[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 10 KB, 222x400, 21480930.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6500836 No.6500836 [Reply] [Original]

What do you think, /lit/-san?

>> No.6501221

>>6500836
read it in a couple days. it was fun

>> No.6501238

reposting what I posted in the other thread

Slow build
Muddled climax
Ran out of steam at the end

Great conceptually, I'm going to watch the movie sometime soon, hopefully it will be paced better

>> No.6501253

>that guy on the front cover

What's his name again?

>> No.6501268

>>6501253
Mat Demon

>> No.6501512

ayy lmao he has my exact name. Nick Dunne. So weird when I saw that shit in theatres.

>> No.6501552

Fun read, but it peaks at the reveal.

>> No.6502082

>>6500836
dunno about the novel, but the film is far too full of clichés and the direction is bad

>> No.6502117

The movie was well-directed and acted, but the plot was stupid page-turner shit. So I'm going to guess the book is shit.

>> No.6502138

>>6502117
How is being a page-turner a negative? If a book is exciting or gripping to read, how is that bad? You people have such fucking nonsensical criticisms.

>> No.6502146

>>6501512
Nick? What are you doing on here?

>> No.6502150

>>6502138
You're kidding, right?

>> No.6502184
File: 2.00 MB, 300x300, 1430421928336.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6502184

>>6502138

>> No.6502222

Thanks, guys. Gon' get this.