[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 1.49 MB, 2048x1536, 1424213564970.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6166114 No.6166114 [Reply] [Original]

Anyone here want to start a philosophy book club?

We'll use pic related starting with the Greeks (at Socrates/Plato) and follow it from there, author by author, choosing the most important work by each author.
If deciding the most important work is tough for whatever reason, we'll vote on what to read.

In order to make a space to congregate and such, we'll use Goodreads but of course /lit/ as well.

Who wants to join?

>> No.6166126

>>6166114
Shouldn't we start with the presocratics?

>> No.6166128

>>6166126
If that is an issue we can start there.

>> No.6166133

>>6166114
I'm in.

>> No.6166139

>>6166114
I'm in too.

>> No.6166140

>>6166133
>>6166139
I'll make a group right now on Goodreads.

>> No.6166148

>>6166140
>Goodreads.

>> No.6166160

>>6166148
Is there a better way to do this? I'm not sure making continuous threads on here is the best option.

>> No.6166169

>>6166140
>goodreads
I'm out

>> No.6166178

>>6166169
Did you even read the first post?

>> No.6166226

I'm in m8

>> No.6166269

>>6166226
Just tell where to go and all that

>> No.6166377

is this gonna happen or not?

>> No.6166396

So what would be the projected reading list? Or is it open for suggestions? If this thing does actually get off the ground it's prob better to have some flexibility so nobody gets stuck reading too much of one school or period.

>> No.6166401

>>6166396
We should read everything :^) two days per book

>> No.6166405

>>6166401
I don't have the time to read a book in two days, I think it should one book a week

>> No.6166415

>>6166405
well then we should resume the most important philosopher of every period and their most important works

>> No.6166417

Man, I really wish someone would make that little chart actually presentable, or that people'd just stop using it altogether.

>> No.6166422

Starting point should be Heraclitus and Parmenides and some essay on the differences between world in a flow/constant world respectively. Then we may move on to Socrates.

>> No.6166442

>>6166422
But that suggests we'll be including scholarly commentary alongside the readings. Which isn't a bad thing if it's well chosen but could end up a mess otherwise.

>> No.6166464

I got these names from my college class (its in spanish but I think you can recognize most names):
DE LOS PITAGÓRICOS A SÓCRATES.
1.1 Parménides. P.6-7)
1.2 HERÁCLITO. (p.7-8)
1.3 DEMÓCRITO (p. 8-9)
1.4 LOS SOFISTAS. (p. 9)

1.5 SÓCRATES (p. 10) Ampliar

1.6 PLATÓN (10-22)
1.7 ARISTÓTELES (22-26)
1.8. EL SABIO HELENÍSTICO (27-34)
a) EL ESTOICISMO.
b) EL EPICUREISMO.
c) EL ESCEPTICISMO.
d) El ECLECTICISMO ROMANO.

II. El hombre medieval.

2.1 SAN AGUSTÍN (p.34-36)
2.2 SANTO TOMÁS DE AQUINO. (p.36-39)
III. El hombre
del Renacimiento.
3.1 ERASMO DE RÓTTERDAM.
(p.40-41)
3.2 LUIS VIVES. (p.41-44)
IV.El hombre moderno.
RENÉ DESCARTES. (p. 44-48)
4.1 LOCKE. (p.48- 50)
4.2 HUME. (p.50-54)
IV. El hombre en la ilustración.
5.1 ROUSSEAU. (p. 54-56)
5.2 KANT. (p. 56- 59)
V. El hombre en el siglo XIX
6.1 HEGEL (p.60-61)
6.2 COMTE (p.61-64)
6.3 NIETZSCHE
(p.65-66)
6.4 El concepto del hombre en Marx
(p.66-73)

We could add some other names of course and we still have to choose which books are we going to read.

>> No.6166466

>>6166114
>>starting with the Greeks (at Socrates/Plato)

>Not at Euclid
>Learning philosophy while being ungeometrical
>Pretending you understand anything

You may as well be reading comic books

>> No.6166474

Just have it here morons

>> No.6166514

>not starting with Thales

P
L
E
B

>> No.6167243

>Philosophy
>only Westerners and a couple Mid Easterners allowed

top kek m8s