/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.6073633]

http://selectsmart.com/PHILOSOPHY/

Post, r8 & h8

[Anonymous No.6073689]

>>6073633

100% Aristotle

Everyone knows virtue is the only motive of the true patrician.

[Anonymous No.6073716]

>>6073689
>virtue

Having high moral standards doesn't make you a patrician, it limits your rational thought. You prejudice yourself because you're inflexible.

[Anonymous No.6073720]

>>6073633
1. Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche (100%) More Info
2. David Hume (82%) More Info
3. Jean-Paul Sartre (76%) More Info
4. Thomas Hobbes (75%) More Info
5. Stoics (64%) More Info
6. Benedictus Spinoza (61%) More Info
7. Ayn Rand (60%) More Info
8. Cynics (58%) More Info
9. Epicureans (56%) More Info
10. Aristotle (55%)

rate me

i rate you 4.3/10

[Anonymous No.6073735]

>>6073633

[Anonymous No.6073741]

Jean-Paul Sartre at 100%

next closest Nietzsche with 61%

sheet

[Anonymous No.6073746]

>>6073720
edgy/10

[Anonymous No.6073749]

>>6073741
>>6073633

jean-paul/10

[Anonymous No.6073765]

To durr is human

[Anonymous No.6073816]

>>6073633
Is this bad guys?

[Anonymous No.6073819]

how did I do

[Anonymous No.6073829]

>>6073816

>Sartre > 0%

Disgusting

[Anonymous No.6073834]

>>6073735
>>6073819
Fucking Thomas Aquinas people must be fucking insufferable to talk to.

[Anonymous No.6073838]

>>6073749
I hope the person who made this stubs their toe, and then their coffee gets replaced with decaf, and then they just feel really crummy all day.

The bum.

[Anonymous No.6073849]

>>6073829
What?

>>6073838
I view it as freeing in a way. It allows you to live without constantly worrying about whether your life is meaningful.

[Anonymous No.6073854]

>>6073849
No, you misapprehend me, I don't dislike them because of the view involved, but because that comic annoys me

[Anonymous No.6073859]

>>6073834
Why?

[Anonymous No.6073863]

r8, I know nothing about philosophy or ethics

[Anonymous No.6073866]

>>6073863
You probably have the most honest results then, because you weren't looking to get any particular philosopher.

[Anonymous No.6073872]

>>6073859
Honestly, it is mostly the prime mover argument and the implication that they believe in transubstantiation. I imagine their moral certainty would get tiresome.

[Anonymous No.6073874]

>>6073863

Hobbes is quite unusual I guess, 99% Aristotle i good though.

[MR No.6073884]

So what does this mean? I'm not big into philosophy, will start with the greeks, once my backlog is done with.

[Anonymous No.6073885]

[Anonymous No.6073896]

>>6073884
I would assume that it means that you believe that moral values are basically man-created but that they should generally center around maximizing utility and well-being for as many people as possible.

[MR No.6073913]

>>6073896
Oh wow, pretty spot on.

[Anonymous No.6073920]

>>6073913
It's not that hard - you have two utilitarians in the top three, which is a branch of moral philosophy that argues that ethics are founded on maximizing well-being for the greatest number of people, and the other one is Sartre, who's the token existentialist, and existentialism is mostly about the lack of existence of meaning external to the individual.

The good thing is that both of these branches of thought have a ton of material to dig into, and a lot of it that's good, in English, and relatively recent.

Also, don't start with the Greeks. It just doesn't make sense for someone in your position.

[Anonymous No.6073927]

Last time I did this I got Aquinas #1 but I have no idea what I answered differently. I like Aquinas's writing better than Bentham's and I don't particularly care for utilitarianism so I have no idea why I got Bentham.

[Anonymous No.6073932]

>>6073920
What does mine say about me, anon?
>>6073816

[MR No.6073939]

>>6073920
Ok cool, thanks for the info. Who should I start with? I'm fluent in English in German and 'semi'fluent in French.

[Anonymous No.6073943]

>Bentham
Literally who? Is this one of your fancy Puritan American writers?

[Anonymous No.6073955]

>>6073932
Similar, except with more of an emphasis on self-interest and pleasure, rather than utility. i would think, anyway.

>>6073939
Utilitarians, pragmatists, existentialists are all pretty decent people to investigate. John Stuart Mill and William James are decent people in the first two categories, who are also reasonably graspable for people who haven't read a ton of philosophy. And Camus and Sartre are probably decent intros for existentialism all told (although I don't actually like Sartre much personally, but that's not necessarily relevant for getting into things) - "Existentialism is a Humanism" is a pretty standard text I would think. Finding decent secondary sources is also a really useful route to take.

[Anonymous No.6073960]

>>6073943
Jeremy Bentham (/ˈbɛnθəm/; 15 February [O.S. 4 February] 1748 – 6 June 1832) was a British philosopher, jurist, and social reformer. He is regarded as the founder of modern utilitarianism.

[Anonymous No.6073965]

>>6073955
Damn, this test is pretty good.

[Anonymous No.6073970]

>>6073960
>tfw utilitarianist
brb killing myself

[MR No.6073984]

>>6073955
Thanks a bunch mate!

[Anonymous No.6074001]

>>6073633
>>6073735
>>6073816
>>6073884
my utilitarian niggas

[Anonymous No.6074010]

>>6074001
Woah, I think the world is inherently meaningless and that no moral code is more correct than any other but that, if I had to live under a moral code it would be utilitarian because at least it has a coherent logic to it that in general does not impede what I wish to do.

I'm>>6073816

[Anonymous No.6074034]

100% Jean Paul Sartre

Seems about right

[Anonymous No.6074042]

>>6073872
>"cmon you faggot, why do you always say its never ok to kill anybody?? you're no fun!!!!"

[Anonymous No.6074049]

[Anonymous No.6074050]

>>6073872
you say a whole lot of nothing friend. How does a belief in transubstantiation make someone insufferable to talk to...? How does a belief in God make someone insufferable to talk to?

> I imagine their moral certainty would get tiresome.

Its easy to fault others for actually standing for something, but its a lot harder to do than constantly change your morality to suit your self interest

[Anonymous No.6074060]

>>6074049
r8 me, pls

[fagve No.6074068]

meh

[Anonymous No.6074070]

Don't believe I tried very hard.

[Anonymous No.6074074]

>14. MAN'S LAWS. What should our legal system be based upon?

>mfw claim to be philosophers yet still believe in the legitimacy and fantastical delusion of the state

[Anonymous No.6074083]

ayy lmao

[Anonymous No.6074085]

>tfw upper class post modernist
>tfw most result shouldn't be correct

[Anonymous No.6074105]

where do I go to collect my fedora

[Anonymous No.6074125]

>>6074042
Seriously, Do you know how many problems can be solved by killing someone? think about the use of force in transnational conflict. Are you implying war never solves any problems or even more ludicrously that state sanctioned killing in war is different than killing in general?


>>6074050
Oh, fuck. He actually does believe in trasubstantiation.

>Its easy to fault others for actually standing for something
Hahaha. There's a difference between standing for something and being an intractable ideologue. Christ. You are proving my point right now by being so bent out of shape.

A reasonable human response might have been something like "Just because we agree with Aquinas's general points does not mean we believe in absolute moral certainty."

[Anonymous No.6074153]

>>6074074
>rand

disgusting.

[Anonymous No.6074168]

How can I get both Nietzsche and Plato simultaneously, aren't they radically different? (Never read Nietzsche)

[ᆦ No.6074169]

I don't even agree with the Stoics. How the fuck do I get 100% with them?
And 97% with Ayn Rand? Seriously?

How shit am I?

[Anonymous No.6074171]

>>6073633
Eh

[Anonymous No.6074178]

>>6074169
It's okay, Spinoza is based, you're okay in my book.

I'm proud of my 0% Rousseau.

[Anonymous No.6074189]

Fucking stupid. Find something better to waste your time with.

[Anonymous No.6074191]

>>6074178
I'm noticing pretty much no one likes Rousseau.

[Anonymous No.6074193]

>>6074191
Rousseau owns as hell but doesn't show up on this test for whatever reason

who the fuck knows what views they assign to him

[Anonymous No.6074194]

John Staurt Mill, Kant, and Aquinas
Can someone please give me a rundown of them

[Anonymous No.6074196]

>>6074191
He had a punchable face.

[Anonymous No.6074203]

>>6074191
OP here, I was very pleased with my 0% Rousseau and my 2% James

[ᆦ No.6074205]

>>6074178
Spinoza is my bro and I've always seen him as my favorite philosopher, so I'm somewhat happy that I have him so high.

But having Ayn Rand so high is turning me slightly paranoid.

[Anonymous No.6074237]

>>6074050
Okay, I'm not an atheist and I believe in god, but how the fuck does anyone believe in transubstantiation. That is the stupidest shit.

[Anonymous No.6074240]

>Answer zero questions in favor of objective morality or the existence of God
>St. Augustine (100%)
>Thomas Aquinas (95%)

[Anonymous No.6074249]

Thomas Aquinas 100%
Aristotle 93&
St.Augustine 88%
Plato 86%
Benedictus Spinoza 80%
Stoics 80%
------
Immanuel Kant 58%
Jean Paul-Sartre 54%
David Hume 54%
Cynics 53%
William of Ockham 50%
John Stuart Mill 50%
Nietzsche 50%
Epicureans 47%
Thomas Hobbes 42%
Ayn Rand 41%
Jeremy Bentham 26%
William James 25%
Nel Noddings 21%
Rousseau 17%
Precriptivism 3%


I'm happy to see Rousseau so low on the list, but having Sartre so high on the list is embarrassing.

[Anonymous No.6074257]

>>6074240
this

I think the test is bunk

[Anonymous No.6074262]

Other illuminating quizzes on this site:

[Anonymous No.6074264]

>>6074240
Neither of them fully believed in God.

[Anonymous No.6074265]

>>6074178
>>6074203
>>6074249
What's wrong with Rousseau?

[Anonymous No.6074277]

Edgy shit coming through.

I thought i was more rounded, but I guess I've always had a soft spot in my heart for that googly eyed fucker.

[Anonymous No.6074282]

Randroid reporting in.

[Anonymous No.6074289]

>>6073633
this is what you get if you put "doesn't matter" for all choices

1. Thomas Aquinas (100%) More Info
2. Aristotle (58%) More Info
3. Epicureans (58%) More Info
4. Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche (58%) More Info
5. St. Augustine (52%) More Info
6. William of Ockham (52%) More Info
7. William James (47%)
8. Jean-Paul Sartre (41%) More Info
9. Jeremy Bentham (0%) More Info
10. Cynics (0%) More Info
11. Thomas Hobbes (0%) More Info
12. David Hume (0%) More Info
13. Immanuel Kant (0%) More Info
14. John Stuart Mill (0%) More Info
15. Nel Noddings (0%) More Info
16. Plato (0%) More Info
17. Prescriptivism (0%) More Info
18. Ayn Rand (0%) More Info
19. Benedictus Spinoza (0%) More Info
20. Stoics (0%) More Info
21. Jean-Jacques Rousseau (0%)

[Anonymous No.6074297]

>>6074196
He looks like my dad.

Fuck, he needs a punching.

[Anonymous No.6074299]

>>6074297
Let's talk about your feelings, anon

[Anonymous No.6074301]

>>6074289
they should change it so if you choose "doesn't matter" and set everything to unimportant you get Camus and nothing else

[Anonymous No.6074315]

>>6074249
What have you got against Jean Paul?

[Anonymous No.6074318]

The rich are killing children.

[Anonymous No.6074320]

>>6074191
i'm p sure the test is broken when it comes to rousseau
forgot where i saw that but i remember seeing it

[ᆦ No.6074323]

>>6074318
So what, nature is killing more of them and faster even.

[Anonymous No.6074324]

>>6074318
cool
What are you doing?

[Anonymous No.6074330]

>>6073720
Are we the same person? My top 3 are the same as you:

Nietzsche (100%)
Hume (86%)
Sartre (85%)

Let me guess, you're scientifically and materialistically inclined and believe all the moral categories were invented by man.

[Anonymous No.6074334]

>>6074318
Somebody has to I suppose.

[Anonymous No.6074351]

I'm a buddhist... many of the questions made no sense under the framework of kamma and not-self but i tried

[Anonymous No.6074360]

>I'm a buddhist

[Anonymous No.6074364]

>>6074351
Its a philosophy questionar of course its gonna be retarded.

Look how many people got sartre, its probably because they said people should do what the want as long as they are not hurting others and liberty is good.

[Anonymous No.6074366]

Augustine (100%)
Aquinas (90%)
Spinoza (85%)

[Anonymous No.6074367]

oaml yya

[Anonymous No.6074370]

>>6074360
>I'm not a Buddhist

[Anonymous No.6074372]

r8 me

[Anonymous No.6074375]

>>6074282
kill yourself

[Anonymous No.6074385]

I can't be assed doing this quiz again, but chalk up another Sartrian

[Anonymous No.6074395]

>>6074370
>being anything other than a catholic

[Anonymous No.6074399]

>>6074372
this is about how i answered, for the curious. each radio button is exact but it's a little off on the weight of each question

[Anonymous No.6074410]

>>6074395
Transubstantiation.

Jesus Christ.

How fucking gullible do you have to be?

[Twiggy !!ErZLYHNhXgZ No.6074429]

>>6074330
>scientifically and materialistically inclined
not really

>moral categories were invented by man
yap

[Anonymous No.6074435]

you are bitchmade if you didn't choose an actual answer to the trolley question

[Anonymous No.6074446]

[Anonymous No.6074450]

>>6074435
>answer relativistically
>i'm supposed to choose a concrete answer for the trolley problem

lel m8 there is no answer

[Anonymous No.6074462]

>>6073633
I got Bentham last time and Mill this time

[Anonymous No.6074522]

> 100% Kant
> 92% Prescriptivism
>88% John Stewart Mill
> 78% St Augustine
> 76% Wiliam of Ockham
> 65% Thomas Aquinas
>58% Spinoza
>54% Epicureans

R8, anyone else 100% Kant?

[Anonymous No.6074523]

>>6074462
>utilitarianism

PIG DISGUSTING

[Anonymous No.6074526]

>>6074522
I'll give you 15/107 points but I think you're kind of gay

[Anonymous No.6074567]

Your Complete Results:
1. Aristotle (100%)
2. Epicureans (100%)
3. Jeremy Bentham (86%)
4. Thomas Aquinas (84%)
5. Thomas Hobbes (83%)
6. Stoics (81%)
7. Jean-Paul Sartre (78%)
8. Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche (74%)
9. Benedictus Spinoza (69%)
10. David Hume (64%)
11. Plato (60%)
12. William of Ockham (60%)
13. Nel Noddings (54%)
14. Prescriptivism (50%)
15. Immanuel Kant (48%)
16. Cynics (43%)
17. Ayn Rand (41%)
18. St. Augustine (39%)
19. John Stuart Mill (36%)
20. William James (28%)

Not big into philosophy, how did I do?

[Anonymous No.6074588]

Apparently I'm 100% an Epicurean.

[Anonymous No.6074598]

>>6074588
You're also 100% a faggot.

[Anonymous No.6074961]

God damn it /lit/

God DAMN IT

[Anonymous No.6074964]

>>6074961
>can't choose "take the track where the train does a flip"

[Anonymous No.6074967]

>>6074961
4th choice is obviously the best

[Anonymous No.6075033]

>>6074961
Lol

[Anonymous No.6075077]

>>6074961
>no sick loop-da-loop option

[Anonymous No.6075089]

>>6074961
>no multi-track drifting
pfft

[Anonymous No.6075091]

[Anonymous No.6075098]

interdasting

[Anonymous No.6075100]

lol

[Anonymous No.6075106]

>>6074360
>Buddhism has no morals

stay retarded orientalist scum

[Anonymous No.6075124]

>>6074323
The rich are killing children.

[Anonymous No.6075129]

how did i end up with Ayn Rand, am i the apex plebbitor?

[Anonymous No.6075177]

>>6075129
Yes

[Anonymous No.6075281]

Fuck my life. She is not a fucking philosopher.

[Anonymous No.6075298]

kant is love

[Anonymous No.6075366]

>Kant 100
>Thomas Aquinas 97
>Aristotle 95
>Stoics 94

[Neostoicism intensifies]

[Anonymous No.6075454]

>>6073633
>Thomas Hobbes

I'm unfamiliar with him.


What does this mean?

[Anonymous No.6075467]

>>6073720
>>6074330
got the same top three...

>scientifically and materialistically inclined and
i would rather say 'empiricist'

>believe all the moral categories were invented by man
how can you not

[Anonymous No.6075561]

>tfw 100% fascist and national socialist

[Anonymous No.6076366]

>>6075561
link to quiz

[Anonymous No.6076376]

>>6075561
>christian socialist

aka faggot

[Anonymous No.6076402]

>generally disgusted with utilitarians
>100% Bentham

HOW COULD THIS HAPPEN TO ME

[Anonymous No.6076875]

For every question I selected 'Doesn't matter/Dislike all answer choices.', because any option is viable (thanks saint Max.)

I do not know what Aquinas' ethical code is

[Anonymous No.6076902]

>>6076402
why does utilitarianism disgust you?

[Anonymous No.6076931]

did i do well /lit/?

[Anonymous No.6076953]

heh

[Anonymous No.6076958]

>>6076402
You unprincipled monster.

>>6076953
>American "Liberal"

Hahahah that made me laugh so hard

[Anonymous No.6076975]

>>6076402

Because you are lying to yourself. I got 91% Bentham. 100% St. Augustine.

[Anonymous No.6076986]

>>6074237

Because you don't understand it, that's why. The substance/reality of the bread/wine becomes Jesus's body/blood. But not the appearance of it to all our senses.

I'm Orthodox, so it's different, but even the Catholic interpretation is not that ridiculous.

[Anonymous No.6076992]

[Anonymous No.6077001]

>>6073716
>it limits your rational thought.

[Anonymous No.6077010]

>>6076953
pretty accurate

[Anonymous No.6077031]

May be, but then again, I don't know much about philosophy

[Anonymous No.6077120]

recs?

[Anonymous No.6077178]

Kant, Spinoza and Epicureans.
What should I know?

[Anonymous No.6077185]

>>6077120
nietzsche

>>6077178
you probably have autism

[Anonymous No.6077210]

1. Jean-Paul Sartre (100%) More Info
2. John Stuart Mill (97%) More Info
3. Thomas Aquinas (85%) More Info
4. St. Augustine (80%) More Info
5. Immanuel Kant (79%) More Info
6. Epicureans (79%) More Info
7. Stoics (78%) More Info
8. Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche (78%) More Info
9. David Hume (77%) More Info
10. Ayn Rand (74%) More Info
11. Thomas Hobbes (73%) More Info
12. Cynics (65%) More Info
13. Plato (61%) More Info
14. Benedictus Spinoza (52%) More Info
15. Aristotle (52%) More Info
16. Jeremy Bentham (52%) More Info
17. Nel Noddings (50%) More Info
18. William of Ockham (49%) More Info
19. Prescriptivism (36%) More Info
20. William James (22%)
21. Jean-Jacques Rousseau (0%)

[Anonymous No.6077309]

>>6074265
Teens having never read him for real having preconceived thoughts about this nigga (who's the best nigga ever)

[Anonymous No.6077615]

>>6073633
I'm an atheist and I hate Ayn Rand...

[Anonymous No.6077684]

>100% Hume
>always agreed with a lot of his stuff and rereading some right now
>as much as it sucks to say, morals cannot be objective outside of individual perspectives
>reason cannot deduce moral actions
Seems bretty accurate...

[Anonymous No.6077705]

Top result is Aristotle.

Does that make me a huge pleb?

[Anonymous No.6077734]

>>6077210
How is it possible to have Sartre that close to Aquinas?

[Anonymous No.6077812]

Sartre at 100%, next is Bentham at 92%

[Anonymous No.6077858]

>>6073633
>st augustine 100%
>thomas aquinas 85%
>plato 67%

rate me

[Anonymous No.6077966]

>>6073633
socialist standing by
r8 me

[Anonymous No.6077981]

>>6075281
i can't imagine what you're feeling right now

[Anonymous No.6077986]

>>6077615
then you must be fucking retarded buddy
have fun with that dissonance

[Anonymous No.6077995]

>>6074169
This is about ethics, not metaphysics or onthology.

[Anonymous No.6078017]

I don't know shit about mill.

[Anonymous No.6078229]

>>6078017

5/10 I refuse to think that human life can be quantified. The greatest good for the greatest number is not just. Trying to base your ethics on measuring pleasure sounds like pseudo science to me. But fuck me was his defence of the freedom of speech convincing.

1. Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche (100%) More Info
2. Jean-Paul Sartre (85%) More Info
3. Epicureans (84%) More Info
4. David Hume (79%) More Info
5. Stoics (79%) More Info
6. Aristotle (76%) More Info
7. Thomas Aquinas (75%) More Info
8. St. Augustine (71%) More Info
9. Immanuel Kant (64%) More Info
10. Cynics (60%) More Info
11. Benedictus Spinoza (53%) More Info
12. Thomas Hobbes (52%) More Info
13. William of Ockham (49%) More Info
14. Plato (44%) More Info
15. Ayn Rand (44%) More Info
16. Nel Noddings (41%) More Info
17. Jeremy Bentham (32%) More Info
18. John Stuart Mill (29%) More Info
19. Prescriptivism (21%) More Info
20. William James (13%)
21. Jean-Jacques Rousseau (0%)

[Anonymous No.6078330]

[Anonymous No.6078379]

Should I actually read some Nietszhe now, also last time I did it a few months ago I had Hobbes on top, not sure what changed since then tbh.

[Anonymous No.6078417]

Alright.

[Anonymous No.6078435]

>>6073716
it limits your rational thought. You prejudice yourself because you're inflexible.

[Anonymous No.6078529]

>>6073633
100% St. Augustine

[Anonymous No.6078654]

[Anonymous No.6078670]

how gay are you /lit/?

http://www.selectsmart.com/FREE/select.php?client=royal

[Anonymous No.6078685]

>>6078670

[Anonymous No.6078701]

Did I win? I've never read anyone on the list except for Sartre. Well, actually, I bought Kant's Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals but still haven't read it.

[Anonymous No.6078718]

>>6078701
let me guess
white, male, left-wing, nihilist, atheist, pro-liberty and anti-death penalty?

[Anonymous No.6078760]

>>6078718
I'm a Turkfag so I'm not exactly white, and I'm not a nihilist either, but for others, yeah.

[Anonymous No.6078767]

>>6078760
>atheist
>not a nihilist
where does morality come from anon

[ΟΥΤΙΣ No.6078797]

>>6078767
Conditioning by society and the family.

[Anonymous No.6078812]

>>6078701
pretty good but could be better
pic related, objectively the most moral way

[Anonymous No.6078823]

1. Thomas Hobbes (100%)
2. David Hume (81%)
3. Jean-Paul Sartre (76%)
4. Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche (74%)
5. Jeremy Bentham (57%)
6. Cynics (48%)
7. John Stuart Mill (46%)
8. Nel Noddings (46%)
9. Stoics (46%)
10. Epicureans (42%)
11. William of Ockham (41%)
12. Benedictus Spinoza (40%)
13. Aristotle (37%)
14. Plato (37%)
15. Ayn Rand (36%)
16. Prescriptivism (35%)
17. Immanuel Kant (31%)
18. Thomas Aquinas (30%)
19. St. Augustine (25%)
20. William James (8%)
21. Jean-Jacques Rousseau (0%)

[Anonymous No.6078841]

>>6078767
In my view acting morally is ultimately more beneficial for a group of people, so I think it's a mix of both intelligence and intuition.

I lean on the altruistic side, which I think is the intuitive basis for morals, and I myself choose to act morally so that everyone can lead better lives. Even if my own moral views on something are different from someone else's, we should be able to have a mutual understanding that morals are relative, and it's the intention, which the outcome should benefit both parties, that actually matters.

[Anonymous No.6078845]

>>6078841
>In my view acting morally is ultimately more beneficial for a group of people
utilitarians pls go

[Anonymous No.6078846]

>>6078797
so nihilism?

[Anonymous No.6078850]

1. Thomas Hobbes (100%)
2. Aristotle (98%)
3. Plato (97%)
4. Stoics (97%)
5. Thomas Aquinas (85%)
6. John Stuart Mill (82%)
7. Jeremy Bentham (78%)
8. David Hume (76%)
9. Ayn Rand (74%)
10. Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche (65%)
11. Jean-Paul Sartre (65%)
12. Immanuel Kant (64%)
13. Epicureans (63%)
14. Benedictus Spinoza (63%)
15. Cynics (58%)
16. Nel Noddings (52%)
17. St. Augustine (43%)
18. Prescriptivism (28%)
19. William James (26%)
20. Jean-Jacques Rousseau (12%)
21. William of Ockham (6%)

>Mill ranks higher than Hume
brb committing sudoku
>Rousseau is second-to-last
nvm redeemed myself

[Anonymous No.6078874]

My philosophical commitments are to samkhya and yoga. Interesting that this quiz, which only includes western philosophers, assumes I'm a Christian.

[Anonymous No.6078893]

>>6078812

[Anonymous No.6078912]

>>6078874
>samkhya and yoga.

>>6078893

[Anonymous No.6078919]

>ITT: Time to google "Nel Noddings"

[Anonymous No.6078949]

>>6078912
Excellent refutation. I especially enjoyed your economy of argument in utilizing a previously posted meme.

[Anonymous No.6078975]

>>6078893
>not accepting Immanuel Kant as your lord and savior

[Anonymous No.6078990]

>>6078975
>kingdom of bellends

[Anonymous No.6079027]

How did I do?

[Anonymous No.6079034]

[Anonymous No.6079107]

On half a pint of shandy I'm particularly ill.

[Anonymous No.6080513]

>>6078670
i love how in-depth it was
pretty sure they only called me gay because i find lesbianism disgusting
mostly hetero bi-guy standing by

[Anonymous No.6080577]

>>6077001
i'm not op but what the fuck are you laughing about faggot?
how is that in the least bit inaccurate

[Anonymous No.6082539]

Jean-Paul Sartre (100%) More Info
2. Thomas Hobbes (95%) More Info
3. John Stuart Mill (87%) More Info
4. David Hume (83%) More Info
5. Jeremy Bentham (79%) More Info
6. Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche (77%) More Info
7. Cynics (73%) More Info
8. Nel Noddings (71%) More Info
9. Ayn Rand (69%) More Info
10. Stoics (67%)