/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.6088996]

So how bout all that cuckolding in the last half?

Jesus fucking christ I dont remember all this cuck shit in this book when I skimmed through it in my youth.

[Anonymous No.6089081]

You didn't know 4chan. Let me guess, next big question is "Was Humbert autistic?"

[Anonymous No.6089090]

>>6089081
I didn't think he was autistic, I just thought the book had a lot of cuck shit in it.

[Anonymous No.6089094]

I was also surprised by the large amount of TTKM

[Anonymous No.6089126]

>fucking christ I dont remember

Sounds like you have been indoctrinated--"pilled" I believe is the term used on this site--into finding a specific, bogus interpretation into everything you read. Try reading it without your thought-masters dictating what you should find.

[Anonymous No.6089131]

>>6089094
what's TTKM? It's not like Mao, is it?

[Anonymous No.6089132]

>>6089126
Its a fantastic book, no doubt. But I don't enjoy cuckoldry.

[Anonymous No.6089195]

>>6089132
So what stuck out to you about what was vile in lolita was cuckoldry?

[Anonymous No.6089228]

What are you talking about? When does Humbert Humbert get cuckolded?

[Anonymous No.6089232]

>>>/pol/
>>>/r9k/
>>>/s4s/

[Anonymous No.6089240]

>>6089232
>implying this board isn't basically an amalgamation of those boards these days

[Anonymous No.6089246]

Agreed, OP. Such a fun book, then...the fucking cuckoldry? What the hell? Did an SJW Tumblr faggot write this? I wrote "Go back to Reddit" on my copy and mailed it to the South Pole.

[Anonymous No.6089276]

>>6088996
tbh I wasn't expecting him to ask that black man to *#%@ Lolita while he sat there watching either. I thought it was different and interesting.

'I think he tore something inside me" really got me

[Anonymous No.6089318]

The idea of a nymphet is repulsive and only appeals to masochistic pederasts; like perhaps the author.
An opinion of mine is that Nabokov was not a masochist but perhaps someone who desired to create a work of fiction that would infuriate those who do enjoy "nymphets", to any outsider the novel is a look into a sadistic delusional man with an obsession, but to those with that obsession the events are almost that straight from fantasy, the author knew this and decided to use it to bring a the crushing realism upon those readers "in the know" who perhaps liked the idea of such fantasies which the first half of the book entices.
It's showing them that THIS is truly the reality of your fantasy, you cannot cage the bird so to speak.
If anything this book is more or less an anti-lolicon piece of literature, yet no normal person can see it.

[Anonymous No.6089326]

>>6089228
I think OP is talking about le mysterious man whom Lola runs away with.

[Anonymous No.6089384]

>>6089318
This, so much fucking this.

This is exactly what I got from the book and it's in actuality what it's about. It's not a pedo book and it's not misinterpreted as erotica because frankly, the first half of the book is fucking tantalizing. Then Nabokov throws a cold bucket of water on your face and says "this is what it'd really be like, you fucking monster!"

As far as cuckholding, I think OP is talking about how Humbert practically pleaded with Lo at the end. But whatever, what'd you expect, for them to ride off in the sunset?

[Anonymous No.6089735]

Pretty sure he's talking about all those times (which aren't clear on a first read) when Lolita sneaks away to have sex with Quilty while she's still living w/ Humbert.

[Anonymous No.6089751]

>>6088996
You think that was bad?
I just finished reading this.
Literally cuck the novel.

[H.Q.S.S.G No.6089769]

>>6089751
>Canterbury Tales
>a novel
lol?

[H.Q.S.S.G No.6089777]

>>6089751
Chaucer is garbage btw

[Anonymous No.6089783]

>>6089769
Is there a better word?
Its a collection of stories, only some of which are in poetic verse, connected by a underlying plot.

[H.Q.S.S.G No.6089788]

>>6089777
fuck off you imposter

but yes, chaucer is dookie

>>6089783
it's poetry