[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 23 KB, 278x318, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6642827 No.6642827 [Reply] [Original]

>"kafkaesque"

>> No.6642830
File: 58 KB, 636x674, 1416924841578.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6642830

>I'm a Hegelian

>> No.6642845

>>6642830
Hegel seems to be so extremely influential.
Who is explicitly and consistently against Hegel?

>> No.6642858

>kierkegaardian
>camusesque

wew lad

>> No.6642881

>>6642858
>Kierkegaardians of the Galaxy
>mfw

>> No.6642892

>>6642845
Bertrand Russell is very critical of Hegel. Lots of people are, even Kierkegaard.

>> No.6642914

>>6642845
>for
Zizek, Lenin, Marx, continental philosophy
>against
Marx, Lenin, Zizek, analytic philosophy

>> No.6642951

>>6642914
But isn't the thesis antithesis synthesis understandable in an classical and analytic frameworks as well?
Is it too fuzzy for a Wittgenstein to give it credit?

>> No.6642960
File: 22 KB, 367x500, oiCwih9.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6642960

>Byronic hero

>> No.6642969

>>6642951
>thesis antithesis synthesis
No one uses that terminology, especially not Hegel.
The answer to your question is no, and even if it does, most people in those frameworks would deny its validity, especially in analytic philosophy, which is literally an attempt to forget that Hegel happened.
>Wittgenstein
Literally made a career trying to forget that Hegel happened.

>> No.6642976

>>6642827
wew lad
>>6642830
wew lad
>>6642845
wew lad
>>6642858
wew lad
>>6642881
wew lad
>>6642892
wew lad
>>6642951
wew lad
>>6642960
wew lad