[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 36 KB, 311x475, Crying_of_lot_49.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6611297 No.6611297 [Reply] [Original]

K, so here it is:

First off, Oedipa is called Oedipa because her tragedy (would) have been the same as that of Oedipus Rex: having sex with one’s mother. Oedipa was birthed by the story, and so reaching (narrative) climax within that story would have been just as tragic as it was for Oedipus.

Secondly, the book attempts to strip narrative down to its most base elements, and then fail. Narratives (read: stories) are descriptions of events, or, more specifically, a single event: the climax. The event in this novel is the title. The book attempts to describe that event and that event only, and the rest of the novel is simply exposition. The fact that novel ENDS just before the event occurs, however, is the failure. It might be that Oedipa decided to end the novel by refusing to further communicate to the audience, thereby avoiding the tragedy mentioned above. OR the novel was ended in order to symbolize the overall sense of miscommunication and detachment present all through. Which brings me to:

Third,and finally, the book’s message is the miscommunication of messages. The fact that a single, simple event (the auction of a postage stamp collection) becomes entangled with complicated love affairs, esoteric historical references, and seemingly other seemingly random events causes mass confusion, reflected in Oedipa who cannot understand the events transpiring around her or the way other characters are behaving. She realizes that the narrative has been lost, and this frustrates her nearly to the point of insanity, and, finally, overall detachment. This is why the overarching symbol of the novel is a muted post horn: the horn is a device used to communicate and announce coming information (letters). If the post horn is muted, its purpose is defeated. One is left to gather information themselves. This image is the essence of miscommunication.

>> No.6611306

kind of a long post dude why not post a meme instead

>> No.6611318

Nice. I enjoyed the book, but didn't get this out of it.

Nice.

>> No.6611326

Is this supposed to be in another thread? Do you have a question? Or did you just randomly decide to post your homework here?

>>>blackboard

>> No.6611331

>>6611297
Oedipa Mass = Oedipus My Ass

You changus

>> No.6611338

>>6611297
>Oedipa
Sister of Lesbia, I presume? (Who were the parents, by the way?)

>> No.6611339

>>6611297
>>6611306
>>6611318
>>6611318
>>6611326
>>6611326
>>6611331
that's an interesting perspective

>> No.6611349

>>6611297
Fun fact: none of the letters in the novel contain any relevant information.

Also, does anyone have the post from a few years back about the poet in the tower and how it relates to TCoL49? I think I could probably find it..

>> No.6611361

>>6611297
Very interesting. Thank you for sharing.

>> No.6611362

>>6611349

>>/lit/thread/S3039755

>> No.6611719

>>6611297
You don't know what a horn mute is.

>> No.6611794

>"She waited for the crying of Lot 49."
fucking dropped it right there

>> No.6611797

>>6611794
Did cmon

>> No.6612124

>>6611297
>Oedipa
>not getting the joke
Pynchon was already making fun of you 50 years in the past.
When you weren't even born.
Based Pynchon.

>>6611794
Is that you Mr Pinecone?

>> No.6612130

>>6611297
>Oedipa is called Oedipa because her tragedy (would) have been the same as that of Oedipus Rex: having sex with one’s mother. Oedipa was birthed by the story, and so reaching (narrative) climax within that story would have been just as tragic as it was for Oedipus.

So many bad thinkers on this site.

>> No.6612151

>>6611297

>tfw trying to explain TCOL49 with this brevity

You might as well look into Jacobean plays. The relationship between the signifier and the signified is there, but when is it not? The miscommunication of messages is a possibility that exists within the "novella", but that's a philosophical question that is a significant topic regarding communication. The book is much more than what you've explained.

>> No.6612153

>>6611297
Are you high OP? Read it again.

>> No.6612199
File: 40 KB, 105x157, whyamihere.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6612199

>>6611297
Your entire 2nd point is retarded and stupid.