[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 34 KB, 527x173, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6591664 No.6591664 [Reply] [Original]

Sexuality is socially constructed to carress my inner beast, how fucked am I?

>> No.6591695

>>6591664
AT FULL FORCE IN THE VAGINA MOUTH AND ANUS

>> No.6591731

Everything is a social construct. Everything we value is bullshit.
You will never be able to escape it. You can only manipulate it and/or indulge yourself in it. Also please try not to become a lunatic while you're at it... tho I am not sure if lunatics even exist.

>> No.6591757
File: 171 KB, 640x620, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6591757

>>6591731
But my organism is not a social construct. That's a good starting point. I touch the trees and they are there as I am. And further. So much social construct depends on the existence of organisms- but do organisms depend on the constructs? Surely they did, but will they continue? Will I? It becomes difficult to assess when they hold the key to your freedom.

>> No.6591765

All of Foucault's works should be burned, and the ashes sprinkled with salt.

>> No.6591773

>>6591757
>>6591765
kill yourself

>> No.6591783

>>6591773
Contribute

>> No.6591821

>>6591783
I would say "you first", but you actually believe your contributions aren't banal and stupid.

>> No.6591835

>>6591757
Well, I believe we will eventually get rid of other organisms and replace them with something more efficient. So yes... Society affects everything and I don't see it stopping. It even affects the way we think. And because it affects the way we think in quite a fucked up way... I'll stop typing because I don't want to infect you with fucked up shit I picked on the way. Don't even take what I wrote right now seriously. Answer your own questions and watch in terror as everyone else thinks you're crazy while you try to free yourself from ideology and fail miserably again and again... Do not take me seriously, but analyse what I said and try to find out why I reacted the way I did. Probably because I forgot to take my pills this morning.

>> No.6591861
File: 113 KB, 640x614, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6591861

>>6591835
We are involved in techne- we manipulate and arrange, etc. But when this is done for us, especially without our permission or knowledge, it becomes dangerous. We enjoy ideology because it's fun. But when we are unaware of ideology, we don't have the option of not playing.

My main dilemma is that the unwanted manufactured social constructs engage various facets of my own base instincts on me, so I am unaware whether I do wanna "fuck bitches" or if there is such a thing as a "healthy sexuality", and whether that ideal is even worth going after.

>> No.6591866

>>6591861
burichan dickhead.

>> No.6591934

>>6591861
I wrote around 300 words and then realised this is not about sexuality but about freedom. You'll always be a prisoner of your own perception. Learn how to deal with yourself. You can learn and gain more control or leave yourself be as you are. Either way you'll live some form of human life. Manipulated or not. I personally chose to start to know myself and the world. Why? I don't want to see anyone hurt including myself? Yea. It's probably that. Why? Because of some childhood trauma. Do I want to fix that trauma? Well... Why do you think I do what I do?

>> No.6591976

>>6591934
Everything is about sex except sex. Sex is about power.

>> No.6591979

>>6591976
>you will never have sex

>> No.6591988
File: 68 KB, 483x720, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6591988

>>6591934
Your attitude is so unwelcome. Perception is the prisoner, and you are the prison. We imitate what DAS man does, we construct structures of thought and then participate in the image. Our identity is not just subjected to external constructs, but we exteriorize our own constructs- and if we do so without knowing it- it would seem hopeless.

It's not about sexuality or freedom, it's about how what has been suppressed in us over centuries of social constructs is now released but in the same manner- social constructs (i.e. Victoria secrets, pornography, etc). It's disorienting because everything seems manufactured. If we're talking around anything- it's trust and paranoia

>> No.6591991

>>6591979
object petit-a can fuck itself mate

>> No.6591997

>>6591934
I didn't totally mean 'ur attitude is unwelcome to the last part, just the first part. I'm glad your dont want others to suffer as you had suffered. That's valiant.

>> No.6592025

Sexuality is a domain created for several different techniques of surveillance, manipulation, and differentiation to play onto a heterogeneous population.

Foucault's thesis is compelling. Essentially, the modern conception of sexuality can be traced back to the tactical maneuvers of the bourgeoisie to utilize already existing technologies of the flesh in such a way to differentiate their body (their literal body and the body politic) in much the same way that the concept of "blood" was used by royalty.

The proliferation of medicinal, juridical, and economic domains for the creation and utilization of different techniques for the deployment of sexuality were originally invented by and used on the bourgeoisie and later found themselves in a tactical arrangement aimed at working on the lower classes given the occurrence of critical economic emergencies and demographic conflict in urban spaces.

>> No.6592074

>>6591988
I see it as a prison because I feel like every construct we create is actually something we picked up during our lifetime and then recycled it. If I never received any information I wouldn't even be able to react in any way. And even the way I react was probably learned from somewhere or maybe I recycled it from a few things I experienced in life (like some traumas :P). I've had a sceptical opinion towards everything for quite some time now since I don't trust anyone and not even myself (by myself I mean... The way I think).

You said something has been released. I think it just changed the way the prison works. That is why it's disorienting. It's a prison you don't perceive as such. Someone will always create what is sexy and what is not and it will most likely be the people who hold some kind of power. You want tits because they mean fertility. You want A because it means you get B.(B is the thing that you actually want.) (A is the thing you think you want.) We could discuss how it all started in a mind of some animal years and years ago, but it would be quite pointless since, if you allow me to assume, we don't know shit about animal behaviour. Make sure to research our primates if you would like to know why we are fucked up the way we are. Maybe we are so fucked up that not even animals can provide an answer.
I have to go now.(sweet sweet sleep) Make sure to make a thread if you find out more about... Whatever the fuck we were just talking about.

>> No.6593505

I'm a bit allergic to this word "socially constructed", its usage seems to imply some sort of artificiality in opposition to what is natural or authentic, to what is supposed to be lying "underneath" or "behind" the surface. Once you start thinking of the world as both completely artificial and real it makes little sense to speak of "social construction".
Sexuality is a thing, and it is truth rather than ideology. But it exists neither as a source or substance, nor is it something universal or eternal. It is historically produced as a thing, but this makes it no less real. Which precisely means that it is not merely a question of getting read of it as as a mere ideological surface, it is instead a question of producing something else that will replace it. When Foucault refers to "bodies and pleasures" at the end of the 1st volume he does not mean that "bodies and pleasures" are that fundamental element or reality that is only subsequently organized into sexuality in era such as ours. What he means instead is that "bodies and pleasures" are on that same single plane of artificial reality as sexuality, but they are yet to be fully produced and become dominant.
Foucault liked to put it this way: "sexuality does not exist, but it is not nothing", which is also a reference to and reversal of Heidegger's phenomenology which was still concerned with authenticity and hermeneutics.

>> No.6594742
File: 38 KB, 552x400, foucat.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6594742

bump

>> No.6594787

>>6591991
Yes with a dildo or electric toothbrush but you can't m8 you have to have objet petit she present to carry on comrade

>> No.6594794

>>6594742
DUDE GIVING KIDS AIDS LMAO

>> No.6596058
File: 56 KB, 512x412, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6596058