[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 149 KB, 558x418, 1387381150755.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5797915 No.5797915[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Fedora
fe·do·ra noun \fi-ˈdȯr-ə\
1. A person, typically male, who takes excess pride in atheism or holding shallow philosophical views, typically derogatory
2. A type of soft hat for men that has a wide brim

>> No.5797946

>my favourite epic meme will shape the english language!

Face it, most people have never heard of this shit.

>> No.5797956

>>5797915
this thread sucks reported

>> No.5797986
File: 312 KB, 700x296, laughingcunt.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5797986

Make fun of fedoras all you want, your God will still never exist.

>1958
>"Hell is a literal place. You'll burn in Hell if you don't believe in Jesus and do good deeds!"
>1998
>"Hell is a real place, but unless you're really evil; you'll most likely just go to Purgatory. God is merciful."
>2006
>"God doesn't send people to Hell. People choose to live a life divorced from God and love, themselves. Hell is just the absence of God."
>2015
>"The Church has always taught that Hell is an allegory rather than a real place."

>> No.5797988

>>5797915
>atheism.

Please, you're fedora if you conception of the almighty which is by definition beyond the ken of human intellect doesn't have a long white beard.

>> No.5797993

>>5797946
>implying this isn't already a shitty reddit meme at this point
>implying your mom won't be using it five years from now

>> No.5797999

>>5797986
whoah, that's so true.

>> No.5798069
File: 320 KB, 600x582, 1307741069001.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5798069

>>5797986

>> No.5798134

>>5797986
>fedoras actually believe this

>> No.5798168
File: 372 KB, 600x545, 8df.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5798168

>>5798134
Is that your final stance on the issue?

You may want to think it over before the general public realizes it's philosophically unsound in a decade, and some pseudo-apologist needs to reinterpret the dogma once again.