/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.6732225]

Any ideas on an Islamic version of this

[Anonymous No.6732229]

>>6732225
"Muslim" is the term you are looking for

[Anonymous No.6732231]

>>6732225
Read the Persians

[Anonymous No.6734129]

I'd be enormously stoked.

tbh though, I don't think anyone who lurks here has the Islamic Studies expertise to pull it off.

Or if they do, they can't be assed.

[Anonymous No.6734406]

"Jihad for Dummies"
"Sand For Beginners"
"An introduction to genocide"
"Babies first Fatwa"
"How to Haram and why you should avoid it"
"Spotting an infidel"

For those who want to get into more advance Islam

"How to invade a country through immigration"
"An analysis on Rape gangs and Rotheram"
"Culturally enriching infidels for dummies"
"Destroying the West: An Introduction"

[Anonymous No.6734409]

>>6734406

And of course there is also:

"Halal Foods: Why you should eat them and how to force Western public schools to serve them"

[Anonymous No.6734412]

>>6734406
>>6734409
you should read "Memes for Begginers".

[Anonymous No.6734419]

>>6732225
What does the Silmarillion have to do with christian lit? Or The Stars My Destination?

[Anonymous No.6734424]

>>6734412

Triggered already?

[Anonymous No.6734428]

>>6734419
You questioning the relevance of a Tolkien work in the fiction section?

[Anonymous No.6734435]

what about one for Hinduism?

[Anonymous No.6734436]

>>6734419
You've never read any of Tolkien's nonfiction or letters, have you? He wrote the Silmarillion with an explicitly Catholic worldview in mind, exploring his theme of "subcreation" within God's creation.

[Anonymous No.6734444]

>>6734419
The Silmarillion is pretty much a Bible mod

[Anonymous No.6734462]

>>6734424
You seem the one triggered making a shitpost like that writing like you're 12 them defending it with modern politival argumentation even though we're talking about classical and medieval history.

[Anonymous No.6734478]

>>6734462

>classical and medieval history
>implying Islamic theology and philosophy has changed, developed or evolved at all since the 600s

[Anonymous No.6734495]

>>6734478
And as always when faced with reality the pol tard asserts that reality must conform to his infantile media buzzword worldview.
>I know nothing of Islamic thought, therefore there is nothing to Islamic thought
Maybe if you read some books you could get somewhere and actually make substantial anti-Islamic arguments that carry more weight than LOL SANDNIGGERS, focus on graduating school though first education is important.

[Anonymous No.6734508]

>>6734495

>defending pic related
>media buzzword worldview

oh lord, you're too much. Please tell me you are not an American or a Brit, just please... we don't need more people like you. Stay out of the anglosphere.

[Anonymous No.6734515]

>>6732225
How about
Any ideas for a non-heretical version?
>All those books by Catholics and mystics

[Anonymous No.6734521]

>>6734508
>still posting media reactionary images when I'm talking about medieval history
Here are a few links to get you started, I recommend some Max Stirner on the side or maybe some Lao Tsu. Clearly /pol/ has you throughly spooked into believing everything you discuss on the internet must agree with your version of political correctness.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00qckbw
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p0038x79
http://www.historyofphilosophy.net/islamic-world
And where did you get the idea that I was pro-Islam in any way?

[Anonymous No.6734541]

>>6734508
go back to /pol/

[Anonymous No.6734548]

>>6734521

>Stirner

Disgusting. I recommend you take the bread pill and read some Kirk Russell, C. S. Lewis, T. S. Eliot, Bertrand Russell, Peter Hitchens, Thomas Carlyle... maybe even a dash of Buckley. That should cure you.

Also go buy Nationalism and modernism by Anthony Smith

[Anonymous No.6734552]

>>6732225
should I start with the arabs or the persians?

[Anonymous No.6734559]

>>6734548
>thomas carlyle
Top kek. I bet you took out that author from the Right Wing Literature chart and you never read his book. He says Muhammed was a great man, comparing him to other great people like Alexander of Macedonia.

Read a book nigger.

[Anonymous No.6734576]

>>6734559

Have YOU read Carlyle? The man shits on the Qur'an and Islamic constantly. His praise of Muhammed is not an affirmation of Islam or its teachings. I also don't happen to agree 100% with every philosopher I read like Stirner fags.

Read a book nigger.

[Anonymous No.6734582]

>>6734548
How do you feel about this man?

[Anonymous No.6734587]

>>6734576
nigger please
Never said he praised Islam or something, I'm just pointing that he considered Muhammed a great man, so your ebin hate for islam itself it's stupid when you say "hurr durr take the bread pill". I'm not the stirner fag. Seems that you are too far into memes. How much GBs does your funny meme pictures folder has?
How many funny Nigel pictures you have?
Too much memes are bad for your life.

[Anonymous No.6734588]

>>6734548
>take a pill
That's precisely their problem. They need a clear conscious before they can begin the pursuit of knowledge, then they will be able to decide for themselves. Which is why I recommended Stirner or Taoists

[Anonymous No.6734596]

>>6734582

He's been on my list of people to look into for awhile now. I've seen a lot of him on /lit/ these days... wish I could give you a better answer but I'm not familiar enough with him to comment.

I'll read up on him though.

[Anonymous No.6734598]

>>6734548
>le pill meme
kek
Sorry anon but you are just shitposting. I doubt you ever read one of those authors you posted. Specially Peter Hitches with his "The Abolition of Britain" which is really funny.

[Anonymous No.6734599]

>>6734582
Milbank might be /lit/'s worst, most boring meme author of all time.

[Anonymous No.6734601]

>>6734582
>tfw /lit/'s new fad will be christian socialism
fug
I guess I should read more books to deal with those christposters.

[Anonymous No.6734611]

>>6734601
>new fad will be
>will be

It already is. Question is, whats next?

[Anonymous No.6734615]

>>6734587

The filename is the number of Nigel pics I have.

>>6734598

Quite frankly I don't give a shit if you think I haven't read any of the books or authors I posted. I've got nothing to prove on a japanese imageboard m8.

For the record though The Abolition of Britain did have some funny parts in it, but that's because P-hitch does have a good sense of humor sometimes despite seeming bland during interviews and debates. The majority of the book is chock full of truth and sadness.

[Anonymous No.6734621]

>>6734615
>Quite frankly I don't give a shit if you think I haven't read any of the books or authors I posted. I've got nothing to prove on a japanese imageboard m8.

I said funny in the sense it fails in the objective Hitchens wanted, that is making yourself more aware of the UK "degenerated" society and probably make you turn into a conservative.
The analogy he makes with China, that is a revolution of the culture itself it's just stupid.
That's why I doubt you read the book. There are way better authors than Peter Hitchens.

[Anonymous No.6734654]

>>6734601
Marxists and Christposters united
Nothing to lose but their chains
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XN6UNVwlRbk

[Anonymous No.6734676]

>>6734654
>mfw this fad is now a thing in my third world country
lel
time to kick out those muh free market faggots

[Anonymous No.6734732]

>>6734676
Do it. Lead the vanguard. The Pope is with you.

[Anonymous No.6734775]

>>6734548

Wow, I don't think I've ever seen so many shit authors in one post. Good job

[Thomas No.6734785]

>>6734775
T.S. Eliot isn't a shit writer at all.

[Anonymous No.6734787]

>>6734785

You like him so he probably is

[Anonymous No.6734791]

>>6734621
Shutup you lefty cuck. Hitchens is one of the only redpilled authors around.

[Thomas No.6734795]

>>6734787
But he's not. Even if you aren't religious. For instance, Ralph Ellison cited him as an enormous influence, and I doubt he was remotely religious.