[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 111 KB, 500x540, tumblr_ljdnn1v2kw1qdo62to1_500.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6462048 No.6462048 [Reply] [Original]

Are leatherbound books with atrocious covers like these the fedora of books?

>> No.6462055

>>6462048
pretty fuckin gross

i hate most book covers though

>> No.6462059

They are teh X-Box One of Books.

>> No.6462060

>what are wordsworth classics

>> No.6462065

>>6462060
They are the Ouya of books

>> No.6462071

>>6462048
There are like 60 in that series. I would say that 5 - 10 look great. Rest are too gaudy

>> No.6462076
File: 1.31 MB, 1700x2338, ivanoh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6462076

>>6462048
This d-d-dont count right, guys?

>> No.6462080

>>6462048
Only if you read them in public

>> No.6462123
File: 244 KB, 800x571, Penguin-Classics-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6462123

>>6462076
I think OP is only referring to Barnes & Noble leatherbounds, they have tacky ass covers.

Penguin clothbound Classics are really nice.

>> No.6462130

>>6462080
I don't think I could look at a bookshelf with those things on them without retching.

>> No.6462168

>>6462123
they are pretty gross as well

>> No.6462175

I don't understand why some people are so picky about covers. It's the content of the book that matters and the BN leather bounds have typos and problems with printing. Why not bitch over that? It seems to be much more of a problem in my opinion than the cover.

>> No.6462178

>>6462175
because they look disgusting

>> No.6462193

>>6462175
most people on /lit/ don't get far past the cover

>> No.6462205
File: 101 KB, 264x399, mobydick.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6462205

>>6462168
Your opinion is wrong.

>> No.6462258

>>6462205
vomit

>> No.6462264

>>6462123
flipping through these i found the binding to be super stiff and annoying

>> No.6462267

>>6462264
can confirm

i have the huckleberry finn edition

you basically have to tear open the spine to make it somewhat loose

also there was a 50+ page introduction that just added unnecessary bulk to it

>> No.6462268

>>6462258
fite me fgt

>> No.6462284

>>6462048
I like the kitsch.

>>6462123
These, on the other hand, look like really bad wallpaper.

>> No.6462383

>>6462048
well, i think theyre pretty...

>> No.6462437
File: 19 KB, 410x410, muh minimalism.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6462437

>>6462048

>> No.6462773

>>6462048
If you think they look good and you like the content of the book, there is nothing fedora about buying something you like, for your own sake.

>> No.6462866

>>6462267
There was a 50+ page introduction that just added unnecessary bulk to it.

That's Penguin Classics in a nutshell. Granted, some books benefit from some additional piece of context, but every single one has a foreword, biography, analysis, and appendices. I've seen books are are twice the length of the actual work.

>> No.6462997

I like the gold pages, fuck you op

>> No.6463000

>>6462866
That's what I love about Penguins and similar editions. I read every word of the front and back matter.

>> No.6463012
File: 136 KB, 578x434, the-great-gatsby.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6463012

I like Alma Classics the best.

>> No.6463184

>>6462048
There are some that aren't awful. I read Dorian Gray, and have a bunch actually. They're usually anthologies, which makes it easy to read most of their works.


I don't see why it matters unless its a translated work. Its just a fucking book. i'm just trying to read nigger. do you also think ebooks are autistic? I just want to read fucking books so eat shit

>> No.6463229

>>6463184
If you only cared about the contents you wouldn't spend $10 extra for a big gaudy monstrosity. Visit your local thrift store once in a while and stop being a pleb.

>> No.6463241

>>6463229
>visit your local thrift store
>implying that there aren't only James Patterson/romance novels crowding the shelves.

Have you been to a thrift store? People aren't donating the collected works of Oscar Wilde

>> No.6463266

>>6463241
Use Amazon Marketplace or Abebooks or something then.

>> No.6463315

>>6463266
who cares. its just a book. Its not like they're bastardizing a classic(sans translations)

theyre probably meant to be decoration, but they actually do have well collected content if English. I dont need 30000000 books, im just trying to read and if these books have a ton of shit im gonna read, i'll buy it. itll probably last awhile, gaudy or not

>> No.6463333

>THE ONLY LIT-ACCEPTED COVER
YOU CAN'T EVEN TELL WHAT THE BOOK IS UNTIL YOU OPEN IT

>> No.6463344

>>6463333
Or is a photo of some clouds with big yellow letters

>> No.6463617

These B&N books have like 4 threads right now on, /lit/.

just fucking buy them and enjoy them. who gives a fuck if some anons don't like them. it's your money spend it however you fucking please.

>> No.6463637
File: 750 KB, 1920x1080, PIC_0681.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6463637

DOPE ASS COVERS COMING THROUGH

BEEP BEEP MOTHER FUCKER

>> No.6463641
File: 273 KB, 320x240, 1428119800927.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6463641

>>6463333
quads confirmed. keep it moving

>> No.6463642
File: 566 KB, 1920x1080, PIC_0663.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6463642

>>6463617
SHUT THE FUCK UP BITCH

>> No.6463649
File: 40 KB, 350x568, Ubik(1stEd).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6463649

>>6462437
I like these covers
pic related is a cooler style tho

>> No.6463651

Absolutely. Mostly because it's pretention via anachronistic posturing. It also looks overdone. Just absolutely stupid looking.

>> No.6463653

>>6463637
>>6463642
these are both really boring
not cool at all sorry

>> No.6463662

>>6462048
I thought Dorian Gray was a novella, how did they fit it into that big thing

>> No.6463677 [DELETED] 
File: 736 KB, 1920x1080, PIC_0683.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6463677

>>6463653
FUCK YOU CUNT BITCH

>> No.6463731
File: 1.02 MB, 1520x2688, 1430160860601391244263.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6463731

Gaudy or not, this book has all of Shakespeare's writings for $20 dollars. These editions are just really good deals most of the time

>> No.6463739

>>6463731
that's a terrible deal and it probably has terrible formatting and other issues

>> No.6463744

>>6463731
The RSC Shakespeare (paperback) contains his complete works, superior analysis and annotations, doesn't look like shit, and costs £13.59 on Amazon.

>> No.6464363

>>6462123
Those would make good patterns for diapers.

>> No.6464396

CHOCOLATE BAR WRAPPER COVERS

>> No.6464409

The format and font they use just drives me crazy.

>> No.6464416

>>6462123
are we picking out wallpapers or books?

>> No.6464717

>>6463731
>crucifix

Kill yourself.

>> No.6465214

>>6463731
but it's like a reprinting of terrible public domain stuff. you can find a complete shakespeare that's way better in any good used book store for under 20$ that probably has annotations, commentary, a better text, better formatting, and doesn't look like shit

>> No.6465937

>>6463344
kek

>> No.6465944

>>6463731
looks like a bible

>> No.6465949

Say what you want about the cover, but 6 plato dialogues for 5 dollars was a fine deal.

>> No.6465957

>>6465949
http://www.amazon.com/Plato-Complete-Works/dp/0872203492

Get them all for a decent price.

>> No.6465984

>>6464717
Irony?

>> No.6465991

>>6462048
>Literally judging a book by it's cover

>> No.6466034

>>6465991
It sounds dumb but if there are multiple versions that are all in the same price range, and all other things are equal, I don't see anything wrong with shopping around for the best cover.

>> No.6466094

>>6466034
Of course. I just had to go for the stupid pun.
Content is most important, but I certainly have as the next qualifier what it will look like in my library.

>> No.6466100

>>6465991
>it's