[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 129 KB, 600x812, 1421066875363.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6357470 No.6357470 [Reply] [Original]

What are the best books for social dominance?

Books like 48 Laws of Power and generally books about managing people.

>> No.6357485

>>6357470
what is this picture trying to tell me?

>> No.6357501

>>6357485
>Social media companies (or any big business) doesn't respect you/is fucking you like JAV whore
Green, green social commentary
>>6357470
The True Believer

>> No.6357503

>>6357485
Net hate?

>> No.6357504
File: 876 KB, 1066x1500, 1_large.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6357504

>>6357485
Smartphones are phallic metaphors

>> No.6357510

>>6357504
No social media is the phallus. Girls spend their time on it, not only because they strife for dick, but because it leaves them the same sensations that dick brings them.

>> No.6357516

>>6357504
ty Siggy

>> No.6357518

>>6357510
>because it leaves them the same sensations that dick brings them.
Validation

Yes, this anon gets it

>> No.6357524
File: 32 KB, 800x667, slide17a.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6357524

>>6357504
No, they are the objet petit a.

>> No.6357617

>>6357524
no actual product can ever be objet petit a as you now. however ofcourse people mistake it for it.
this makes them addicted as they never really get what they want.
however they should aim for the agalma in order to enjoy surface
blabliblabla

>> No.6357646

>>6357617
hmyeah, but i was just making a rather autistic joke about the phones in the picture being small objects a(sian cocks). shouldn't have posted in the first place.
anyway, there is one lesson we can get from this thread: if your erect cock isn't longer than your phone, you should worry.

>> No.6357660

>>6357470
>it always has to be a japanese schoolgirl

>> No.6357665

>>6357485
This picture demonstrates the status of Woman-as-Thing. The radical Otherness of this thing arrives from the emptying of value from the feminine Subject leaving behind a black hole around which the masculine ideology centers desire.
This image is a perversion demonstrates the absurdity fetishizing the Real in pursuit of the Ideal feminine.

>> No.6357683
File: 70 KB, 700x655, 1337975861112.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6357683

>>6357665
>tfw

>> No.6357789

How to Deceive Everyone Once and For All
69 Ways to Trick People Into Sleeping With You
Top 10 Techniques to Control Everyone Around you
The Scientific Proven Way to Influence Everyone
The 58 Secrets and Winks ;)

>> No.6357844

>>6357665

you made me deep google, because I was sure I had read this somewhere else and thought it was copy/pasta

>> No.6357941

>>6357844
This is the first time I've posted this.

>> No.6357950

>>6357665
>>6357683
lol when women start talking about their own troubles i get a boner

>> No.6357959

>>6357665
*wipes nose*
thish ish pure ideology

>> No.6357996
File: 42 KB, 450x445, george-bush-laughing.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6357996

>>6357959
ECKS FUCKING DEE MATE NICE ZIZEK MEME

KEEP POSTING ZIZEK MEMES THEY ARE SO FUCKING HILARIOUS

>> No.6357997

>>6357996
My god, there is no escape from pure ideology!
Enjoy your symptom and so on and so on.

>> No.6358385

>>6357941
Yes. Yet it reads like so much academia

>> No.6358434

>>6357683
>dress like a whore
>complain about being treated like a whore

>> No.6358477

>>6357524

WHAT
THE FUCK
DOES THAT EVEN MEAN

I can't even get what he means after reading his stuff.

>> No.6358481
File: 13 KB, 400x300, 300x300.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6358481

>>6357665

No it just means that when you're beta orbiting a girl you're partaking in her own personalized attention bukkake.

>> No.6358497

>>6357470
The Prince

>> No.6358498

>>6357504
Freud, please go.

>> No.6358508

>>6357665

I'm under the impression that Lacanians are all socially anxious beta's with their bullshit that there is an abyss between me and the 'Other' and how terrifying that shit is.

The way they phrase shit is like a stoic robot.

>> No.6358523

>>6358434
>Assuming how anyone dresses automatically defines they're actions.
Besides you're full of shit, the only reason girls dress like that is to fulfil the feminine role that society tells them to fill. Society tells girls(especially today) that wearing skirts and feminine and makes them look very attractive( a role that society makes essential for women before they can be even considered women).
>Inb4 women are sheep
Not they're just trying to fulfill the feminine role just as men have to live up to the masculine role of not being "a bitch or a pussy" and being "manly" whatever that means(it varies). These roles both of them, aren't just enforced by men or women but by both.

>> No.6358549

>>6358523

Well, all the justification aside of dressing like a skank, good ol' Dave Chappelle says it best:

“The girl says "Oh uh-uh, wait a minute! Wait a minute! Just because I'm dressed this way does not make me a whore!" Which is true, Gentlemen, that is true. Just because they dress a certain way doesn't mean they are a certain way. Don't even forget it. But ladies, you must understand that is fucking confusing. It just is. Now that would be like me, Dave Chappelle, the comedian, walking down the street in a cop uniform. Somebody might run up on me saying, "Oh, thank God. Officer, help us! Come on. They're over here. Help us!" "Oh-hoh! Just because I'm dressed this way does not make me a police officer!" See what I mean? All right, ladies, fine. You are not a whore. But you are wearing a whore's uniform.”

>> No.6358656

>>6358549
WAS a whore's uniform. Society's standards of of fashioned have changed so much that you could regarded as a prude for anything else(yes by men and women). Besides, most girls also simply wear short clothing in accord with the weather. If you're an Arizona and it's 90 degrees, short shorts and a tube top seems great. No one says shit about men walking around topless in such whether anyway(nor should they). It's not that girls are necessarily walking topless as well( not that it really should be much of a problem considering that breasts are simply sexualized in our society but that's another story that I don' really care fore)

>> No.6358665

>>6358656

>not that it really should be much of a problem considering that breasts are simply sexualized in our society

The sexual attraction behind showing flesh is no social construct you structuralist retard.

>> No.6358950

>>6358665
For boobs yes.
There are some tribes in Africa where women walk around topless and no one cares. But again, I'm not really harping on it cultural differences will exist, it's only bad when those gender differences transform into ways to deride, are harmful, or put down women
>inb4 what if I showed my dick in public
that's not the same as no one is arguing that women should be allowed to show their genitals in public. Just chest(that happen to have a larger amount of tissue.

>> No.6359005

>>6358665
Yes it is. In parts of Europe and Africa they laugh at American breast obsession.
>they like look at boobs a lot? like baby?
It's true that female nipple are an erogenous zone but that's also true of the male nipple as well as the inner thigh, the lower stomach, the earlobe, and the foot.

>> No.6359013

>>6357470

Ayn Rand - atlas shrugged

>> No.6359079

>>6358950

What's this leftist obsession with emulating primitive people their customs?

>> No.6359092

>>6358665
Yes, there is a gene that says which clothing is hot and which isn't. You like asses? it's genetic. Some cameltoe? genes. showing too much or too little leg? hereditary, ask your daddy.

>> No.6359098

>>6358434
well, to me you dress like a whore... can I treat you like a whore, anon?

>> No.6359114

>>6359092

Oh yeah if it wasn't for 'the Text' I would never find shit attractive I'm evolutionary wired to spot.

Thanks, hacksophy.

>> No.6359118

>>6359079
This isn't about emulating primitives, it's about using primitives to show that many more things are social than we think they are.

>> No.6359138

>>6359118

Well civilizations tend to objectify and sexualize. I don't know any civilization that doesn't like a good pair of tits. Deal with it. We're never returning to your savage utopia, Engels.

That Noble Savage romanticism needs to die.

>"yeah some spearchuckling comrades in the jungle practise communism"
>"you see, when we steal from a monkey he doesn't like it, that's basically reason enough for a chimpout"

Leftists confirmed for wanting to see us returned to the ape days.

>> No.6359148

>>6359138
>Well civilizations tend to objectify and sexualize.
Thank you for agreeing with my point, retard.

>> No.6359163

>>6359148

You seem to have a problem with it because "gender differences transform into ways to deride, are harmful, or put down poor wimmin"

Civilization is here to stay, fucker.
Deal with it. Your poor wimmin and their proneness to golddigging certainly will.

>> No.6359205

48 Laws of Power. Popular with niggers and criminals. It is revisionist history and anecdotes put forward as proof of laws in action. It's a fun read but I feel for those who think it's a serious take on the subject.

>> No.6359222

>>6359163
I don't care.
What I do care is that you said being aroused by breasts is genetic, when it isn't.
also, europe between the renaissance and the victorian era considered the legs far more risque than the breasts, and dressed accordingly, toplessness is no longer taboo in much of western europe and the left coast, the minoans were the most advanced civilization of their time and didn't give a shit, and this is just shit from the top of my head

>> No.6359224

>>6359222
> toplessness is no longer taboo in much of western europe and the left coast
I'm from California and I didn't know a woman's breasts were supposed to be sexy until I moved away for college.

>> No.6359231

>>6359222

It isn't now?
What's your source? Or is that your structuralist unverifiable bullshit claim that it's a 'social construct' and can therefore be deconstructed to the point we go "meh"?

http://www.scienceworldreport.com/articles/6152/20130410/why-men-love-breasts-titillating-theory-explains-release-neurochemical-oxyto.htm

>> No.6359234

>>6359222

Shut the fuck up.
I'm from western Europe and tits are sexualized.
Some nudist beaches maybe, but that's it.

You stupid liberal American pansies need to stop idealizing us.
Also don't come here, fuck off already.

>> No.6359245

>>6359231
>citing one tertiary source, which cites a psychiatrist trying to shill his book
Neither side can cite a real and relevant (neurological, not psychological or sociological) paper on this, because none has ever been written, that I've been able to find.

>> No.6359247

>>6359234
I'm also from western Europe and breasts aren't sexualized at all.

>> No.6359249

>>6359245

I don't have the immediate study myself, but it's worth more than your jack-shit-claim.

Maybe you could provide some sources yourself now?
Or am I gonna get some postmodern newspeak?

>> No.6359254

>>6359247

So you look at a pair of firm tits and say "this doesn't do anything at all to me in a non-sexual context"

Get the fuck out of here... Now.

>> No.6359267

The Ego and His Own (90% of what's stopping you from gaining power is you)
The Gay Science (Stirner with Style)
The Prince
Sextus Empiricus and Pyrrhonian skepticism
Some David Hume

Basically accept skepticism, realize there exists no truth outside of ideas (read Kant through to transcendental idealism, and some on German idealists).

When you realize it's just you and your property, you'll be happy.

>> No.6359278

>>6359254
arousing =/= sexualized , you dimwit.
just because people get hard with feet doesn't mean they are sexualized, you can get hard just looking at a hot facial expression and that doesn't mean faces are sexualized.

>> No.6359286

>>6359278

Now we're talking semantics.

>> No.6359294

>>6359247

I'm from America and I like to stare at flat chests and greatly enjoy penis.

Clearly all of us Americans must do the same.

>> No.6359301

>>6359286
you assumed words mean things they don't, don't get so buttdebastated with silly things and let things go

>> No.6359308

>>6359301

Sexualization doesn't come from thin air.
It implies attraction.

Nobody is being buttblasted here.
You're just trying to push that neenerneener feelgood continental shit in all conversations because it gives you intellectual cred but means shit.
In this case, no fucking ground to stand on.

Bodies are objects of lust. Sex is primary. Get fucking bent.

>> No.6359324

>>6359278
Wrong.

>> No.6359742

>>6357950
>lol when women start talking about their own troubles i get a boner
I am considering becoming a psychologist to better wank off at the case of my female patients.

>> No.6359759

>>6358950
>There are some tribes in Africa where women walk around topless and no one cares.
I think that you confuse a 40 year old mother who has never wore a bra and the pesky little hills of a teen boiling with hormones as she understands her role on earth


but this is the typical mistake from the leftists : they compare a thing in their culture to what they believe is the same thing in another culture. Do you know that they are several categorizations and roles for women in other cultures ? Do you know that these categorizations are not the same as yours ?

>> No.6359770

>>6358950
>>that's not the same as no one is arguing that women should be allowed to show their genitals in public.
why not after all ?

>> No.6360065 [DELETED] 

>>6358523
>Besides you're full of shit, the only reason girls dress like that is to fulfil the feminine role that society tells them to fill.

Bull fucking shit. No "society" tells women to dress like that, teenagers want them to dress like that.

>> No.6360086

>>6357950
this comment is funnier to me than it should be.

>> No.6361346
File: 91 KB, 540x471, 2335[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6361346

>>6357485
KIDS TODAY AND THEIR SMARTPHONES
THEY DON'T KNOW WHAT REAL LIFE IS

>> No.6361534

>>6361346
>implying the printing press isn't technology

>> No.6361839

>>6361346
What did people do before books?

>> No.6361868

>>6361839
Scrolls, tablets, and quipis.

>> No.6361993
File: 58 KB, 720x608, peasant.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6361993

>>6361839

work

>> No.6362060

>>6358523
>Assuming how anyone dresses automatically defines they're actions.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fL-1kHxsavI

>> No.6362208

>>6357683
Lern 2 perspective

>> No.6362213

>needs a book to be socially dominant

not how it works

>> No.6362232

>>6357470
>books
>social dominance
one of these things is not like the other

>> No.6362314
File: 22 KB, 218x265, 1408902460358.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6362314

>>6361993

>> No.6362347

>>6359254
I can get aroused by certain girls' necks or arms or the way they lift of a chair or pretty much anything, really.

Now, do you wanna go out and make women wear burkas and only move in the quickest and most automatic way posible because of that?

>> No.6362668

>>6357485
His artwork is hilariously edgy. Look it up. It's Coldsteel-tier.

>> No.6363052
File: 32 KB, 948x711, Chipstophercolumbus (6).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6363052

>>6357470
This picture makes me feel wierd. I keep coming back to look at it.

>> No.6363058

>>6359742

can you tell me more about your life? i want to use you as the basis for a character

>> No.6363059

having strong moral values and wanting the best for those around you

>> No.6363110

>tits are social construct

Oh man. I used to be a good thinking left. The nonsensense has gone too far.

ALL WOMYN MUST HANG.
RACE WAR NAO.

>> No.6363569

>>6357665
nice buzzwords

>> No.6363590
File: 28 KB, 614x460, 02834u208347 (12).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6363590

>>6357470
What could be going through her head at a time like this? Those empty eyes.

>> No.6363599
File: 255 KB, 801x925, hkfkh.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6363599

>>6363052
It says a lot if you think about it. Our lives are social media, porn addicted, depraved, palliative, dream disasters. Who here fully faces their reality?

Brave New World and Neuromancer got it.

Pic has no bearing on any of our direct realities, yet we know all about it. Now let me check my messages.

>> No.6363605

>>6361346
Moronic image, moronic argument.

The printing press didn't supplant face-to-face communication with people in your daily life. People did/do not get addicted to printed materials to the point where they could suffer withdrawal symptoms in their absence.

>> No.6363615

>>6363590
>4chan Rules
>13. Do not use avatars or attach signatures to your posts.

>> No.6363648
File: 118 KB, 600x325, sailedtheseain1583 (2).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6363648

>>6363615
that means posting the same picture over and over. Bless you

>> No.6363654

>>6363599
The worst part of the picture is how on the nose it is.

>> No.6363660

>>6363605

> People did/do not get addicted to printed materials to the point where they could suffer withdrawal symptoms in their absence.

casual scum detected

there's a reason why the best writers tend to be the most depressive and isolated ones

>> No.6363671

>>6363660
Even accepting your unbelievably shitty logic, the best writers are not representative of broader society. They are literally exceptional.

>> No.6363972

sigh. another jew on his way up. this board is depressing

>> No.6364230

>>6363569
>cannot into lexicon

>> No.6365262

>>6363599
>Who here fully faces their reality?
Why do you care about the 'truth' of sense reality. All perceptions are maya. The only reasons to care are purely practical.

>> No.6365277

>>6357683
i wish that was me

>> No.6365302

>>6363052

I think it's the lip thing that keeps giving me a boner, that twitter phone is lifting her lip, that (to me) is very erotic and makes me wanna go jerk off

>> No.6365316

>>6363605
What you are describing was called "Lesewut" in 18th century Germany

>> No.6365336

>>6357485
social media is the equivalent of jerking off on someones face with very little gratification, very little interaction among other people

>> No.6365339

>>6365336
I'm 14 and this is deep

>> No.6365340

>>6357470
someone should photoshop those to have the 4chan, 9gag, memecenter, reddit logos etc

>> No.6365350

>>6365339
well than what is it suppose to be? other than some cheap shallow expression that insists on obscenity

>> No.6365359

>>6365350
I think it's exactly what you said, but it is so grossly expressed and with such an overused concept that I find that it doesnt do a good job to convey its point and makes it unnecessarily edgy

just my opinion tho

>> No.6365435

>>6359224
niggayougay.jpg

>> No.6365571

>>6365359
>grossly expressed and with such an overused concept that I find that it doesnt do a good job to convey its point and makes it unnecessarily edgy
welcome to contemporary art for the last 40 years