[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 304 KB, 1432x1432, pinker.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6841184 No.6841184 [Reply] [Original]

Who are some authors that epitomize 'middlebrow?'

Steven Pinker for sure.

>> No.6841193

>>6841184
Who cares, honestly?

>> No.6841196
File: 44 KB, 403x537, bend.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6841196

Dostojevsky and most other 19th century moralists.

>> No.6841197

>>6841184

Jonathan Franzen has the middlest brow I've ever seen.

>> No.6841198
File: 29 KB, 460x276, Dwight-Macdonald.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6841198

late Hemingway ofc

>> No.6841199

>>6841184

some basic ones:

- Sartre
- Camus
- Updike
- DFW
- Franzen
- Zadie Smith
- Cheever (though he's probably the most talented on this list)
- Carver
- Naipaul
- O'Hara
- most nobel winners these days
- Saramago
- Bellow
- Hemingway
- Faulkner's later stuff
- a bit of DeLillo's stuff, especially White Noise
- Fitzgerald

I mean some of those authors are good (Cheever, Fitzgerald, Saramago) and some bad (Updike, Franzen, DFW) but they are certainly all middlebrow

>> No.6841201

>>6841196
this is bait

>> No.6841204

>>6841201

not him, but Dostoevsky really is not much other than the smoke and mirrors surrounding juvenile philosophy

>> No.6841205

>>6841184
Are you asking which are bourgeois cunts?

Basically most of them

>> No.6841210
File: 24 KB, 333x333, fedora man.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6841210

>>6841204
>juvenile philosophy

>> No.6841215

>>6841205
what's with the high school marxists on this board?

>> No.6841223

>>6841210

it's not his christian stance I'm talking about, but rather how he presents his ideas -- basically he just has characters that talk back and forth in oblique soliloquy until they end up spelling out a manifesto of his ideas. There's nothing creative, there's no allegory, it's just a thin veil over basic moral principles.

>> No.6841246

>>6841215
>being this entrenched in capitalist ideology and bourgeois values
top kek
oh and:
>le 'If you aren't an ardent capitalist adherent, then you must be 15!' meme

>> No.6841263

Much of what the majority reads, plain and simple.

Holy grail of middlebrow 'thinkers' aka read by those, and only those, that have never been in, or read, academic papers in their lives (feel free to extend the list if you wish): Pinker, obviously, Sam Harris, Neil deGrasee (or whatever it's spelled) Tyson, Sagan, Krauss, Dawkins, Hitchens, Coyne

I feel like I've missed someone.

If you look closer you can spot a pattern: we have formed a list with representatives that correspond to nearly all natural and special sciences, except of course for Hitchens who was merely a journalist and polemicist.

>> No.6841267

>>6841199
>this will trigger plebs
But you're absolutely right.

>> No.6841275

>>6841199
Who are the highbrow authors? Pinecone and Joyce?

>> No.6841286

>>6841246
le sophmore year

>> No.6841293

>>6841275
Chomsky tbh, even if his politics are stupid

>> No.6841299

>>6841286
>le 'I desperately have to reduce different views to a strawman to avoid having to confront my own beliefs and rationalizations'

I realize that you have to do this because it helps reinforce your pigeonhole based weltanschauung which provides convenient ad hominem attacks that you can use to silence opposing views with little to no effort.

It's cute.

>> No.6841303

Douglas Coupland

>> No.6841306

>>6841246
Aren’t you sort of concerned that your ideology is the stuff of 16-year-old boys?

>> No.6841311

>>6841306
see >>6841299

>> No.6841319

>>6841311
>It's cute.
Oh, you're a woman, ok.

>> No.6841330

Marcuse

>> No.6841334

>>6841319
>'arguments' consist entirely of strawmanning opposing position

You must be a woman :^)

>> No.6841353

>>6841334
I don't think you know what a strawman is. I'm calling you a faggot.

>> No.6841366 [DELETED] 

>>6841215
>>6841246
>>6841286
>>6841299
>>6841306
>>6841311
>>6841319
>>6841334
>>6841353
for sure brother

>> No.6841371

>>6841353
>I'm calling you a faggot.

That's so hurtful

>> No.6841709

>>6841223
Isn't that what Shakespeare did?

What is a better example of inserting philosophy into your stories? allegory? that shit is as old as the greeks.

>> No.6841718

>>6841184
So Sense of Style isn't worth a read then, I take it?

>> No.6841814
File: 90 KB, 500x500, 1434997060569.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6841814

>>6841275
>highbrow
>Pinecone

>> No.6841819

>>6841718
no

>> No.6841826

>>6841184
Say what you will about Pinker, but the man is a damn good linguist

>> No.6841834

>>6841275
I know Pynchon is a fantastic meme but maybe read up on him more.

>> No.6842421

Joyce, Pynchon, Faulkner, McCarthy, DeLilo, DFW

>> No.6843418

>>6841306
>Aren’t you sort of concerned that your ideology is the stuff of 16-year-old boys?
That's objectivism, not Marxism. Marxism is for 19-21 year olds.

>> No.6843427

>>6841223
Damn wait till you read The Republic. It is so painfully obvious it hurts.

>> No.6843962
File: 17 KB, 230x307, 230px-Steven_Pinker_2011.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6843962

ass

>> No.6844011

>>6841184
that's subjective

>> No.6844016

>>6843962
this tbh

>> No.6844025

>>6841263

>aka read by those, and only those, that have never been in, or read, academic papers in their lives
>omg i've read a paper with an anova in it now im smart gaiz

>> No.6844034

>>6841184
No way. Pinker is top tier intellectual material. Only higher are people like Perry Anderson or the late Christopher Hitchens.

You want middlebrow, read Adam Kirsch. Or maybe Paul Kennedy.

For lowbrow - or netherbrow - Malcolm Gladwell. David Brooks. Complete Shit.

But not Pinker. Pinker writes and operates at the highest level, engaging with science, philosophy, and other domains with the utmost seriousness. His writings are among the best in contemporary Anglophone literature. This doesn't mean that he's right. What it means is that he engages with the utmost seriousness, plays for the highest possible stakes, and acquits himself well.

He's a top dog in modern thought.

>> No.6844041

>>6843962
Steven Pinker

>> No.6844052

Kafka

>> No.6844071

Is there anything wrong with middlebrow?

I mean you are likely to get a well-written, accessible and reasonably thoughtful book and you're likely to learn at least something from it, even if you cannot agree with everything

>> No.6844075

>>6841293
>even if his politics are stupid
They're his best aspect.

>> No.6844107

>>6844034
Are you serious? The Better Angels of Our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined is one of the worst books I've ever read.

>> No.6844110

Came in here to say Malcolm Gladwell. Ctrl+f'd and found >>6844034

I was trolled until
>Only higher are people like Perry Anderson or the late Christopher Hitchens

>> No.6844161

>>6841199
Grow up child

>> No.6844177

>>6841215
marxists aren't the only ones who hate the bourgeois. everyone hates the bourgeois. even the bourgeois hate the bourgeois.