[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 147 KB, 750x1334, 1432431765218.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6593831 No.6593831[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

why do bookfags always talk like complete losers

use normal vocabulary shitcunts. What? Afraid of your ideas not being special enough? Afraid of YOURSELF not being special?

Thats right. now fuck off

>> No.6593843
File: 151 KB, 800x800, 2tZwmqz.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6593843

>>6593831

>> No.6593853

>>6593843
Opie's grilpic actually looks like a pepe.

Rare shitposter.

>> No.6593863

“Class is responsible for hierarchy,” says Lacan; however, according to Dietrich[1] , it is not so much class that is responsible for hierarchy, but rather the absurdity, and some would say the fatal flaw, of class. Thus, any number of discourses concerning not appropriation, but neoappropriation exist.

“Sexuality is intrinsically meaningless,” says Derrida. The primary theme of the works of Spelling is a mythopoetical reality. However, Lacan suggests the use of surrealism to deconstruct capitalism.

“Sexual identity is elitist,” says Marx; however, according to Porter[2] , it is not so much sexual identity that is elitist, but rather the futility, and subsequent genre, of sexual identity. The subject is contextualised into a capitalist paradigm of consensus that includes reality as a paradox. It could be said that if semantic theory holds, we have to choose between subcultural nihilism and the structural paradigm of expression.

The premise of surrealism suggests that the State is part of the rubicon of art. However, Sontag uses the term ‘semantic theory’ to denote the role of the poet as writer.

The subject is interpolated into a postcultural libertarianism that includes sexuality as a totality. But the characteristic theme of Parry’s[3] model of subcultural nihilism is the common ground between sexual identity and consciousness.

Dietrich[4] states that we have to choose between textual desemanticism and subdialectic patriarchialist theory. Thus, Bataille promotes the use of semantic theory to read sexual identity.

The example of subcultural nihilism depicted in Stone’s Platoon is also evident in JFK. Therefore, the subject is contextualised into a surrealism that includes sexuality as a whole.

In Platoon, Stone examines Foucaultist power relations; in Natural Born Killers, however, he denies surrealism. Thus, if subcultural nihilism holds, we have to choose between the precultural paradigm of reality and dialectic rationalism.

>> No.6593868

>>6593863
1. Dietrich, D. O. V. ed. (1996) Semantic theory and surrealism. Yale University Press

2. Porter, L. (1982) The Meaninglessness of Class: Semantic theory in the works of Pynchon. University of Oregon Press

>> No.6593880

>>6593831
u can be my gf if u want 2

>> No.6593888
File: 314 KB, 476x384, 1432417492459.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6593888

>>6593863
>“Sexuality is intrinsically meaningless,” says Derrida.
"I am a kissless permavirgin please kill me now," thinks Derrida.

>> No.6593897
File: 3 KB, 125x125, low quality bait.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6593897

>>6593831

>> No.6593898

>>6593831
I know what you mean. Sometimes I'll accidentally use words like "irrevocably" and I'll get odd looks, so I backpedal and use shorter words. If you can't use small words to explain your shit, why even try?

>> No.6593899
File: 14 KB, 251x273, 1385225019711.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6593899

>>6593831
You're tricked into generalisation because of your uncritical observational skills.

You're like someone walking down the street and thinking "why do faggots have to be so in your face about their cocksucking all the time?"

This seems reasonable to you, because every faggot you detect is a flamer.

What you fail to realise is that the low key homos simply fly under the radar and suck cock quietly in the night, so you are biased since you're only detecting the flamboyant queens.

The same is true for bookfags. A large number of bookfags will speak to you in the plebspeak you can comprehend, leading you to only identify those who aren't as accommodating to your lack of mental development.

>> No.6593905

>>6593831
No it's just how we filter out idiots who won't even be able to grasp our ideas, regardless of the vocabulary we use.

>> No.6593907
File: 115 KB, 214x261, 1432494208469.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6593907

>>6593899
Bookfags: 5 paragraphs of the exact shit OP criticized
Everyone else: "Selection bias."

OP 2
bookfags 0

>> No.6593911
File: 151 KB, 1500x2250, 938984-katie-holmes.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6593911

>>6593905
>No it's just how we filter out idiots who won't even be able to grasp our ideas, regardless of the vocabulary we use.

>> No.6593912

>>6593899

I enjoyed this explanation.

>> No.6593913

>>6593899
kek
>leading you to only identify those who aren't as accommodating to your lack of mental development

>> No.6593914

>>6593831
The whole point of reading literature is to be superior to others.

>> No.6593921

>>6593831
Uh-oh, Michelle Malkin is mad at /lit/.

>> No.6593923
File: 117 KB, 211x278, stirner.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6593923

>>6593831
>use normal vocabulary shitcunts.

>Implying I'll do what you tell me to, because you tell me to do it
>Implying I do not only care for myself and the unique
>Implying I care about your spook
>Implying you are not my property

>> No.6593925

Besides, the vocabulary we use is fuckin 8th grade English...not that hard.

>> No.6593934

>>6593925
>Besides, the vocabulary we use is fuckin 8th grade English...
>>6593899

>> No.6593938
File: 43 KB, 750x534, 1432609813233.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6593938

>>6593899
This, stop generalizing

>> No.6593940

>>6593923
Did you read the whole book?

>> No.6593945

>>6593905

"guys... my ideas... I need you to understand my ideas..."

fedora.jpg

>> No.6593950

>>6593945
Who are you quoting?

Why didn't you just post an image instead of a filename?

Do you need help using the site? If so, I can call a moderator to show you around.

>> No.6593969

>>6593934
Which of those words did you find difficult?

>> No.6593979

BA
ZING
GA

>> No.6593989

>>6593888
Derrida was swimming in pussy what the fuck are you talking about. Its a common criticism that he was a hack who did it all for the fame and women.

>> No.6593991

>boofafs
>fuck off
>/lit/ - Literature
where do you even want us to fuck off to? we're already in our ghetto.

>> No.6593992

>>6593969
"Your mom"

>> No.6594019

>>6593888
dirty da slayed more than you m9

>> No.6594226

>>6593888
Why do Americans have to put so much importance on sexuality?

>> No.6594238

>>6594226
>all human interaction fundamentally come down to sexuality

>lol America