[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 174 KB, 500x476, foucaulta27.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6745461 No.6745461 [Reply] [Original]

OK, I've handshaked with Hegel, hammered into Heidegger, fattened up with Freud, maxxed out with Marx and sailed into Sartre. Are there any other philosophers I need to get to know before face off with Foucault?

I deferred Derrida, ill get to him later

>> No.6745475

Try to catch up with Canguilhem

>> No.6745489

Halt the charlatan heap and awaken with Harris

>> No.6745509

>>6745489
you could have at least been fun said cease the Charlatans and hit up with Harris

>> No.6745526

>>6745461
Did you remember to page through Plato, attempt at Aristotle, accost Augustine and aggress Aquinas?

>> No.6745541

Read Korzybski you fucking pleb.

>> No.6745544

>>6745526
You go down that path, and you'll just end up ripping that shit up with Rand.

>> No.6745545

>>6745509
Hit up does not do justice to what this man's writings can do to the mind of even the plebbiest pleb like yourself

>> No.6745571

>>6745461
Assault Adorno, masturbate to Marcuse, hold down Horkheimer.

>> No.6745575

Seduct with Neil Strauss

>> No.6745603

>>6745544
I'd rather rape Rand

>> No.6745673

>>6745461
Nip into Nietzsche niqqa

>> No.6745675
File: 31 KB, 259x194, 1434689690269.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6745675

>>6745489
>If I could wave a magic wand and get rid of either rape or religion, I would not hesitate to get rid of religion -Sam Harris

https://youtu.be/ifpIw3EK7-A?t=9s

>> No.6745689
File: 274 KB, 2400x960, Sammy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6745689

>> No.6745699

>>6745603
she might actually respect you. Probably wouldn't though real talk.

>> No.6745704

>>6745461
Don't forget to deduce with Deleuze

>> No.6745712

You still need to be kekking with kierkegaard bb

>> No.6745723

Nietzsche. Foucault was a slef proclaimed nietzschean

>> No.6745743

>>6745704
Deleuze can be deterriotorialized before/after/during Foucalt's fits. Same thing with deciding Derrida: they're contemporaries whose works link and branch off each others.

But Foucalt frankly disliked Deleuze.

>> No.6745745

>>6745723
any book or idea in particular?

>> No.6745753

>>6745745
Genealogy of Morals for Foucault but he has much better books

>> No.6745762

>>6745675
can't make out what the guy he is responding to is saying

>> No.6746038

>>6745689
>>6745675
are there any good debates between a continental philosopher and someone like Sam Harris? I'm curious to how he responds to them

>> No.6746059

>>6746038

No, new atheists just stick to picking on theists.

Chomsky v Foucault is the closest i can think of anything like that and that was a disaster on both sides.

>> No.6746065

>>6745541
underrated post

>> No.6746344

>>6745745
>>6745753
Actually, Nietzsche's influence on Foucault is much broader than just N's genealogical method, like N's critique of the notions of subject and truth, and his notion of the will which F also uses.
So I would add Beyond Good and Evil as well as a sort of overview.

Another big influence is Heidegger. You can also add structuralism if you're going to read his early works.

>> No.6746363

>>6746059
What about Searle vs. Derrida? Searle didn't really think through what Derrida was saying then Derrida showed him through the practice of him writing a response.

>> No.6746375

>>6745461
>I deferred Derrida, ill get to him later
I grinned. Also you should have fucking started with Stirner. And stopped after Stirner.

>> No.6746469
File: 12 KB, 240x240, agamben.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6746469

>>6745461
After that you can agitate with Agamben.

>> No.6747494

>>6745461
You've not done structuralism. Do Althusser and Poulantzas