[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 48 KB, 305x479, 1421547766370.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6206098 No.6206098 [Reply] [Original]

Why do people care about philosophy from before 1900?

Modern epistemology obsoletes everything pre-Frege.

>> No.6206098,1 [INTERNAL] 

How so?

>> No.6207564
File: 161 KB, 1632x732, 061711154704.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6207564

>> No.6207568

You take that back before I make you regret it.

>> No.6207947

Egoism pretty much wrecks everything.

>> No.6207954

>>6206098
wait was Beauvoir really that attractive

>> No.6207956

That's because there were no truth tables

>> No.6207957

In the False Principle of Our Education, Max Stirner explains very well the value of obsolete philosophy.

>> No.6207958

>>6206098
>Modern epistemology obsoletes everything pre-Frege.
Ah yes, the debates about foundatiomalism v coherentism are totaly not rehashes of age old issues phrased in bullshit lingo to make them seem original.

>> No.6207963

>>6207947
Only "Involuntary Egoism" which is compatible with almost every major philosophical school.

Voluntary egoism a shit.

>> No.6207972

>>6206098
I can tell you're super educated on the history of philosophy. That's why you're on 4chan.

>> No.6207973

>>6207957
>Max Stirner explains very well the value of obsolete philosophy.

never read stirner. does he say that it's a spook?

>> No.6207974

>>6207963

Volentary egosim can be compatable with anything as long as you don't commit to it.

>> No.6210241

Fuck anyone with that opinion

>> No.6210284

>>6210241
>/lit/