[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 26 KB, 367x500, 1432685946027.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6644463 No.6644463[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

What's wrong with feminism? Don't women deserve equal protection under the law?

>> No.6644473
File: 103 KB, 549x280, plsleave.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6644473

>>6644463
not /lit/

just report thread and move on.

>> No.6644477

>>6644463
>Don't women deserve equal protection under the law?
white knight beta cuck

>> No.6644479

not literature, fuck off
>>>/pol/

>> No.6644482

No.

>> No.6644488

>equal protection under the law?

You fucking moron

>> No.6644536

It's a philosophical question. De Beauvoir was a philosopher.

>> No.6644542
File: 33 KB, 1024x576, 4ccb243504fe3f3dd1a53a9205e41fa1b94af3a3a80b9bbb869a4c7a76db3c67_large.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6644542

>>6644536
>De Beauvoir was a philosopher.
Back to /pol/

>> No.6644549

And let us guess, if we point out to you that they do have equal protection under the law, you'll immediately start naming perceived inequalities in society that are completely outside the boundaries and competences of the law.

It's just like you can't even disagree with certain radical feminist measures without them immediately retreating back to something vague and without actual political connotations like "feminism is the radical notion that men and women are equal!" to free themselves of the burden of owning up to the clumsy shit they impose.

>> No.6644586

>implying equal treatment is a coherent concept while the state exists