[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 31 KB, 300x300, 010_christopher_hitchens-300x300.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6742693 No.6742693[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

ITT: people who read a lot throughout life but maintained a very simple, rude, unsophisticated worldview

>> No.6742700
File: 40 KB, 620x350, benito-mussolini.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6742700

Apparently he was a prolific reader. Same with Stalin.

>> No.6742707

how did he have a "simple, rude, unsophisticated worldview"?

>> No.6742716

>>6742693
nice b8, m8

>> No.6742719

>>6742707
He was an atheist.

>> No.6742723

>>6742707
read his work and it's abundantly clear

>> No.6742733
File: 945 KB, 2400x2267, 1426265394582.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6742733

>>6742719

>> No.6742736

>>6742707
HOW

DARE

YOU

>> No.6742742
File: 59 KB, 640x640, 1402650798774.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6742742

>>6742707
>We have the moral responsibility to bomb people who violently enforce their ideology

t. Chris Hitchens

>> No.6742745

>>6742723
Assume he already did and still wants to hear an explanation for the statement.

>> No.6742752

>>6742745
>>6742742

>> No.6742756
File: 177 KB, 292x250, 1366142960685.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6742756

>>6742719

>> No.6742759

>>6742752
In short, it's fucking nothing. Good thread.

>> No.6742774

>>6742745
His foreign policy, his critique of any form of Christianity besides evangelical and it's theology, many of his own created logical arguments (Hitchens' Razor), his theological critiques of any religion, and his critiques of authors like Chesterton and such.

Just some examples.

>> No.6742778

>>6742759
If you can't see the hypocrisy of claiming a moral right to use violence against those who use violence then you're a dullard.

Fedora issues aside, Hitchens' stance on Iraq severely tarnished his legacy.

>> No.6743121

How many books do you think he read over his entire lifetime?

>> No.6743142

>>6743121
more than you'd read in 10

>> No.6743145

>>6742700
I have a feeling he didn't actually believe half the shit he spouted, he just enjoyed being dictator of Italy.

>> No.6743154

>>6742693
>implying hitchens read a lot

>> No.6743161

>>6743142
How many pages could he read in an hour? I doubt it

>> No.6743163

>>6742700
But Mussolini doesn't really fit the character of the OP.

>> No.6743166

>>6743145
Of *course* he didn't. It's like Trotsky said: when it comes to understanding history and society, being a marxist is like being a doctor, who possesses the means to either heal the patient or find the easiest, most lethal way of killing him.

Mussolini remained a marxist until the end of a life, just a marxist who decided to put his knowledge to the service of those already in power. And Jesus Christ, who can blame him.

>> No.6743171

Literally any living intellectual popular enough for the average person to know them

>> No.6743179

>>6743166
Are you really this brainwashed?

>> No.6743272 [DELETED] 

>>6743179
>brainwashed

A term, incidently, that only who qualify as one tend to use.

>> No.6743277

>>6743179
>brainwashed

A term, incidently, that only people who qualify as one tend to use.

>> No.6743302

>>6742693
I don't know much about Christopher Hitchens views, except his atheism, but you sound like a bigot. I'd rather you died than Hitchens.

>> No.6743304

>>6742693
My dad

>> No.6743325
File: 1.04 MB, 1455x1392, 1434545610309.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6743325

>>6743304

>> No.6743326

>>6742778
>self defense is immoral and categorically the same as initiating force

oh boy is it time already

>> No.6743342 [DELETED] 

>>6743326
Yes it is. Problem, sir cuck?

>> No.6743352

>>6743121
Honestly, at least 5,000. The man read incessantly. /lit/ doesn't like him because everyone is converted to Cuckstianity, but the man was really widely read.

>> No.6743358

>>6743342
Were you born a dumbass, or did you lobotomize yourself?

>> No.6743363

>>6743325
kek

>> No.6743403

>>6743326
Are you suggesting that invading Iraq was an act of "self-defense?" Hitchens argument was that the West was entitled to invade Iraq because radical Islam violently enforces its ideology which is what that post is referring to.

>> No.6743471
File: 48 KB, 499x499, Joyce.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6743471

>>6743304
>mfw seeing my dad read Ulysses in between his second cheeseburger from Wendy's, then watching The Big Bang Theory when he was done

>> No.6743603

>>6742700
Stalin had a more sophisticated worldview than most people today.

>> No.6743751
File: 227 KB, 953x711, 1415937613684.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6743751

>>6742707
>how did he have a "simple, rude, unsophisticated worldview"?
>>6742723
>read his work and it's abundantly clear
I have read most of pic related and about 50 separate articles and essays from him, and still have no idea how he had "a "simple, rude, unsophisticated worldview"

As you appear to be someone else who has read his work, could you critique 'inequalities in Zimbabwe' or 'Cyprus: Hostage to history' or 'The Parthenon Marbles' or his books on Jefferson or Thomas Paine to support your stance?

>> No.6743757
File: 605 KB, 873x701, 1362166244995.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6743757

When you see it you will shit bricks.

I guess we know what gave him cancer now.

>> No.6743760

>>6743751

Most people know him for "God is not Great", which is an incredibly rude and unsophisticated book( with no citations at that).He gets almost everything wrong and can hardly piece together a coherent argument in it.

>> No.6743774

>>6743403
They are though.

>> No.6743775
File: 565 KB, 963x942, Stoop kid.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6743775

>>6743757
Heh.

>> No.6743776
File: 6 KB, 350x200, noway.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6743776

>>6743304
>>6743471
Pleb family stories? Pleb family stories.
>tfw Dad has PhD in a STEM field.
>tfw he knows fucking everything off the top of his head, and if he didn't know it can look it up in his own library in a heartbeat.
>Actually made my sister and I start with the Greeks.
>teachers and friends' moms all blatantly lust after him and ask if he's with the military or "something else"
>he doesn't have a military haircut at all, so they must think he's in intelligence or special warfare
>tfw he's also a natural athlete and skilled outdoorsman
>mfw he sits down to watch an hour of Big Bang Theory, laughing to the point of tears throughout

I-is Big Bang Theory actually patrician and I'm just missing it?

>> No.6743794

>>6743760
You are shifting the goalposts. Your initial stance was that he maintained a very simple, rude, unsophisticated worldview. When challenged, you retreated to "Well, one of his books is rude and unsophisticated."

I'm not interested in the fedora meme, or "atheism vs Christianity." I was hoping you could support your argument and actually discuss some of his work without the inevitable 'christposting/tipping' that you appear to want. He was a prolific writer too so there is plenty to choose from.

>with no citations at that
>He gets almost everything wrong and can hardly piece together a coherent argument in it.
Much like your posting.

>> No.6743800

>>6743776
>dad is getting a PhD
>he is in a good political position too
>mum is an actress (in plays not in movies) and enjoys patrician movies
>they all enjoy the Big Bang Theory and laugh at BAZINGA jokes

Top lel. Who knows nigga

>> No.6743802

>>6742774

so basically you don't like him because he criticizes your faith.

>> No.6743805

>>6743776
i think that's just the generation that grew up with television, so the laughs are nostalgic

>> No.6743810

>>6743403
Hitchens made his argument pre-Iraq, and said he supported an invasion or assassination because Saddam Hussein was a genocidal dictator and the people of Iraq would be better off liberated.

You can't look at the mess America made from the perch of 2015 and say "that was what Hitchens wanted."

>> No.6743836

>>6743471

Hahaha how the fuck..

>> No.6743905
File: 28 KB, 409x325, 1435295955825.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6743905

>>6742719

>> No.6743920

>>6743757
I wonder if he finished it before he died

>> No.6743924

>>6743794
BTFO
T
F
O

>> No.6743926

Someone post the copypasta where anon ruins hitchens in 3 points
I used to have it

>> No.6743937

>>6743810
Hitchens supported the Iraq War when he was trying to get U.S. citizenship, which would protect him from U.K. libel laws. He also had a wife and kids here.

In his career he had pissed off a lot of powerful people who were at that time in charge of the State Department, and could deny him citizenship with a whisper.

Supporting the war publicly in a big way gave them reason to not interfere with his petition. He was allowing himself to be a poltical mouthpiece to stay with his family and cover his own ass.

His motives were obvious. No one seemed to get it. Any of the people he debated could have devastated him by pointing this out argument.

>> No.6743946
File: 17 KB, 480x360, hqdefault.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6743946

>>6743751
And that pic is about half of his books anyways.
Anyone who says he didn't read incomprehensibly much is mistaken. He was a boarding-school boy in Old England, which means he didn't have much else to do than read and have gay sex.
Also, he grew up (and got old) before the Internet was great, so he, unlike us, had a sane concept of reading.

>> No.6744095

>>6743937
>Hitchens supported the Iraq War when he was trying to get U.S. citizenship, which would protect him from U.K. libel laws.
You're saying he supported the war just to get away from libel laws.
>He also had a wife and kids here.
Here meaning the US? I didn't know that. I know he married a Cypriot and had two children with her in Cyprus; they both had duel UK/Cypriot citizenship. His son is some kind of writer/journalist now too.

>He was allowing himself to be a poltical mouthpiece to stay with his family and cover his own ass.
I think there is more to it than that. If you read his early work on Zimbabwe and hatred of Mugabe, you can see he had a similar position there. He genuinely hated genocidal tyrants. He first voiced his stance on the Iraq war after the evidence for chemical weapons was revealed. He knew about the mass genocide of the kurds, and even visited war-torn Iraq himself to see the mass graves and devastation of Chemical warfare for first hand knowledge. I really don't think that when he was standing there, looking down at thousands of disfigured corpses, the rural villages raised to the ground, the thousands of raped women with hands cut off, chemically burned children, the horror inflicted under Saddam's brutal regime, he was thinking "gee, I hate those pesky UK libel laws, so for that reason alone I'll speak out against these atrocities."

>Any of the people he debated could have devastated him by pointing this out argument.
No. To say someones premise is wrong because they have a bias or ulterior motive is a fallacious stance and doesn't defeat the premise.

>> No.6744105

>>6743166
It's like what Lenin said... you look for the person who will benefit, and, uh, uh... you know what I'm trying to say...

>> No.6744114

>>6744095
>His son is some kind of writer/journalist now too.

This is his son:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=igMmgbKS2Ho

>> No.6744119

>>6744105
It's like what Stalin said... >>>/gulag/

>> No.6744137

>>6744114
what a stuttering beta

>> No.6744189

>>6744114
I bet Peter Hitchens' children would slap this joker in a debate

>> No.6744200

>>6744189
Didn't know Peter had kids.

>> No.6744202
File: 84 KB, 640x293, amis-and-hitchens-horseleech-pond.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6744202

>>6744114
The problem is he's half Greek. Even with an eloquent wordsmith like Christopher for a father, he was doomed from the start. You can see the Greek tard in his eyes when he was a baby.

>> No.6744221

>>6743810
>and the people of Iraq would be better off liberated.

And history has proven him very much wrong.

>> No.6744230

>>6744221
you can easily make the case that had rumsfeld and friends not been retarded about securing the country and worked with the mid-level authorities that existed it would have been just fine

>> No.6744231

>>6744114
it takes a while to be properly telegenic, he's still too young

>> No.6744484

>>6744221
>>and the people of Iraq would be better off liberated.
>And history has proven him very much wrong.

History has proven that America shouldn't be in charge of liberating countries, not that a particular country under a dictatorship would be better off left alone.

>> No.6744495

>>6744202
So it's right from the start with the Greeks?

>> No.6744502

>>6744230
It still wouldn't have been a legal war, capitalist shill

>> No.6744512

>>6744502
>"legal" war

>> No.6744520

>>6744512
>Implying constitutional limits on what is and isn't legal within the process of declaring war are irrelevant to the legality of a war from the perspective of the law
Read a book

>> No.6744542

>>6744520
>implying anyone cares about the law, it's a fucking war
>implying america has declared any of its wars

>> No.6744546
File: 48 KB, 216x176, ATY_large.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6744546

>>6743946
>mfw i have those same vertical bookcases as Hitchens

>> No.6744551
File: 163 KB, 377x398, 1433517075741.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6744551

>>6744542
>implying anyone cares about the law, it's a fucking war
Not before it's been declared, it isn't. You seem to be missing my point entirely.
>implying america has declared any of its wars
No wars we've fought since we pulled out of Korea have been legal by any meaningful standard even by our own laws, but we fought WWII quite legally, and WWI, too. The Gulf of Tonkin resolution was predicated upon a CIA hoax that took American lives.

>> No.6744552

>>6744520
>from the perspective of law
>perspective of law
>law
>perspective
>from the

Why you giving credence to inanimate construct? Stop propagating the autocracy, capitalist shill.

>> No.6744560

>>6744552
>Muh revolution
Nah, rational legal authority is a good thing. You're too Utopian. My claim is that if the law, domestic or international, had been followed the war would never have been declared.

>> No.6744652

>>6743776

Big Bang Theory is Dadcore.

Father's can't help but like it.

>> No.6744662

>>6744652

> Father's

pls no bully

>> No.6744667

>>6744652
this
I can confirm this and I'm not even American

>> No.6744677

>>6744652
This is true, my dad inexplicably loves it.

>> No.6744697

>>6744652
My dad fucking hates it. he thinks it's garbage.

If he catches my mother and sister watching it he lets out a bellowing insincere guffaw whenever the laughtrack pops up.

>> No.6744716

>>6742778

Hitchen's case was that you should have deposed Saddam in the Gulf War the first time and he said so back in the day. Deposing him in '03 was the next best thing. In principle, he makes the case that interfering in state sovereignty is permissible in case of genocide and proliferation of WMD.

For him and others discussing a similar case (allied bombing in WWII) watch: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3doYSqBWhZI

>> No.6744722

>>6744697
your dad sounds like an idiot

>> No.6744725

>>6744667
>>6744677
>>6744697
Season one was funny.

<All thise t resembling numbers.

>> No.6744727

>>6743757

>yfw Hitch died by samizdat

>> No.6744729
File: 46 KB, 620x412, 2KHDNT-david-foster-wallace-was-right-JXOd.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6744729

>>6742693
He was an hero tho'.

>> No.6744786

>>6743757
Fucking Hell. I didn't expect him to have read that.

>> No.6744795

>>6744727
this can be fatal?

i will stop my pamphlet asap. i want to live.

>> No.6745028
File: 77 KB, 402x402, Bukowski.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6745028

>> No.6745057

>>6745028
>>feminist/sjw detected

>> No.6745126

>>6743757
I read a (really hard to find) article online once about how, in the early-er days of the internet, Hitchy sent a nasty email to some dbag who wrote a dumb shitposty review of IJ and posted it on his website.

>> No.6745129

>>6743920
doesn't look that weathered and I doubt he would have picked it as one of his final books to read. Or he might not be that rough on books and read a different edition before that one.

>> No.6745152

>>6745028
I don't think he read as much as he just shitposted on a typewriter.

>> No.6745168

>>6743776
whats inherently wrong with liking simplistic entertainment?

>> No.6745169

>>6745126
This one?
http://misterbulger.com/2011/12/19/christopher-hitchens-an-asshole-in-memoriam/

>> No.6745175

>>6745028
He also wasn't even an alcoholic given that he died at 73 to something unrelated to alcohol abuse.

>> No.6745183

>>6744546
I have something in common with Hegel, we both were alive at one point.

>> No.6745187

>>6743794
Love to see a shitposter get fucking rekt

>> No.6745202
File: 101 KB, 300x374, Dostoevsky_main.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6745202

Y u mad tho?

>> No.6745205

Orwell, Mishima and dfw

>> No.6745209

>>6745169
>publish a shitty review of a book you haven't even read
>get called out on it
>be so butthurt about it that you talk shit about the reviewer when he dies 20 years later

wow, that guy sounds like a complete and utter turd

>> No.6745212

>>6745183
>were alive at one point

spooks
spooks on the internet

>> No.6745232

>>6745169
Why do old people take the internet so seriously?

>> No.6745335
File: 37 KB, 788x685, 307.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6745335

>>6742719

>> No.6745693

>>6744221
They would have been better off liberated
If they were white.

He was optimistic and had too high an opinion of people thanks to his own success.