[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 60 KB, 498x674, Peter_Kropotkin_circa_1900.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6404328 No.6404328 [Reply] [Original]

any of you guys anarchists?

>> No.6404331

>>6404328
Ye

Kropotkin a best

>> No.6404332

>>6404328
No, I love the state.

>> No.6404334
File: 262 KB, 964x453, leo785645338.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6404334

Are you? Maybe you can explain Christian Anarchism to me so I can understand and then laugh at this picture? I like to laugh.

>> No.6404335

>>6404328
When I was an edgy 15 year old..

>> No.6404344

>>6404334

Christian anarchism is the answer.

>> No.6404448

>>6404344
Yeah, the only one, so I've heard.

>> No.6404460

>>6404328
Marxism is this board's official ideology.

>> No.6404471

>>6404460
After the influx of /pol/ and /r9k/-faggots its ideology is 'le red pill meme ideology'

>> No.6404480
File: 56 KB, 850x400, trublewitlibs.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6404480

>>6404460
How about no?

>> No.6404488
File: 284 KB, 847x894, Lenin.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6404488

>>6404480
>implying marxism is always liberal

>> No.6404490

>>6404480
>Marxism
>liberalism

>> No.6404491

>>6404471
cool meme

>> No.6404494

>>6404491
back 2 tumblr, you reddit tumblrina feminazi liberal cuck

>> No.6404576

Was Mao Zedong a closet anarchist? the cultural revolution was pretty much anarchism. The biographies I have read have indicated he was more influenced and read anarchism before communism.

>> No.6404721

I think in the distant future some sort of Communistic Anarchy would be the best system

>> No.6404742
File: 66 KB, 850x400, filthyreds.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6404742

>>6404488
>>6404490
sorry wrong pic

>> No.6404801

>>6404480
>>6404742
Are you capable of autonomous thought or do you just regurgitate Reagan quotes?

>> No.6404835

trip fag named Foucault is an anarchist.

>> No.6404850

>>6404480
I love how americans are so retarded and stuck inside right wing politics they use liberal as a term for leftist


Also, yes OP, I am a anarchist, but I have some left-marxist tendencies. I guess they aren't that different, since both are childish diseases

>> No.6405126

>>6404328
Yes

>>6404335
You couldn't have understood it properly at 15.

>>6404344
A willfully atrophied mind will only make you slaves to the 15-year-old mentality who will yolk you all over again.

>>6404835
Cool.

>>6404850
It's as left as we're allowed to think, officially. It's a sad state of affairs.

>> No.6405139

>>6405126
>yolk

>> No.6405140

>>6405126
Where can I go to better understand it as a political ideology?

I do not understand the concept "monopoly on violence" usually when I ask really what would change when the power vacuum from the state would let other large "gangs" in, they just say that its the same as we have now which doesn't answer my question.

>> No.6405176
File: 25 KB, 400x300, 00.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6405176

>>6405139
>Yoke

XD

>>6405140
As I understand it, it can't happen overnight. Even decentrilizing the government in this generation should be done carefully. I haven't put my mind to it enough, but it can only be reached through stages .

>> No.6405179

>>6405176
>decentralizing

>> No.6405184

>>6405140
Well, anarchists aren't eager to form closed systems of thought, but I believe that only self-responsibility and peer-regulation (as in, everyone keeps everyone in check) are the best ways to allow the "power vacuum" to remain a vacuum

>> No.6405230

>>6404328
Because anarchists are a bunch of weenies. All bark and no bite, their whole ideology is based on "I dont like it so ill run away from it"

>> No.6405257

>>6405230
>"I dont like it so ill run away from it"
My gradual acceptance of it came more as "I see what is wrong in the world and this is the the best way to live"

Capitalism as a game is sick and no, I don't want to play it anymore. But I am sentenced to life in this prison because weasels and no-nothings will make sure we play till we all choke and die.

>> No.6405337

>>6404328
Anarchism would only work if everyone was an anarchist, any large groups that aren't would turn into some flavour of totalitarianism

>> No.6405353

>>6404328
Yes I own that property.

Post-left anarchy though, leftist anarchy is spooky as fuck

>>6405230
No anon, that's your reaction to our nihilism and bare-knuckled reality

>>6405337
>implying anarchists give a shit about "what works"

>> No.6405357

Proudhon is the only sensible anarchist.

>> No.6405359

>>6405257
Capitalism is only sick if you're fucking retarded and believe all the nominalistic descriptions. It functions super well for its actual purpose

>> No.6405361

>individualist anarchists
>post left anarchists
>stirner anarchists
>insurrectionists

Gross.

Left-Heideggerean syndicalism is where it's at.

>> No.6405365

>>6405357
>not Stirner

Stirner is the only consistent and reasonable protoanarchist

>> No.6405370

>>6405361
>implying I value your sense of grossness

>> No.6405396

>>6405361
>syndicalism

How many spooks do you have to accept to begin that belief?

>> No.6405405
File: 258 KB, 1210x1796, Gates of Freedom - Delamotte.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6405405

>> No.6405414

>>6405396
quite a few

>> No.6405424

A just and righteous state can only arise from anarchy.

>> No.6405426

>>6405179
Lrnhow2edit

>> No.6405870

>>6405424
But to become the anarchist, one must first become the monarch

>> No.6405934

No, one must search for solutions to liberalism without simply being liberalism in hysterics, nor is it a duty or principle to uphold the inviolable rights of those who find themselves felicitously appointed to allocate resources. I trust them to make mistakes without religiously reminding them how to improve their role.

>> No.6406020

>>6405126
>willfully atrophied mind
>she doesnt praise the One True Righteous King daily

>> No.6407112

>>6404328
No but I often lean anti-statist.

By that I mean I don't think abolishing government as a whole would work and I'm not interested in whether or not it would. My philosophy is individualist in that it doesn't give a damn what the majority of people do, and in fact would fail if the majority of people could and did follow it (think about Nietzsche with regard to being individualist).

So yeah, I dislike the huge amount of power the state has, and think that, all things being equal, an act contrary to the law is in no way worse, and may even be a bit better.