[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 99 KB, 421x634, 135.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6015958 No.6015958 [Reply] [Original]

Has any of those sexist writers you guys like so much ever explained why women love religioin?

Give me your own theories about it as well

>> No.6015965

>religioin

haha is that funny or what

I mean religion of course

>> No.6015973

Women are more dependent, obviously

But this isn't literature

>> No.6015989

>>6015958
What's religioin, and do women even love it more than men?

>> No.6016014

Actually Nietzsche wrote about this specific topic (in a positive way: women should be religious) but i can't be arsed to find the text.

>> No.6016029

>religioin

>> No.6016200

no I wont do your gender studies homework

>> No.6016928

Because praying was the only thing they could do to try keep their husband from beating and raping them

>> No.6018830

>>6015958
There's no such thing as sexism, so it follows: there are no sexist writers.

>> No.6019132
File: 81 KB, 500x328, No proof you exist.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6019132

>>6018830

>> No.6019521

>>6015958
I wasn't aware women were any more religious than men are on average.

>> No.6020545

the oppressed, abused, and disempowered (of any kind, anywhere, man or woman) find comfort in the promise that justice and peace are real

>> No.6020579

>>6015958
Because they are naturally submissive and literally all of them have daddy issues. Nothing like having a supreme father to serve in that case.

Also, when you look at how nuns relate to Christ it's generally pretty erotic, calling themselves his brides et cetera.

>> No.6020699
File: 7 KB, 480x360, hqdefault (2).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6020699

>>6020579
russel brand plz

>> No.6020701

>>6016928
Top kek

>> No.6020705

>>6015958
they can use religion to protect themselves against the strong

>you're not allowed to rape me you know

basic bitch slave morality

>> No.6020864

I don't know about it being an increased disposition toward religion strictly, I'd say it's more of one toward spirituality in general. And that just so happens to take the form of doctrine due to circumstance.

If I had to venture a guess I'd say it's probably due to their maternal nature more than anything. I think childbirth as a biological process ties them to life in a way that a lot of men don't really arrive at. They don't feel as abstract and lost as a larger portion of men do in the world.

>> No.6020886

>>6020579
this, they sometimes even reach orgasm, and it wasnt even that rare

>> No.6020904

>>6020864
>I think childbirth as a biological process ties them to life in a way that a lot of men don't really arrive at. They don't feel as abstract and lost as a larger portion of men do in the world.
That's because our most profound biological process, tribal warfare, rape and murder, isn't allowed any more.

>> No.6021034

>>6020904

Those are societal, not biological. And you sound like a sociopath.

>> No.6021103

>>6021034
>you sound like a sociopath
more like an angry kid

>> No.6021164

>>6021034
>female behaviour is biological
>male behaviour is societal

that's sexist.

>> No.6021171

>>6019521
They are.

>> No.6021174

>>6021034
sociopath is such a mis- and overused term

>> No.6021185

>>6021034
Sociopaths are necessary for a healthy society

>> No.6021188

>>6021174

Not when you're pining for more war, rape and murder it isn't.

>> No.6021199

>"It's queer how out of touch with truth women are. They live in a world of their own, and there has never been anything like it, and never can be. It's too beautiful altogether, and if they were to set it up it would go to pieces before the first sunset. Some confounded fact we men have been living contentedly with ever since the day of creation would start up and knock the whole thing over.

>> No.6021205

>>6021034
>societal, not biological

I bet you think natural/artificial is a meaningful dichotomy, too, huh retard?

Why does every argument for equality predicate itself on the argument that "society" caused it, while ignoring the cause for society?

Why should I treat people equally anyway lmao literally no one person is equal to any other

>> No.6021211

>>6021188
>males have been waging war, raping and killing forever
>since WW2 it's suddenly not allowed any more
>blame men for feeling alienated while they have to repress their natural behaviour constantly

>> No.6021215

>>6021188
War, rape and murder are the only interesting aspects of life

>> No.6021237

>>6021205

>Why should I treat people equally anyway lmao

I like how you used that post as a platform to just start angst lamenting over completely unrelated things. Try to calm yourself.

>> No.6021246

>>6021188
he mentioned that certain tribal strategies are not feasible anymore
i doubt he actually wants to go back to ye olde times

discussing something that makes you feel uncomfortable doesnt make anybody a sociopath, it just makes you look simple for not being able to detach your emotions from a discussion.

>> No.6021256

>>6021237
It's not unrelated, since the original cuntposter said women are more in touch with life while ignoring that this is the case because their behaviour is allowed and fostered while male behaviour is discriminated against.

>> No.6021307

>>6021256
you're so right, we should all live in a society where instead of allowing childbirth, we should only allow murder, rape, and war. then we can all die and stop having this retarded discussion.

>> No.6021315

>>6015958

religion arises from the overwhelming desire to belong and to have purpose in life and be a part of a greater whole. people in general can't stand the thought of being tiny and pointless, but it's typically more difficult for women because they are more susceptible to desires for family, social structure, being loved, etc.

feels => religion
more feels => more susceptible to religion

>> No.6021321

>>6021315
although a better word would be "spiritualism", as religion can also imply organised persecution etc

>> No.6021324

>>6021307
dunno in what kind of world you live in, but mankind murders, rapes and wages war since we wiped out the neanderthals
we still here.

>> No.6021328

>>6021256

It's strange that you have a selective memory when you can literally go back and read the previous posts. I said that childbirth, as a biological process, ties them to life in a way that most men don't really arrive at. I didn't say that men were incapable of this, but rather that a larger portion of them feel abstract and lost. I never just blurted out "women are more in touch with life" and ended it at that.

And the post I was responding to never said anything about male behaviour being discriminated against. All he did was list certain acts. That's it. These are acts that are entirely dependant on other temporal factors, namely societal factors, whereas childbirth is an absolutely necessitated stage of life. They are not equally comparable.

>> No.6021330

>>6021307
>instead of

There is room for both, anon. There always has been. It's been a fairly recent notion that there isn't.

>> No.6021338

>>6021328
>It's strange that you have a selective memory when you can literally go back and read the previous posts. I said that childbirth, as a biological process, ties them to life in a way that most men don't really arrive at.
Because their way of arriving at it is frowned upon these days.

>> No.6021341

>>6021237
I can say the exact same about this post, dude

>> No.6021364

It's threads like these that really convey just how many teenagers we have on this board. Angst levels through the roof.

>> No.6021375

>>6021364
>if you don't worship us girls you're a little kid

kek

>> No.6021401

>>6021375

Stop living in the autism echochamber it's messing with your mind.

>> No.6021409
File: 39 KB, 640x427, mfw.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6021409

>ITT: tumblr meets /r9k/

>> No.6021412

>all this betas putting pussy on a pedestal
Women are more prone to be religious just as they are more inclined to vote for “big government"
They are more likely to seek shelter/protection/leadership (much more so than men) they don't like the “burden" of having to be accountable for their own life.
Its just part of their female imperative.

>> No.6021418
File: 62 KB, 900x602, 1387170073326.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6021418

>>6021328
it's not just an artefact of childbirth, though that definitely plays a part. the archetypical female sexuality has its basis in being unique and desired. this belies other differences arising from brain structure and hormones, like a greater need for companionship and desire to empathise. see (>>6021315). basically, we're just more inclined to be feelsy

>>6021338
what way are you referring to?

>> No.6021431
File: 401 KB, 815x611, 1406000319422.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6021431

>>6021409

>ITP: maymay meets ayyymay

>> No.6021440

>>6021412

Are you playing a parody right now or are you really this defeated as a person?

>> No.6021441

>>6021431
>that pic

Furiouslyvomiting.jpge

>> No.6021451

>>6021401
All successful men are misogynists, m8.

>> No.6021456

>>6021440
I'll bite, what in my comment made you think I'm “defeated as a person"?

Men and women are vastly different mentally and physically, and that's a fact, if you think that we think and base our behaviour in the same things you are just oblivious of the world around you.

>> No.6021464

>>6021451

Success is a relative notion.

>> No.6021475

>>6021418
>what way are you referring to?
war, rape, murder etc.

for as long as we exist, groups of males have been roaming around and fucking up other groups of males and taking their women. just like chimpanzees do, by the way. that is how we've been rolling for hundreds of millennia.

the last century or so, we've generally been deprived of this type of behaviour. so men do things like join the military, become football hooligans, join street gangs, join ISIS etc. still, it's a meagre substitute for the old fashioned way.

>> No.6021502 [DELETED] 

>>6021456

>I'll bite, what in my comment made you think I'm “defeated as a person"?

The opening line to say the least.

>they don't like the “burden" of having to be accountable for their own life

And the fact that you make blanket statements like these and don't see that you're being dehumanising toward and entire gender. As a whole in a domestic sense you'd probably find women to be the more accountable ones over men. You have lots of men simply finding reasons to fuck off and leave women to raise families by themselves. Being responsible not only for themselves but others too. On the whole when it comes to a kind of civil fabric women are more accountable than men.

This doesn't mean that one gender is better than the other etc, that's all bullshit. Errant naive crap peddled by frustrated people with agendas. Which is most of the people ITT. No temperate reasoning whatsoever, they take up one hostile position and sail it through a sea of cognitive dissonance.

>> No.6021506

>>6021456

>I'll bite, what in my comment made you think I'm “defeated as a person"?

The opening line to say the least.

>they don't like the “burden" of having to be accountable for their own life

And the fact that you make blanket statements like these and don't see that you're being dehumanising toward an entire gender. As a whole in a domestic sense you'd probably find women to be the more accountable ones over men. You have lots of men simply finding reasons to fuck off and leave women to raise families by themselves. Being responsible not only for themselves but others too. On the whole when it comes to a kind of civil fabric women are more accountable than men.

This doesn't mean that one gender is better than the other etc, that's all bullshit. Errant naive crap peddled by frustrated people with agendas. Which is most of the people ITT. No temperate reasoning whatsoever, they take up one hostile position and sail it through a sea of cognitive dissonance.

>> No.6021507

>>6021475
both true and gross. hopefully the removable of this behaviour will be at least one good thing to come of genetically-designed childs

>> No.6021509

>>6015958
>you will never have the love of an average-looking flexible South-Asian woman

>> No.6021535

>>6021506
So not putting pussy on a pedestal is defeating me as a person? Lol
I've never said that one gender is better since we are not arguing about that I won't comment further on that.


Women are affected by solipsism in a huge way, they can only truly love themselves and their children, concepts like honor and sacrificing oneself for an idea is beyond most women, that's why you'll find 1 woman martyr for every 100 men.


Meaning that they are not prone to sacrifice themselves for the sake of society, men do that, and there is overwhelming evidence of that in any history book..

>> No.6021537

>>6021507
it has it up and downsides. when shit hits the fan you need savages on your side to fuck people up. you can only do away with them as soon as you're a 100% sure there will be no more outside threats, which is probably never.

>> No.6021542
File: 93 KB, 500x684, nbyujduqyo1s5kgq3o1_500.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6021542

>>6021535
>martyrdom is something to aspire to
>dieing for memes

>> No.6021557
File: 25 KB, 600x620, 1409277348309.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6021557

>>6021542
>tfw people literally die for memes every day

>> No.6021566

>>6021542
Meh, it could be either bad or good. Wasn't the point though.


Won't waste more time with you if that's your kind of argument, don't even bother to reply.

>> No.6021584

>>6015958
well the reasons are mainly societal. women are statistically more prone to creating dependant identities because they are so raised (or at the very least, more so than men). think about it; if you were taught your whole life not to think according to yourself but according to another ideal (like we teach little susie to follow the ideal of the wife, of the mother, of the sex object, instead of her own interests) you wouldn't learn to think on your own but would instead latch on to whatever ideal catches your eye. this is why the most obnoxious christians, or fans of harry potter, or horse-riding, are usually women.

>> No.6021589

>>6021535

So they can truly love their children but they are incapable of understanding a concept like sacrifice?

Brilliant.

Not to mention that society is built on the family unit and somehow their sacrifice and providing for these family units to a larger degree than men somehow doesn't fit into the sacrifice "for the sake of society". Why is that again? Because it isn't in line with your machismo notions of "sacrifice"? There are many forms of sacrifice that are made for the sake of society. Men and women make huge sacrifices every day for it in a myriad of ways.

I'm out. Dealing with adolescent retards is too draining. I don't understand how some of you idiots can say schoolboy shit like this and expect to be taken seriously.

>> No.6021597
File: 376 KB, 1920x1271, 111333.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6021597

>>6021566
brotip: if someones making fun of you, there might be a chance that your point is so ridiculously wrong they dont even bother.

>> No.6021641

>>6021589

>>6021589
Do you even know what solipsism is?


I've never said they are not capable of sacrifice I said that this sacrifice is triggered for their children, as they are loved dearly by their mothers (as they are part of them)


I also mentioned that there are are cases that women do sacrifice not for them or the greater good, but those are outliers.
Your other arguments are so out of topic and so charged of buzzwords and ad hominems that I won't try to have a discussion about it, like the other asshole I'm done talking with you.

>> No.6021647

>>6021597
Not even the guy you are replying too but your argument is beyond stupid, and it seems like you just can't form a counter

>> No.6021660

>>6021641
What does solipsism have to do with this? Do you really believe that women doubt the existence of other minds?

>> No.6021663

>>6021660
he doesnt know what it means, but demands to be taken seriously.

>> No.6021726
File: 351 KB, 1580x1136, 1417623346999.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6021726

>>6021660
You really think that I'm talking about either philosophical or metaphysical solipsism?


Haha, anyway like said, done talking with you betas enjoy being miserable your whole life because you won't ever get or understand women.
http://www.goingyourownway.com/mgtow-mgtow-101/female-psychosis-3-solipsism-640/
Might as well post this for anyone reading and want to really know what I meant.

>> No.6021742

>>6021726
When people say solipsism that is usually what they are referring to. What is non philosophical solipsism?

>> No.6021745

>>6021660
> Do you really believe that women doubt the existence of other minds?


Also solipsism is the belief that only your mind and what it perceives is real, god damn you are stupid.

>> No.6021754

>>6021742
Read the link

>> No.6021764

>>6021745
How is that inconsistent with the definition of solipsism? People who take the existence of other minds for granted are not solipsists. Frankly you sound like the stupid one.

>> No.6021783

>>6021764
>>6021742
>solipsism is doubting the existence of the own mind
>not offering even one argument
Yeah, I'm done talking to you too.

>> No.6021788

>>6021783
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solipsism