[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 42 KB, 552x549, 1433301635234.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6633431 No.6633431[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Hey guys, I need help sexting. Can someone tell me a better way to phrase "sliding my dick in your pussy and pulling it out and then sliding it back in and then pulling it out" and "pounding that pussy like a jackhammer"

>> No.6633454

The Kafka Technique: rope her into thinking she's getting some vanilla sexting, only to switch it up into insanely freaky bondage shit when she leasts expects it. Don't explain a thing.
The Nabokov Technique: halfway through description of your genitals, shift to French
The Dostoevsky Technique: tell her how pathetic you feel until she fakes an orgasm out of pity
The DWF Technique: insert an aside about the first time you got high in between your rant about how horny you feel
The Pynchon Technique: compare your penis to a movie you just saw mentioned in the news and hope they think you're relevant
The Cormac Technique: type like a retarded 13 year old texting and call it literature

>> No.6633462
File: 2.08 MB, 1024x768, Dana_Scully.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6633462

Context?

It's probably a bad idea to use the word pussy.
Rather, to appeal to the girls mind, describe your satisfaction with the action, and describe you acting upon her.

>"sliding my dick in your pussy and pulling it out and then sliding it back in and then pulling it out"
Just say you can't wait to lie on top of her.

>"pounding that pussy like a jackhammer"
Tell her you'll fuck her till you can't take it anymore.

You should make a narrative out of it, though. And it's a good thing to talk about your hands.

>> No.6633475

What? Don't say anything like that. That sort of shit is for sexting with men. Avoid using any graphic terms as much as you can, without using any euphemisms. You gotta be erotic, not explicit. That's what turns them on. Don't say "I put my dick in your cunt", say "I slide myself into you".

>> No.6633477
File: 31 KB, 320x320, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6633477

>>6633462
LOL. What is this? Would read TBH.

>> No.6633489

>>6633431
"I insertionalise my throbbing, veiny pole-pole into your quivering quim-slot, and you become like unto a child unto me, the abra-kadabra all-dadderoo at the end of time, which devours the universe of your soul."

"With every re-entry you are murdered and born anew. I am the Sun and you are Jesus Christ. My rapidfire sodomification of your third anus, you alimentary Cerberus, is both your damnation and your salvation. Chant with me, my child: Amen, amen, amen"

Write that in two consecutive texts and then reap.

>> No.6633498

Add in little bits of details like "I can't wait to take you to the bedroom and kiss you on your lips and neck and shoulder and slowly undress you taking time to run my fingers all along your smooth sexy body etc etc" The key to success is to focus less on pounding the pussy and more on the subtle details. She will find it much sexier. Also maybe mention distinct features of her to make it more personal.

>> No.6633505
File: 1.33 MB, 976x740, paws!.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6633505

>>6633477
I don't know what you're saying but I just made the suggestion based on my experience. Pic related is the mental image of what do describe in not too extreme terms. So the message goes like "I want X and I'm going to do X and then Y". She might reply "that's hot" or not at all, which is the good sign.
That works for me: You just say what you want to do and what you're gonna do. That way the girl is being freed from any responsibility and conscious decision sluttyness and in turn starts anticipating the act.

>> No.6633544
File: 441 KB, 193x135, book772830.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6633544

>>6633489

>> No.6633728 [SPOILER] 
File: 317 KB, 1280x960, 1433352019342.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6633728

>>6633454
>DWF
David Woster Fallacy... ?

>> No.6633750

>>6633489
This is actually well written and a very interesting prose style

>> No.6633755

>>6633431
Read dumb shit like 50 shades for research. Bitches love shit like that.

>> No.6633908

>>6633505
That statue is completely unreal. Did they mold it or something? Is it 3d printed? Petrified people?

>> No.6633921

>>6633489
>abra-kadabra all-dadderoo at the end of time, which devours the universe of your soul

Saved. I love the way /lit/ turns to shit and then the clouds part and there's the sun again, fucking me in the face with rays.

>> No.6633946
File: 112 KB, 493x700, David.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6633946

>>6633908
It's Gian Lorenzo Bernini. That's his most famous, but look up some of his other sculptures and paintings. He was inhumanly good at everything he ever did.

>> No.6634017

>>6633946
My god. Thank you lots. I wanna see one in person! I wonder if there's some directory of where his work is

>> No.6634035

>>6633489
actually beautiful, 10/10 would sext

no homo

>> No.6634035,1 [INTERNAL] 

is anyone engaged into Snapchat sexting???
Where could I try Snapchat sexting?