[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 21 KB, 477x292, of course.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5853979 No.5853979 [Reply] [Original]

>yfw most Stirnerists are of the ENTP personality type

>> No.5853982

>paying attention to myers-briggs
>>>/mu/

>> No.5853990

>>5853982
>not realising its applications as a broad tool
>trying to base your beliefs off any single tool

>> No.5854010
File: 80 KB, 300x460, ddr.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5854010

>>5853990
>basing your beliefs on tools
>trying to base your beliefs on something
it's amateur hour over here

>> No.5854022

>>5854010
>literally 'you can't know nuffin'

>> No.5854029

>>5853979
I'm INTP actually

Then again I don't personally ascribe to the idea of the mass application of a broad personality type

>> No.5854032

>>5854029
Isn't that the whole point of a broad personality type, a useful generalisation?

>> No.5854037
File: 17 KB, 500x330, 1415827984960.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5854037

>>5853982
>Most people who are X are a specific myers briggs type.
>HURR ITS USELESS HURR!!1!!

>> No.5854047

>>5854032
But that's the thing; it's a generalization. My best friend and I both took the same test and got the same results yet are radically different people in mostly every way. I think it's too general to be applicable to any pedantic sort of science or study.

>> No.5854076

>>5854047
The test works every time 60% of the time

>> No.5854083

Myers Briggs is just astrology for INTJs

>> No.5854087

The strongest argument against a union of egoists is spending a considerable amount of time among Stirner reading anarchists.

>> No.5854104

>>5854083
Astrology is Myers Briggs for ESFPss

>> No.5854107

>>5854087
Get a load of this involuntary egoist.

>Nearly 2015
>Still being dominated by spooks like a beta

>> No.5854116

The first thing any Stirnerist knows about being a Stirnerist is that there is no such thing as a "Stirnerist" but for Stirner himself.

>> No.5854127

>>5854116
>any stirnerist knows that they are not a stirnerist

>> No.5854142

>>5854127
That's what I said, isn't it? What's the point of this post?
Yes, we noticed that you can read. Congratulations anon we are very proud of you, now eat your cake while I sweep up this confetti.

>> No.5854170
File: 35 KB, 569x510, 1412158373849.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5854170

>job interview
>have to do MBTI test
>try to answer questions so I get STJ (stereotypical hard worker type or whatever)
>mfw I fuck up and accidentally get INTJ

The employer started talking about how I was an independent and edgy person in a tone which said, "you obviously aren't for this job so fuck off".

>> No.5854175

>>5854170
That's the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard.

>> No.5854183
File: 2.23 MB, 1089x1600, catcher.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5854183

>>5853979
Is it time for Stirner?

>> No.5854360

>>5854170
This just pisses me off. If that happened to me and I got the feeling that was the way they were going with the interview I would start telling them how MBTI is pseudoscience bullshit. I wouldn't even care about getting the job at that point if the employers are that fucking retarded.

>> No.5854390

>not being a based ENTJ
You did it wrong, folks.

>> No.5854398

>>5854360
>/The Middle Class/

>> No.5854400

>>5854170
>tfw actually INTJ (I've taken the test 3 times or so and got that)
The website said that means I'm good at working and have good attention to detail and making sure shit works. Why wouldn't a manager want that? I dunno, if they're stupid enough to to the MBTI for a job interview they're probably a shitty place to work anyway.

>> No.5854401

"Voluntary egoism" is the proper name for Stirner's philosophy.