 2394x2244, 1430673861609.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6847313

>>6847275
But is this actually even true
>inb4 telemachus
pic related is pretty revealing

>> No.6847318

>>6847264
doubtful tbh. Try test #2 instead

>> No.6847363

>>6847263
hiroshima was justified.

>> No.6847373

>>6847363
See
>>6847313

>>6847264
Not claiming I know everything.

>> No.6847385

>>6847275
Makes sense, I guess. Would you say it happened before, or after? Does it even make any difference?

(not talking about the principles btw)

>> No.6847388

>>6847363

by the bad guys

>> No.6847402
File: 84 KB, 524x760, comman62cov.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6847402

>>6847373
>>6847388
pic related

>> No.6847420
File: 156 KB, 1120x767, Vladimir Mikhaylovich Komarov.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6847420

>>6847402
Marx was less involved with the idea of the thing than with the specific tests, though

Same with his successors, really

>> No.6847422

>>6847262
This

>> No.6847426

>>6847126
So you saying you like shitty prose eh?

>> No.6847429

>>6847422
I'd say the same if he wasn't countermanded

as things stand, though, you'd need to run #4 and #5 for it to mean anything

>> No.6847442
File: 130 KB, 312x670, 4yFoDgj.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6847442

>>6847429
This is false. Compare top and bottom

>> No.6847472

What in hell is going on in this thread?

>> No.6847508
File: 58 KB, 600x400, 1414077957861.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6847508

>>6847442

>posts a disjunction
>asks for comparison

OP was right all along

>> No.6847528
File: 34 KB, 640x436, 1415990077779.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6847528

>>6847508
>implying
It's possible to derive without background, you know.

You're right, still, but you might need some set of instructions to use it non-neurotically unless you’re sure your life is all together.

>> No.6847539

>>6847528

This guy has no clue what he's talking about

The comparison is bullshit

>> No.6847544

i like how most of the images on the right are propaganda posters

>> No.6847553

>>6847126

Ulysses for prose, since the plot of the book is just Leopold Bloom walking around Dublin doing errands.

>> No.6847557
File: 1.19 MB, 929x1213, astrocism.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6847557

>>6847544
Check that against >>6847190 and you'll see how things fall into place

>> No.6847632
File: 57 KB, 406x559, Goebbels.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6847632

>>6847544

>If propaganda is to succeed, it must know what it wants. It must keep a clear and firm goal in mind, and seek the appropriate means and methods to reach that goal. Propaganda as such is neither good nor evil. Its moral value is determined by the goals it seeks. Propaganda must be creative. -- Joseph Goebbels

>> No.6847636

>>6847632
One word: Utica.

>> No.6847650

>>6847557
>>6847632

the point being propaganda posters are what a subject should aspire to, not really what they were like

>> No.6847658
File: 941 KB, 301x169, nothing like smores made over burning nazis tbh.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6847658

>>6847632
I bet he enjoyed watching his kids writhe around dying from the poison he fed them- both the literal poison and the ideological poison he subjected them into for their short lives.

>> No.6847664

>>6847650
I don't think you really understood my image
>>6847557

>> No.6847668

tests?

>> No.6847676

>>6847664
kill yourself

>> No.6847677

>>6847668
From what I can gather, they've already been run

>> No.6847679

>>6847658

He loved his family very much. He was a good man and dindu nuffin wrong.

>> No.6847770

>>6847126
Capote is king of stylish prose with nothing to say.

Getting away from just prose, Madame Bovary and Flaubert's whole aesthetic is style = substance.

in terms of substance over style, look at anything pre Flaubert

Good luck in your argument, give her an angry skullfuck from /lit/

>> No.6848037

>>6847126
Finnegans Wake is literally the ultimate pinnacle, one could even say reductio ad absurdum, of Style over Substance. Joyce once said it is all style and no content.

>> No.6848141
File: 87 KB, 948x435, japan.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6848141

>> No.6848205

>>6847126
I was born in le wrong generation. Why couldnt I live in an opressive, corrupt regime that looks really cool in propaganda? :(

>> No.6848460

>>6848141
boner tbh
>>6847126
look into formalist criticism and find out why your distinction is meaningless

>> No.6848499

>>6848460
>look into formalist criticism and find out why your distinction is meaningless

technically his distinction is meaningful, so formalist criticism must be meaningless.

>> No.6848511

>>6847126
Why would you want to seek for books that confirm a memetic false dichotomy ? It's like you want 4chan to have even more sway over your intellectual life than it already has.

>> No.6848529

>>6848499
technically youre a nigger

>> No.6848543

>>6848499
technically formalist criticism is meaningful, so his distinction must be meaningless

>> No.6848639

>>6847363
dresden was justified, too.