/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.6114351]

>tfw INFP

[Anonymous No.6114352]

I waver between INTP and INFP
feels ambiguous

[Anonymous No.6114356]

>Myers–Briggs Type Indicator
>21st century astrology
Enjoy your pseudoscience and generic personality descriptions.

At least the zodiac is more interesting to read.

[Anonymous No.6114357]

>Thinking behavior is determined by an internal trait rather than situation factors

[Anonymous No.6114361]

>>6114351
Fortunately for you, it's just a pseudo-scientific quiz you took on the internet and it means nothing. Those MB tests are about as accurate as the Buzzfeed quiz asking which type of breakfast cereal you are.

>tfw cornflakes with no milk.

[Urban Shaman No.6114373]

>>6114351
thanks this pepe was still missing in my collection
have one too

[Anonymous No.6114376]

>>6114356
>▶
>>Myers–Briggs Type Indicator
>>21st century astrology
>Enjoy your pseudoscience and generic personality descriptions.
>At least the zodiac is more interesting to read.


so much this

[Anonymous No.6114379]

>>6114376

>▶

are you a wizard

[Anonymous No.6114380]

>>6114376

what the?

[Anonymous No.6114393]

so much shilling. surely people that are more introverted then extroverted and are more intuitive then others excel in activities that heavily rely on imagination. surely you couldn't be that dense to overlook that

[Anonymous No.6114398]

>>6114393

Human persons and their relations to others are so stupidly complex that any 4-dimensional rendering of them is bound to be an outrageous oversimplification.

It's like saying a knob is a door, regardless of what its various locks may look like.

[Anonymous No.6114405]

>>6114398
of course it is more complex, but there is nothing wrong with general comparison between peoples personalities.

soccer mom, manager of fortune 500 company, and a scholar have significantly different personalities

[Anonymous No.6114425]

I just did that test and this is what came out.

t-thoughts?

[Anonymous No.6114435]

I hate my life.

[Anonymous No.6114463]

>>6114351
same here

[Anonymous No.6114465]

[Anonymous No.6114476]

this is literally horoscopes

[Anonymous No.6114484]

>>6114476
>literally
no it's not, dumbass.

[Anonymous No.6114491]

isn't INFP master race here on /lit/

[« 零 » !Ry9.FWKNDY No.6114511]

I AM "INTP".

http://ryzhknd.tumblr.com/psy

http://ryzhknd.tumblr.com/pol

[« 零 » !Ry9.FWKNDY No.6114521]

>>6114352

THE "MBTI" SYSTEM IS NOT A SPECTRUM; YOU ARE EITHER INCONSISTENT WITH YOUR ANSWERS, AND/OR THE TESTS THAT YOU USE ARE FLAWED.

[Anonymous No.6114525]

>>6114351
>caring about myers briggs
you're almost as bad as astrology fags

[Anonymous No.6114527]

[Anonymous No.6114528]

>>6114352
INTPs and INFPs have completely different dominant and auxiliary functions. one can't really alternate between those two

[Anonymous No.6114530]

>>6114525
>>6114476
>>6114356
is this a new meme

[Anonymous No.6114535]

>>6114521

of course I'm inconsistent with my answers
I answer according to the mood I'm in when I take the test

[Anonymous No.6114537]

>>6114528

Certainly one can, if aspects of one's personality change over time

[Anonymous No.6114538]

I'm INTP, how pleb is it?

[Anonymous No.6114539]

>>6114425
ENTJ master race.

Future leaders man.

[Anonymous No.6114540]

>>6114425
>E___
you should probably leave /lit/

[Anonymous No.6114544]

This thread ain't literature!

[Anonymous No.6114546]

>>6114530

I find it funny that people take this pop psychology shit seriously.

[Anonymous No.6114549]

>>6114540
>implying only antisocial losers read.

[Anonymous No.6114550]

>>6114538
Fedora tier
I'm the same

[« 零 » !Ry9.FWKNDY No.6114551]

>>6114535

MOST PROBABLY YOU ARE "INFP".

CLUES IN YOUR POSTS THAT INDICATE, OR SUGGEST, YOUR STATE AS "INFP":

>>6114352
>feels ambiguous

>>6114535
>according to the mood I'm in

[Bring back sage No.6114554]

>>6114351
That's cool!
I'm a Fire Rabbit since I was born in 1987.

[« 零 » !Ry9.FWKNDY No.6114557]

>>6114537

YOU IGNORE HOW THE "MBTI" SYSTEM WORKS; DO NOT DISCUSS SUBJECTS OF WHICH YOU ARE IGNORANT.

[Anonymous No.6114559]

>>6114551

why would I trust an autist tripfag's opinion?

[Anonymous No.6114563]

>>6114537
>over time
sure, but you don't freely alternate between the two

[Anonymous No.6114574]

>>6114557

I know how the test works, and I know that I've answered differently on different occasions

protip: 'personality type' is not something that stays constant regardless of how you see yourself or how you might respond to the questions in the test

[Anonymous No.6114578]

>>6114563

no, not freely, just that I've tested as both consistently at different times in my life

[« 零 » !Ry9.FWKNDY No.6114594]

>>6114574

YOU IGNORE HOW THE "MBTI" SYSTEM WORKS; DO NOT DISCUSS SUBJECTS OF WHICH YOU ARE IGNORANT.

[Anonymous No.6114601]

>>6114594

I know how the test works, and I know that I've answered differently on different occasions

protip: 'personality type' is not something that stays constant regardless of how you see yourself or how you might respond to the questions in the test

[Anonymous No.6114620]

>>6114549
>valueing social life
gtfo nigger

[Anonymous No.6114627]

>>6114620
>nigger
I am not the one who should leave.

[« 零 » !Ry9.FWKNDY No.6114631]

>>6114601

APPARENTLY YOU ARE MENTALLY IMPAIRED.

[Anonymous No.6114643]

>>6114631

why do you say that?
my personality changes over time, why is that so problematic for you?
do you believe you are an essence which persists over time or some other bullshit anarchofascist hebephile garbage

[Anonymous No.6114652]

>>6114631
Fuck off. You are a bore

[Anonymous No.6114678]

While we have this psuedoscience /x/-tier thread, what is everyones enneagram sign?

http://www.enneagraminstitute.com/

[Anonymous No.6114690]

>>6114678

>pseudoscience

stop using that word. what are you trying to signify? as opposed to science? this isn't a science board and the scientific method is not some overarching transcendent provider of truth
I'm not sure where you faggots get these notions

[Anonymous No.6114699]

>>6114631
Autistic and a tripfag to boot... how could someone fail so much at life?

[Anonymous No.6114723]

>>6114511
>>6114521
>>6114557
>>6114551
>>6114594
>>6114631
HEY MAN DON'T YOU JUST HATE IT WHEN THE CAPS LOCK BUTTON GETS STUCK?

[Anonymous No.6114727]

>>6114690
Because the test is pretending to be scientific when in actual fact it isn't? That's the definition of psuedoscience?

[Anonymous No.6114731]

>>6114727

sure it is, it's based on psychological theory

[Anonymous No.6114732]

>>6114690
I apologize for not giving your infallible myers brigs thread (which has a lot to do with literature) the respect it deserves.


Gb2 >>>/r9k/

fucking autist.

[Anonymous No.6114734]

>>6114678

Type 6

[Anonymous No.6114735]

>>6114690
>scientific method is not some overarching transcendent provider of truth
But like democracy, it's the best system we have.

[Anonymous No.6114741]

>>6114732

I give a fuck about the thread
I hate faggots who go around calling everything pseudoscience, including sciences like psychology and sociology

[Anonymous No.6114750]

>>6114735

those are value judgements you've made personally, I'm not sure what makes you consider science as the 'best' means of discovering anything close to 'truth'

[Anonymous No.6114756]

>>6114750
cry more

[Anonymous No.6114763]

>>6114741
I bet you believe in homeopathy too. If it feels like science it is science. yah dude, hit this blunt and cure your autism.

[Anonymous No.6114766]

>>6114756

Sorry I made you question an assumption about your worldview bro

[Anonymous No.6114773]

>>6114763

science relies on observation of empirical data according to the scientific method

this would include natural sciences, psychology, sociology etc.
it would not include homeopathy, obviously

[Anonymous No.6114779]

>>6114741
So basically you are shitposting stuff that has nothing to do with the thread... nobody called psychology a pseudoscience. We are calling the MBTI online tests pseudoscience.

Now get the fuck out.

[Anonymous No.6114783]

>>6114779

Myers-Briggs type indicator tests are based on psychological theories
I'm not sure how this makes them unscientific

[Anonymous No.6114806]

>>6114783
Nobody can dignose your "personality type" (as if it was something set in stone rather than changing constantly depending on personal circumstances) and in particular nobody can do it with a bunch of random, poorly thought out questions over the internet.

I'm pretty sure psychology majors would agree with me that this whole thread is bullshit.

[Anonymous No.6114842]

>>6114783
Yes, Jungian nonsense which has been shown to be quackery...

[Anonymous No.6114886]

>INTJ
>turbulent
>analyst
Yeah seems pretty accurate.

[Anonymous No.6114916]

>>6114357
Confusing behavior with personality

[Anonymous No.6114924]

>>6114530
People only like this stuff because it makes them feel special somehow. It is embarrasing.

[Anonymous No.6114928]

>>6114528
Not >>6114352, but I get either INTP or INTJ depending on the test, e.g., 16personalities gave INTP and humanmetrics INTJ.

[Anonymous No.6114930]

I'm INTJ. Tell me about myself.

[Anonymous No.6114932]

>>6114511
YOU ARE CANCER

[Anonymous No.6114949]

Who ISFP here?

[Anonymous No.6114973]

>>6114393
whats the original pic from?

[Anonymous No.6115004]

>>6114351
>tfw INTP who wants INFP gf
>have INTJ gf instead
>she motivates me to do all sorts of shit I'd never do on my own
>I'm getting my life together, and it's mostly thanks to her
>and yet still, in my fantasies, I imagine an INFP girlfriend instead

I feel horrible for it

[Anonymous No.6115011]

>>6114949
>Sensor

[Anonymous No.6115016]

>>6115011
I'm a dancer man. Fight me.

[Anonymous No.6115020]

>>6115016

[Anonymous No.6115077]

>>6114559
autism and major bricks tests go handy hand man