[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 103 KB, 620x990, 4950929.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6068638 No.6068638 [Reply] [Original]

How many deconstructions have you done today?

>> No.6068646

>>6068638

I would tell you, but the ordering of the signified in any given utterance is necessarily a defference and I can't give you a number as all quantifying referents are empty semiotic placeholders

>> No.6068650
File: 1.45 MB, 1364x736, 1394032693923.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6068650

Since /lit/ can be appropriately described and identified as the home of analytic philosophy: We only do conceptual analyses here, Jacques.

You know where the door is.

>> No.6068654

>>6068650

>/lit/ can be appropriately described and identified as the home of analytic philosophy

kill yourself before making any further posts on this board

>> No.6068660

>>6068646
>empty semiotic placeholders

They're not empty, they're undergoing the free-play of differance

>> No.6068663
File: 7 KB, 389x255, que.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6068663

>>6068646
>referents are empty semiotic placeholders
>confusing the referent for the name of the referent

also, what >>6068650 said.

>> No.6068671

>>6068663

>>confusing the referent for the name of the referent
>implying a transcendental signified

>> No.6068672

>>6068646
I would say topkek but the privileging of its presence over its differential absence of bottomkek is to conceive of a structure subject to play but is itself not and must be disrupted

>> No.6068689

>>6068638
watching a course on deleuze if this counts

>> No.6068745

>>6068650


>muh language games

>a word is what I define as.

lel go back to Ludwig, it's clear you could never get into linguistic theory.

>> No.6068757

>>6068745
Literally—what? Why do you mumble so incoherently?

>> No.6068803

>>6068672
lol

>> No.6068816

>this whole thread
I love you /lit/. Never stop

>> No.6068818

This thread sounds more like secondary sources on Derrida by Anglophones rather than Derrida himself.
What have you guys been reading?

>> No.6068824

>>6068818
>horstexte
Non

>> No.6068826

>>6068818

Wikipedia

>> No.6068829

>>6068818
john cena: an autobiography

>> No.6068839

>>6068824
"hors-texte" doesn't mean monism, Derrida doesn't reduce differences to a totality like Hegel — although he sometimes has that tendency (the curse of Hyppolite on him), but then he's talking about it at the level of "différance" rather than about more concrete things (e.g. this or that Derrida's text versus this or that text on Derrida) which are being produced by "différance".

>> No.6068849

>>6068818
Palo Alto by James Franco

>> No.6068857
File: 124 KB, 960x601, derridas-cat.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6068857

>muh speech
>muh metaphysics of presence
>muh phallogocentrism
writing ftw

>> No.6068863

>>6068839
Je ne crois pas que tu a compris le mot ou la blague.

>> No.6068902

>>6068863
>le mot
"hors-texte", c'est une expréssion de Derrida bien connu, et alors ce que j'ai "voulu-dire" (voilà, une blague) c'est "pas de hors-texte" avec le "pas de".

>la blague
Quoi, "horstexte" comme "cheval-texte", mais comme une drogue plutôt qu'un animal?

>> No.6068921

>>6068902
>anglophone
No, that's not the joke, it's the usual meaning of hors-texte (ancillary and auxiliary published materials) being taken literally.

Horse would have to be Cockney English or something I think in order for your joke to work, but I did smile at the attempt of French.