/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.6832209]

where do i get started on this motherfucker right here.

is there any philosopher more based?

[Anonymous No.6832222]

>hasn't read hume
>already presumes he is "based"

hopeless.

[Anonymous No.6832231]

>>6832209
he managed to touch on almost all of the shit later philosophers discussed and continue to discuss with great clarity and perspicacity of argument. i dont necessarily agree with all of his shit, but i have great respect for him - not that my respect means much anyway - and enjoyed reading his work more than most of the other drivel ive been made to read for my undergrad degree.

[Anonymous No.6832235]

start with the greeks my friend

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1y8_RRaZW5X3xwztjZ4p0XeRplqebYwpmuNNpaN_TkgM/pub

[Anonymous No.6832240]

>>6832209
How would you know, if you haven't read it?

Treatise of Human Nature, and then continue chronologically.

[Anonymous No.6832243]

>>6832231
to add to my post: though i no scholar of hume, at any rate i very much enjoyed his dialogues on natural religion, his enquiry concerning human understanding, and his essay of the standards of taste (which is where to get started in aesthetics, by the way).

[Anonymous No.6832296]

>>6832235
very helpful, thanks motherfucker.

[Anonymous No.6832325]

>>6832209

Hume is very interesting and original, but if you read through his works carefully you start to notice that allot of it is fairly thin and at times even weak philosophically. Modern Humeans have a done a better job actually supporting Hume's general philosophical positions.

A Treatise of Human Nature is very important.

[Anonymous No.6832382]

jump into treatise
it's the first philosophy book i read and i didn't have any problems with it

[Anonymous No.6832387]

>>6832209
start by reading how his views are absurd and self defeating

[Anonymous No.6832427]

>>6832387
right. im also not content to trust the philosophical opinion of a person who uses the word 'absurd' in that sense and fails to hyphenate 'self' with 'defeating'.

[Anonymous No.6832485]

>>6832387
urine idiot

[Anonymous No.6832565]

>>6832209
>where do i get started

Why are people so interested with the Enlightenment thinkers? Have you read Locke? If so, you're done; it's basically the same epistemological warfare that's been going since man could think. I've always been suspicious of "Philosophers" who spend their lives persuading their readers to acknowledge man's limited capacity for reason. Hume is just another radical empiricist who uses poorly supported, incomplete arguments--arguments in which he introduces axioms which he takes to be self evident and postulates further using those untenable axioms as a reference--to attack creative reason.

If you want to read philosophy start with the Greeks.

[Anonymous No.6832583]

>>6832565
if you think provable axioms are possible, stop doing philosophy

[Anonymous No.6832612]

>>6832583
>if you think provable axioms are possible, stop doing philosophy

[Anonymous No.6832664]

>>6832565
>I've always been suspicious of "Philosophers" who spend their lives persuading their readers to acknowledge man's limited capacity for reason
Quick, compute 10 to the power of 10 to the power of 10 to the power of 10.

[Anonymous No.6832672]

>>6832565
>radical empiricist
reason is there to aid the senses

[Anonymous No.6832701]

>>6832664
What the fuck are you even saying here?

[Anonymous No.6832740]

>>6832672
Does the act of discovery first occur in the mind as a hypothesis, outlined by principles that are already proven, or must it be witnessed inductively, through experience?

[Anonymous No.6832752]

>>6832565
>I've always been suspicious of "Philosophers" who spend their lives persuading their readers to acknowledge man's limited capacity for reason.
that's probably because that scares you

[Anonymous No.6832764]

>>6832209
>where do i get started on this motherfucker right here.
An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding
>is there any philosopher more based?
no

[Anonymous No.6832774]

>>6832235
this meme should be ban worthy tbh

[Anonymous No.6832785]

>>6832387
but they arent so

>>6832565
hume is very carefully reasoned. you are clearly biased against it, because you disagree with its conclusions. Not logically, but because it leads to a (in your opinion) defeatist mindset.

if you want to show us some of his "untenable" axioms, go ahead.

[Anonymous No.6832793]

>>6832752
>that's probably because that scares you

nope, just don't see what good it does. looks like you mind as well just not read or inquire at all; its all the same in the end.

[Anonymous No.6832799]

>>6832612
hes not wrong, every axiom BY DEFINITION is unprovable by the system it creates

further, any semi decent system will have to accept "self-evident" axioms, the alternative is constructing a system built around unobserved, or non-evident axioms which seems odd

>>6832793
the only philosophy that should be explored and investigated is one which leads to conclusions that do "good"

the "good" of course being defined by you

>looks like you mind as well just not read or inquire at all; its all the same in the end.
rewrite this in a not retarded way, ty

[Anonymous No.6832804]

>>6832785
of course they are, take Hume's fork as an example, it's self defeating

[Anonymous No.6832813]

>>6832804
what about it is self-defeating??

[Anonymous No.6832845]

>>6832813
the Fork is neither an analytic proposition or a synthetic proposition

[Anonymous No.6832856]

>>6832845
no

its an analytic proposition.........

ok, now again, how is it self-defeating?

[Anonymous No.6832867]

>>6832856
it isnt an analytic propostition, dude

[Anonymous No.6832891]

>>6832867
but it is

hes using it to show that science doesnt tell us anything as a matter of fact, and for that to be true you would also have to consider a statement like "gravity acts on objects on earth" as an analytic statement. it is not telling us anything about the ACTUAL earth where we don't actually know that gravity has acted or will continue to act, only the theorized Earth.

[Anonymous No.6832901]

>>6832664

10 billi, yo

off the dome

[Anonymous No.6832906]

>>6832891
how is it an analytic proposition?

[Anonymous No.6832907]

>>6832906
it is strictly related solely to ideas and not the actual world as it is found

[Anonymous No.6832909]

>>6832785
Generally speaking, for Hume , there is really no human self, but merely a bundle of changing perceptions. In his Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Hume attacks the idea of cause and effect. For Hume, there is no necessary connection between a cause and an effect that the human mind can know with certainty; we only have a vague association or habit of thought that one phenomenon has been usually followed by another. But in this same work, Hume at least accepted the importance of filling the tabula rasa of each new human mind with a stock of received ideas of conduct which can be lumped under the heading of morals or custom, including religion.

Then, in Hume's later works, as in his Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, he totally repudiated the notion of custom and morality, which, one can only assume, in practice would lead to an unbridled hedonism.

You're right about my bias, insofar as my distaste for him stems from an unwillingness to accept his conclusions, because when applied I believe the effects of Hume's skepticism altogether defeat the goals of philosophy.

[Anonymous No.6832918]

>>6832909
Hume, like Parmenides, preaches a philosophy he doesnt practice.

he is trying to show that the traditional conception of life is untenable, not based on fact and truth, but simply on belief. he is not saying that one should live without believing in cause and effect, only that you cannot KNOW cause and effect.

this is why you believe his moral philosophy interferes with his metaphysics (or anti-metaphysics)

[Anonymous No.6832936]

>>6832907
but you cant know it's true by itself, how can it be analytic?

[Anonymous No.6832942]

Marcel Proust
Ludwig Wittgenstein
Soren Kierkegaard
Ralph Waldo Emerson
William Shakespeare

butler: Oswald Spengler

We would start by talking about Hamlet, and end by talking about the role culture plays in creating the individual

I wanted to bring Walt Whitman, but I dont think he would say very much

[Anonymous No.6832950]

>>6832936
it has the implicit assumption that it is based on an abstract world built from observations of the world

it is true by itself, because it is only true about the world that the speaker believes to exist. if someone went to Mars and talked to a Martian who spoke in neither analytic or synthetic statements his worldview would change and Hume's Fork would seize to meaningful for him, but the universe DID NOT CHANGE, what changed was his conception of the world

you can't know 2*2=4 unless youre building it on some assumptions which remain implicit in the statement

[Anonymous No.6832963]

>>6832950
how is that an analytic proposition?

[Anonymous No.6832966]

>>6832209
Start with Locke's "An Essay", then read Hume's "An Enquiry". Descartes is necessary too.

[Anonymous No.6832967]

>>6832963
define "that"

[Anonymous No.6832970]

>>6832950
>it is true by itself, because it is only true about the world that the speaker believes to exist.
this isnt true by itself

[Anonymous No.6832972]

>>6832970
>this isnt true by itself
how

[Anonymous No.6832973]

>>6832565
>>6832387
Why do a bunch of christfags/-boos of other philosophers/idiots always go full rabid retard in Hume threads?

Your opinion isn't valued, fuck off

[Anonymous No.6832979]

>>6832612
Hahahahhahhahahah

Stop posting anytime, you tried trolling, but it's just not your thing!

[Anonymous No.6832982]

>>6832785
Peter Millican will admit himself Hume has weak spots, but that's fine, because the meat of his work is overwhelmingly very good.

[Anonymous No.6832984]

>>6832972
you say it is true by itself, but then say it is because fo the world....

that's by definition not true by itself

[Anonymous No.6832989]

>>6832984
the world IMAGINED BY THE SPEAKER

you even quoted it........ how can you be confused by that

im not talking about the world, im talking about the world AS IT EXISTS IN THE SPEAKERS HEAD

[Anonymous No.6832995]

>>6832804
You're the same person that shits up every Hume thread, aren't you?

[Anonymous No.6832998]

>>6832989
it still depends on something other than itself, so it cant be true by itself
come on, your Humelove is showing

[Anonymous No.6833004]

>>6832998
>it still depends on something other than itself
so does 2+2...

[Anonymous No.6833005]

>>6832909
Hume's concept of causation simply being recognizing the most accurate pattern is basically how all neuroscientists are beginning to view the mind BTW

[Anonymous No.6833010]

>>6832995
>>6832973
>hume isnt wrong, so youre trolling!!1
the delusion, everyone

[Anonymous No.6833012]

these fucking semantics itt

[Anonymous No.6833019]

>>6833004
it's a mathematical statement, so no

[Anonymous No.6833028]

>>6833010
Of course he ends up not being perfect or right, but you're shitting up the thread and pushing people away from reading him at all.

He's fun to read and his ideas are very good, many are still codified in philosophy today.

Just because you suck God's dick or whatever your thing is shouldn't lead you to be such a cunt about this.

[Anonymous No.6833037]

>>6832918
No, but I believe your post shows that his metaphysics does, in fact, interfere with his moral philosophy.

If the principles of his metaphysics do no find their basis in demonstrated truths, but rather on his word, or as you have it, in his speculative hypothesis which cannot be proven but somehow derives it's legitimacy from the fact that it is being advanced, how can we take anything he says seriously? And apparently the same is true for explaining cause and effect; what difference is made by saying, that one should not live without believing in cause and effect, only that you cannot know cause and effect. So what significance does the relationship between cause and effect have if the entire process is unknowable?

[Anonymous No.6833039]

>>6833028
>shouldn't lead you to be such a cunt about this.
did i hurt your feelings, anon?

[Anonymous No.6833062]

>>6833019
read Cicero on Academic Skepticism

the distinction of separating knowledge from belief is important

>>6833019
ok, theres nothing special about mathematical sentences, except that you accept the implicit mathematical foundation and reject the implicit personal perspective foundation

[Anonymous No.6833074]

>>6833037
His sentimentalism basically isn't against moral practice at all.

Kant thinks it is, but all Hume says can be summed up that "just because you say murder is wrong or isn't wrong won't really change whether people murder" which is essentially true to everyone who isn't an idiot.

[Anonymous No.6833075]

>>6833062
>theres nothing special about mathematical sentences
of course there is, they cant be coherently denied

[Anonymous No.6833081]

>>6833012
Generally when people say "le semantics" they mean "le syntactics" because semantics is what these dialectics should actually be.

[Anonymous No.6833089]

>>6833075
Denied what? Food and water?

[Anonymous No.6833103]

>>6833089
here's your reply

[Anonymous No.6833106]

WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW

[Anonymous No.6833109]

>>6833103
TIL Godel wasn't coherent

[Anonymous No.6833113]

My mom caught me masturbating.?
Im 14 and I found a dildo in my mom's drawer and i decided to use it. And while i was using it my mom walked my room, and gasped and quickly closed the door. Then she came back with a vibrator in a box and said that she never used it and give it to me. Then she got naked and showed me how to properly use it. Is this normal I feel like my mom was just trying to help her daughter out.

[Anonymous No.6833114]

The Flat Earth Society Library - This online library contains a growing selection of Flat Earth resources. We have interviews, newspaper and magazine articles as well as the largest collection of Flat Earth Society newsletters in the world (online or otherwise!). The Flat Earth Society Library also includes hard-to-find writings from members of the 19th and early-20th Century Flat Earth movement and Universal Zetetic Society.

The Flat Earth Wiki- This extensive Wiki is based on a FAQ originally compiled by forums user cheesejoff. It aims to answer any questions visitors might have about Flat Earth Theory or the Society. Because there are different schools of Flat Earth thought, the Wiki should not necessarily be taken as the "official" view of the Society. The specific beliefs of our members are widely varied, as should be expected from such a group of free-thinkers!

About the Society - A short history of the Flat Earth Society from its roots in the 1800s through its incarnation under Charles K. Johnson and finally to the modern Flat Earth Society of today.

Official Membership - After much planning, we are now ready to officially accept new members to the Society. Becoming an associate member of the Society is free and is as simple as sending a postcard. For those who wish to take on a more committed role in the Society, full membership (including a signed certificate, membership card and hand-numbered Flat Earth Society medallion) is available for a small donation.

The Flat Earth Shop - A small selection of Flat Earth Society merchandise is available. At the moment, it's t-shirts and sweatshirts.

[Anonymous No.6833119]

>>6833113
Im sorry but I find this really odd, is this a troll question?
There is nothing normal or right about your mum getting naked with you and performing a sex act on herself. This is what you see when you visit incest porn sites which aren't actually real relatives anyway. Your mums behaviour is severely sexually inappropriate to say the least.

[Anonymous No.6833123]

>>6833075
2+2 isn't asserting anything though. it's like, the beginnings of a thought.

if you had said 2+2=4 maybe we'd have a conversation here

[Anonymous No.6833124]

It's not allll that cold, right...
H
File: JimmieBrown and Dane Posner.jpg (78 KB, 720x960)
78 KB
Anonymous 07/16/15(Thu)00:26:30 No.628271911 [Reply]▶
Sup fags what's it like knowing even a nigger like me has a girlfriend.

Jelly fat fucks?
H
File: 40.png (135 KB, 700x700)
135 KB
Anonymous 07/15/15(Wed)23:58:47 No.628266168 [Reply]▶
new drawthread
+80 replies and 28 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
Anonymous 07/16/15(Thu)00:25:06 No.628271612▶
>>628271188
Espec gtfo
>>
Anonymous 07/16/15(Thu)00:25:40 No.628271732▶
File: whyy.jpg (30 KB, 500x566)
30 KB
>>628270553
Enough out of you go fuck yourself you falseflagging, shit-flinging, paranoid little fuck. I can't draw for shit, I doubt I'll ever be good enough, but I can at least enjoy art by people who can draw here. Ambi was a great person, both did vocaroo threads and drew for us here in drawthreads, I talked with her all the goddamn time. Do you have any idea how much it hurt when I found out she died? A whole goddamn year she's been gone, and I've been in denial about it, thinking she just moved on from us and is busy as a chef which she finally became. I needed that picture, I even have it up on my fucking skype. And now she's gone, the world is without her cooking, her drawings, and her voice. So fuck you, fuck your drawma drawfag bulllshit you fucking fuckhead piece of shit. Take time away from these fucking threads instead of gossiping and posting garbage like that shit you petty insufferable cunt.
Fuck you
>>
Anonymous 07/16/15(Thu)00:26:29 No.628271910▶
>>628271081
*he is holding
H
File: image.jpg (58 KB, 270x404)
58 KB
Anonymous 07/16/15(Thu)00:19:50 No.628270523 [Reply]▶
ITT: Describe the last shit you took with a movie title.

Had a long day need some lulz.
+3 replies omitted. Click here to view.
>>
Anonymous 07/16/15(Thu)00:25:31 No.628271704▶
>>628271502
That one's tough to beat
>>
Anonymous 07/16/15(Thu)00:25:42 No.628271737▶
Paul Blart Mall Cop 2
>>
Anonymous 07/16/15(Thu)00:26:29 No.628271904▶
Fast and Furious

[Anonymous No.6833128]

>>6833075
only because you accept the axioms to be true

you also cannot deny a statement that is based solely on someones imagined world, because it will always be true of their conceived, imagined world

[Anonymous No.6833130]

>>6833124
Can the doctor tell if I'm not a virgin?
My mom is taking me to the doctor to get a test to see if I'm having sex, which I am but I don't want her to know. So I'm just wondering if the doctor can tell if I'm not a vigrin. Thank you for the help!

[Anonymous No.6833139]

Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes, rape.Mmmyes,

[Anonymous No.6833145]

>>6833062
>>6833074
>>6833075
>>6833081
>>6833037
>>6833019
>>6833028
A guy I'm sleeping with that I really like is giving me the HEAD LICE! Over and over.?
About 2 months ago I found some head lice in my hair the morning after someone I'm dating slept at my place.
I did the treatment the same day.
2 weeks later we slept together again , and found living lice again.
It happened again yesterday (then I got the treatment again) and today as well!!
What should I do?! We're not close enough to talk about that, but I'm pretty sure he's the one giving them to me.
Tired of doing treatments and changing tons of sheets after we're sleeping.
I thought about telling him I got them somehow and in a responsible way I'm telling him- but I'm afraid he'll be turned off by me..

Please help me :(

[Anonymous No.6833148]

>>6833128
But what even are axioms????

[Anonymous No.6833149]

WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW

[Anonymous No.6833154]

>>6833128
>only because you accept the axioms to be true
because they cant be coherently denied
>>6833123
he said 2+2=4 earlier

[Anonymous No.6833158]

>>6833149
>>6833148
>>6833145
>>6833139
>>6833130
Lenovo PCI Express Test for Windows 8.1 (32-bit), 8 (32-bit), 7 (32-bit), XP (32-bit) and 2003 Advanced Server (32-bit) - Desktops, Notebooks, Workstations Windows 8.1 (32-bit)
Windows 8 (32-bit)
Windows 7 (32-bit)
Windows XP (32-bit)
Windows Server 2003
Lenovo PCI Express Test for Windows 32-bit 4.2.0.70 41 5/14/2015
README for Lenovo PCI Express Test for Windows 32-bit 4.2.0.70 41 5/14/2015

Diagnostic Lenovo PCI Express Test for Windows 8.1 (64-bit), 8 (64-bit), 7 (64-bit), 2003 Advanced Server (64-bit) and 2008 Advanced Server (64-bit) - Desktops, Notebooks, Workstations Windows 8.1 (64-bit)
Windows 8 (64-bit)
Windows 7 (64-bit)
Windows Server 2003
Windows Server 2008
Lenovo PCI Express Test for Windows 64-bit 4.2.0.70 41 5/14/2015
README for Lenovo PCI Express Test for Windows 64-bit 4.2.0.70 41 5/14/2015

Diagnostic Lenovo Quick Test for Windows 8.1 (32-bit), 8 (32-bit), 7 (32-bit), XP (32-bit), 2003 Advanced Server (32-bit) - Desktops, Notebooks, Workstations Windows 8.1 (32-bit)
Windows 8 (32-bit)
Windows 7 (32-bit)
Windows XP (32-bit)
Windows Server 2003
Lenovo Quick Test for Windows 32-bit 4.2.0.70 41 5/14/2015
README for Lenovo Quick Test for Windows 32-bit 4.2.0.70 41 5/14/2015

Diagnostic Lenovo Quick Test for Windows 8.1 (64-bit), 8 (64-bit), 7 (64-bit), 2003 Advanced Server (64-bit) and 2008 Advanced Server (64-bit) - Desktops, Notebooks, Workstations Windows 8.1 (64-bit)
Windows 8 (64-bit)
Windows 7 (64-bit)
Windows Server 2003
Windows Server 2008
Lenovo Quick Test for Windows 64-bit 4.2.0.70 41 5/14/2015
README for Lenovo Quick Test for Windows 64-bit 4.2.0.70 41 5/14/2015

Diagnostic Lenovo RAID Test for Windows 8.1 (32-bit), 8 (32-bit), 7 (32-bit), XP (32-bit) and 2003 Advanced Server (32-bit) - Desktops, Notebooks, Workstations Windows 8.1 (32-bit)
Windows 8 (32-bit)
Windows 7 (32-bit)
Windows XP (32-bit)
Windows Server 2003
Lenovo RAID Test for Windows 32-bit 4.2.0.70 41 5/15/2015
README for Lenovo RAID Test for Windows 32-bit 4.2.0.70 41 5/15/2015

Diagnostic Lenovo RAID Test for Windows 8.1 (64-bit), 8 (64-bit), 7 (64-bit), 2003 Advanced Server (64-bit) and 2008 Advanced Server (64-bit) - Desktops, Notebooks, Workstations Windows 8.1 (64-bit)
Windows 8 (64-bit)
Windows 7 (64-bit)
Windows Server 2003
Windows Server 2008
Lenovo RAID Test for Windows 64-bit 4.2.0.70 41 5/15/2015
README for Lenovo RAID Quick Test for Windows 64-bit 4.2.0.70 41 5/15/2015

Diagnostic Lenovo Storage Test for Windows 8.1 (32-bit), 8 (32-bit), 7 (32-bit), XP (32-bit) and 2003 Advanced Server (32-bit) - Desktops, Notebooks, Workstations Windows 8.1 (32-bit)
Windows 8 (32-bit)
Windows 7 (32-bit)
Windows XP (32-bit)
Windows Server 2003
Lenovo Storage Test for Windows 32-bit 4.2.0.70 41 5/15/2015
README for Lenovo Storage Quick Test for Windows 32-bit 4.2.0.70 41 5/15/2015

[Anonymous No.6833159]

>>6833154
>because they cant be coherently denied
that does not make them true btw

[Anonymous No.6833162]

seriously someone help me

what is happening, i'm scared

[Anonymous No.6833168]

>>6833159
of course it does
if they cant be coherently denied, you must accept them as true

[Anonymous No.6833173]

>>6833168
>you must accept them as true
according to?

[Anonymous No.6833174]

>>6833162
ϛƖ0ᄅ/ϛƖ/ϛ Ɩㄣ 0ㄥ˙0˙ᄅ˙ㄣ ʇiq-ᄅƐ sʍopuiM ɹoɟ ʇsǝ┴ ʞɔinQ ǝƃɐɹoʇS oʌouǝ˥ ɹoɟ ƎWp∀Ǝɹ
ϛƖ0ᄅ/ϛƖ/ϛ Ɩㄣ 0ㄥ˙0˙ᄅ˙ㄣ ʇiq-ᄅƐ sʍopuiM ɹoɟ ʇsǝ┴ ǝƃɐɹoʇS oʌouǝ˥
Ɛ00ᄅ ɹǝʌɹǝS sʍopuiM
(ʇiq-ᄅƐ) ԀX sʍopuiM
(ʇiq-ᄅƐ) ㄥ sʍopuiM
(ʇiq-ᄅƐ) 8 sʍopuiM
(ʇiq-ᄅƐ) Ɩ˙8 sʍopuiM suoiʇɐʇsʞɹoM 'sʞooqǝʇoN 'sdoʇʞsǝp - (ʇiq-ᄅƐ) ɹǝʌɹǝS pǝɔuɐʌp∀ Ɛ00ᄅ puɐ (ʇiq-ᄅƐ) ԀX '(ʇiq-ᄅƐ) ㄥ '(ʇiq-ᄅƐ) 8 '(ʇiq-ᄅƐ) Ɩ˙8 sʍopuiM ɹoɟ ʇsǝ┴ ǝƃɐɹoʇS oʌouǝ˥ ɔiʇsouƃɐip

ϛƖ0ᄅ/ϛƖ/ϛ Ɩㄣ 0ㄥ˙0˙ᄅ˙ㄣ ʇiq-ㄣ9 sʍopuiM ɹoɟ ʇsǝ┴ ʞɔinQ pI∀ɹ oʌouǝ˥ ɹoɟ ƎWp∀Ǝɹ
ϛƖ0ᄅ/ϛƖ/ϛ Ɩㄣ 0ㄥ˙0˙ᄅ˙ㄣ ʇiq-ㄣ9 sʍopuiM ɹoɟ ʇsǝ┴ pI∀ɹ oʌouǝ˥
800ᄅ ɹǝʌɹǝS sʍopuiM
Ɛ00ᄅ ɹǝʌɹǝS sʍopuiM
(ʇiq-ㄣ9) ㄥ sʍopuiM
(ʇiq-ㄣ9) 8 sʍopuiM
(ʇiq-ㄣ9) Ɩ˙8 sʍopuiM suoiʇɐʇsʞɹoM 'sʞooqǝʇoN 'sdoʇʞsǝp - (ʇiq-ㄣ9) ɹǝʌɹǝS pǝɔuɐʌp∀ 800ᄅ puɐ (ʇiq-ㄣ9) ɹǝʌɹǝS pǝɔuɐʌp∀ Ɛ00ᄅ '(ʇiq-ㄣ9) ㄥ '(ʇiq-ㄣ9) 8 '(ʇiq-ㄣ9) Ɩ˙8 sʍopuiM ɹoɟ ʇsǝ┴ pI∀ɹ oʌouǝ˥ ɔiʇsouƃɐip

ϛƖ0ᄅ/ϛƖ/ϛ Ɩㄣ 0ㄥ˙0˙ᄅ˙ㄣ ʇiq-ᄅƐ sʍopuiM ɹoɟ ʇsǝ┴ pI∀ɹ oʌouǝ˥ ɹoɟ ƎWp∀Ǝɹ
ϛƖ0ᄅ/ϛƖ/ϛ Ɩㄣ 0ㄥ˙0˙ᄅ˙ㄣ ʇiq-ᄅƐ sʍopuiM ɹoɟ ʇsǝ┴ pI∀ɹ oʌouǝ˥
Ɛ00ᄅ ɹǝʌɹǝS sʍopuiM
(ʇiq-ᄅƐ) ԀX sʍopuiM
(ʇiq-ᄅƐ) ㄥ sʍopuiM
(ʇiq-ᄅƐ) 8 sʍopuiM
(ʇiq-ᄅƐ) Ɩ˙8 sʍopuiM suoiʇɐʇsʞɹoM 'sʞooqǝʇoN 'sdoʇʞsǝp - (ʇiq-ᄅƐ) ɹǝʌɹǝS pǝɔuɐʌp∀ Ɛ00ᄅ puɐ (ʇiq-ᄅƐ) ԀX '(ʇiq-ᄅƐ) ㄥ '(ʇiq-ᄅƐ) 8 '(ʇiq-ᄅƐ) Ɩ˙8 sʍopuiM ɹoɟ ʇsǝ┴ pI∀ɹ oʌouǝ˥ ɔiʇsouƃɐip

ϛƖ0ᄅ/ㄣƖ/ϛ Ɩㄣ 0ㄥ˙0˙ᄅ˙ㄣ ʇiq-ㄣ9 sʍopuiM ɹoɟ ʇsǝ┴ ʞɔinQ oʌouǝ˥ ɹoɟ ƎWp∀Ǝɹ
ϛƖ0ᄅ/ㄣƖ/ϛ Ɩㄣ 0ㄥ˙0˙ᄅ˙ㄣ ʇiq-ㄣ9 sʍopuiM ɹoɟ ʇsǝ┴ ʞɔinQ oʌouǝ˥
800ᄅ ɹǝʌɹǝS sʍopuiM
Ɛ00ᄅ ɹǝʌɹǝS sʍopuiM
(ʇiq-ㄣ9) ㄥ sʍopuiM
(ʇiq-ㄣ9) 8 sʍopuiM
(ʇiq-ㄣ9) Ɩ˙8 sʍopuiM suoiʇɐʇsʞɹoM 'sʞooqǝʇoN

[Anonymous No.6833183]

>>6833173
reason

[Anonymous No.6833186]

>>6833168
come now, you can't see that there are some statements which cannot be coherently denied (by circa 2015 humans) that are yet untrue? this is basic stuff here

[Anonymous No.6833191]

>>6833186
like?

[Anonymous No.6833193]

>>6833183
>>6833174
ɟlǝsʇi ʎq ǝnɹʇ ʇusi siɥʇ
˙ʇsixǝ oʇ sǝʌǝilǝq ɹǝʞɐǝds ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʇ plɹoʍ ǝɥʇ ʇnoqɐ ǝnɹʇ ʎluo si ʇi ǝsnɐɔǝq 'ɟlǝsʇi ʎq ǝnɹʇ si ʇi<
0ϛ6ᄅƐ89<<

[Anonymous No.6833205]

help...

[Anonymous No.6833216]

>>6833186
say that I say that there are some statements that cannot be coherently denied yet are untrue.

can you prove that this statement is not an example of itself

[Anonymous No.6833222]

>>6833216
meant for >>6833191

while the time runs out, how do people even enoy shitposting as much as this fucker in this thread seriously

[Thomas No.6833223]

Berkeley?

[Anonymous No.6833230]

>>6833222
ʎlsnoiɹǝs pɐǝɹɥʇ siɥʇ ui ɹǝʞɔnɟ siɥʇ sɐ ɥɔnɯ sɐ ƃuiʇsodʇiɥs ʎouǝ uǝʌǝ ǝldoǝd op ʍoɥ 'ʇno sunɹ ǝɯiʇ ǝɥʇ ǝliɥʍ

Ɩ6ƖƐƐ89<< ɹoɟ ʇuɐǝɯ
9ƖᄅƐƐ89<<

[Anonymous No.6833233]

>>6833216
i wasnt talking about statements

[Anonymous No.6833239]

I hate my aunt, got my laundromat pussy washed, hump me Randy?

[Anonymous No.6833241]

Ice cream? I LOVE ice cream!

[Anonymous No.6833245]

>>6833233
hhrrhr well I'm not talking to you fag

[Anonymous No.6833249]

>>6833241
>>6833239
Twerk my ding dong, make me moannnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn

[Anonymous No.6833268]

>>6833249
>>6833245
>>6833241
>>6833239
>>6833233
>>6833230
>>6833230
>>6833222
>>6833216
>>6833205
>>6833193
>>6833191
>>6833186
>>6833183
>>6833174
>>6833173
>>6833173
>>6833168
>>6833162
>>6833159
>>6833158
>>6833154
>>6833148
>>6833130
>>6833128
>>6833123
>>6833119
>>6833113
>>6833109
>>6833103
>>6833089
>>6833075
>>6833081
>>6833249
Preacher said he died too young
Over there totin' that gun
For Uncle Sam and our freedom
Mom and Daddy dressed in black
They folded up that flag
Handed it to dad
Started prayin'
Yeah he went out 21 guns blazin'

An' that's One Hell of an Amen
That's the only way to go
Fightin' the good fight
Til the Good Lord calls you home
And so be well my friend
Til' I see you again
This is our last goodbye
But it's a Hell of an Amen, Amen

Doctor said he ain't got long
He just smiled said bring it on
If you think I'm scared
You got me all wrong
A little cancer can't break me
My heart's right and I believe
We all hit our knees
Started prayin'
Naw he never gave up
Said the Good Lord's waitin'

An' that's One Hell of an Amen
That's the only way to go
Fightin' the good fight
Til the Good Lord calls you home
So be well my friend
Til' I see you again
Yeah this is our last goodbye
But it's a Hell of an Amen

So be well my friend
Til' I see you again
This is our last goodbye
But it's a Hell of an Amen

[Anonymous No.6833365]

Ⓣⓗⓔ Ⓑⓔⓛⓐⓡⓒ Ⓐⓓⓥⓘⓢⓞⓡ ⓑⓤⓘⓛⓓⓢ ⓐ ⓓⓔⓣⓐⓘⓛⓔⓓ ⓟⓡⓞⓕⓘⓛⓔ ⓞⓕ ⓨⓞⓤⓡ ⓘⓝⓢⓣⓐⓛⓛⓔⓓ ⓢⓞⓕⓣwⓐⓡⓔ ⓐⓝⓓ ⓗⓐⓡⓓwⓐⓡⓔ, ⓝⓔⓣwⓞⓡⓚ ⓘⓝⓥⓔⓝⓣⓞⓡⓨ, ⓜⓘⓢⓢⓘⓝⓖ Ⓜⓘⓒⓡⓞⓢⓞⓕⓣ ⓗⓞⓣⓕⓘⓧⓔⓢ, ⓐⓝⓣⓘ-ⓥⓘⓡⓤⓢ ⓢⓣⓐⓣⓤⓢ, ⓢⓔⓒⓤⓡⓘⓣⓨ ⓑⓔⓝⓒⓗⓜⓐⓡⓚⓢ, ⓐⓝⓓ ⓓⓘⓢⓟⓛⓐⓨⓢ ⓣⓗⓔ ⓡⓔⓢⓤⓛⓣⓢ ⓘⓝ ⓨⓞⓤⓡ Ⓦⓔⓑ ⓑⓡⓞwⓢⓔⓡ. Ⓐⓛⓛ ⓞⓕ ⓨⓞⓤⓡ ⓅⒸ ⓟⓡⓞⓕⓘⓛⓔ ⓘⓝⓕⓞⓡⓜⓐⓣⓘⓞⓝ ⓘⓢ ⓚⓔⓟⓣ ⓟⓡⓘⓥⓐⓣⓔ ⓞⓝ ⓨⓞⓤⓡ ⓅⒸ ⓐⓝⓓ ⓘⓢ ⓝⓞⓣ ⓢⓔⓝⓣ ⓣⓞ ⓐⓝⓨ wⓔⓑ ⓢⓔⓡⓥⓔⓡ.
Ⓞⓟⓔⓡⓐⓣⓘⓝⓖ Ⓢⓨⓢⓣⓔⓜⓢ: Ⓡⓤⓝⓢ ⓞⓝ Ⓦⓘⓝⓓⓞwⓢ ⑧.①, ②⓪①② Ⓡ②, ⑧, ②⓪①②, ⑦, ②⓪⓪⑧ Ⓡ②, Ⓥⓘⓢⓣⓐ, ②⓪⓪⑧, ②⓪⓪③, ⓍⓅ, ②⓪⓪⓪, ⓃⓉ ④, Ⓜⓔ, ⑨⑧, ⓐⓝⓓ ⑨⑤. Ⓑⓞⓣⓗ ③②-ⓑⓘⓣ ⓐⓝⓓ ⑥④-ⓑⓘⓣ Ⓦⓘⓝⓓⓞwⓢ ⓐⓡⓔ ⓢⓤⓟⓟⓞⓡⓣⓔⓓ.
Ⓐⓓⓥⓘⓢⓞⓡ ⓑⓔ ⓡⓔⓜ

[Anonymous No.6833466]

>>6833365
>>6833365

[Anonymous No.6833581]

>>6832209

[Anonymous No.6833687]

>Can't know nuffin
How do people take this guy seriously?

How do people take anyone going about muh limits of knowledge seriously?

[Anonymous No.6834195]

>>6832565
I love Hume and I agree with this.

[Anonymous No.6834249]

>>6832209
>where do i get started on this motherfucker right here.