/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.6504167]

Why is my literature course 95% women?

[Anonymous No.6504169]

Because men are wasting their times measuring their dicks with hard sciences ruler.

[Anonymous No.6504174]

Because women these days are more literate than men and thus more educated than them, and so they haven't been tricked into majoring in engineering.

[Anonymous No.6504177]

>>6504174
If only this were true

[Anonymous No.6504180]

Because you have entered the secret inner sanctuary of audience pussy, the supplest and easiest prey known to man.

All you must do now is exploit the innate gender disparity between yourself and the female students, displaying your own superior male prose and male ability to write something that isn't trite, adolescent vampire romance, and you will be swimming in pussy. The kind of pussy that a true literary genius needs to inspire him to write great things.

You tread in the wake of DFW and John Green. Once they inhabited this same sanctuary and feasted on another generation of audience pussy, and now they live like kings, with eager audience pussy delivered to their door every day. All you have to do is follow their footsteps. Good luck.

[Anonymous No.6504183]

>>6504174
are engineering textbooks literature?

[Anonymous No.6504185]

>>6504180
>DFW
>they live

I have some news for you m8

[Anonymous No.6504189]

>>6504169
This

[Anonymous No.6504193]

>>6504185
>believing greatly exaggerated rumours

he said INFINITE jest not FINITE jest

[Anonymous No.6504194]

>>6504169
This.

Plus your question is implicitly negative. Why don't you say anything like 'Why are all my books written by white guys?' or 'Why can't we read Mein Kampf'

Yep, OP, you are one filthy casual

>>6504177
>>6504180
And lo, a wave of tipping descended across the land

[Anonymous No.6504195]

>>6504174
>this is what women actually believe

[Anonymous No.6504202]

>>6504195

You forgot to tip it, bro

[Anonymous No.6504208]

Because women don't have to worry about making a career after university since men will always look after them anyway.

[Anonymous No.6504211]

>>6504208
The virgins are out in full force today.
How many Good Boy Points do you get for striking a blow to the matriarchy on an American anime board?

[Anonymous No.6504215]

>>6504211
>implying he's wrong

[Anonymous No.6504219]

>>6504215
>implying he's right

[Anonymous No.6504222]

>>6504219
Female spotted

[Anonymous No.6504224]

>>6504177
What makes it false?

[Anonymous No.6504226]

>>6504195
I posted that, I'm a man, and I believe it. I can only speak from experience, but at every school I've been to, at every level, this was demonstrably the case. With guys there's a huge gap: the majority are barely literate, but there is a small concentration who are very intelligent and educated. Women, however, aren't as extreme. They're nearly all of around average intelligence and education, which puts them above the majority of men, who are just outright stupid and anti-intellectual, more concerned with sports, video games, drugs and making money than reading and learning.

[Anonymous No.6504229]

>>6504219
>implying a statement is able to be labeled as right or wrong

[Anonymous No.6504230]

>>6504222
Mate you've probably never been near a female in your life. How would you know what one looks like. The closest you've ever come was when your penis touched your mother's vag when she spawned you, and that's probably the closest you'll come to a women for years to come yet. Here's a thumbs up to your continued asperger's syndrome. I'm sorry there's no cure

[Anonymous No.6504240]

>>6504230
Says the male feminist. Every one of you cunts I've met IRL has been a beta of the highest order.

[Anonymous No.6504243]

i didnt expect much from /lit/ so its normal for /lit/ to believe STEM majors are jokes

[Anonymous No.6504245]

>>6504211
>>6504202
>>6504194
>british femanon
>posting this exact combination of posts verbatim on every single board in every single thread every time someone disagrees with you
>in a thread about women being bad in literature, proving you are completely unoriginal at writing
>posting on /soc/
>attention whoring on /mu/
>dressing like a basic bitch

lmao these are all you

https://archive.rebeccablacktech.com/mu/?task=search2&ghost=&search_filename=1424886761998&

>>>/mu/55610079
boards.4chan.org/mu/thread/55609484/alright-mu-lets-do-this#p55610243
>>>/mu/55610337

http://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/44600595/#44604038

https://fgts.jp/soc/thread/21715052/#21718574

https://archive.rebeccablacktech.com/mu/?task=search2&ghost=yes&search_filename=1411522640751

https://archive.rebeccablacktech.com/mu/?task=search2&ghost=yes&search_filename=1423823173723

get raped pleb

[Anonymous No.6504254]

>>6504211
>implying this isn't a Bhutanese make-shift mannequin mabolo

[Anonymous No.6504258]

>>6504245
patriarchy wins again

[Anonymous No.6504265]

>>6504245
She writes like the girl from Krautchan who sucked cock for a Michelin meal. But that might just be because they're both chav slags.

[Anonymous No.6504272]

>>6504240
I get dat pussy
I am better educated than you
I think we know who's winning, angry man

>>6504245
I am 4chan famoose

[Anonymous No.6504274]

Shit Op, shit responses. Probably more b8 conditioning.

[Anonymous No.6504275]

>>6504243
I hesitate to speak for everyone, but I assume most of us have respect for, say, physics or mathematics majors. Mechanical engineering is certainly a joke, though.

[Anonymous No.6504279]

>>6504245
I highly doubt that those are all the same person.
and this has gotta be one of the most annoying memes, if not the worst

[Anonymous No.6504282]

>>6504274
I'd say so. This board is half shit all the time

[Anonymous No.6504285]

[Anonymous No.6504287]

>>6504272
>I get dat pussy

Being pussywhipped by a single mother or some other damaged whore is hardly something to brag about you dickless faggot.

[Anonymous No.6504294]

>>6504245

What's that style? I'm fairly sure that's pretty much what my IRL waifu wears 99% of the time.

[Anonymous No.6504295]

>>6504279
It makes cucks like you angry though, so it's an efficient meme if an annoying one

[Anonymous No.6504298]

The split is more 40:60 men:women. On average, women both read more and play more video games. What those studies crop out is that most of that is recreational bullshit ala Game of Thrones/Angry Birds.
I wouldn't say that there are no well-read women there are certainly less than men.

[Anonymous No.6504304]

>>6504287
I do have a willy
And my parents are still married
Stop projecting, anon, or I'll tell your stepdad to cut off your Good Boy Point allowance :^)

[Anonymous No.6504308]

>>6504294
It was on a 'what do you wear' thread on /mu/ the other day

[Anonymous No.6504311]

Isn't it kind of misogynistic to accuse someone who criticizes women to be a virgin?
It almost implies that the only way to analyse women's behaviour is if you used their holes.
Should I let some guy fuck my boy pussy to be allowed to talk about other men?

[Anonymous No.6504316]

>>6504275
i dont know what university you went to but mec enginnering isn't a joke at mine unlike African Studies.

[Anonymous No.6504324]

>>6504311
No. It implies that you have ever spoken to, let alone touched a woman and so are in a position to make a reasoned judgment. Instead of just donning a fedora, surfing /r/atheist and then coming here crying because your mother doesn't love you so all women must be evil

[Anonymous No.6504333]

>>6504311
>Should I let some guy fuck my boy pussy to be allowed to talk about other men?
yes, your parents or your uncle should had explained this to you.

[Anonymous No.6504336]

What's with the /r9k/ brigade lately?

[Anonymous No.6504337]

Why do 95% of people getting English degrees not give a fuck about literature the second classes are out?

[Anonymous No.6504341]

>>6504324
How can someone make such a big non sequitur is beyond me.
First off, talking to women is not a sufficient condition to fuck them.

Second of all, basement dwellers don't even talk to other men or fuck them, yet I think they are still allowed to talk about other men.

You are literally( :^) ) reducing women to walking holes instead of normal people who can be criticized and talked about.

[Anonymous No.6504345]

>>6504174
>these days
Women always read a lot. In the 19th century the rich women who obviously couldn't go to work and had maids to do house work were the target market.

[Anonymous No.6504351]

>>6504341
>First off, talking to women is not a sufficient condition to fuck them

I didn't say it was

Furthermore, your privileged (:^)) needs to be checked, m80

[Anonymous No.6504356]

>>6504337
Because most of them are tumblrina's who want to teach English in some fuck-knows-where country where noone speaks it.

[Anonymous No.6504357]

>>6504230
Hey, not against you, but why do you people respond to misogyny with virgin-shaming? It's one of the facets of modern day "feminist" rhetoric, of shaming sexually inexperienced men, that really ruins it for me. I mean, it seems contradictory that slut-shaming is bad, but virgin-shaming is good since there's an assumption that virgins are that way because they don't respect women, when in fact it's most often due to a range of social/psychological issues. Conversely, there are many men who hate women who have tremendous sexual experience.

[Anonymous No.6504370]

>>6504345
And now the average woman is as privileged as a noblewoman from 100 years ago.

[Anonymous No.6504376]

>>6504311
I'd agree if this was another forum, but remember we're on 4chan

Virgin is often used as shorthand for 'misogynistic /r9k/ basement dweller mired in redpilled conspiracy theories and a supportive echobox for their delusion'

[Anonymous No.6504380]

>>6504370
And so is the average man.

[Anonymous No.6504391]

>>6504337
Because while reading is great, the bureaucracy and bullshittery that infests academia is exhausting and noxious

[Anonymous No.6504393]

>>6504357
From experience, if you hate women, you are one of the following:
-virgin
-homo
-woman
-ASPD
-molested as a child
That's all there is to it. Which one are you, /r9k/?

[Anonymous No.6504397]

>>6504357

Pretty much this >>6504376

I could make a well reasoned argument and I'm sozzles if it's crude (it is) and a retarded stereotype (it is). But this is 4chan, son. It's not exactly a competitive debate. I know that if I put time and effort into a response I'll just get:

>beta
>cuck
>faggot
>pussy whipped
>feminazi
>cunt

in riposte, so I don't bother anymore.

[Anonymous No.6504398]

Inclination to emotion.

[Anonymous No.6504400]

>>6504393
>women can't be criticized
Check your privilege, hole.

[Anonymous No.6504403]

>>6504398
Everyone is inclined to emotion you retard, what do you think? That men are like the terminator with a CPU inside or something?

[Anonymous No.6504404]

>>6504400
I don't thin you know how privilege works

CHECK'D
H
E
C
K
'
D

[Anonymous No.6504405]

>>6504393
>That's all there is to it.
kek, fuck this board; good for books but it's left /pol/.

[Anonymous No.6504410]

>>6504380
No, most men are still wage slaves.

[Anonymous No.6504413]

>>6504403
More inclined, amplified, more ready to act on them.
You knew that, faggot.

[Anonymous No.6504416]

>>6504410
so are women

[Anonymous No.6504421]

>>6504400
It doesn't make sense to "criticize" women because they're a GROUP, an abstract entity. I know many individual women but I have never met "women". Not only that, they're an extremely large group without a central will or volition, so it's idiotic to infer any kind of general agenda, collective behavior or whatever, just like you wouldn't do so for men.

On top of that, >>6504393 said "hate", not criticize.

[Anonymous No.6504425]

>>6504416
No, most women don't bother taking working-class positions and instead just leech off of men.

[Anonymous No.6504426]

>>6504413
No. All humans are 100% irrational and act on emotion all the time, save for mathematicians doing proofs. Shitty heuristics evolved from primates isn't "logic".

[Anonymous No.6504431]

>>6504425
Stop now. You just look like a silly billy :^)

[Anonymous No.6504438]

>>6504425
So you're implying that women take up skilled professions to leach off their underskilled partners? I mean, it's an interesting way of debating (it isn't, it's retarded) but I think we can discount your theory. Thanks for trying though

[Anonymous No.6504439]

>>6504421
It makes perfect sense to make inference about the average behaviour of large amounts of people, what are you talking about?
You are being deliberately obtuse if you can't figure out that when people say "women", they are not making a statement about every single woman on the planet, but most of the time on an average western women.

The average woman weights X. Am I not allowed to make such a statement? Is there something wrong with it?
Why can't I make inference on the behaviour of large groups of people who follow certain social rules?

[Anonymous No.6504448]

>>6504426
So how is it men have been the more predominant architect and artisan, and the less emotional, more 'hardened' in virtually all societies in history?

[Anonymous No.6504459]

>>6504439
>most of the time on an average western women

Bitch, are you honestly saying that one cuck getting 'friend-zoned' is a sufficient sample size for them to multiply out criticize women as a group. Do you even statistics

>Why can't I make inference on the behaviour of large groups of people who follow certain social rules

'social rules' doesn't factor into it, but you're obviously a pseud so we can ignore that part. The first part is just retard talk. You're saying that if a scantily clad baby gets raped that means that all scantily clad babies are whores who are asking for it.

Go back to Call of Duty, friend

[Anonymous No.6504460]

>>6504439
>average western women
There ia no such thing. I know Italian, French, German, American women but I have never met a single typically western woman in my life.

>the average woman weighs X
Oh, so because you can infer from averages on single-dimensional quantitative traits you can suddenly infer from "averaging" every trait ever?

[Anonymous No.6504467]

>>6504254
>not browsing the scottish druid cave network

[Anonymous No.6504468]

>>6504438
Women almost never settle with men who earn less than them, though.

[Anonymous No.6504471]

>>6504254
>>6504467
How come /lit/ is less funny than /sp/?

[Anonymous No.6504475]

>>6504468
Why do you think conjecture is a valid basis for argument? If you work at a gas station and hate it because your boss is a woman who earns more than you do just say so, anon.

[Anonymous No.6504478]

>>6504471
>implying

[Anonymous No.6504481]

>>6504448
Can you into reading comprehension? There is no such thing as "less emotional" because everyone is always very emotional all the time, ever. Your thoughts are emotions. The way you reason is driven by emotions. Every single act, every single thing you've ever thought of has been the product of your own emotions. Except, of course, if you have ASPD or are a mathematician doing a proof, in which case there are no emotions involved at all. But it's idiotic to draw any comparison about emotions or any distinction between "reason" (whatever that means) and emotions.

[Anonymous No.6504486]

>>6504468
Wrong
Every single woman I've dated was richer than me

[Anonymous No.6504492]

>>6504459
Nice ad hominem and strawmen, hole. Thanks for proving my point.

>>6504460
>There ia no such thing. I know Italian, French, German, American women but I have never met a single typically western woman in my life.
Nationality is a factor that could influence the output of a model, that doesn't mean a general trend is absent.

>Oh, so because you can infer from averages on single-dimensional quantitative traits you can suddenly infer from "averaging" every trait ever?
Strawmen.
I was talking about making inference about groups of people. How I make that inference is not the point.
You are just grasping at everything you can to convince me that I can't make a statement about a general trend in a specific group of people. Can you get any lower?

[Anonymous No.6504505]

>>6504481
All right, bad phrasing then, perhaps 'acting on emotions in a more short-sighted , less communally constructive way' would be better.

[Anonymous No.6504512]

>>6504492
Just because such trends exist doesn't mean you are pointing out the right ones. For instance most assumptions /r9k/tards make about "western women" ia blatantly false and only concern a tiny subset of American white upper-middle-class girls in their 20's but obviously these people never leave their basement and never travel, what with being American and all, so they think their sample represents all the group. There are many other such biases but I shouldn't expect /lit/ or /r9k/ to understand statistics.

[Anonymous No.6504519]

>>6504505
>short-sighted
In what regards
>less communally constructive
What does that mean

[Anonymous No.6504525]

>>6504492
Oh noooo, did the pseud get angry because he can't come up with a good argument. Abloo bloo bloo :'(

[Anonymous No.6504529]

>>6504492
>hole

Why are you calling everyone here 'hole'? Is it supposed to be an insult? It's not very insulting

[Anonymous No.6504537]

>>6504519
Well, assume I was playing devils advocate. There's still a lot to study.

[Anonymous No.6504540]

>>6504512
You are indeed allowed to point out problems about those inductive statements, I don't deny that.
Yes, they might be badly drawn inferences with shit samples.
Does this imply that it's impossible to infer a trend that is actually well supported by facts?

I don't think so.

>>6504525
Stop shitposting lad.

[Anonymous No.6504542]

>>6504529
Americans think that sexual objectification is a big deal because sex is baaaaaad. Puritan country built on native genocide and slavery, what did you expect

[Anonymous No.6504545]

>>6504529
It's kind of a meme insult tbh.

>>6504542
Jokes on you, I'm not a Yank.

[Anonymous No.6504549]

>>6504540
You are stating the obvious, I did statistics 101 too. What I'm aiming at is that your "facts" are actually bullshit, so your conclusion is too.

[Anonymous No.6504553]

>>6504167
Honestly, I'm glad its that way. If there were more dudes it'd be as if my classes were filled with /lit/izens, which I think we can all agree would be horrendous

[Anonymous No.6504559]

>>6504549
I haven't made a single statement about women in the thread, I just pointed out the really pathetic white knight trend to suppress any kind of criticism towards women by calling names.

[Anonymous No.6504560]

why is your brain 95% dumb?

[Anonymous No.6504567]

>>6504542
Do you not think there's anything wrong with sexual objectification?

[Anonymous No.6504574]

>>6504567
inb4 some dumbass things sexual objectification means being attracted to someone

[Anonymous No.6504584]

>>6504553
this. i take art history and it is also 95% women. it's easier to learn in that kind of environment when you don't have pseuds trying to question everything because they have a chip on their shoulder, rather than having a genuine interest in the answer

[Anonymous No.6504589]

>>6504567
If I'm only having casual sex with someone, I don't know them much other than their being attractive, so no I don't see what's wrong with objectifying them. Depends on what you call objectification though, I'm obviously not talking about American dominant-wannabe insecurely aggressive "pump-and-dump" frat behavior.

[Anonymous No.6504630]

Y'know, guys. We could call an end to hostilities here and just talk about our feels instead.

>tfw studying for exams
>tfw done no where near enough work because I'm always tired
>tfw eating horrible ready meal tonight
>tfw I'll meme myself to sleep
>tfw need to shower but cba

[Anonymous No.6504647]

>>6504630
are you me?

do you also have a headache?

[Anonymous No.6504656]

>>6504647
Where are you, my negro? What do you study?

I've taken a bunch of caffeine tablets because I don't drink coffee or w/e so I feel woozy rather than headachey atm. Drink dem fluids!!

[Anonymous No.6504694]

>>6504656
> Spain , Madrid. Physiotherapy not even sure its my passion but I like the freedom it could give me to do the fuck Í would want with a minimalist way of life.

22 but i´m finishing my first year of uni ,had a shady path from high school to here. Wise enough to not lose my time in shit , but lacking the energy of my youger peers.

and you?

[Anonymous No.6504697]

>>6504656

sorry for bad the grammer if I fuck something while I write my story i´m trying to fix that

[Anonymous No.6504712]

>>6504630
That feel man.

>barely sleep anymore
>exams left and right
>cluster headaches again
>nothing helps
>coke helps
>can't do coke all the time
>pain fucks me up

[Anonymous No.6504730]

>>6504230
Is that you? Do you dress like that regularly?

[Anonymous No.6504734]

>>6504712
not OP but would I be a retard to think MDMA might work in exam periods. It's a stimulant and keeps you up but would it make me alert or just awake but unfocused? :/ Also, sorry to hear about your feels, bro

[Anonymous No.6504739]

>>6504734
Yes, you would be a retard to think that.
Not even the short term effects of MDMA would be of particular use to you during exams given the nature of them; furthermore they way you will be left feeling afterwards will just make it way harder for you to continue studying.

[Anonymous No.6504743]

>>6504167

[Anonymous No.6504746]

>>6504734
I honestly wouldn't recommend it at all, MDMA seems the wrong drug for studying altogether.
Something like methylphenidate would be best, I think. But generally I dislike learning on drugs.

[Anonymous No.6504750]

>>6504739
>>6504746

What do? I can't afford coke and I'm so tired all the time I can't study :/

[Anonymous No.6504751]

>>6504421
>It doesn't make sense to "criticize" nazi because they're a GROUP [...].

[Anonymous No.6504756]

>>6504730
>>6504743
>>6504751

You bitches are late. This is a feels - increasingly an exam feels it seems- thread and nothing more

[Anonymous No.6504768]

>>6504750
Isn't there something like Ritalin wherever you live? That's not too expensive around here and most of my med and law studying friends use it.
Coke is shit for learning too, anyway. You'd have to take way too much.

[Anonymous No.6504773]

>>6504768
Britbong here, studying law too. My man only does coke, MDMA and weed. I've asked around for Ritalin before because I heard it does wonders but have never found any. I'm guessing it's not really a think you can buy online outside of the deep web

[Anonymous No.6504778]

>>6504773
I don't think so, no. I have a friend who got Ritalin from his doc (cause he needed it as a kid, had some sorta attention span BS going on) and he sells it around the campus.
Apart from that, no idea where you'd buy it normally, I assumed a good dealer might just have it.

[Anonymous No.6504793]

>>6504167


I'm studying french literature in University (I'm Quebecer), and it's the same thing here ; girls make up maybe 90% of studients in my programme. That is a little bit annoying, because we cannot have the same kind of discution with girls than with other males. And because there are a bunch of girls, many guys don't wanna study in this domain : they probably think that it's a domain for girl and fagget (and it's not false in reality).

PS : but the worst thing ; I don't have fucked yet one girl in my course lol.... fucking loser....

[Anonymous No.6504797]

>female /lit/ isn't dank enough on its own so universities are now subject to quota
topcuck
women,not even once

[Anonymous No.6504813]

>not saging this kind of shit
Horrible.

[Anonymous No.6504970]

>>6504813
>announcing you're saging

that's a paddling

[Anonymous No.6505028]

>>6504416
As long as the woman isn't a fat slob she can always find a man to provide for her. Even the fat slobs can usually find a man.

[Anonymous No.6505067]

>>6504169
Then women bitch about "unequal pay" because they got worthless degrees while men went off to have actually productive careers.

[Anonymous No.6505086]

>>6505028
>>6505067

>there are people browsing /lit/ who have never studied economics