[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 9 KB, 219x230, 1388740396397.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6345872 No.6345872 [Reply] [Original]

>off of

>> No.6345886
File: 81 KB, 500x415, 1427747353195.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6345886

> Verbs that have the same form in Present, Past and Past Participle form:

> Verb | Past Simple | Past Participle
> bet bet bet
> broadcast broadcast broadcast
> cut cut cut
> hit hit hit
> hurt hurt hurt
> let let let
> put put put
> quit quit quit
> read read read
> set set set
> shut shut shut
> spread spread spread

>> No.6345890
File: 26 KB, 259x259, 1389904063272.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6345890

>similes
>2015

>> No.6345891
File: 49 KB, 401x362, 1389808613574.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6345891

>had had

>> No.6345899
File: 368 KB, 945x574, 1427725218919.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6345899

"Ghoti is a constructed word used to illustrate irregularities in English spelling. It is a respelling of the word fish, and is intended to be pronounced in the same way (/ˈfJʃ/), using these sounds:

> gh, pronounced [f] as in tough [tʌf];
> o, pronounced [J] as in women [ˈwJmJn]; and
> ti, pronounced [ʃ] as in nation [ˈneJʃən].

"

> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghoti

>> No.6345914
File: 139 KB, 675x500, 1390775658059.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6345914

>>6345891
>have had

>> No.6345919

>>6345872
As in: OP jumped off of the bridge?

>> No.6345923

>>6345919
exactly anon
it is fucking retarded
and so I hate it

>> No.6345928
File: 44 KB, 454x453, 1424639119350.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6345928

>>6345923
>haikus that don't rhyme

>> No.6345933
File: 87 KB, 526x437, 1427560926615.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6345933

>>6345891
The religious convictions he had had had had no moral influence on his judgement

>> No.6345936

>>6345933
The religious convictions he had were of no moral consequence to his judgment

>> No.6345937

>>6345933
>judgement

>> No.6345940

>that that

>> No.6345947

>>6345872
>would of
>could of
>should of

>> No.6345966

>an historic

>> No.6345968

>>6345966
I don't get it though. Is it incorrect to use 'an historic' or is it correct but fucking annoying?

>> No.6345976

>>6345872
Nigger