/lit/ - Literature

File: 286 KB, 750x733, max-stirner.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Tue Jan 20 17:50:41 2015 No.6028882 [Reply] [Original]

Why did he never come to the conclusion that the Ego and the Self are also spooks?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 20 17:52:05 2015 No.6028891 Because those are the very definitions of non-spooks. You can't reduce away the Self Also, thread soundtrack: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m9We2XsVZfc

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 20 17:52:07 2015 No.6028892 Twould've been a spooky conclusion.

Anonymous Tue Jan 20 17:53:53 2015 No.6028901

>>6028882
They are not. He pulls some "the tao that can be named is not the true tao" shit:

>What Stirner says is a word, a thought, a concept; what he means is no word, no thought, no concept. What he says is not what is meant, and what he means is unsayable.

>Stirner speaks of the Unique and says immediately: Names name you not. He articulates the word, so long as he calls it the Unique, but adds nonetheless that the Unique is only a name. He thus means something different from what he says, as perhaps someone who calls you Ludwig does not mean a Ludwig in general, but means You, for which he has no word. (...) It is the end point of our phrase world, of this world in whose "beginning was the Word."

>... [F]or 'being' is abstraction, as is even 'the I'. Only I am not abstraction alone: I am all in all, consequently, even abstraction or nothing: I am all and nothing; I am not a mere thought, but at the same time I am full of thoughts, a thought-world. ...."

Read more, lad.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 20 17:54:28 2015 No.6028903 >>6028891 >you can't reduce away the self I can't think of a philosophical tradition that hasn't at least produced one guy that has done just that.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 20 18:00:15 2015 No.6028934 >>6028903 Your not familiar with the way Stirner uses the concept of self. You should read his books first.

>>	G 0 D B L 3 ß !zR/LhJxu0Q Tue Jan 20 18:11:15 2015 No.6028986 >>6028882 What art style is this? Its not varying in color enough or I'd take it to be a futurist portrait.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 20 18:14:34 2015 No.6029002 >>6028934 >my nonstandard use of that concept isn't reducible the way the standard usage is I can almost smell the spookiness.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 20 18:15:26 2015 No.6029004 >>6028882 cause he was a spook

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 20 18:19:12 2015 No.6029018 >>6028882 Because you're a pleb.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 20 18:25:54 2015 No.6029054 >>6028986 neo retro futurism

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 20 18:32:41 2015 No.6029084 File: 525 KB, 441x300, 1348817131475.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6029018

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 20 18:34:45 2015 No.6029099 File: 159 KB, 600x760, Blast2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6028986 vorticism?

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]