[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 819 KB, 1920x1080, 1428414861836.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6370453 No.6370453 [Reply] [Original]

Hey /lit/, /mu/ here.

A lot of people here seem to believe that literature is art. And while I don't disagree completely with that notion, I'm not completely convinced that this is true.

Part of what makes music an art is that there's experimentation and innovation happening all the time.

What are some examples of experimentation in lit? Are there?

>pic related, a very experimental album

>> No.6370463

The point of [good] literature is to transmit ideas, the innovation is contingent to it.

>> No.6370467

The Dictionary of /mu/

Art
ɑːt/
noun
Something with experimentation and innovation happening all the time.

>> No.6370479

>Part of what makes music an art is that there's experimentation and innovation happening all the time.

My girlfriend and I have been experimenting all the time with innovative new ways to stimulate my prostate while on meth. Good to know that /mu/ thinks we're making art.

>> No.6370487

Gothic literature is the answer you're looking for.

>> No.6370488
File: 181 KB, 750x550, stophibari-kun .jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6370488

Literature enters in what's called "narrative arts" and it has only been considered an art (instead of a craft) in the last 100 years or so. You could consider that the impact that a story can generate while being a simple construction fulfills the requirements that early aesthetes demanded in art (Walter Benjamin called it the "aura" of a work, the relationship between the emotional power and the material simplicity of the object), but it has a lot to do with validating cinema as an art by allowing narratives to be more than crafts.
There's a lot of experimentation in literature if you're looking for that. It would be hard to find any /lit/ required reading that isn't pushing the boundaries of the medium or its context. Usually the most standardized stuff is tied to genre, and that's a tiny amount of all literary production. If you have particular interests we can guide you thorugh recommended reading, but you have to consider than reading a book is more time consuming than listening to one or two or twenty albums.

>Part of what makes music an art is that there's experimentation and innovation happening all the time.
That's a very poor interpretation of what makes art. Experimentation could be what makes something a science if you want.

Hope I could help, /lit/ is a bit shitty around this time of the year. Try not to judge us for this experience.

>> No.6370490

>>6370467
This is precisely why I stopped browsing that shithoe.

>> No.6370494

>>6370453
Go look up Finnegans Wake by James Joyce and tell me experimental lit doesn't exist

>> No.6370498

>>6370453

> What are some examples of experimentation in lit? Are there?

Finnegans Wake, The Recognitions, Umbrella, V., Gravity's Rainbow, The Sound and the Fury, the poetry of: Ezra Pound, Wallace Stevens, John Ashbery, John Keats, Lord Byron, ...

Were all considered a bit radical for their time. But all great literature has been, in some way, "experimental", using the retarded blanket terms used over on /mu/. Transgressive, Innovative, etc.

Haven't you read some books in high school by now?

>pic related, a very experimental album

babby's first visit to RYM?

>> No.6370505
File: 102 KB, 530x663, Stevie-Ray-Vaughan-stevie-ray-vaughan-35307461-530-663.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6370505

What is the Stevie Ray Vaughan of literature?

>> No.6370518

>>6370463
>>6370487
>>6370488
>>6370494
>>6370498
Thanks guys, I have skim read these posts and look forward to absorping them fully later today when I have more time.

>> No.6370525

>it's art if you're constantly experimenting
TOP KEK
O
P

K
E
K

>> No.6370528

>>6370518

You're going to need more than "today" for Finnegans Wake. More like a few months, a few pages a day, and half a dozen supplementary books (annotations, lexicons for Gaeilge/Latin/French/German/Whatever else you're illiterate in, a few essaybooks to understand it better in a modern context, etc.)

I'm currently about 200 pages into my copy, and I'm loving it, but it actually requires some time if you want to get anything out of it.

>> No.6370531

>>6370490
Let's be real here, every board has shit opinions as soon as they try to talk about "art".

>> No.6370533

>>6370528
Hm. Sounds a lot like De-Loused In The Comatorium by The Mars Volta.

>> No.6370534
File: 33 KB, 267x320, spuck.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6370534

>>6370531

Art... is a beautiful flower -- that smells bad.

>> No.6370537

>>6370505
Someone who writes cheery, joyus stories that occasionally reflect on the darker side of life by having a character go through a heartache.

>> No.6370538

>>6370534
Point in case.

>> No.6370539

>>6370533

So you're saying you have terrible taste in music as well?

>> No.6370544

>>6370528
Reading the plot summary on Wikipedia as we speak. Much easier and less time consuming than all the effort you went through.

>> No.6370547
File: 43 KB, 780x520, 1426187132998.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6370547

>>6370544

>> No.6370548

>>6370544
Touché.

>> No.6370550

>tago mago
>very experimental
>slightly weird psych rock album released during the same time period free improvisation began
Jeez

>> No.6370559

>>6370544
Jesus dude.

>> No.6370562

>>6370550
Not to even count the serialism and atonality of classical music that happened decades before that.

>> No.6370564

>>6370550

> free improvisation
> very experimental
> slightly weird instruments doing weird things during the same time Ferneyhough and Hübler were composing
Jeez

>> No.6370572

>>6370559
now I've finished the book I'm reading amazon to find out what I think about it.

>> No.6370579

>>6370564
Non-classical music is always decades behind classical music.

>> No.6370580

I really love this attitude of
>only what I want can be experimental
and
>it's not experimental enough
really mature, not adolescent and desperate for validation at all. I'm sure all great thinkers were like that instead of accepting all interesting variations that came.

>> No.6370584

>>6370580
this is what happens when you let /mu/ in, namedropping and trying to one up things that don't have a scale and shouldn't have one.

>> No.6370586

>>6370528
Sorry, but this was an impenetrable mess. For academics only. I have a Master';s degree and several hours of advanced study beyond, and I am no slouch in the brains department, so I'm told, but this thing...The layers of meaning hinge so critically on classical studies and extensive knowledge of classical languages that I was reduced to a bystander musing at a babbling rant. Can't decide whether to reevaluate Joyce's genius, feel duped by an incredible literary joke, or write the whole thing off as pompous pretense. Probably just not the book for me.

>> No.6370589

>>6370518
>Hey, guys what authors should I namedrop so girls see me as an autistic poet when I'm out partying

Looks like /mu/ is in the house

>> No.6370590

>>6370579

The point is that it's retarded to compare things based on "amount of experimentialityness" or whatever /mu/ does these days

>> No.6370606

>>6370590
/mu/ is a shithole, but if you take any discussion here on 4chan seriously there's something wrong with you. If I wanted to discuss things I'll do it at my university.

>> No.6370612

>>6370606
>joke's on them
>I was just being retarded on purpose

>> No.6370613

>>6370584
because /lit/'s obsession with one upping each other with "difficult" pomo and modernist crap isn't at all pointless namedropping. it's serious

>> No.6370617

>>6370453
Everything wrong with /mu/ in one post.

Mutants are literally pure cancer.

>> No.6370620

>>6370606
4chan is nothing but the sum of all anons posting here, if you take it seriously and discuss things in it like an adult, then the website itself would be serious.

>> No.6370627

>>6370620
Unfortunately we both know that's not going to be the case.

>> No.6370635

>>6370620
Truth.
>>6370613
>>6370627
Nothing worse than a naive cynicism.

>> No.6370640

What board is the most populated by philistines?

>> No.6370644

>itt: /lit/ thinks they're not as shit as /mu/
kek

>> No.6370659

>>6370644
>implying /mu/ didn't flood /lit/ half a year ago
>implying /lit/ in its essence isn't a wise and cosy place free of judgement

>> No.6370690

>>6370564
>Ferneyhough and Hübler
>very experimental
>regular instruments sounding like they're being simultaneously tuned during the same time I recorded myself farting the melodies of ancient Eastern throat singers
Jeez

>> No.6370697

>>6370690

> Eastern butthole singing
> very experimental
> something that actually makes sound during the same time I've put out my ears and cut out the portion of my brain responsible for auditory function
Jeez

>> No.6370795

>>6370531
>>6370534
yeah, but /mu/ lacks any self awareness in this regard. especially /Classical/.

>> No.6370804

>>6370659
Wasn't*

>> No.6371077

>>6370635
>Nothing worse than a naive cynicism.
very true. it's like trying to talk with an edgy teen who doesn't realize that while he's misinterpreting nihilism his peers are accomplishing things.