[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 220 KB, 1466x1050, feelcaesar.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6237405 No.6237405 [Reply] [Original]

What's wrong with adverbs?

>> No.6237410

>>6237405
Nothing, just use them right.

>> No.6237426

>>6237405
Nothing, just use them rightly.

>> No.6237443

They're too clingy.

>> No.6237455

>>6237405
Hemmmmingway didn't like them

>> No.6237456

Some loud and mediocre writers don't like them.

>> No.6237593

They quickly make your writing worse.

>> No.6237616

>>6237405
why doesn't that image say "Et tu, Pepe?"

>> No.6237671

>>6237405
Everything

>> No.6237673

they dress provocatively

>> No.6237681

>>6237616
Frogus is the latin word for Pepe, you fucking pleb

>> No.6237685

>frogus

>> No.6237699

>>6237681
it's incorrectly conjugated, and Pepe rhymes with the correct form "Brute"

>> No.6237701

>>6237405
They're only ever "buy" or "order" or "have" or "get"

>> No.6237721

>>6237405

Because they're annoyingly pointless, see what i did there?

>> No.6237802

>>6237616
it was made before he was commonly refered to as pepe

>> No.6237853

>>6237802
he was called pepe at his inception brother

>> No.6237863

>>6237802

kek
are you kidding

>> No.6237883

>>6237616
Pepe doesn't sound Roman

>> No.6237905

>>6237721
Yes, you correctly modified the adjective pointless using the adverb annoyingly.

If you hadn't, I would not have known that not only were they pointless, but the pointlessness of them has the quality of causing annoyance.

Thank you for using an adverb in a manner which adds to the meaning of your sentence, giving them a point and refuting your former statement. Truly a masterful display of the English language.

>> No.6237913

>>6237883
Yeh but the creator of that inage must have known the quote is 'et tu brute' even if he doesnt know anything about latin and should have used 'froge' if he didnt know that pepe is the name which works better anyway

>> No.6237920

Do not use adverbs. They are transvestite hermaphrodites representing absolutely nothing. All they do is show you've been to college.

>> No.6237946

>>6237920
>absolutely

>> No.6237984

>>6237920
Fuck off Stephen King

>> No.6238112

>>6237920
>all these unnecessary multisyllabic words
Wow, anon, you must be right. Definitely not a mindless Stephen King drone.
Also,
>absolutely
Fuck right off.

>> No.6239040

>>6237405
What's wrong with adverbs? OP, said faggingly

>> No.6239056

Nothing.

The Hemingway cult of todays creative writing programs is fucking annoying.

>> No.6239057

>>6239056

There's nothing inherently wrong with anything
problems start to emerge when your trying to impress your reader with things

which used to be the case with adverbs at the time hemingway wrote
which is the case with cutting them as this poster expressed

>> No.6239126

Since I'm nearing retirement I'll let you in on a little secret: we few talented, successful writers tell all aspiring writers not to use adverbs so we don't have to deal with as much competition. The truth is that they're useful. Just read Nabokov, Joyce, Woolf -- nearly any of the great writers -- and you'll find countless adverbs.

>> No.6239149

nothing, as long as they're actually doing work. so they should be employed sparsely