>started rereading the rules of attraction >first time I read it was January 2011, near the start of my crappy lonely time at university >now in my final few months and just as isolated Le "best years of my lyf" have been wasted.

File: 217 KB, 781x1600, Cartoon17.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 08:28:48 2015 No.6240158 [DELETED]

>started rereading the rules of attraction
>first time I read it was January 2011, near the start of my crappy lonely time at university
>now in my final few months and just as isolated

Le "best years of my lyf" have been wasted.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 08:32:51 2015 No.6240172 the presence of /r9k/ gets stronger every day soon enough one of our boards will be deleted

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 08:34:28 2015 No.6240177 >>6240158 I was banned for posting these

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 08:35:19 2015 No.6240179 >>6240158 Wow is there even one thing about all that red pill thing that doesn't scream 'repressed homosexuality'?

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 08:36:08 2015 No.6240184

>>6240158
Well then go make some other years the best years of your life, you big eeedjit. Try going and teaching English somewhere foreign, that's how I started enjoying life.

Also, what the hell is that comic trying to say? Is it making the earth-shattering point that women enjoy sex with attractive dudes?

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 08:37:43 2015 No.6240191 >>6240179 hardly repressed >>6240184 something something lying whores something something used goods it all sort of blends together

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 08:41:23 2015 No.6240198 >>6240179 Because it depicts men as being physically attractive? In a comic about a women feeling physical attraction to something other than kittens?

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 08:41:40 2015 No.6240199

>>6240191
How is the gayness not repressed, these people sell their 'insights' as a way to get girls. I mean, I don't get how the people involved don't notice how they talk about big dicks and women being repulsive all the time, either, but still, they don't.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 08:44:07 2015 No.6240205 >>6240199 Why do you hope that they are gay, anon? It's almost as if you view homosexuality as an insult that you can use to degrade those you dislike. Are you a homophobe, anon?

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 09:23:07 2015 No.6240280

>>6240205
>>6240198
Guys, just look at the fucking comic. That sexually successful male that is the hero of the story, he is what /r9k/ commonly refers to as 'chad thundrcock' (I shit you not, ask them), an object of envy and fear. His sexuality is what is being celebrated in the comic, while the female has gotten old and ugly by the time she's finished chad's bottle of vine. The doctor is the object of identification for the reader, but he deludes himself: he takes the vile corrupred woman and rejects chad's advances. The whole thing is, in summary, just incredibly gay. Not that there would be anything wrong with that, if it wasn't at the same time a denial of this very fact.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 09:25:15 2015 No.6240293 >>6240158 What the hell is going on in that comic?

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 09:26:41 2015 No.6240299 >>6240280 whats your point you fucking idiot

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 09:27:51 2015 No.6240306 >>6240299 The one I originally made, that the whole thing is drenched in repressed gayness, pay attention.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 09:29:06 2015 No.6240310 >>6240306 it clearly depicts retarded coping intellectuals in their pursuit for "knowledge" lmao.. It shows the strugle of the incel loser that gets the used up slut. How is it repressed gayness?

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 09:30:52 2015 No.6240317 I'm not really feeling this "best years of my lyf" thing either I think we've been lied to

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 09:31:39 2015 No.6240322 >>6240310 It is very interesting how you chose to exclude the protagonist from the comic now. I understand, must not think evil thoughts. It's alright.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 09:31:50 2015 No.6240323 >>6240280 The truth is, there is definitely something fucking wrong with being gay. Stop denying it, just embrace it.

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 09:33:30 2015 No.6240330

>>6240280
>The whole thing is, in summary, just incredibly gay.
Because it depicts certain men as being more desirable to women than others?

>>6240306
>t the whole thing is drenched in repressed gayness
This is a pretty strange conclusion to draw. Do you believe that women are, as you might phrase it, "gay"?

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 09:34:44 2015 No.6240336 >>6240323 Since I'm nkt gay, I don't know what would be wrong with it. But there sure are troubling aspects of homosexuality, just like there are of heterosexuality.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 09:35:37 2015 No.6240340 >>6240336 Just take my word for it man, faggots have stuff wrong with them, the guys who get women do not.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 09:38:24 2015 No.6240353 >>6240340 There are plenty of well adjusted homosexuals. Sure, you don't have to look far to find some girl with daddy issues or a man attempting to attract attention to himself, but it isn't fair to group the whole gay population into the same boat.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 09:40:31 2015 No.6240366 >>6240353 Yes it is, but we'll just have to disagree.

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 09:40:44 2015 No.6240368

>>6240330
The comic clearly isn't about women, or whom they find attractive. Instead, it portrays female sexuality as gross. And almost as gross as a woman who had sex, is someone who will touch a woman who had sex, the pitiful beta doctor. So, what is it that the comic portrays as good? It's chad, with his confidence, his muscular body and his big fat thundercock. He is the only thing that has any business existing at all, he is the object of desire.

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 09:42:23 2015 No.6240374

>>6240280
>That sexually successful male that is the hero of the story,

i think you've missed the point of /r9k/'s bitterness

the successful male is just something that's there to reinforce the female's identity as a slut, which is what makes her undesirable

she knows this so she manipulatively hides it from the doctor so that he unknowingly marries her

it's not shown but it's kind of implied that the doctor didn't get the same experience as chad, hence why the doctor is not the object of identification, he's the thing to be avoided the most

i don't see where you're getting homosexuality from, the comic is about not marrying a slut

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 09:43:13 2015 No.6240378 this comics actually originated on a gay hookup site called "sluthate" the gay theory guy is spot on

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 09:43:49 2015 No.6240381 >>6240374 I will and always will interpret that comic as the 'chad' being the normal, well-adjusted person getting pussy.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 09:45:13 2015 No.6240383 >>6240340 >the guys who get women do not. That's just because you fetishize them, man. Of course they have stuff wrong woth them, everybody has. But if it helps you get off, I won't judge you, because I'm trying to be a good person.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 09:46:18 2015 No.6240387 I go to /r9k/. The comic is saying that women will be promiscuous early on in life with 'alphas'. When the women is old and used up, she goes to find a 'beta' to provide for her. It's called 'Alpha fucks, beta bucks'.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 09:47:40 2015 No.6240391 >>6240368 chad is the source of all the bad things in the comic the reason he has big muscles and a big dick is because that's what /r9k/ thinks women like the one depicted in the comic want

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 09:48:38 2015 No.6240393 >>6240387 I know, but don't you see at least the cuck fantasy aspect of this? Also >I go to /r9k/ Shiggy

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 09:49:42 2015 No.6240397 >>6240393 There is no cuck fantasy. You are supposed to avoid cuckoldry at all costs. >Shiggy I do not go for the reasons you think I do.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 09:49:53 2015 No.6240398 >>6240293 A women bangs every chad she just met until she found a provider.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 09:51:16 2015 No.6240402 >>6240374 This is what /r9k/ believes about themselves, that much is for sure. But the whole thing is just too homoerotic and onsessed with big cocks and chad's testosterone for me to even start believing that.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 09:51:43 2015 No.6240404 >>6240293 A women bangs every chad she just met until she finds a provider.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 09:52:07 2015 No.6240405 >i hate R9k!!!!!!! >THEY ARE SO DELUDED >I HAVE A LONG TERM RELATIONSHIP, IM AN AVID TOLSTOY READER AND SHE NEVER CHEATED ON ME WITH THIS SO CALLED "CHAD" HAHAHAHA PATHETIC!!!!

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 09:53:11 2015 No.6240406 >>6240405 stay mad /r9k/ I hear your mother calling, the tendies are done!

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 09:53:23 2015 No.6240409 If college is the best time of your life, I feel bad for you, son. Yeah, it's a hell of a lot of fun, but by no means the pinnacle.

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 09:54:10 2015 No.6240412

>>6240374
that might have been the intention, but we need to consider all the inherent meanings intended or not.

The doctor has "already lost" so "marrying a slut" does not change anything.

The real target of the comic is not people like the doctor its people who are viewing this comic. And people like the buff guy are not reading this comic.

so if the person reading the comic is not the doctor, and not the chad and not a woman . . .

then the comic is a hierarchy, and its teaching the reader to worship the chad. That the chad is on top and that the most deluded among the whole comic is the nerd who tries deny that the chad is on top.

This means that you are implicitly told that you MUST realize the greatness of the buff guy.
That everyone SHOULD rightly worship him, and that if you dont you are deluded.

thats the real moral.

its teaching you to revere muscular cock.

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 09:55:14 2015 No.6240415

>>6240397
/r9k/ is just satire, right?
I keep trying to convince my self that only a few spiteful internet virgins exist no matter how much I know otherwise.
just can't tell whether it's majority fuckos messing with the robots or majority robots who get rilled up over rusemen
>>6240405
I don't date women. I've realized that my personality is completely incompatible with romanticism, which most women expect in a stable relationship. I'm not gay or any so called "alternative" sexualities (eg pansexual, asexual, etc) I just choose not to pursue women. I suppose this is kind of anecdotal evidence but a very small portion of /lit/ are delusional assholes. Most of us are faggots.

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 09:55:20 2015 No.6240416

>>6240391
No, it's because their obsession with their own unattractiveness transformed over time into an obsession with attractive males.
>>6240397
I know that's what they tell you, but they can't stop thinking about dicks, especially when thinking aboit women. What would you call a person lime that, someone who starts thinking of big cocks every time he thinks about sex?

I mean, you have to admit, they're not exactly a self-aware bunch over there.

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 09:55:26 2015 No.6240418

>>6240393

>cuck fantasy aspect

yeah i agree with this other dude, this is sort of sketchy

according to lacan, there are two possible outcomes of a contact with an object of desire, ie the phallus,

one being desiring it
and the other being 'desiring to become it'

which is a much more reasonable framework to explain r9k's relationship with cuck, imho
in that they repress their desire to become chad
etc

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 09:56:17 2015 No.6240422 >>6240158 What is it with people coming into /lit/ and betaposting? Are you making fun of us? We just want to talk about books. We don't hate women.

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 09:56:19 2015 No.6240423

>>6240368
Your analysis is alright, but I disagree.
You're identifiying female sexuality and modern female promiscuity, which would not be possible if it were not for a combination of alcohol and birth control.
The doctor and the interchangeable chads are separate polarities: the comic asks, if women are going to behave like this, which would you rather be? Not: which would you rather fuck, the doctor or the chad? Identification is not the same as attraction.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 09:57:21 2015 No.6240427 >>6240422 this there's actually a pretty successful women lit thread up right now

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 09:58:56 2015 No.6240430

>>6240412
You're an idiot who wants to see homosexuality in this.
Women are scorned for their behavior. Chad is basically just the male that was commonly pursued when humans behaved more like animals.
Women are viewed as more animalistic and destructive, which I agree with.
>>6240415
>/r9k/ is just satire, right?
No.
>>6240416
>I know that's what they tell you, but they can't stop thinking about dicks
I go to /r9k/ to express feels about being circumcised and the woe and whatnot that accompanies that.

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 09:59:00 2015 No.6240431

>>6240422
>We just want to talk about books. We don't hate women.

okay now you are just throwing around crazy assertions.

People probably come here to beta post because we have huge threads deconstructing the beta posts, and they probably think they are "trolling" us, but in reality we were already wasting our time reading far too much into things and the topic barely maters at all.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 09:59:03 2015 No.6240432 http://greatmisogynists.tumblr.com/

That's DOCTOR Chad to you, ner(...) Sun Mar 8 09:59:18 2015 No.6240434

>>6240423
this whole thing is stupid because the biggest chads on campus are always premed pr prelaw anyways, the beta nerd is probably doing a women's studies degree or about to drop out of a computer science degree once you realizes programming is harder than playing video games

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:01:25 2015 No.6240441 >>6240432 what is this meant to prove? are you really surprised to discover stupid people usually find something beyond themselves to whine/blame their stupidity on?

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:01:58 2015 No.6240444

>>6240430
No, you are not chad.

The comic is idealizing chad.
The comic is therefor teaching you to idolize chad.

The comic is not scorning women. This comic is not changing anyone's mind. You already scorn women yourself, and the comic is building off that feeling and subverting that angst into the direction of worshiping muscular cock.

This is air tight logic.

You cant just argue based on the comics supposed "intention" as if that ever matters.

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:02:43 2015 No.6240449

>>6240158

That's a weird coincidence. The last thing I read before I started university was rules of attraction as well. I'm in my second year, really enjoying and appreciating every second of it. I'm an Eng Lit major.

Shame this thread was so derailed by the OP

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:02:51 2015 No.6240450 >>6240444 Think whatever you want you pretentious ass.

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:03:05 2015 No.6240453

>>6240402
see >>6240391

repressed homosexuality is just the wrong reading of this comic, i know where you're getting it from but you're just projecting

misogyny might be a better reading (only the woman is depicted as vile for sleeping around, she's then depicted as manipulative for settling) but i don't think that really holds up either

chad isn't a real person, he's a character there to reinforce the identity of the female as a slut, but the female isn't a real person either, rather she's just a character there to reinforce the identity of the reader

/r9k/ makes comics and lashes out at promiscuous women not because they're secretly gay or hate women but because they hate themselves and think the only woman who would settle for them would be a "used up" slut

these comics are just self loathing for men who accepted long ago that they're never going to be worthy of affection or desire like chad is

it might look like they hate women, but they really hate themselves because the only woman they can imagine themselves being with is a deceitful slut who's just there for the money

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:03:12 2015 No.6240454

>>6240423
The reader does not identify with chad though, he reveres him, while the very possibilty of emotional attachment to a woman is portrayed as pathetic, as women become old and ugly and disgusting the moment chad is done with them, so he leaves. But the reader is not like that, and he knows that, so what is he supposed to do, still run after women? Hell no, he's in love, but with chad's cock, not some phony girl's blessings.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:03:51 2015 No.6240456 >>6240434 True dat. That's the saddest part of the comic in my opinion- the doctor, the dude /r9k/ apparently want to avoid being, is actually successful beyond anything they could hope to achieve.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:03:53 2015 No.6240457 File: 231 KB, 881x1600, Cartoon16.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6240409 What should be the pinnacle? How do people make friends after university?

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:05:04 2015 No.6240459 >>6240456 if anything, /r9k/ is closer to the unsuccessful leech

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:05:29 2015 No.6240461 >>6240453 Misogyny and repressed homosexuality are almost synonymous m8, think about it.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:05:40 2015 No.6240463 >>6240449 Yeah, I loved university too. I do feel genuinely bad when people post about not enjoying it.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:07:00 2015 No.6240469 >>6240456 >success dying

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:07:07 2015 No.6240470 >>6240391 >the reason he has big muscles and a big dick is because that's what /r9k/ thinks women like the one depicted in the comic want it is not what r9k thinks, it is a fact

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:07:11 2015 No.6240471 >>6240340 Read Foucault's History of Sexuality or Berlant and Warner's Sex In Public. 'homosexuality' is merely another static, inadequate category through which the discourse of the master is established.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:07:17 2015 No.6240472 >>6240457 Pls stop, the /r9k/ is hurting my brain.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:07:39 2015 No.6240473 >>6240461 What is wrong with you that would have you think that?

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:08:41 2015 No.6240476 >>6240457 >How do people make friends after university? The same way they did at university. It's not hard to make new friends, if you can do it. And it's no easier to do it at uni than anywhere else if you can't do it.

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:09:10 2015 No.6240478

>>6240463
I have a full ride and hate university so much that I'm probably going to willingly drop out after my first year.

I've heard that the only thing it's good for now is 'networking' but fuck that.

I'll just sit around and read books like I do anyway. I hate it here.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:09:11 2015 No.6240479 >>6240418 why did everyone ignore my post i thought it was insightful goddamn you lit

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:09:26 2015 No.6240481 File: 303 KB, 1180x1600, cartoon12.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6240469 >"success" I know, LOL! OP here. That relates to my favourite of these comics

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:11:04 2015 No.6240483 >>6240418 >lacan Oh well, I guess I'm a freudian at heart, so I don't find any of that particularly convincing. Desire for a cock is desire for a cock.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:11:24 2015 No.6240486 >>6240456 >doctors are successful love this meme

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:11:46 2015 No.6240487 >>6240481 >>6240481 >m-m-maybe when i know how to cure common cold ill finally be deemed as successful on a 4chan literature board!!! LMAO

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:11:47 2015 No.6240488 >>6240476 I'd disagree with that. University throws you into a large group of people of similar age with whom you spend a lot of time in close proximity. Most post-university options won't involve nearly so much obligatory socialising.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:13:10 2015 No.6240493 >>6240478 >I've heard that the only thing it's good for now is 'networking' What? It's good for making friends and having fun, if that's what you mean by networking.

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:13:21 2015 No.6240494

>>6240457
Sometimes there is no pinnacle, it keeps climbing until you die. Sometimes it declines steadily. Sometimes it's 10 years later, etc. It's entirely up to you, but living with the idea that there is a pinnacle limits you. You should be able to look fondly upon many memories, not say "Yep, my life went downhill after that good time".

Volunteer, join clubs/sports teams, seek out people of similar interests, start a random conversation, it goes on. Pro-tip: in actuality, bars are not that good a place to genuinely meet people.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:14:55 2015 No.6240500 >>6240493 >It's good for making friends and having fun I don't do either of those things.

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:14:58 2015 No.6240501

>>6240158
It's funny who you r9k project your inability to get laid on everyone "intellectual"
No, smart people can pull just as much as dudebros, they don't need to pick up the spoils.

You just spin the narrative that way so you can at least pretend you're one of the smart successful guys.

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:15:40 2015 No.6240502

>>6240453
you are delusional,

thats like arguing that cuck porn is about making women seem like sluts rather than worshiping ethnic penis.

Anyone can see in the prior example that its about the cock.

Take the OP's comic and make all the chads of one race and the girl and the nerd of a same different race and you would see unarguably that its about cock.

But nothing changes because they are all white

its still about cock

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:16:25 2015 No.6240504

>>6240488
>Most post-university options won't involve nearly so much obligatory socialising.

Most jobs do, and other social opportunities are easy to come by (gallery openings, performances, poetry readings and shit like that if you want to meet arty people).

I've never really seen any difference making friends post-university and while I was there, and I've moved around a lot and had to make new friends often.

I'm a pretty sociable guy though, always have been.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:17:10 2015 No.6240508 File: 289 KB, 1112x2893, gaylifestyle.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6240471 A static, inadequate category, that gets you AIDS, right Foucault?

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:17:43 2015 No.6240510 >>6240502 a surface reading of the comic conveys the frustration of not having a major dong / being fit etc what steps do you take to go from there to 'it's latent faggotry' ?

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:18:51 2015 No.6240514 >>6240510 its all about the face, the major dong and the being fit part is just a 0.5-1/10 point bumpber

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:19:01 2015 No.6240516 File: 255 KB, 982x1600, cartoon15.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6240434 Actually, this is recognized.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:19:34 2015 No.6240519 >>6240510 because people that get mad about sluts are usually jealous of them rather than of the chad, and end up transitions to tranny sluts after they graduate

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:20:12 2015 No.6240522 >>6240519 it stopped being funny 2 posts ago

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:20:55 2015 No.6240526 >>6240516 lmao you dudes are such losers, holy shit, that was funny tho

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:21:43 2015 No.6240531 >>6240514 as in the frustration of not having a beautiful face? and if so, again, how do you get from there to homosexuality?

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:22:11 2015 No.6240534 >>6240516 The person who makes these comics is fucking retarded.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:22:40 2015 No.6240538 >>6240534 >M-M-MY GF IS NOT A WHORE... I SWEAR!!!!!!!!! LMAOOOO

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:23:02 2015 No.6240539 >>6240531 face it, everyone knows you're a fucking faggot because of how obsessed you are with alpha males, you're like a fucking chick

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:23:21 2015 No.6240541 >>6240516 this is dark

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:23:58 2015 No.6240544 >>6240538 Jesus christ, did your mother never hug you or something?

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:24:03 2015 No.6240545 >>6240516 Heh, that one was better.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:24:09 2015 No.6240547 /r9k/ is not filled with repressed homos ... its filled pretty much a mix of repressed homos and openly gay people. >>>/r9k/16917932

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:24:42 2015 No.6240549

>>6240541
it's true though, the people who develop dominant personalities by being the strongest and most athletic in high school use the traits to become leaders in industry and politics later in life, meanwhile nerds like you go on to post on 4chan all day...

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:26:26 2015 No.6240555 >>6240549 High school is not even close to being an indicator of success later on in life.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:27:00 2015 No.6240556 >>6240539 i'll fight you fag

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:27:52 2015 No.6240560

>>6240502
the comic is cuck porn though

look at the terminology used in cuck porn, there's:

>cuckold
>bull
>slutwife

two of those things are entirely dependent on one, you can't have a "slutwife" or a "bull" without the existence of a "cuckold". obviously you can have wives who are slutty and sleep about but the same terminology is not used when a wife is just cheating, she's then just a cheating wife (hence why cuckold and cheating wife are two difference catagories, and one is much more popular than the other)

cuckold porn generally focuses on the wife's pleasure but as a story it's purely about the cuck and everyone else is a side character used to reinforce the cuck's identity, in the same way that the characters in the comic are used to reinforce the reader's identity

also its interesting that you bring race into it, the race factor is a very american thing, cucks exist in all places of the world but the idea of black men having huge dicks is only really a factor in one of those places

it's not about the cock, it's all about me

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:28:29 2015 No.6240562 >>6240544 she did 30 minutes ago, i gave her a present

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:29:33 2015 No.6240563

>>6240555
of course it is, in fact how successful you are in high school pretty much determines the entire rest of your life...high school determines which undergrad you get in to, then once you are accepted you can drop out of it's too hard, "yale dropout" is worth a lot more than "phd from wisconsin state" and how do you get into those schools? it all has to do with how successful you are in high school, and if you're some angsty nerd getting beat up every day you're not going anywhere.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:32:26 2015 No.6240571 File: 457 KB, 1200x1657, 1424182051922.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6240453 /r9k/ here, you're mostly right. But realizing this doesn't stop me from loving these comics.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:34:10 2015 No.6240575 >>6240571 omg these things are fucking funny

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:34:46 2015 No.6240579 >>6240575 >Most women aren't primal whores. Sure thing.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:36:15 2015 No.6240585 >>6240563 Nope. You can acquire more knowledge later in life, develop other qualities, etc. You are in no way tied down deterministically to anything established in high school, especially if you live in America.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:37:09 2015 No.6240588 >>6240579 i never said there was some injustice, it's the natural order of things that the most cocky dominant mendacious dude receive the most pussy, i just think it's funny the way they show the poor beta getting blown the fuck out like that, lol

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:38:57 2015 No.6240594

>>6240585
believe whatever you need to buddy, but if you arent the same dorky ass beta from high school why are you posting edgy/angsty trolls on a childish cartoon board for anonymous cowards? because you transformed into a successful randian atlasman holding up the world? cool story

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:40:25 2015 No.6240598

>>6240453
>it might look like they hate women, but they really hate themselves because the only woman they can imagine themselves being with is a deceitful slut who's just there for the money
stereotypes exist for a reason, and such about women exist outside /r9k/
it'd be naive to say that all women are like that, but a majority of them seems to fit to /r9k/ stereotype

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:41:21 2015 No.6240603 Women will truly be the death of us all.

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:43:15 2015 No.6240610

i think college betas have this weird fantasy that there are these wild orgies and bukkake gangbangs and shit happening somewhere on campus every night and they weren't invited...the truth is most women are not even close to as slutty as you fantasize that they are, and the one or two times some chick gets drunk and gangsbangs the whole frat, she wakes up the next morning and pressed sexual assault charges...sorry dudes, but college isn't nearly as wild and exciting as the education industrial complex wants you to believe.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:43:33 2015 No.6240613 >>6240594 Is it one extreme or the other for you?

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:44:30 2015 No.6240616 >>6240610 >she wakes up the next morning and pressed sexual assault charges >Waaaah. I shouldn't be responsible for my actions. Another reason to hate women.

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:45:19 2015 No.6240619

>>6240613
one extreme of what exactly? if it's not determined by early life experience then are saying some people are just born beta? and others are born leaders? then i guess being a beta is like being a faggot, you were born that way so be proud don't pretend to be something else. right?

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:46:50 2015 No.6240622 File: 247 KB, 1400x990, cartoon7.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6240610 Actually, college betas are made to accept female promiscuity, or they are naive like you.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:47:20 2015 No.6240625 >>6240158 >tfw the person who made this comic thought it proved some kind of point but actually only does if you already buy into the ideology behind it

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:48:42 2015 No.6240630 >>6240598 >a majority of them seems to fit to /r9k/ stereotype The main stereotype I get from these comics is that women like sex with attractive dudes, and prefer them to unattractive dudes. Which... well, it seems pretty obvious, really.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:48:48 2015 No.6240631 it's clear the people writing these comics don't have any life experience, or at least pretend not to for the sake of humor

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:51:02 2015 No.6240637 >>6240625 >what is every comic or even every book written about ideology You don't actually think Foucault's "History of Sexuality" convince anyone except those who set off to read it already buying the ideology behind it either, don't you?

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:51:44 2015 No.6240640 >>6240622 >>6240571 too much porn

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:51:47 2015 No.6240641 >>6240461 Kind of like how anti-semitism and a fetish for lustrous, flowing sidelocks are synonymous? >lash my goy cock, rabbi

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:52:25 2015 No.6240643 >>6240637 and what do you think the ideology behind The History Of Sexuality is?

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:53:17 2015 No.6240649 >>6240622 WHY ISN'T THE FRENCHMAN HOLDING A BAGUETTE YOU HAD ONE JOB, WEIRD /R9K/ CARTOONIST Still pretty funny, though

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:54:01 2015 No.6240651 >>6240461 exactly, the guys who imagine these women are all sluts sucking cocks at the drop of a hat are actually wannabe trannys imagining all the stuff they wish they could do, they're projecting their homosexual promiscuity on to women

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:55:37 2015 No.6240656 >>6240516 HAHAHAH this is so true, post more!

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:56:11 2015 No.6240657 >>6240643 Cultural Marxism

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:56:26 2015 No.6240658 File: 635 KB, 947x419, 1422996016484.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6240651 >women aren't promiscuous unless forced not to be >the feminist sexual revolution has done nothing

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 10:56:33 2015 No.6240659 >>6240637 What I mean is the comic is literally nonsense unless you know about all the redpill shit. It's just two people with different experiences of the same woman and women in general if you look at it without that background knowledge.

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:00:21 2015 No.6240663

>>6240641
God dammit. I fucked my logic up, carried away by dreams of hook nosed seducers.
Let's try that again.

>Misogyny and repressed homosexuality are almost synonymous m8, think about it.
Kind of like how all feminists are lesbians?
No, no, that doesn't work either, since it's basically true.

Kind of like how disliking milk means you're lactose intolerant?
Yeah, that works.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:01:25 2015 No.6240667 >>6240659 >redpillcomics fucking blogspot spamfilter com holy shit, i need to make a meme blog for angry betas and monetize that shit!

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:01:38 2015 No.6240669 >>6240541 no, this is dank

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:02:41 2015 No.6240674 >>6240663 >Kind of like how disliking milk means you're lactose intolerant? exactly, vegans are just lactose intolerant vegetarians who try to make their inability to digest dairy products into something cool

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:03:39 2015 No.6240676 >>6240280 >Ah, this guy is talking shit about women >I better call him gay

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:04:55 2015 No.6240679 >>6240676 not all men who hate women are gay, some of them are just angry nerds.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:05:19 2015 No.6240681 >>6240658 What's wrong with being promiscuous, anyway?

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:06:11 2015 No.6240682 >>6240681 >changing the goalposts

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:06:12 2015 No.6240683 >>6240681 ya that is the flaw in this whole shit

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:07:27 2015 No.6240688

>>6240681
It leads to a breakdown of the social order. Just look at all of the single moms.

>Why should I give children to the scientists who advance society?
>I'll just have Chad's kids.
>Society breaks apart.

Also, way to move the goalposts when shown proof of female promiscuity.

>W-Women are angels.
>W-What's wrong with being promiscuous anyways?

Cuck.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:08:41 2015 No.6240694 >>6240688 oh come the fuck on m8 so you're saying that you would be perfectly fine with a promiscuous girlfriend if society was unaffected by her actions?

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:09:00 2015 No.6240696

>>6240688
>>Why should I give children to the scientists who advance society?
>>I'll just have Chad's kids.
>>Society breaks apart.

but you're not a scientist, so how would women only fucking scientists help you? and what's to say scientists at prestigious institutions aren't swimming in vag anyways? this whole shit is dumb, but it's kind of fun to bash betas so i will continue on for one more cup of coffees worth

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:09:34 2015 No.6240701 >>6240679 I don't think you have to necessarily hate women to agree with the comic though.

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:10:55 2015 No.6240706
File: 567 KB, 780x1330, win-win situation.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6240374
>i don't see where you're getting homosexuality from
(Not the guy you've been talking to, but) then there's this question: What's the moral of the story? "do not marry a slut" doesn't work. From the last panel we can glean that the whole womankind are sluts.
However:
- If it's gay propaganda it's clear: "Do not marry a slut, bro. Take my cock in it's stead."
- If it's poly cuck propaganda it's clear, it too: "embrace it, Bruder, least you want to be living a lie."

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:12:03 2015 No.6240710

>>6240696
if women only fucked scientists then all these nerds would just make comics with scientists fucking their wife instead of dudes with big muscles...also, this ignores the idea that dudes with big muscles may also be scientists...lol, it's so stupid, but funny

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:12:22 2015 No.6240712 >>6240694 >so you're saying that you would be perfectly fine with a promiscuous girlfriend if society was unaffected by her actions? I still wouldn't. I'm just giving one example of why it's bad.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:13:12 2015 No.6240714 >>6240688 Not the same anon, though. I've never believed that all women are angels, I just believe it's perfectly fine for women to have sex and enjoy it. Hell, I welcome it, since it means more sex for me.

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:13:59 2015 No.6240717
File: 365 KB, 1223x1570, teachman.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6240681
Sexual liberalism has the same effects as economic liberalism, concentration of resources at the top, pauperization at the bottom and increasing competition at the middle for dwindling resources. How it works is obvious, if in the past any male was guaranteed a wife thanks to arranged marriages, in a free sexual market women are free to only date at the top, while those at the middle have to fight for scraps and the ones at the bottom are left with nothing. This is not a source of stability. As competition for the top increases, so will the stakes of it. It is also known that females are attracted to aggressive and violent alpha males, as many scientific researchs have shown:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_triad#As_mating_strategy
http://www.ehbonline.org/article/S1090-5138%2814%2900077-4/abstract
http://www.bakadesuyo.com/2012/06/are-dangerous-men-more-attractive-men/
http://www.livescience.com/20294-women-choose-bad-boys.html
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19350760

The logical result, therefore, of a free sexuality, is that such violent men will have more sex. Once lesser men realize that, they come to realize that the path to pussy is littered in the blood of innocents, and they become thugs, criminals, murderers and drug dealers in order to have access to female sexuality.

Besides, to make a commitment you need to trust the other person, i am not talking merely about cheating, i am talking about being able to expect your partner to exhibit inhibition and self-control when the opportunity arises for them to indulge in instant gratification that would hurt you. A promiscuous and degenerate female, who is unable to exhibit a modicum of self-restraint, won't think twice about stealing your money, kidnapping your parents for drugs or killing you for life insurance, because their minds have been literally warped by their addiction to the short term pleasures of satisfaction of one's instincts.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:14:19 2015 No.6240720 >>6240461 >Misogyny You mean that thing where a guy expects his stay at home wife to have dinner ready? Yeah, he wants it up the hole.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:16:19 2015 No.6240724 >>6240717 >if in the past any male was guaranteed a wife thanks to arranged marriages That's a pretty big 'if'. Why would you assume that to be the case?

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:16:55 2015 No.6240725

>>6240712
it's a grab it and go argument, don't pretend you have any interest in how behaviors and attitudes harm society while posting on fucking 4chan of all places

there's nothing wrong with promiscuity and there's nothing wrong with being finding promiscuity an undesirable trait, but why would you lash out against it if it has nothing to do with you? because you know you can't get one of the "good ones"

>b-but all women are like that

as far as you're ever going to be concerned, yes they are

why don't you drop out of the gene pool if you're so concerned about society? after all, its betas like you who are going to end up enabling this promiscuous behavior in the end

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:17:13 2015 No.6240726 >>6240706 The moral of the story is: Don't invest in a depreciating stock.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:17:57 2015 No.6240728 File: 248 KB, 1131x1600, cartoon9.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] I've been going through these comics and I'm not entirely sure what their point is. A slightly self-ironic revenge fantasy?

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:18:58 2015 No.6240734
File: 635 KB, 1328x2148, whatever1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6240714
>Hell, I welcome it, since it means more sex for me.

That's the same logic behind Reaganomics, they tell you the wealth will trickle-down, but it doesn't, it just concentrates at the top.

It's the same with promiscuity and degeneracy, when women are free to choose their partners, they won't choose us (or at least me, i don't know about you), they will choose aggressive, violent, dominant and charismatic alpha males who will them form de facto harems.

It is funny how many people who are socialist and opposed to neoliberal economics support at the same are opposed to sexual socialism and support "neoliberal sexuality". My guess is that such people, while they can't compete in the economic market, therefore they want to regulate it, are charismatic enough to compete in the sexual market, so they want to keep it deregulated for their own benefit.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:19:22 2015 No.6240735 >>6240724 Drastically lower incidence of divorce, meaning fewer average men are rejected by wives hopped up on Edward Cullen and Christian Grey and Eat Pray Love? In short, fewer average men are rejected by average women who have delusions of grandeur?

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:20:25 2015 No.6240737 >>6240728 he's a beta bitch so he converted to islam. damn, these comics actually have a lot of truth, at least this one and that one about the high school bully becoming the boss

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:20:37 2015 No.6240738 >>6240726 So it's pedo propaganda?

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:21:29 2015 No.6240742 >>6240728 /lit/ is so obsessed with finding a deeper meaning that, when a piece of literature is supposed to be taken at face value, the real intent swooshes past through them.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:23:38 2015 No.6240749 >>6240742 It's not the "deeper meaning" by the author, it's about what subconsciously motivated the author to create this work. I have no trouble believing that whoever makes these strips genuinely believes in what he draws.

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:24:58 2015 No.6240752

>>6240726
all human stock is depreciating.

this is why the sex robot revolution can't come quick enough.
sex robots will solve 100% of the worlds problems you cannot argue this.

Its 100% possible to be happy working part time, creating art, living simply, and fucking a 20/10 inhumanly skilled sex bot that fulfills your every need.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:25:59 2015 No.6240754 >>6240742 Go read some Gadamer you fucking retard.

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:26:07 2015 No.6240756

>>6240734
but this is why i believe in capitalism, it would be oppressive to tell women who to fuck, it's oppressive to tell customers who to buy from or what websites to browse...suppose some socialist committee decided 4chan was getting too much traffic and it was unfair to less popular websites, you wanna be redirected to some obscure bullshit for the sake of "equality"? freedom results in inequality, deal with it.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:28:19 2015 No.6240765 >>6240630 You should get what >>6240387 said

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:30:42 2015 No.6240770

>>6240765
so basically it's losers who are mentally still stuck in high school and can't get over the fact that some guido douche got all the pussy in 11th grade and now they can't enjoy the pussy they get as grown men because of what happened 20 years ago; stay beta, nerd

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:30:49 2015 No.6240772

>>6240756
>suppose some socialist committee decided 4chan was getting too much traffic and it was unfair to less popular websites, you wanna be redirected to some obscure bullshit for the sake of "equality"?
Protip, that's _exactly_ what Google does. (Well, except for the 'socialist' part, the deciding committee isn't socialist.)

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:31:42 2015 No.6240775 >>6240772 so you think google sends traffic to less popular websites? uh ok

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:32:58 2015 No.6240781

ITT: People that only read books and doesn't know anything about society and sex

seriously, even my mom and my father acknowledges that this /r9k/ thing happens

you are just deluded into muh spirit and such, this happens. There are women that seek older men for providing grounds and it's really, really unfortunate to be the male in that relationship. It's better to have awareness of such things than delude yourself into thinking "lel this will not happen to me!!!"

In the end depends on your interests, if you really want a woman that wants you only because of your money when you are 35 years old then it's your choice lel

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:33:41 2015 No.6240784 >>6240765 Imagining for a second that that's true, wouldn't that just a win-win scenario? Even the unattractive dudes end up getting women thanks to the power of their money, and it all ends happily.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:35:57 2015 No.6240791 >>6240784 You are trying to defend something undefendable. If you just want a relationship with whatever thing that comes up, by using the power of your money, why you don't just buy an escort and pretend it's your wife?

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:36:14 2015 No.6240792

>>6240784
no because they get women who don't match up to what they think they deserve and it will hurt them forever

the same is kind of true of the woman, do you think she wanted to end up with a guy like that or one of the guys she was fucking in her heyday?

this shit only breeds misery, and the worst part is these couples go on to have children, as if they haven't done enough to hurt people

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:36:17 2015 No.6240795

>>6240784
>Even the unattractive dudes end up getting women thanks to the power of their money, and it all ends happily.

Is that a happy ending for the unattractive dudes with money though? They get a fucked over rapidly aging, rapidly drying up, rapidly devaluing money hole. And that's on the bright side where they are free of incurable diseases like AIDS, herpes or OMBC (Other Men's Bastard Children)

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:37:57 2015 No.6240801 >>6240784 Anyway it's your choice man, you can do whatever you want, but don't try to make it more valid for us who wouldn't want to be in that situation

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:37:58 2015 No.6240802
File: 59 KB, 570x620, white knight hoodie.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

/lit/ has to be the most white knight place out there.
Is this because it's required in your leftist circles to take up arms against the fedora MRA's for offending your sisters in arms?
I'm sure you beta faggots get a lot of literati pussy.

>"I-I have a gf and she's smart, s-so I don't get where you guys are coming from."

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:38:26 2015 No.6240803

>>6240781
Well obviously it happens. I think the issue is that /r9k/ believes it happens enough to be a general fact of life, and apparently believes it's a serious enough issue to justify... I dunno, what is the plan to achieve equal access for all males to sex? Enslaving all women and forcing them into marriage ISIS style? Free state-run brothels in every town?

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:38:57 2015 No.6240806 >>6240784 Unattractive dudes only get the money when their older and when once all the women in the age group are already used up.

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:39:10 2015 No.6240807

>>6240756
>suppose some socialist committee decided 4chan was getting too much traffic and it was unfair to less popular websites, you wanna be redirected to some obscure bullshit for the sake of "equality"?
Protip, that's _exactly_ what Google does. (Well, except for the 'socialist' part, the deciding committee isn't socialist.)

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:39:35 2015 No.6240810

>>6240781
>People that only read books
as if there aren't plenty of books that cover all this in much more depth than your uneducated betamind can comprehend

>if you really want a woman that wants you only because of your money when you are 35 years old then it's your choice lel

if your money is your game, then use it to get pussy, i don't see what you problem is, all's fair in love and war

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:39:56 2015 No.6240812 File: 20 KB, 230x307, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6240802 nice memes, friend

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:39:59 2015 No.6240813

>>6240803

Well /r9k/ are a bunch of faggots that still think that making a political policy about something will change anything in their lifetimes.

I just keep awareness of that stuff so i don't get into that situations, it works for me at least. It's not common but being doubtful about intentions it's better than just "going for it brah"

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:40:04 2015 No.6240815 >>6240802 It's because /lit/ is offended by poor thinking (even if we are poor thinkers and can't recognize it in ourselves.)

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:40:49 2015 No.6240817 >>6240806 >used up What does that even mean?

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:41:08 2015 No.6240818 >>6240803 Nice slippery slope faggot. And this board is supposed to be filled with intellectuals. More like self-important liberal faglords who assume they know the bulk of the women out there based on the 3 relationships they've had between 17 and 22.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:41:32 2015 No.6240820 >>6240803 bring back temple prostitutes, seemed to work well enough in the ancient world

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:42:25 2015 No.6240827 >>6240815 >ur dumb Oh how intellectually sound. Can you people actually discuss a topic with the other side of the spectrum or is it inevitable for you to go to the usual "le faux news" neener-neener?

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:42:33 2015 No.6240828

>>6240775
>so you think google sends traffic to less popular websites? uh ok
Google has a committee that checks out popular search queries and decides which sites should be at the top. They do the deciding based on an ill-defined metric of subjective 'quality'. So if they decide that 4chan isn't 'quality', then too bad for 4chan.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:44:14 2015 No.6240833 >>6240827 I misread, I thought you were defending /lit/.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:45:32 2015 No.6240842 >>6240810 >>6240784 >>6240801 :^)

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:45:58 2015 No.6240845 File: 169 KB, 750x750, 1345997300197.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6240803 How about something tried and tested for thousands of years? TRADITIONAL VALUES

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:46:32 2015 No.6240848

funny story from outside your mom's basement:

one day i was eating my lunch outside in some urban "park" (more granite slabs and concrete that trees but whatever) and there were these too big burly black working class dudes there also having lunch...a hot chick and this light skinned guy with tight ass jeans and little bomber type jacket (as opposed to some triple fat goose "biggie" jacket) and the two big burly black dudes where shaking their heads like "these days women don't even care if a dudes a bitch, they just want to see that paper!" and the other dudes just shaking his head with a sad look like how r9k betas much shake their head when they see a big burly black guy walking by with a hot chick...the truth is there are only two types of men: those who get laid on the reg and those who do not.

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:48:15 2015 No.6240855

>>6240734

It's funny that leftist types who advocate economic regulation do not understand that the same applies for the sexual market. Because the first one is the cause of the second.
Men wouldn't be "neet who lives at home and pees in bottles" if female sexuality was constrained and females had relationships with men other than Chad. Arranged marriages harness beta male potential, but free sexuality leds to a concentration of resources at a few alpha males harems, and withdrawing behavior at lesser betas and omegas who can't even compete for the scraps.

Most leftists tend to be normies who benefitted from sexual deregulation, so they don't care for it's effects the same way they care about the effects of economic deregulation.

Like always, they'll champion whatever cause they directly see causing harm to them ( any time soon ). The current libertine climate is of no danger to them, it affects them little, so they don't care.

If we really wanna get social justice about it, Asian males are suffering the most, yet they're "le privileged" so who fucking cares about overprotected shut-in dicklets not getting any action right?

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:48:26 2015 No.6240857 What are some good books dealing with betaness attracting grills that are not completely shit? /fit/ recommends models by mark manson

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:50:36 2015 No.6240870 Realizing that people can change themselves over time and having a positive outlook towards women is not 'beta' thinking. Just like having a pessimistic outlook on life in general is not 'alpha' thinking. If those archetypes actually existed.

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:51:16 2015 No.6240871

>>6240855
>Asian males are suffering the most

what the fuck are you talking about? every time i see some couple walking down the street molesting each other it's always some fucking chinks, even caribbean spanish (stereotyped as "hot lovers" or whatever) don't put on this kind of public display

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:52:50 2015 No.6240878 >>6240845 >if female sexuality was constrained and females had relationships with men other than Cha Do you define "Chad" as "anyone who doesn't habitually piss into bottles" ?

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:53:02 2015 No.6240879 >>6240855 >Asian males are suffering the most moreover, some of the biggest chads on any campus are the slick indian dudes from rich ass families

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:53:32 2015 No.6240881 >>6240280 >nazi's are homoerotic >/r9k/ are fags in waiting >homophobic christians want to suck cock What is it with this shitty "haha, they're gay themselves, I bet they wanna get jizzed on. just admit you are gay, so gay, haha."

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:54:49 2015 No.6240889

>>6240827

You have to admit there is clearly a lot of very poor thinking and thinkers coming from the groups this comic is intended for and arises out of, I think mainly because everything is motivated by hatred and factionalism more than neutral sociological interest.

But I'm also willing to admit there is some shrewd observation on their part. If you read 19th century novels you'll see that, more or less, women have been engaged in all sorts of gamesmanship for advantageous marriages. The non-retards in gender theory really put it best, though: rigid gender expectations fuck everybody. Men are expected to be cold, to die in wars, to be brutal, to provide, and so on. Women are expected to be innocent, emotional, put into situations where they have to manipulate, and so on.

The truth is nearly everybody is awful because they're human. Goodness is the exception, not the trend.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:55:30 2015 No.6240891 >>6240871 >I saw an asian dude with a hot chick once Your anecdotal evidence means shit buddy. Move along. Talk to most Asian dudes and they'll admit their race is not perceived as exerting masculinity and they experience this on a day-to-day basis.

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:56:37 2015 No.6240897

>>6240881
it's true though, you obviously wish you were a slutty chick, getting to suck all those big semen spurting chad cocks and then after you get your fill and your ass is good and stretched you go find some rich guy to buy you shit while you sit at home and play videogames....i mean it's just not fair right? why can't you do that? but, my beta friend, thanks to the miracle of modern science you can! start your transition today!

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:57:09 2015 No.6240900 >>6240889 +1

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 11:59:48 2015 No.6240914 File: 98 KB, 1337x611, lit.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] bye /lit/ :^)

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:00:02 2015 No.6240915 >>6240891 >talk to most asian dudes maybe you should try actually talking to some asian dudes, since you obviously have this racist stereotype of them

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:01:02 2015 No.6240924 >>6240688 >Why should I give children to the scientists who advance society? >I'll just have Chad's kids. >Society breaks apart. How does society break apart from this? There are so many hidden/insane premises in your argument it's not even funny.

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:01:04 2015 No.6240925
File: 38 KB, 474x528, 1425689364825.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6240897

And what exactly are you compensating for by trying to put the "beta's" in their place?

I'm a divorced man and had a few ONS's and gf's in my life before that. I'm far from a robot ( they'll probably post raging frogs if I tell my story ), but I can agree with some of their statement.
The pariahs and the kings often share the same perspective. Just a sweet intellectual gem by René Girard I wanted to throw into the conversation. Hmmm, hmmm yes.

Of course the ideal type of a Chad does not exist in such a number that every girl you'll ever meet has had his dick up her mouth.
But if you're going to deny that this social climate is not extremely beneficial to women, you aren't just wrong but haven't been paying much attention or haven't heard the juicy stories yet.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:04:37 2015 No.6240947 >>6240915 When you walk down the street you don't see the shut-ins. Japan is literally dying off because of NEET permavirgins rather playing with their toys than hooking up with girls.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:04:49 2015 No.6240949 >>6240924 >implying it's not quite funny

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:06:22 2015 No.6240955 >>6240925 >But if you're going to deny that this social climate is not extremely beneficial to women life's not fair, fucking deal with it, you beta bitch

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:08:27 2015 No.6240964 >>6240806 Fucked so many times that their pussies can hide soccer ball's and unable to give much pleasure because of their dryness. Also, the pussy of old women smell like uric acid. That's why men should fuck only teenagers or non promiscuous women.

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:08:33 2015 No.6240965

>>6240947
>Japan is literally dying off because of NEET permavirgins rather playing with their toys than hooking up with girls.

every industrialized country is facing low birth rate, it's only a problem for racist countries like japan and russia that are unwilling to accept immigrants to make up for the loss, this has nothing to do with "chads and betas"

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:09:56 2015 No.6240972

>>6240889
For me what it's about is that the rules have changed. Not that long ago people got married in their 20's if not late teens, got jobs they stayed in the rest of their lives and started pumping out kids and raising families. Now people (at least Western middle class white people) are getting married later. Things have changed, women are more free, more independent. Since they're more independent, men are less obligated to provide for them.

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:10:23 2015 No.6240975

>>6240924

It's inherently unstable.
What then happens is a complete breakdown in male investment in women and families. Men either spend their working hours battling it out in vast, unproductive “Who’s the Sexiest?” competitions for privileged access to a veritable harem of vaj, or on the other end, working a basic job making just enough money to support and entertain themselves, or even going full NEET pissjugging neckbeard.

If you think this is a recipe for creating and sustaining an advanced modern society filled with creature comforts, I have a grass hut somewhere in the Congo to sell you.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:11:26 2015 No.6240984 >>6240955 >well you're right, life's hard, so go kill yourself if you can't cope Spoken like a true libertarian.

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:11:28 2015 No.6240985

>>6240610
>i think college betas have this weird fantasy that there are these wild orgies and bukkake gangbangs and shit happening somewhere on campus every night and they weren't invited...the truth is most women are not even close to as slutty as you fantasize that they are, and the one or two times some chick gets drunk and gangsbangs the whole frat, she wakes up the next morning and pressed sexual assault charges...sorry dudes, but college isn't nearly as wild and exciting as the education industrial complex wants you to believe.

>he does not know med students

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:12:45 2015 No.6240990 >>6240975 >going full NEET pissjugging neckbeard i don't get this, is it because you have to live in a rented room without a private bath and you don't want to have to go down the hall to the public bathroom so you piss in a bottle?

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:12:51 2015 No.6240991 File: 35 KB, 427x306, tokyo-subway.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6240965 >population reduction is a problem for Japan

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:13:08 2015 No.6240992 >>6240965 Russia does have a very large immigrant community. It's just there is also a large outward flow, of both cute sexy girlas and doctors.

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:13:44 2015 No.6240997

>>6240965

>it happens in other countries too

This is my whole fucking point I make in other posts here, you shit for brains.
And it's not just because "people don't want kids anymore", but because there's a percentage of sexual paupers out there who are unable to reproduce because of the rules of the game as it is determined by female preselection.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:13:45 2015 No.6240998 >>6240984 >i can't get pussy as much as some guy who gets a lot of pussy so lets have a beta revolt and make a new society based on equal distribution of hot chicks take you Sexual Marxism to tumblr, faggot

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:13:45 2015 No.6240999

>>6240975
How is Chad Dudebro making money then?
Why are so many scientists in relationships then?

The only party you seem to have any worthwhile insight into is the " full NEET pissjugging neckbeard", commentating society from the sidelines of life that are the boards on 4chan through your distorting looking glasses of viriginity.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:15:19 2015 No.6241012 >>6240997 dude, stop making excuses for being a fucking loser.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:16:09 2015 No.6241019 >>6240925 the betas exist to finance the upbringings of the alphas' children

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:16:21 2015 No.6241021 >>6240997 if god had wanted you to pass your genes on he wouldn't have made you unattractive. it's the lord's will.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:17:07 2015 No.6241025 >>6240999 >beta bucks scientist provider proves that the myth of the hypersexual alpha concentrating most young female sexual action isn't true kuk

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:17:16 2015 No.6241027 >>6240990 I piss in a bottle and pour it down the sink so I don't have to leave my dorm room. It's convenient if I'm not dressed.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:18:05 2015 No.6241032 >>6241025 Do you think women will like you if you just shitpost hard enough?

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:18:16 2015 No.6241033 >>6241012 >>6240998 >>6241021 What's with these ad hominems? Maybe discussing Leninism is more your thing than debating harsh realities.

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:18:19 2015 No.6241034

>>6240681
>What's wrong with being promiscuous, anyway?
non-official whores are not whores with the robots, but only with those 6/10 with explicit advantages. Non-official whores drive the price of a woman up by forbidding prostitution for sub6/10 men, the average guy who has no financial means, no free contraceptives, nor time to go to bars and so on. Non-official whores are reducing the women market to most men while still being proud of displaying their behaviours. Non-official whores are hypocrites who shit on men.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:18:28 2015 No.6241035 >>6240965 >that are unwilling to accept immigrants to make up for the loss Yes Goy. Import immigrants and displace the natives. You always have to grow or something's wrong!

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:20:01 2015 No.6241043 >>6241034 >it's bad for other people to have sex because that means I can't buy sex Oh wow. How entidled can you get?

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:20:27 2015 No.6241044

>>6241035
you'll probably pull a "not the guy who are replying to" but if not-growing isn't a problem then why is it a problem if a bunch of jap faggots dress up in school girl outfits and wack it to cartoons instead of having kids? and it's not jewmedia conspiracy since all those fucking tranny-inducing cartoons are made by the japs themselves

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:21:53 2015 No.6241053 >>6241044 I'm only the guy you're replying to. I never said downsizing was a problem.

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:22:36 2015 No.6241056

>>6240999

>sexual paupers should just die because they're worthless hahaha, unless they're non-white, I love non-whites, did you know the KKK also burned niggers, so ISIS isn't all that bad, white people suck more

Maybe if you're done feeling bad for other races you might have some empathy left for white permavirgins.
I don't know when that will happen in your circle.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:22:42 2015 No.6241057 >>6241033 it's not an ad-hominem, you have taken the position of the unattractive loser who can't get any pussy, to you i say "deal with it", if you were meant to get pussy you wouldn't be unattractive.

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:23:18 2015 No.6241062

>>6240975
Why is this inherently unstable? Not everyone/everything is motivated by sex, both males and females. Women are not primal hormonal beasts. Men are not primal hormonal beasts. Were you one of those people that looked at the movie Idiocracy and found it incredibly valid as a social criticism?

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:23:42 2015 No.6241063

>>6241035
Population decline implies economical decline which _is_ bad unless everyone else is doing it.

And yes, it is a problem. Here in German shit's gonna hit the fan since the young, shrinking population won't be able to afford the social security of the non-working seniors.

>>6241056
Que?

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:25:30 2015 No.6241071 >>6241057 See >>6240925 I don't know where I "took that position" because I'm sharing a particular observation. Guilty by association? Also, you're agreeing with me on everything. The only difference is your sadism.

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:27:48 2015 No.6241085

>>6241062

I wasn't one of those people no.
But if you see 1 in 2 marriages go down the shitter, you know something's up.
You also know something's up when "social dynamics" is a lucrative business in today's world where a significant number of men need to be learned how to engage and hold down a woman.

Oh sure, babies are still being born. Albeit in broken families, but all is ok.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:30:00 2015 No.6241098 I like the comics. The way there's talking and ideas and then there's a fuck picture which somehow trumps everything.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:30:35 2015 No.6241101 >>6241085 >>6241085 >1 in 2 marriages go down the shitter, more marriages fail only because it's ok to get divorced, back in the day 1 in 2 marriages were still miserable, they just couldn't divorce...why do betas hate freedom so much?

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:32:02 2015 No.6241108 File: 259 KB, 891x576, 1425697051473.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6240610 >the truth is most women are not even close to as slutty as you fantasize that they are Maybe because you weren't invited.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:33:03 2015 No.6241113 >>6241101 >it's ok to get divorced Now ask yourself why people get divorced?

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:34:07 2015 No.6241118 >>6241113 i'm so glad history has conservative faggots like you on the run

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:34:44 2015 No.6241119 >>6241118 What the fuck is that supposed to mean?

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:35:56 2015 No.6241124 >>6241119 it means you're on the wrong side of history, and eventually you will die off.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:36:52 2015 No.6241129 >>6241101 >back in the day 1 in 2 marriages were still miserable, they just couldn't divorce Nice assumption, do you have any proof?

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:37:42 2015 No.6241134 >>6241129 you're not very smart are you? then again, if you were you wouldn't be conservative...

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:37:52 2015 No.6241135 >>6241124 >on the wrong side of history, and eventually you will die off That's what the Soviets said, look where the Soviet Union is now.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:39:27 2015 No.6241147 >>6241134 At least i capitalize the first letter of the first word of every sentence

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:40:02 2015 No.6241148 >>6241147 >i are cuckservatives really this dumb?

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:40:24 2015 No.6241150

>>6241085
>1 in 2 marriages go down the shitter
I believe 1 in 2 marriages have always been poor. I actually believe high incidence of marriage shows that we deal with problems in a healthier way. I don't think people that resent and hurt each other are great parents.

>significant number of men need to be learned how to engage and hold down a woman.
Fortune tellers make wild amounts of money! Hacks preying on the insecurities of people are an age old thing. What is a "significant" amount anyway? Anecdotal: I don't know any man that /needs/ this type of training.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:40:27 2015 No.6241151 >>6241147 why would that make sense on an internet forum? this isn't a fucking illuminated manuscript, asshole

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:40:55 2015 No.6241157 >>6241148 I'm not a native English speaker so i don't know the specifics of English grammar, only the universals that are valid for every language.

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:42:01 2015 No.6241161

>>6241135
it was obviously the soviet union was going to collapse, even trotsky himself predicted that shit in the 30s...face it, liberal capitalism is the end of history and america, the constantly regenerating nation of immigrants, is it's epicenter. future historians will split history not between the fall of rome and renascence but the fall of rome and the founding of america

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:42:35 2015 No.6241164 >>6241124 Oh right, you guys believe that. I'm still waiting for that spectre to do something, but it seems to be a shitty poltergeist.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:43:01 2015 No.6241165 >>6241157 >only the universals that are valid for every language. best be trolling nigger, even a pleb knows there are plenty of languages that don't have capital letters

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:43:10 2015 No.6241168 File: 65 KB, 640x480, fotos-del-dia-6-enero-2015.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6241150 >I believe 1 in 2 marriages have always been poor. Again, you can't prove that. You are just projecting modern day shitty marriages into the past.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:44:10 2015 No.6241172 >>6241161 Not even Fukuyama believes that anymore. >>6241165 Then these languages are not relevant.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:44:18 2015 No.6241173 >>6241168 and you're not imagining some romanticized past that has no basis in fact? if 1 in 2 marriages today are unhappy what makes you believe before divorce became common people marriages were not unhappy?

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:45:18 2015 No.6241176 >>6241172 >Not even Fukuyama believes that anymore. that's because fukuyama is a pleb and didn't even really understand his only decent idea

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:45:51 2015 No.6241177 >>6241168 No, on the other hand, believing that there was some kind of social utopia in which the vast majority of marriages were idyllic is hardly any better.

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:46:07 2015 No.6241178

>>6241150

>it all works out just fine

Funny how the world can look so great from a nice little spot high above the waves.

Also this "this has always happened" is bullshit that needs to die. As soon as someone has a bit of knowledge on world history: "well this happened in 2000 B.C. too."
Stop using examples of the past as "well things are still the same :D". No it isn't. There's an obvious trend going on where this shit is stronger than ever before. And it's not just because there are more people.

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:46:36 2015 No.6241179

>>6241168
I don't actually think 1 in 2 marriages end in divorce either. I see no reason why human relationships now are any worse than they were in the past. Neither of us have good data to back up this claim. I might be projecting current bad marriages on the past, but you are making up good marriages in the past. There is no data showing how happy people in marriages were back in God knows what arbitrary period you claim as the pinnacle of human society.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:47:08 2015 No.6241180 >>6241178 dude, are you even educated? you seem somewhat stupid.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:47:44 2015 No.6241182 >>6241161 Marxists need to shut their stupid mouths. Every prediction they made turned out to be flat out wrong. Arab Spring was supposed to be the start of the world revolution too, hu? Fucking grad students I swear to god.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:48:41 2015 No.6241183 >>6241178 >There's an obvious trend going on where this shit is stronger than ever before. [citation needed]

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:48:44 2015 No.6241184
File: 316 KB, 959x1280, tipicas.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6241173
Because those marriages were based on different premises.

You can't compare relationships based on tribes and clans making alliances, arranging marriages for it's young members to symbolize that, based on the accurate consideration of personalities by the couple's parents and clan elders, where a true love would grow out of the shared labour of building a household and raising a family, and the mutual dependence as the couple got older, with "modern marriage" based on wether two people like to have sex with each other and that goes into the shitter as soon as they get bored of the sex.

And you can't expect women who engage in cocaine fueled orgies with alpha males while they can before settling up with lesser males they will NEVER be able to love because their standards were fucked up by exposure to men at the top of the hierarchy to be able to commit themselves. They have become addicted to their instant gratification, unable to exhibit inhibition and self-control to restrain their primitive urges and natural instincts. Having any kind of long-term relationship or commitment in this context only makes sense if you are a cuckold fetishist who gets off on being cheated on and humiliated.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:48:51 2015 No.6241185 >>6241180 Tell me why and I'll gladly lick your intellectually superior feet.

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:49:37 2015 No.6241187

>>6241182
>Arab Spring was supposed to be the start of the world revolution too, hu? Fucking grad students I swear to god.

Arab Spring was a CIA operation to reshuffle the deck in North Africa and when it didn't work out they got NATO to bomb it until they got the results they wanted. No serious Marxist considered the Arab Spring the start of anything except a new wave of imperial puppet regimes. You seem stupid.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:50:18 2015 No.6241190 >>6241183 http://www.nbcnews.com/id/39911299/ns/technology_and_science-science/t/superstitious-beliefs-getting-more-common/#.VPx9q_xwvO8 I count PUA and all that personal development stuff among it too.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:50:37 2015 No.6241191 >>6241184 are you that indian muslim loser who can't get any pussy and needs his parents to arrange a marriage for him or he'll run off and join isis? stay beta, bitch.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:50:53 2015 No.6241192 >>6241187 Hindsight is a bitch. I remember 2011 and the discussions at my university.

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:52:19 2015 No.6241196

>>6241187

Funny because I remember 2011 pretty well and the marxist blogosphere was on fire about how this is a chance for the left to overthrow capitalism. Even hacks like Zizek were on that bandwagon. Alain Badiou coined his "event" in that context. Also #Occupy happened because they wanted to show solidarity with their brethren eastwards.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:52:46 2015 No.6241199 File: 64 KB, 600x459, 1396739557930.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6241063 Jesus a german advocating for foreign immigration. If you're an ethnic german, kill yourself you worthless piece of shit.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:52:49 2015 No.6241200 >>6241192 The first uprising in Tunisia was legit but the ones in Libya, Egypt and Syria were fake as fuck. Anyone who was paying attention could tell that.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:53:48 2015 No.6241202 >>6241190 From your source: >There is no hard data on how common it is to believe in the paranormal. Also, it's an nbc news story. How is this a source?

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:53:55 2015 No.6241204 >>6241199 >Implying Turkish immigration won't just make Germany even more masterful Even Nietzsche would approve, he dug the Turkish Mohammedans.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:54:00 2015 No.6241205 >>6241199 >>>/int/

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:54:05 2015 No.6241206 >>6241200 Agreed. Heck Tunisia is fine now. Especially Libya was basically a foreign coup.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:54:07 2015 No.6241207 >>6241043 >>Oh wow. How entidled can you get? implying I should not be entitled.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:55:01 2015 No.6241211 >>6241200 >Tahrir square was fake >all the protestors in Libya and Syria were obvious CIA-supported proxies Guess who's the dumb idiot here.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:55:11 2015 No.6241212 >>6241207 That's exactly what I was implying.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:55:23 2015 No.6241214 >>6241204 >Niezsche thought so so it must be true >>6241205 I'm actually surprised you didn't say /int/

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:56:29 2015 No.6241217 >>6241214 >I'm actually surprised you didn't say /int/ shit, meant /pol/

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:56:33 2015 No.6241218 If it makes you feel better, OP, I've wasted my high school AND my university years, I have no friends, I never have sex, and yet I'm generally in good spirits.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:56:37 2015 No.6241220 >>6241202 Fine. Go read this then: http://www.amazon.com/The-New-Age-Movement-Sacralization/dp/0631193324 Jesus fucking Christ you people and your autism.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:56:45 2015 No.6241221 >>6241211 Dude, read the history of how the CIA rolls. They've been doing this shit for half a century already. All of it was straight out of their playbook.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:57:00 2015 No.6241224 >>6241207 and you have no means to support your view. Also, it is not entitlement. It is about to truly free the sex market and stop the feminist hypocrisy in keeping a coherence in our morality

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:59:22 2015 No.6241233 >>6241220 And we've ended up in ad hominem. I hope you find happiness someday.

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 12:59:50 2015 No.6241234

>>6241211
>>Tahrir square was fake

actually it's funny the ny times recently did a story about middle class arabs who join isis, and the story they ran had a photographer who was working tahrir square during the uprising and then also happened to be besties with this dude who infiltrated, err, i mean, joined, isis last year...no they aren't cia assets, no sir!

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 13:00:03 2015 No.6241235

>>6241221

You sound like those sandniggers claiming ISIS is all Mossad agents.

I'm sure the CIA did have a hand in it, but to claim that the discontent among the protestors in those countries was all staged is flat out wrong. These were authentic revolts.
But sorry, no world revolution resulted from that. Go figure, hu?

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 13:00:45 2015 No.6241237 >>6241235 >Libya >authentic revolt shill pls

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 13:01:27 2015 No.6241241 >>6241237 Were you on the ground?

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 13:01:59 2015 No.6241243 >>6241241 No, but I was in France when all the zionist shills like BHL convinced Sarkozy to bomb Libya.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 13:03:00 2015 No.6241252 >>6241243 Let me guess, you're a sandnigger?

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 13:03:07 2015 No.6241254

>>6241237
Not even denying that foreign agents had a hand on it, or that it was only through Western military supports that the Libyan rebels could win their war, but it's obvious that there must be some authentic, native resentment for such uprisings to occur. Otherwise it would be just too easy, CIA would be omnipotent agent that could destroy any government it doesn't like, when it isn't like this, and they have a lot of difficulty in places where the government is not hated enough, such as Cuba, Venezuela, North Korea, Russia, Iran or even Syria.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 13:03:19 2015 No.6241255 >>6241237 if libya was an "authentic revolt" nato wouldn't have had to drop 400 million dollars worth of bombs on it to "aid" the movement

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 13:03:37 2015 No.6241258 File: 120 KB, 500x544, tumbl00.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >any revolt >authentic

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 13:03:53 2015 No.6241261 File: 38 KB, 500x332, 1395410114849.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6241252 Nope. Fuck Allah. Let me guess, you're a kike ?

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 13:05:10 2015 No.6241267 >>6241258 every revolt is just a beta uprising by resentful losers

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 13:05:52 2015 No.6241273 >>6241254 Obviously, in any repressive system there exists some resentment. However it's indisputable that the Western powers hijacked the arab spring movement for their own interests, which culminated in bombing Libya to help the rebels.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 13:06:36 2015 No.6241277 File: 786 KB, 900x916, 1420920911155.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >thread about the perceived exploitation of beta males has turned into a thread about the arab spring

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 13:07:18 2015 No.6241280 >>6240696 bob dylan cuck tier

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 13:07:29 2015 No.6241281 >>6241277 see >>6241267

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 13:07:49 2015 No.6241283 >>6241277 That's actually quite an improvement over the initial posts of this thread.

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 13:07:50 2015 No.6241284

>>6241254
Nixon wanted a coup in Chile as soon as Allende was elected. The CIA advised against it. He had too much popular support. It was only when he started losing popular support (and support of Chile's military) that Pinochet's coup was possible. When the CIA doesn't have popular support to exploit you wind up with Vietnam not Chile or Iran.

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 13:07:59 2015 No.6241287

>>6241273
and arming rebels in syria who would become isis. i agree there are probably a lot of earnest protestors in egypt, that one is more murky because i remember at first the usa didnt want the government to fall until they got assurances from the military that nothing would change with regard to israel

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 13:08:50 2015 No.6241289 File: 3.93 MB, 5880x2799, 14136[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] TAKBIR!

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 13:10:54 2015 No.6241299 come on man this thread was supposed to be about pointing and laughing at betas who can't get any pussy, how did it become an analysis of cia coups

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 13:11:40 2015 No.6241302
File: 210 KB, 897x1206, hot.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6241267
Beta uprising is not revolution, but reaction. Every revolution is led by charismatic alpha males who want to destroy traditional systems of value because they can exploit their own charismatic authority to build new ones, while beta males are invested in traditional forms of authority since that gives them enough legitimacy and power to navigate without the need for charisma and social skills.

Pic relates, or Che Guevara, or even Russell Brand, rebels are always young alphas.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 13:12:28 2015 No.6241309 >>6241299 because the people doing the pointing and laughing started losing i may never feel a woman's warmth but i'll never feel the cold taste of bitter defeat in an internet argument either

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 13:14:58 2015 No.6241316 >>6240855 You know there's no such thing as a "sexual market", right? Do you realize the mere notion of treating people's relationships with other people as an exchanging process that can be regulated marks you as a sociopath, don't you?

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 13:15:30 2015 No.6241319

>>6241302
>thinking communism wasn't just a reaction against capitalism attempting to bring feudal serfdom from the farm to the factory
>thinking anarchism isn't just a reaction against the rise of the modern nation state system

keep misunderstanding history, betabuddy

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 13:16:32 2015 No.6241324

>>6241316
>Do you realize the mere notion of treating people's relationships with other people as an exchanging process that can be regulated marks you as a sociopath, don't you?

then later he'll be in r9k crying that chicks only like bad buys and not nice guys like him lmao

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 13:16:40 2015 No.6241326 >>6241302 >implying he was no reactionary en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Die_Sexualit%C3%A4t_im_Kulturkampf

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 13:17:28 2015 No.6241329 >>6241316 Calling me names doesn't invalidate my observation.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 13:18:29 2015 No.6241334 >>6241324 So great hu, schadenfreude?

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 13:20:37 2015 No.6241344 >>6241329 Calling out your observation as the insane ramblings of a sheltered, hormone-driven sociopath does, though.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 13:21:57 2015 No.6241352 >>6241344 Ebin ad hom, I'm sure you're a big hit in your feminist workgroup.

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 13:23:36 2015 No.6241359
File: 103 KB, 600x450, gobekli.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6241302
To expand upon it, since i believe that alpha-beta dichotomy is the missing link of political theory.

In the state of nature, humanity lived in harem societies were a few alpha males monopolized all the women thanks to their higher aggressivity, violence and dominance. This is the natural pattern towards which mankind evolved to live and therefore is still presented in our biological imperatives, this is the reason why women prefer to mate with alpha males, because they are better suited for the lives that man used to live in the jungle.

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/11/071129-ancient-harem.html

Now, such a society was hell to beta males, who were excluded from every possibility of having sex or having any social participation at all, they were just to be used and killed when no longer necessary. It was on this context that the first Beta Revolution occurred. Religion, tradition and morality arose as a way to curb alpha male predation and give beta males the access to women, it is now known that religion predates civilization (pic related), unlike what it is belived in Marxist or feminist theory, the subjugation of women and the taking of the power of beta males preceded the beginning of agriculture. It was the dawn of beta age, where patriarchs ruled society and thanks to their efforts and productivity (now incentived by the facts that they could have sex, thanks to new morals that regulated female sexuality) it led to the Neolithic Revolution.

But as this happened, outside the confines of settled, beta society, lurked still nomads, hunter-gatherers and other societies dominated by alpha males, as these societies preyed upon sedentary betas, they established themselves as a ruler caste of alpha males at the top of the hierarchy. Ever since them, the struggle between the centralized state and the people have been the struggle between the "stationary alpha" and it's beta underlings.

But there was other menace, the rebel alpha. As i said, traditional morality empowers beta males. Since they can therefore have a place at society without having social skills, because everything has already been set by dead people who are still respected, beta males thrive at ordered, civilized and stable societies with respected religions, but they can't compete in chaos, in disorder where charisma is the basis of political and social authority. This is why at the same time that alpha males thrive in overcentralization, they also want complete decentralization of power towards the mean, so they can destroy society. This is the origin of anarchism as alpha revolution.

The entire history of the world is the history of alpha males wanting either to centralize power at their hands through the State, or to destroy the State so they can build a new power structure, and beta males trying to find a equlibrium.

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 13:24:35 2015 No.6241361

>>6241352

I'm sure you're not, since apparently you have the whole humanity figured out even though you don't take a minute of your time to actually reach out to anybody other than yourself. Keep believing in a Chad that steals your right to put your dick inside a hole, though, but I assure you that way of thinking is doing you more harm than good, and you'll end up regretting the time wasted.

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 13:25:46 2015 No.6241367
File: 74 KB, 640x480, reproduction.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6241316
>Do you realize the mere notion of treating people's relationships with other people as an exchanging process that can be regulated marks you as a sociopath, don't you?

You only say that because deregulation benefits you.

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 13:28:41 2015 No.6241382

>>6241367

Not at all, I've been in an exclusive relationship for years and haven't pursued the odd opportunities to at least flirt with people on my environment. I'm also not attractive and in fact suffered from social anxiety for years in college, to the point I had to hide in bathrooms and miss whole periods. What I'm saying is, things are much more complicated than some bogus alpha-beta dichotomy.

>inb4 "muh statistical evidence versus your anecdotal evidence"

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 13:28:47 2015 No.6241383 >>6241361 You're probably sucking on a big fat chad cock as you're typing this, slut.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 13:29:52 2015 No.6241388 >>6241359 >alpha-beta dichotomy it's called master/slave morality, nietzsche already covered this 150 years ago, bro.

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 13:32:15 2015 No.6241396

>>6241316
>Do you realize the mere notion of treating people's relationships with other people as an exchanging process that can be regulated marks you as a sociopath, don't you?
Huh? Whoring's been around a long long time. Marriage has all kind of rules and regulations and legally binding contracts.

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 13:32:59 2015 No.6241400

>>6241388

Yeah, I don't recall Nietzsche talking about those pesky women getting all wet because Chad's megacock. He talks about a will to live and bathe ourselves in our reality, not about having supergenetics and being some kind of natural sex machine.

>>6241383

Now that's lewd, anon.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 13:33:13 2015 No.6241403 >>6241388 No, what i am saying is different.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 13:34:28 2015 No.6241407 >>6241400 Read the guys actual post, it's just a paraphrase of Nietzsche...

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 13:34:57 2015 No.6241409 >>6241382 So basically you are this guy >>6240516

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 13:35:28 2015 No.6241413 >>6241403 how is it different exactly, because it sounds completely the same.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 13:35:37 2015 No.6241414 >>6241367 the solution is to legalize prostitution so that betas become less betas

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 13:35:58 2015 No.6241415 >>6241407 I've never read Nietzche, though.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 13:37:44 2015 No.6241418 >>6241407 Yeah, not gonna take seriously a guy talking entire walls of text using "alpha" and "beta" without irony. >this is the origin of anarchism as alpha revolution Literally thinking with his dick.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 13:41:20 2015 No.6241427 >>6241418 his "alpha revolutionary" is just nietzsche's ascetic priest

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 13:41:40 2015 No.6241429

>>6241409

Maybe in your fantasy land. In the actual word, abrasive personalities in school either stay the same, which makes for a poor future, or change for the better and become much more likeable as a result. Comics like this confuse being assertive with being a dick, because it's an easier pill to swallow than just assuming maybe people don't feel comfortable around you.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 13:42:21 2015 No.6241431 >>6241415 well, that's why you should actually read the canon before you waste time thinking up stuff that was already obvious 150 years ago...

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 13:43:44 2015 No.6241436 >>6241429 that's the slave resentiment at work, "i'm too weak to be assertive so i'll create a morality system that says being assertive is bad so i turn my weakness into a strength"

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 13:43:50 2015 No.6241437 >>6241427 Explain how.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 13:43:58 2015 No.6241438 >>6241429 > Comics like this confuse being assertive with being a dick, because it's an easier pill to swallow than just assuming maybe people don't feel comfortable around you. That doesn't have anything to do with the comic.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 13:48:24 2015 No.6241448 >>6241437 oh ya ur right, the shit he wrote is just a bunch of dumb shit by someone who has a weak grasp of history...i guess i was giving him too much credit

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 13:48:37 2015 No.6241449
File: 1.09 MB, 1512x902, japoneses.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6241436
When unregulated assertiveness inflation competition leads to societal collapse, how bad is exactly that morality system regulates that to create a orderly and stable society?

Japanese people tend to be unassertive, Haitians tend to be assertive, where would you prefer to live?

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 13:50:41 2015 No.6241456 >>6241449 individuals are assertive, not "races" or "nations".

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 13:51:10 2015 No.6241458 File: 5 KB, 184x184, a775df3acf72e913ee953ad58aefc772a3bd0c9c_full[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >alfalfa males on my /lit/!?

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 13:52:48 2015 No.6241462

>>6241449
One could argue the United States is the most assertive nation in history since it manipulates the entire rest of it's world for it's own goals and advantages through "soft power" like world bank, g8, etc and through military like nato when it can't get what it wants through negotiation, and the United States is this way because the most assertive people from anywhere in the world come here to live in freedom, meanwhile beta bitch like you and the jap trannies stay in the basement and angrypost all day

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 13:53:31 2015 No.6241465
File: 75 KB, 600x439, 825.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

I remember a story related to this

I was a nerd through high school, there was this girl, the typical girl, she friendzoned me and sucked the dick of a friend.

Fast forward i'm graduating from uni, the best time of my life, literally /fit/, getting money, and doing drinking and parties with friends every weekend.

Then this girl appears again, she is now a bartender, living in a poor flat, with other punks, "anarchists", etc.

She contacts me and wants to have some conversation, she is all funny and happy with me, literally she makes herself the best that she can.

After some weeks of pure conversation, she wants to live in my apartment with me, I remember my power and say to her "Sorry, but, I don't want a relationship with you, I have better plans right now"

Now comes the funny part, in the next week she spends all days commenting my photos in fb saying that i'm a disgusting misogynist, a chauvinist pig that only cares about his patriarchal status, etc etc. she goes on full resentment on me and after a month deletes all the comments and starts having a relationship with another jobless punk.

That's how you dodge a bullet my friends, some months passed and when speaking with another high school friend, he asked how i went with this girl, i tell the story and he proceeds to tell me that she speaked with him and he said that i was getting money because i just left uni

Never forget

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 13:57:36 2015 No.6241480
File: 443 KB, 400x296, 1423549134485.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6241449

>unregulated assertiveness inflation competition

That's hysterical. What, you gonna apprehend people exceeding a certain groovyness cuota? You going to make random inspections at clubs to see if somebody is pulling too much pussy? Maybe raid shops so you retire all articles of clothing except cargo pants on critical situations? Jesus man.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 14:00:15 2015 No.6241492 >>6241465 yeah i always get hoodrat hookers trying to hit on me, then i tell them i live in an apartment that doesn't allow guests and they fuck off to the next sap they think has money...but the truth is an alpha chad would have fucked them all

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 14:04:17 2015 No.6241506

>>6241085
If you remove second and third marriages, and so on, from that statistic, it becomes much less drastic; there's a small subset of people who marry who are shit at keeping marriages but good at getting them.

The divorce rate is also declining because people in their 20's aren't getting married anymore and that was the largest source of divorce stats.

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 14:06:45 2015 No.6241519

>>6241506
also the decline is related to the fact that when divorce first became "acceptable" all the old people in shitty marriages they hate went for divorce, but younger people are less likely to get into a bad marriage just because it's "expected" or whatever, which shows the betabitch guy who was crying about divorce is full of shit, but this shit come as no surprise

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 14:11:12 2015 No.6241538

>>6241519
the marriage is about filiation and therefore it was already destroyed when bastards were recognized as worthy children. The no fault divorce were pushed by the feminazis and weakened it further. Now with the faggots, the marriage is emptied of any signification

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 14:12:08 2015 No.6241544 >>6241519 That's the official history, and a myth. https://dalrock.wordpress.com/2014/12/04/ny-times-happy-talk-about-divorce/

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 14:13:49 2015 No.6241557

>>6241519

It's pure speculation, but I think in the next few generations the norm of monogamy is going to loosen up a bit and there's going to be another drop as it becomes more and more normal for people to step out of their marriages to fuck people or to bring other people into the marriage. It's the natural conclusion of marriage being viewed as a social contract rather than either a utility set up or something done out of duty to god. This sort of view is very prevalent in places were people give relationship advice on the internet. There's also pressure from globalism to have workers be very mobile. Looser relationships lend themselves to that.

There's a really strong polygamy movement brewing among fringe types that could solidify with a few good polemicists and a desire to look outside rather than form enclaves. I have a few out there friends and I get to peer into these communities through them.

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 14:19:26 2015 No.6241580
File: 29 KB, 481x273, aposta.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6241557
As societal norms regulating human sexuality break up, we go back to the harem societies we evolved to live into, that's obvious and in no way opposed to red pill philosophy.

That's what we say that everyone who enters in a relationship is a de facto cuckold fetishist. Soon it will become demanded that you share your partner, otherwise you will be seen as a retrograde sexist, and what argument can you come up to deny that? Things move along a path preordained by the dominant worldviews, and the dominant worlviews, at least among the intelligentsia, who set the path the rest of the world will follow, is feminism and hedonism. Mix the two and you have alpha utopia.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 14:21:33 2015 No.6241594 >>6241465 would be interesting if true i suppose

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 14:25:17 2015 No.6241615

>>6241580
>Mix the two and you have alpha utopia.
only for the celibates

why going into a relationship when celibacy offers all the advantages without any inconvenient ? the only requisite is that you must be wealthy

and monogamy will take the form of one partner at a time, for the daily life bills and what not, but no longer the form of the sexual fidelity. Also, the polyamor will rise a bit, but will not be acknowledge by the state before a few generations.

Unless we say that sex no longer matters that much, but I do not see this coming.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 14:26:57 2015 No.6241626 R9K GET OUT BETAS GET OUT FEDORAS GET OUT >WOMEN ARE HAVING SEX WITH PEOPLE BESIDES ME WHO CAAAAAAAAAAAAAARES

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 14:27:21 2015 No.6241629 >>6241594 when you actually leave you basement you'll find things like this happen all the time in life

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 14:29:06 2015 No.6241637 >>6241626 Says the people who literally want to overthrow the entire economy and society because money and political power is at the hands of other people besides you.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 14:30:24 2015 No.6241645 >>6241637 i'm an unapologetic lover of all things bourgeois, so i don't know what the fuck kind of shit you're projecting

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 14:32:22 2015 No.6241664 >>6241645 Why do you hate bourgeois morality then?

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 14:33:31 2015 No.6241671 >>6241664 you're the one who hates bourgeois morality and wants to go some restrictive peasant shit

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 14:35:23 2015 No.6241684 >>6241626 >people are dying of hunger, who cares, I have enough food

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 14:36:29 2015 No.6241694 >>6241684 >You will die without sex

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 14:36:57 2015 No.6241698 >>6241684 >christian_bale.jpg if you're so hungry, why don't you get a job?

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 14:37:59 2015 No.6241706 >>6241684 >pls make my waifu real

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 14:39:30 2015 No.6241715 >>6241694 >>6241706 >hahaha ur a sexless loser, maybe u shud die or have my work ethic.. I mean social skills

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 14:41:21 2015 No.6241722 >>6241715 people are born with all kinds of disabilities, you just happened to be born socially retarded, too bad but don't blame "chad", blame god for making you defective

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 14:42:26 2015 No.6241725 >>6241715 If you are on a point where calling for government action so you can wet your dick sounds reasonable to you, yes, maybe you should improve on that aspect.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 14:43:32 2015 No.6241731 >>6241725 this guy is basically a nigger of sex, so failed at life he needs the government to prop him up and make him a viable human...

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 14:43:52 2015 No.6241732

>>6241722

Well you might not believe it, but I am not a sexless permavirgin loser.

I happen to be a moral person who can feel empathy with the downtrodden without having to be one.
Strange hu? How you try to understand the plight of those pariahs and not enjoy their suffering?

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 14:45:31 2015 No.6241741 >>6241732 >thinks identifying with the weak and failed is somehow "virtuous" sorry, bro, i'm not into christianity, take the guilt trip somewhere else

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 14:47:37 2015 No.6241757 >>6241741 Your edges are tearing up this thread.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 14:48:50 2015 No.6241767 >>6241757 you're the one who wants a government program to distribute sexy babes to ugly dorks

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 14:49:27 2015 No.6241772

I believe in the sexual free market and laws of attraction stuff. Seems pretty much like how society governs itself now. Which shouldn't come as a big shock. Life is unbalanced from the get go.

What I don't get with the redpill mentality is why waste all your time being bitter and squawking about it and learning theories and statistics to support your philosophy.

The whole idea is that they've become enlightened to the way the world works but it doesn't seem to do much for them other than make them extremely toxic. You've been handed the silver bullet apparently so go out there, get fit, give less fucks, and slay pussy if that's what you want and really think life comes down to.

Or do redpillers just want something to point to for all their shortcomings so they can hide behind it like a shield and not actually do anything. Just sit there and be depressed about wasted time. I'm sure that's going to work out.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 14:49:55 2015 No.6241778 >>6241757 sex for pleasure is sin anyways, so if you try to get laid you'll just go straight to hell, better leave all those hot sluts to chad, he's an evil doer

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 14:49:57 2015 No.6241779 >>6241767 Tell me exactly when the state in the West ever did that?

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 14:51:25 2015 No.6241789 File: 21 KB, 246x300, theodore_roosevelt_laughing-246x300.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6240516 I'm dying, more of this

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 14:51:33 2015 No.6241791 >>6241779 earlier you were arguing for state intervention to help all the losers who can't get pussy on the "free market", sounds pretty fedora tippy to me

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 14:53:10 2015 No.6241799 >>6241791 I never said that. You're confusing me with another anon.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 14:54:16 2015 No.6241806 >>6241799 oh the old "that idiotic post wasn't me, it was some other guy with my same opinions who is totally not me!"

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 14:55:20 2015 No.6241813 >>6240728 That one wasn't actually so bad.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 14:55:55 2015 No.6241818 >>6241806 You're predictable you shithead. I was expecting exactly such a post "oh but it wuz u ur jus not admittin hhaha i still win statist"

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 14:57:07 2015 No.6241824 >>6241818 but i mean what the fuck is your point? that the state should intervene? that there should be some religious moral ideology that guilt trips women into giving pussy to losers? i don't know where you're going with all this angst?

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 14:59:06 2015 No.6241835 >>6241824 Monogamy has been in force without there having to be a law that allocates hot women to men. Cultural norms and values can have an effect without a state. I thought that was what you 'anti-statists' believed yourselves?

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 14:59:29 2015 No.6241841 >>6241818 i can see why your wife divorced you, you're a fucking foolish loser with a lot of resentment

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 15:00:23 2015 No.6241849 >>6241594 It's true, i'm actually wondering why you would think it isn't

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 15:00:35 2015 No.6241852 >>6241835 if monogamy is "in force" then what the fuck are you crying about u little bitch

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 15:01:31 2015 No.6241860 >>6240622 Okay, this one's hilarious.

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 15:02:20 2015 No.6241864

i think i'm going to throw away my windows pc, i use it for pirating shit but usually i end up on this dumb ass board arguing with the most degenerate failures and foolios....i used to play games on this thing like 5 years ago, but i think it's time to trash this shit

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 15:02:54 2015 No.6241871

>>6241580
>Soon it will become demanded that you share your partner, otherwise you will be seen as a retrograde sexist, and what argument can you come up to deny that?
tell those that they must sleep with their parents as well, otherwise it means they do not want the best (pleasures) for their own family.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 15:03:24 2015 No.6241874 >>6241852 That's my whole point, it increasingly isn't.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 15:04:12 2015 No.6241876 >>6241874 >monogamy is somehow good for society

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 15:04:25 2015 No.6241878

>>6241871
well isn't there some intepretation of the incest taboo as part of slave morality since incest was allowed by despotic rulers in egypt and to a lesser extent roman emperors, so when the kikes took over they banned it because they were still jelly of the pharaoh poking his sis

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 15:05:26 2015 No.6241885 >>6241874 so what? do you have something against freedom? if you want a girl to be faithful to you try not being such a loser, which judging from your conservative angst is quite serious problem for you

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 15:06:24 2015 No.6241891 >>6241876 >"monogamy is still in full force, what are you ciomplaining about fegget" >"it isn't" >"well it sucks anyway hahahahaha"

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 15:07:25 2015 No.6241895 >>6241891 did you ever think you wife left you because you're a loser not because monogomy is declining? stop blaming others for your failures you lil beta slave

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 15:07:42 2015 No.6241898

>>6241885

>try not being such a loser

This whole hypermasculine "ur a pussy ass nigga, if everyone wuz as manly as me we'd have women in line hhahaha, also freedom fuck yeah" is so cringe I'm gonna leave you and your spliff to enjoy the rest of your day.

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 15:08:31 2015 No.6241904

>>6241891
Not the same anon as those other posts. Not saying monogamy is bad either. I think you have a strange archaic view of things. There are plenty of people (men and women) interested in monogamy, find yourself a monogamous partner. It's not that hard.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 15:08:43 2015 No.6241906 >>6241895 >getting this personal I hope you die of cancer. Have a good night.

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 15:09:13 2015 No.6241908

I don't care about people choosing about libertarian sex life and such

What is pissing me off is that you SHOULD respect them, what the fuck, if i want to don't respect people like that it's MY OWN FUCKING CHOICE. It's the same argument that they use to go full libertarian as well

"Amanda wants to have sex with everyone, RESPECT HIM"

FUCK OFF, If she wants to have sex with everyone, fine, no problems for she, no guilt, but if she is pissed off that people doesn't respect him then she may as well think that it's people choice to do so

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 15:10:21 2015 No.6241913

>>6241898
i never said you have to be more masculine, i said stop being such a loser, which means being a guy who spends his whole free time posting on racist cartoon image boards, holding backwards conservative beliefs, and just being an all around lame dude, although from the way you think "not being a loser" is about being masculine leads me to believe you aren't especially masculine either...which is a problem for your ideology because you believe in "traditional monogamy" welll that means you'll have to put on some big boy pants and go work at a steel mill or something instead of working at gamestop or whatever for minimum wage

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 15:11:47 2015 No.6241919 >>6241908 you are so liberal that the person you used in your example literally changed genders a few time during your post. that's hardcore liberalism man.

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 15:12:01 2015 No.6241922
File: 204 KB, 500x296, 1327893488387.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Guys.

Guys.

Sex: Biological necessity just like food and water

Welfare: Attempting to provide the alienated with access to these things even if they're left off the market

Conclusion: Make state subsidized prostitution a thing then die single and happy

This is all there is to it. Hide the misogyny and push for this using SJW language.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 15:12:57 2015 No.6241924 >>6241913 And you're somehow only here in passing and living a rich and fulfilling life beyond this board. Had enough of your venting. Go and seek another victim for your shitposting spree to give some meaning to your shitty life.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 15:13:46 2015 No.6241927 >>6241922 >Sex: Biological necessity just like food and water will never be accepted, as it is insane.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 15:14:13 2015 No.6241928 >>6241908 >its my choice to be an ass to people who wont fuck me on command because Im a big baby Alrightio.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 15:14:45 2015 No.6241931 FEDORAS GET OUT REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 15:15:06 2015 No.6241934 >>6241924 Do you honestly believe no one that posts here has a rich and fulfilling life? I honestly hope not, that would be very sad.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 15:16:08 2015 No.6241938 >>6241934 If you didn't you wouldn't waste the last few hours enjoying bullying the beta's. Or at least that's what you consider bullying.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 15:16:29 2015 No.6241940 >>6241927 Yeah yeah yeah. Let's act like all the young men killing themselves is just something craaaazy totally beyond our comprehension.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 15:18:31 2015 No.6241948 >>6241938 I'm not the guy you've been talking to. I have made a few posts in this thread, genuinely interested in the ideas. I have no one in my personal life who thinks like this. I'm also genuinely happy with my life. I hope you are too.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 15:18:38 2015 No.6241949 >>6241940 if you end up killing yourself then i guess the women had good instincts and could sense that you are a mentally unhealthy creep, this is how it's suppose to work, there is nothing wrong

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 15:19:55 2015 No.6241954 >>6241940 I don't actually believe this is happening, yes. If you end up killing yourself because you're not having sex, that would be pathological on your part.

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 15:21:33 2015 No.6241962
File: 25 KB, 400x341, 1405284442986.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

The problem with you guys is that you actually make a correct diagnosis of the problem and then work towards the worst possible solution.

Nobody will ever accept monogamous purity as the model for relationships again, and the more you act like an asshole towards women the easier it will be for them to stereotype you with MRA types and simply dismiss you as "men mad over loss of privilege"

You need a new language and a new way of fighting this shit

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 15:22:36 2015 No.6241967 >>6241949 >if you end up starving to death than these people were probably right in not hiring you eh

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 15:24:08 2015 No.6241976

>>6241962
fighting what? not getting as much pussy as they feel entitled to? any time i don't get pussy it's my fault, am i supposed to blame the girl if she gives me her number and i'm too beta to call her? the solution is government regulation of sex! a new taliban style religion forcing monogamy! or if those don't work suicide! no maybe stop being such a pussy and pick up the fucking phone. seriously, you dudes need to take responsibility for your life.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 15:24:33 2015 No.6241980 >>6241919 holy shit i'm the one you reply i completely lost it LEL

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 15:25:17 2015 No.6241984 I was giving /lit/ another chance, but I'm getting the same impression I got last time. Most of you are pretentious fucks. I'll still probably stick around this time though.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 15:25:19 2015 No.6241985 >>6241948 Obviously I'm not or I wouldn't consider such ideas. At least that's what some in this thread claim, that jadedness of this kind leads to untruths. I'm not too sure if that's true. But that's a whole other discussion.

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 15:27:40 2015 No.6241994

>>6241928

I'm not being an ass, in the same way that she isn't being a slut, there is no good/evil dichotomy there

it's my interests only man, maybe society ideals will tell otherwise, but I'm capable of doing that in the same way that they can.

You don't think so? then it's self-defeating because you can't have sex with everybody if it's your choice to do so

You see, being an ass is something bad for you, but it's something good for me, in the same way having sex with everybody is something good for you, and bad for me. It's just personal interests man, don't go "it's my right" without understanding from where it comes the power to make it your right

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 15:36:43 2015 No.6242021

>>6240855
>>6240734

You guys, actually, have a point.

But I advice you to not be hostile to "leftists" in general. The right will usually only seek the reinforcement of the traditional order (mostly in vain) and they will probably not even understand what you're talking about. The left is used to arguing things on the basis of social forces and exclusion, and it's easier to change it from the inside. I can totally see even some feminists I know agreeing with you.

You should also explore the fact that ownership of some form of capital, either financial or social or cultural, is the main factor in making men desirable, so the economic order is even more present in sexual relationships than you're suggesting

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 15:37:47 2015 No.6242024 >>6241976 >fighting what? not getting as much pussy as they feel entitled to? "entitled" I lol'd. You sound like libertarian types saying the poor should stop feeling entitled to education and work. Fuck off.

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 15:43:16 2015 No.6242036

>>6242021

Well I think with leftists I mostly mean the usual liberal suspects.
I know there are some rational Marxists out there who actually consider these ideas open for debate and not solely deal with political issues that only direct their own petty lives.

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 15:44:33 2015 No.6242041

>>6242024
it would be funny if some politician put a clause into obamacare saying if you didn't get laid that year you have to pay an extra tax penalty, you have to be careful what you wish for...because everyone thought obamacare would be good and help people but it did nothing for people who already have healthcare and it did nothing for people who can't afford healthcare, but now the government can take some of your tax return if you're poor and can't afford healthcare...so if you did a campaign and got all the betas to elect some republican wacko to institute a "healthy population growth tax incentive" it would probably just mean betas who didn't get laid lose their tax refund because they didn't help maintain a healthy birthrate or some shit

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 15:53:14 2015 No.6242061

>>6242024
it would be funny if the government instituted a socialized state run prostitution system to stop betas from joining isis and killing themselves...you would have to fill out 5 pages of paperwork, wait in some office for 6 hours then somebody would call your name over a loud speaker and you go through one of those steel doors with the little rectangular window in it, all the way down a long beige hall to a room with a bunch of tables in with curtains around them, you would wait nervously trying not to pop too huge of a boner as you eagerly await your free government sex, then a fat black slips through the curtain, reads your name of a chart and tells you to lean back....

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 15:54:42 2015 No.6242065

>>6242041
>>6242061
>starting two posts with it would be funny

sorry, but i guess i can't help but think how fucking lame it would have to be to really on government help to get pussy, i guess they could give you like one of those foodstamps cards but you could take it to various government licenses whore houses around town, sort of like legal marijuana shops, i suppose that wouldn't be sooo bad, but still....

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 15:55:45 2015 No.6242071

>>6242041
I don't know how it works in the US, but healthcare systems in many places pay for birth control, for sildenafil, in some places people are already pushing for including abortion, and so on. So there is already people in public health that acknowledges the importance of sexuality. These aren't taken as the means to an end, they are the end.

So I know this sounds corny, but we just need to raise awareness. People still think of sex as something that dirty men feel entitled to, instead of a need. They don't know the correlation between its absence and depression, mental instability, and so on.

It's too bad that people who go through this almost always end up becoming whacky reactionaries, because reform never comes from them. It only comes from clean-cut liberals who have mastered inclusive speech. MRA and Incels may actually be digging their own graves.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 15:57:50 2015 No.6242082 >>6242061 >>6242065 I see no reason why it wouldn't be just like legal prostitution, except that instead of money the state pays.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 15:58:57 2015 No.6242088 >>6242082 >except that instead of money the state pays. Except that instead of you, the state pays*

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 15:59:32 2015 No.6242091 >>6242071 yeah, but i feel like people who are really mentally healthy will be able to get laid "naturally" without government vagina handouts,

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 16:00:36 2015 No.6242095 >>6242082 just imagine when walmart or some other mega capitalist opens up use walmart style whore houses with tons of fat white ladies and ratchet black chicks, just to get the government dollars....oh boy...

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 16:01:59 2015 No.6242103 >>6242095 the rich guys will still be fucking the 1000 dollar a night escorts, meanwhile you'll be taking your "sex card" down to the back of walmart where they have a bunch of white trash chicks giving out handies

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 16:03:29 2015 No.6242107 >>6242071 government public housing created some of the most violent and crime ridden ghettos in america, just think what a "the projects" of sex will be like, oh god, can't you betas just figure out how to get laid on your own, holy shit

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 16:06:36 2015 No.6242118

>>6242091
Are we supposed to exclude the "mentally unhealthy" now?

Isn't it amazing that we all celebrate liberal democracy, welfare mass society and its principles, yet every time a change is proposed that is entirely consistent with its philosophy we are at first against it, unless we're the benefited? There's this knee-jerk conservative impulse in all of us, that we seriously need to master if we're going to preserve this shit.

There is this lesson as old as democracy itself that says you can't pretend a social problem isn't a problem just because you like to believe the people who go though it somehow deserved it.

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 16:10:22 2015 No.6242136

>>6242107
I know you're not going to believe it, but I'm not speaking for me here. If this ever happened I'd probably never make use of it. And despite the fact that you might be right, I still think that a cheap relief beats complete exclusion from a basic necessity.

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 16:19:54 2015 No.6242174

>>6242136
well, i'll never live in public housing either but that doesn't mean having a huge fucking ghetto filled with degenerates doesn't make the urban landscape that much shittier, public housing seemed like a good plan at first, to replace slumlords with the government, but in the end it was no better.

Anonymous Sun Mar 8 16:22:24 2015 No.6242186

>>6242136
dude holy shit no wonder you fucking dudes never get laid. instead of rearranging the entire federal government with a massive new spending program, why don't you just go to the gym, by some clothes that aren't stupid and then go and talk to women...that's a lot easier way to get laid than fucking changing the whole government. it's like the kids who can't get a living wage job, so instead of doing some easy ass two year degree and getting some skills they become marxists and proposing overthrowing capitalism and rerouting world history...it's like you really think that's the easiest way to get a job? or to get pussy? you aren't think clearly at all dude.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 16:27:14 2015 No.6242208 well, this thread was a fucking waste of 8 hours. although, i am going to read that hallouobecq book tho so i guess it wasn't 100% waste of time

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 16:31:12 2015 No.6242227 >>6242186 And these kids are right. If a particular arrangement doesn't suit you and you feel you're not alone, you have a right to demand change. But since you just showed your libertarian colors I'll stop replying to you, have a nice day.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 16:34:00 2015 No.6242245 >>6242227 so an arrangement where women have a choice not to fuck creeps should be changed? or an arrangement where lazy fucks with no skills get paid as much as people who learn useful things? lol ur sad bro

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 8 17:36:21 2015 No.6242631 That image is a cuck fantasy if I ever saw one. You people need help

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]

/lit/ - Literature