[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 1.49 MB, 2048x1536, 1417314319204.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6392406 No.6392406 [Reply] [Original]

Which row was the zenith of philosophy?

>> No.6392416
File: 9 KB, 185x180, 1426615144659.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6392416

>>6392406
Epicurus

>> No.6392417
File: 16 KB, 342x423, 1395823478598.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6392417

>no Frege
>no Moore
>no Ayer
>no Popper
>no Carnap
>no Kripke
>no Searle
>no Chalmers
What a PoC list.

>> No.6392420

DEFINE "ZENITH OF PHILOSOPHY".

>> No.6392421

Third from the bottom.

>> No.6392424
File: 1.25 MB, 2048x1536, 3535353657.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6392424

The final

>> No.6392426
File: 18 KB, 676x344, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6392426

>>6392420

>> No.6392431

>>6392424
Why would he be included? What great discoveries of knowledge has he made?

>> No.6392432

>>6392426

DEFINE "ZENITH OF PHILOSOPHY", NOT "ZENITH".

>> No.6392433

>>6392420
>>6392426
The most accomplished, well-known philosophers/philosophy?

>> No.6392436

bottom two

>> No.6392440

>>6392431

PHILOSOPHY IS NOT ABOUT "MAKING DISCOVERIES", MORON; IT IS ABOUT THE INTELLECTUAL DIALECTIC TOWARD "TRUTH".

>> No.6392442

>>6392406
who removed camus

>> No.6392443

>>6392416
Even the Stoics were superior to Epicurus.

>> No.6392446

because he is the most recent philosopher discussed on /lit/ and because Im slightly autistic and can't stand the one missing space

>> No.6392449

>>6392440
LMAO NO IT'S NOT RETARD

>> No.6392450

>>6392440

>truth

read more

>> No.6392452

>>6392440
No it is not. It is about knowledge. Read less Hegel, his erroneous views, used solely to justify his lack of actual accomplishments, have corrupted your mind.

>> No.6392453

Socrates honestly beats them all, his socratic method is probably the single greatest thing philosophy as a whole has ever contributed, even though it makes you look like an asshole when you use it all the time.

>> No.6392454

>>6392442
He wasn't a philosopher, he was just a writer.

>> No.6392458

>>6392406
>>6392424
Third row from the bottom

>> No.6392459

>>6392442
Please tell me his accomplishments and contributions to philosophy. Am I missing something?

>> No.6392461

>>6392406
The row with all the Indian and Tibetan Buddhists.

>> No.6392462

>>6392459
Uh, Absurdism, maybe, you twit.

>> No.6392471

>>6392452

YOU ARE PRESUPPOSING THAT KNOWLEDGE IS SOMETHING "READYMADE", WAITING TO BE APPREHENDED; YOU ARE MISTAKEN.

HOW DO THINK THAT ONE COMES TO KNOWING SOMETHING; ANYTHING AT ALL? KNOWLEDGE IS A PRODUCT OF THE DIALECTICAL PROCESS —KNOWLEDGE IS NOT AN END IN ITSELF; KNOWLEDGE IS SUBORDINATED TO "TRUTH".

>> No.6392474

If we're being honest...the first row

>> No.6392481

>>6392471
As I said, stop reading Hegel and start with the Greeks.

>> No.6392482

>>6392459
Who added Hayek?

Add Stirner and Arendt, I say.

>> No.6392503

>>6392452
> lack of accomplishment
> being one of the most studied and influential philosophers of the last 200 centuries

Stop taking your community college professor's word for everything.

>> No.6392507

>>6392503
That's not an accomplishment, that just shows how dogmatic his followers are. Tell me, what did Hegel discover that was so ground breaking?

>> No.6392528

>>6392507
>Tell me, what did Hegel discover that was so ground breaking?

see

>>6392440

>> No.6392549
File: 251 KB, 800x1067, 3453.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6392549

Only objective answer in the eyes of god is the second row. Why do you even have to ask this?

>> No.6392552
File: 27 KB, 544x468, 1428362709447.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6392552

>>6392549

>> No.6392554

>>6392528
Yep, you're retarded.

>> No.6392556

>>6392507
Dogmatic? That's just babble. There are about as many dogmatic Hegelians as there are dogmatic Platonists. Just like no one really repeats Plato but his influence is everywhere, few people just repeat Hegel.

As for what he "discovered", you sound like one of those over-reaching STEM fags.

>> No.6392590

>>6392406

Why would you ever shoehorn Thoureau, that piddling fuck wad in with arguably the greatest minds of the age?

He was a fucking hack and anyone who doesn't realize it needs to be chemically castrated.

>> No.6392624

>>6392406
Can someone edit Aristotle scratching records? That hand is perfect.

>> No.6392628

>>6392406
second row. you got zeno, jesus, augustine, and aquinas. hard to top that.

>> No.6392633

tim mitchell, charles taylor, lila abu-lughod

the rest are sublimated into me like all 500 pounds of hegel

>> No.6392641

>>6392406
The 3rd or the 5th. The german idealists might be my favorite, but the Hegel row disgusting things like Marx, Newton and Diderot.

>> No.6392644

>>6392482
He's been there since the start. I can ask what kind of idiot added Marcuse instead of Adorno, but ain't complaining am I.

>> No.6392673

the middle

>> No.6392680
File: 1.55 MB, 2540x1905, final boss of philosophy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6392680

>> No.6392691
File: 20 KB, 407x355, 1426622572113.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6392691

IF Wittenburgstien ISN'T IN YOUR TOP ONE ON YOUR PHILOSOPHERS LIST, STOP POSTING ON /LIT/.

>> No.6392696

>>6392424
>no stirner

>> No.6392724

>>6392406
it starts kinda low and goes downhill from there

>> No.6392742

herbert spencer?

isn't that supposed to be mill?

>> No.6392747

>>6392424
I feel like Chomsky should be on there but I guess he's not a philosopher in the strict sense of the term

>> No.6392752

>>6392406

>no zizek

dropped.

>> No.6392776

>>6392406
Rows 0 and 8

>> No.6392929

>>6392406
What about Camus?

>> No.6392934

>>6392440
>THE INTELLECTUAL DIALECTIC TOWARD "TRUTH".
holy shit. I used to think you were smart, REI.

you're as stupid the rest of them

>> No.6392947

>>6392416
Looks like the porn star Dave Cross

>> No.6392972

>>6392417
there is not one person of color on that list

>> No.6392975

>>6392972
middle easterns are not people of color btw

>> No.6393825

>>6392431
He's a dank meme.

>> No.6393834

>>6392975
Everyone is a person of color except for Swedes, Germans, and Dutch. t. /int/

>> No.6393838

>>6392975
People of colour = not white
Arabs = not white

>> No.6393849

>>6392556
>There are about as many dogmatic Hegelians as there are dogmatic Platonists

This is b8 right?

>> No.6393853

>>6392406

Last two

>> No.6393869

>>6393849
No, it's obviously true. No one - not Zizek, not Pippin, not Pinkard, etc, just repeats stuff Hegel said. They're all obviously Hegelians, but their vocabulary is very different and they all have different end goals from Hegel himself. Again, it's just like there are tons of Platonists running around, but no one thinks we need to divide people into bronze, silver, and gold, or that a demiurge created the world, etc.

>> No.6393882

>>6393869
I have never read any contemporary or recent philosopher even come close to espousing something like the world of forms, or any other Plato tidbit and yet, the Hegelian teleology rears it's head all the time.

>> No.6393889

Can MARCUSE be the BELARUSE of /lit/?

>> No.6394437

>>6392440
Read Nietzsche

>> No.6394447

German idealism is the epitome of human knowledge, in all fields.