[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 1.31 MB, 1100x1398, Luis Ricardo Falero Witches Going to Their Sabbath (or The Departure of the Witches).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5730849 No.5730849 [Reply] [Original]

>art thread deleted
>memmy threads on front page unscathed
Post favorite paintings etc.

>> No.5730857

>>5730849
Why paint photorealistic stuff if you have photography and photoshop ?

>> No.5730867

I don't know why mods haven't caught on that the silmarillion thread is shitposting

>> No.5730868
File: 105 KB, 507x601, Donquixote.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5730868

ITT: Post your favorite /lit/ related paintings/art

>> No.5730907
File: 265 KB, 747x942, don-quixote-118.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5730907

>>5730857
Yeah a futurist guy said that too. Can't remember who. Anyways the answer is because
>>5730868
I really like this one Don Quixote illustration. The book scene is already hilarious, when I actually went and looked for Doré's pictures this one was my favorite.

>> No.5730919
File: 379 KB, 2101x1661, the-islander-1976.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5730919

why are the mods such shit?

/lit/ is probably the easiest board to mod and they can't even do it right

>> No.5730924
File: 112 KB, 513x800, tamara-de-lempicka-the-communicant-1928.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5730924

>> No.5730925
File: 181 KB, 1024x842, 504348-03.-Portrait-of-Shor-1024x842.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5730925

>>5730857
If you have ever seen a photo-realistic painting in real life you would know why

>> No.5730928
File: 248 KB, 1942x1087, jamie-wyeth-portrait-of-lady-1968.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5730928

>>5730919
Based Wyeth. take a look at this other one.

>> No.5730954
File: 401 KB, 1638x1080, the city rises.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5730954

Based Italian futurism

>> No.5730968

>>5730919
>>5730928
sheep eyes are so fucking alien

>> No.5730969
File: 199 KB, 1276x1057, dinamismo-di-un-cane-al-guinzaglio-buffalo[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5730969

>>5730954

>> No.5730984
File: 310 KB, 1908x1200, defense-of-bayazet-do-ubeyaz-t-1891.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5730984

>> No.5730990
File: 541 KB, 1400x1692, 1413373800635.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5730990

>>5730984

>> No.5730996
File: 1.19 MB, 2653x1903, Phaedra - Alexandre Cabanel 1880.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5730996

>>5730849

>> No.5730997
File: 2.72 MB, 1800x1298, 1413707652526.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5730997

>>5730990

>> No.5730998

>>5730857
odd that you assume that just because a painting is realistic its purpose is to provide an accurate depiction of reality

>> No.5731004
File: 450 KB, 2000x1303, 1-Jjgzrwsx06mmw6MpxBowjg.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5731004

>>5730997

>> No.5731006

Who's that one dude, that has the sexiest water imaginable. I cannot for the life of me remember his name or the paintings name. It's a ship on the ocean and the water is rather rough.

Vague as fuck example, but it's the go to response whenever people ask for well-painted water.

>> No.5731014
File: 2.43 MB, 3701x2868, 1413707057765.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5731014

>>5731004

>> No.5731058

>>5731004
what is this painting about?

>> No.5731117
File: 79 KB, 700x840, Nicola Samorì - L'Age Mur.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5731117

/lit/ always seems to focus on older work, are there any contemporary artists you like?

>> No.5731123

>>5731058
General Torrijos’ ill-fated attempt to dethrone King Ferdinand of Spain

>> No.5731136
File: 141 KB, 1024x731, angels_by_sstolo-d2y1o1r.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5731136

>>5731117
Oh I sure do.
Never heard of Samori. Thought it was Nerdrum at first glance.

Jósef Stolorz pictured. Has a sort of Beksinski thing going for him

>> No.5731139
File: 101 KB, 900x800, Theyll_Have_Your_Name_In_Hate_by_sstolo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5731139

>> No.5731145
File: 294 KB, 892x1200, FrankFrazetta-Conan-the-Adventurer-1966.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5731145

>>5731117
Frazzeta is goat.

>> No.5731154
File: 78 KB, 400x503, 39441275_zdzislaw_beksinski.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5731154

>>5731145

>> No.5731159
File: 251 KB, 1536x1515, 2148_10[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5731159

>> No.5731165
File: 570 KB, 1626x1686, Kazimir_Malevich_-_'Suprematist_Composition-_White_on_White',_oil_on_canvas,_1918,_Museum_of_Modern_Art[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5731165

>>5731159

>> No.5731168
File: 772 KB, 3000x2119, Ivan Aivazovsky.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5731168

>>5731006
There are many ships at sea paintings, but how about this one from Ivan Aivazovsky

>> No.5731172
File: 59 KB, 808x611, Kline_no2[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5731172

>>5731165

>> No.5731174
File: 120 KB, 640x934, anderszorn2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5731174

>>5731014
That entire painting looks retarded, those pillars lmfao.

>> No.5731180
File: 123 KB, 626x480, artwork_images_425932294_543567_franz-kline[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5731180

>>5731172
degeneracy
feminists
vagina splatter
etc

>> No.5731182

>>5731168
This is the exact painting I was looking for. Thanks butterbutt.

>> No.5731184

>>5731165
>>5731159
I can't paint one of those on your wall for a small fee, anon.

>> No.5731186
File: 378 KB, 1091x800, SANTA-ROSALIA-roberto ferri.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5731186

>>5731117

>> No.5731192

>>5731184
But you can't be the first one to have the idea to paint squares and call it art.

>> No.5731196
File: 1.46 MB, 1496x1927, IKB_191[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5731196

>>5731180
2l8m88 already inb4'ed retarded comments

>> No.5731200
File: 50 KB, 500x362, Eyebrow wiggle.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5731200

>>5731192
I can also improvise and make something similar but unique. I'm that good.

>> No.5731204
File: 172 KB, 922x1200, Rothko-Untitled-White-Blacks-Grays-on-Maroon-1963[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5731204

>>5731196

>> No.5731207
File: 69 KB, 500x637, tumblr_n19o2uloRG1shesgao1_500[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5731207

>>5731204

>> No.5731208

>>5731204
>>5731196
>>5731180
>>5731172
>>5731165
>>5731159
>>5731207
All these paintings can't be your favorite, come on now

>> No.5731217
File: 116 KB, 1013x768, Odd Nerdrum -The Futility of Trying.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5731217

>>5731172
This is a dude in a top hat crash landing his ornithopter, as seen from the roof of a dilapidated barn

>>5731180
This is funky wiring inside some wall

>>5731207
This is racist. Please delete.

>> No.5731221
File: 19 KB, 297x420, CRI_190029[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5731221

>>5731208
favorite[s]
>>5731217
if you want them to be >>5731180 looks more biological to me than mechanical

>> No.5731229
File: 138 KB, 1024x791, 1024px-El_Tres_de_Mayo,_by_Francisco_de_Goya,_from_Prado_thin_black_margin[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5731229

>>5731221

>> No.5731230

Does anyone know any paintings depicting the Salem Witch Trials? I've been thinking of doing a Viva La Vida and just throwing the novel title and artist name over a classic extremely famous painting.

>> No.5731240
File: 63 KB, 1147x1143, 1331502411017.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5731240

>>5731207

>> No.5731252
File: 97 KB, 557x800, francisco_goya_witches_sabbath.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5731252

>>5731230
Not quite what you're looking for, but it is semi-related and it's the first thing to pop into my head.

>> No.5731257
File: 118 KB, 870x1257, witches-in-the-air-1798.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5731257

>>5731230
Posting this because it's semi relevant.

>> No.5731268

For April fools moot should turn /hc/ into a high culture board

>> No.5731277
File: 45 KB, 460x600, anderszorn.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5731277

>>5731174

>> No.5731286

>>5731252
>>5731257

... those are absolutely incredible! Thank you so much. Would you be able to maybe provide names of artists who'd have focused on this sort of stuff?

>> No.5731301
File: 15 KB, 293x417, witchessabbath.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5731301

>>5731286
Francisco de Goya did the goat one. Most of his art is in that style. I like his stuff.

>> No.5731302

>>5731286
those are both from goya

>> No.5731306

>>5731286
Huh. I posted witches in the air, and they're both by Francisco Goya.

Interesting we had the same thought go through our head.

>> No.5731372

>>5730857
well, there are generally two camps: technical fetishists who get off on autistcally creating exact replicas and those who are deeply attracted to the deep and length experience of looking at thing and the amazing detail and attention we're capable of having flow through our eyes and brains. that experience is exactly what clicking a camera cannot do.

>> No.5731391
File: 1.66 MB, 3434x1953, Xavier_Melley-Ronde_des_heures.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5731391

maybe not my favourite but I love it so much

>> No.5731416

>>5731174
>>5731186
Winners thus far

>> No.5731417
File: 31 KB, 500x350, Bleu_II_Pre_made.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5731417

I know this is shit too most people but I fucking love it.

>> No.5731428
File: 31 KB, 600x315, 116_l-origine-du-monde-de-gustave-courbet.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5731428

I'll be honest. even if it's a bit cliché, I find this one amazing.

>> No.5731430
File: 79 KB, 736x736, picabia.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5731430

My god, the fluidity of this piece is absolutely gorgeous.

>> No.5731432

>>5731430
>fluidity
Explain yourself. It looks like everything converges into the center and gets stuck, no more movement.

>> No.5731435

>>5731428
AAAHH!!!

>> No.5731436

>>5731430
>dat lighting
neat

>> No.5731437

>>5731430
Jesus Christ this is amazing, Thanks for posting it.

>> No.5731440
File: 764 KB, 1544x1600, Ween-–-The-Mollusk-1997.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5731440

this is art, both visually and acoustically

>> No.5731451

>>5731430
>fluidity
lel wut its rigid and stiff as and hell

>> No.5731468

>>5731432
What you see as everything converging and getting "stuck," I see a focal point with everything around it twisting in a way that feels like a river flowing into its ocean, all with a gorgeous sense of shading that casts everything with an eerie, metallic glow. It feels like it is a portrait of a machine, and yet it is a natural machine.
>>5731451
I suppose I fail to see that rigidity. I do understand where you see it-- as I mentioned, it does seem mechanical in nature-- but its elements of rigidity are captured in such a way as to suggest a flow, a curving, warm segment of something unbelievably massive.

>> No.5731486

>>5731468
Good explanation, anon. I suppose we just differ in the direction we see the piece moving (me to center, you outward).

I'll stick by my interpretation however. Feels more natural to me (not to knock yours or anything).

>> No.5731507

>>5731468
the lines are curving but thats about it. even the shading and transitions are stark. there is no subtlety to it. just not a fan

>> No.5731575
File: 999 KB, 1306x1600, searlelautrecmoses.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5731575

>> No.5731605

>>5730857

why not just shit in a can and call it art? why not just be a j..w and make deg..a.t.e a..t ?

>> No.5731612
File: 1.50 MB, 5001x2471, art 3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5731612

>>5731186

nice

>> No.5731620
File: 2.09 MB, 3564x2097, 124 44.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5731620

:[

>> No.5731626
File: 23 KB, 300x239, manzoni1[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5731626

>>5731605
>why not just shit in a can and call it art?
>every time
literally 50 year old idea

>> No.5731628
File: 281 KB, 1800x1128, 1414003951699.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5731628

>> No.5731636
File: 171 KB, 995x1000, 1414003779817.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5731636

>>5731626

get lost, real art coming through

>> No.5731639

>>5731626
Isn't it still a mystery whether there is actually shit in the cans or not, since opening them would be damaging the work and value?

>> No.5731645
File: 1.77 MB, 1900x1796, 1414003663628.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5731645

>> No.5731646

>>5731620
This is very nice. Is this a reference to something I'm not getting?

That shade of blue is amazing on that dress. Wonderful contrast to the rest.

>> No.5731659
File: 207 KB, 1280x706, President Hamilton's invasion.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5731659

>>5731628
>>5731636
Like dogs playing poker

>> No.5731660
File: 255 KB, 1024x1499, Piss_Christ_by_Serrano_Andres_(1987).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5731660

>>5731605
>>5731626
While not quite the same, there is also this photograph of urine.

>> No.5731662

>>5731646

It's called the The Souls of Acheron

>In Dante's Inferno, the Acheron river forms the border of Hell. Following Greek mythology, Charon ferries souls across this river to Hell. Those who were neutral in life sit on the banks.

>> No.5731666

>>5731660
Is much more beautiful than
>>5731636

>> No.5731671

>>5730868
Ugh every art history class ever

I still don't get why this gets attention

>> No.5731677

>>5731660
>le edgy art

>> No.5731678
File: 38 KB, 380x254, Manzoni[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5731678

>>5731636
>muh christ paintings
yawn.
>>5731639
I don't think anyone ever opened them. If you read about the guy a little it won't seem weird at all that he would actually shit in dozens of cans. His relatives said he just arrived home one day with all of these cans and stayed up all night or something.
Whatever, I wouldn't open it anyways. That's not the point. He even made stuff like drawing a very long line and rolling up the paper into a box. Would you open the box? I wouldn't, but I wouldn't blame someone who would.
I visited a museum in which there's a balloon inflated by him... A half a century old balloon looking all wrinkly like some sort of elderly pinhead.
btw you can buy reproductions of artist's shit on ebay. ain't that a nice time to live in

>> No.5731686
File: 90 KB, 900x542, ahasuerus-at-the-end-of-the-world-adolph-hiremy-hirschl.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5731686

>>5731662
Oh! Now it makes sense.

This dude is pretty great. Loving the blue he puts in all the stuff of his I've seen in the last 5 minutes.

>> No.5731690

>>5731677
Dumbass pleb coming through

>> No.5731691

>>5731690
>piss Christ

>> No.5731700
File: 341 KB, 1488x2125, 1414005952590.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5731700

Outta my way Degenerate fucken Shills

>> No.5731705

>>5731686

yep, Adolf Hirschl is legit.

>> No.5731707

>>5731700
>laughing_girls.canvas

>> No.5731712

>>5731691
>Not being able to dissociate context to enjoy aesthetics

The lighting in that photo is fucking beautiful.

>> No.5731716
File: 1.48 MB, 2998x4339, Karl_Wilhelm_Diefenbach_Christus_am_Kreuz_1891.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5731716

>>5731678
>>5731666

>> No.5731721
File: 1.03 MB, 2184x2818, edgar-degas-singer-with-a-glove-1878.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5731721

>>5731712
>art reactionaries
>able to do anything

>> No.5731726
File: 74 KB, 313x510, 151515.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5731726

>>5731716

>> No.5731734

>>5731712
it's gorgeous but i can't respect anyone or their work if theyre intentionally edgy enough to put any religious figure in a jar of piss to piss people off. what kind of faggot does that. fucking pretentious edgy faggots

>> No.5731735
File: 513 KB, 1280x1135, 1409263904445.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5731735

>>5731721
>art reactionaries
>only hope for human kind

>> No.5731746
File: 832 KB, 2334x2033, balthus-katia-reading-1974.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5731746

>>5731735
Yes, yes.
Go be hope for humankind over there.

>> No.5731749

>>5731735
That girl looks very american

>> No.5731756
File: 1.79 MB, 2000x1195, 1414003712085.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5731756

>>5731746

>> No.5731763
File: 84 KB, 435x600, Roberto Ferri (4).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5731763

>>5731749

Americans are ancestrally European

>> No.5731764

>>5731735
those are nice boobies

>> No.5731768
File: 3.62 MB, 2825x4259, 1415911283272.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5731768

>>5731764

yep, the girls are beauties

>> No.5731778

>>5731712
>Not being able to integrate context and aesthetics into one understanding

>> No.5731783

>>5731768
Guy that's been talking about his boner for the blue in Hirschl's works here: I've always been bothered by the blue shirt in this. Something seems off about it, like it was tacked on later. Love the line of action* though.

*I know fuck-all about art theory or whatever. Hopefully my stupid made up terms make sense in context.

>> No.5731784

>>5731145
I remember my parents used to have like four or five frank frazetta books. I think they gave them to my oldest brother

>> No.5731798
File: 14 KB, 251x242, 1414877950191.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5731798

>>5731700
>Bouguereau

>> No.5731799

>>5731783
I can see that being true. Either that or it was intended to be a tight ass fucking shirt

>> No.5731816

>no anime
shit thread

>> No.5731823

>>5731286
goya always reminded me of some william blake, though less bleak

>> No.5731824
File: 401 KB, 1627x1203, 1403626459734.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5731824

>>5731798

have another

>> No.5731836
File: 239 KB, 1024x1024, JamesHartDyke.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5731836

>>5731824
Have some non meme art.

>> No.5731841
File: 220 KB, 896x942, no jew art plz.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5731841

>>5731836

I prefer good art instead.

>> No.5731844

>>5731836
>have a third grader paint it, but tell them where to paint with what color

>> No.5731847
File: 1021 KB, 1920x1080, wild-chase1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5731847

This was one of Hitler's favorites.

>>5731836
>>5731841

>> No.5731854

My favourite composer is either Kotzwara or Rimsky.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dma-5NbZdkU

>> No.5731859
File: 62 KB, 500x664, tumblr_m2l97cz49x1qj92je.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5731859

>>5731841
>>5731844

>> No.5731860

/lit/ - Literature

>> No.5731867

>>5731860
Art can inspire writers mang.

>> No.5731871

>>5731859

>likes degenerate art
>saves pedophilia on his pc

I'm not even surprised. Have you been to synagogue lately?

>> No.5731873

>>5731859
Bro I was Bob Ross for Halloween, I think I'm a bit more knowledgeable on the subject of art than you.

>> No.5731888
File: 121 KB, 640x960, AndersZorn7.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5731888

>>5731871
:^)
>>5731873
Pics?

>> No.5731897

>>5731888
didn't take any, but I got a fair amount of compliments on the costume at the bars we went to, at least as far as I can remember (which isn't much)

>> No.5731904

>>5731867
so does music, but there's a board for that

>> No.5731919

>>5731904
yeah but mu sucks and there's no art board

>> No.5731937

>>5731919
yeah but the place for discussion is not here

>> No.5731945
File: 690 KB, 1206x1600, bacon3bscreamingpopefrommet.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5731945

>> No.5731947

>>5731204
this one is quite nice actually

>> No.5731950
File: 153 KB, 800x660, Surprise!.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5731950

>> No.5731955

>>5731645
thats me

>> No.5731965

>>5731904
so does complaining, and they used to have a board for that.

moot shut it down because too many faggots like you though

>> No.5731982

>>5731734
>being this plebeian
>thinking you are fit to post on lit

>> No.5731989

>>5731700
>dat Rubenesque ass

>> No.5731994
File: 286 KB, 800x1065, tumblr_mc6d1cymmp1qe31lco1_r1_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5731994

>>5731945
bacon is my favourite painter of the 20th century

the amount of energy in his works is just unbelievable

>> No.5731997

>>5731994
that looks like a cumshot.

>> No.5731999

>>5731997
it is

>> No.5732007
File: 233 KB, 1010x685, DEAKIN_1964_Lucian_Freud_bed.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732007

>>5731994
I love how he painted photographs.

>> No.5732024

my personal favorite of paintings ive seen irl. great thread everyone, thanks for the Hirschl and the Bacon pictures,

>> No.5732029
File: 2.79 MB, 3100x3711, JanWeenix_FalconersBag.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732029

>>5732024
fuck me

>>5731994
title?

>> No.5732038
File: 68 KB, 622x859, bacon_jet_of_water.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732038

>>5732029
Jet of Water

He paints visions multiple times.

>> No.5732041
File: 222 KB, 400x579, А._Лактионов._Письмо_с_фронта.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732041

>>5730857
>Why paint photorealistic stuff if you have photography and photoshop?
The reason is that truly capable painters don't paint realistically, they paint utterly unrealistic (according to physics) paintings that trick the eye and mind into perceiving them as a kind of hyper-realistic transcendental reality.

E.g.: picrelated. That kind of light is impossible in real life, there is no combination of photography and retouching that would let you make a photo like that.

>> No.5732043
File: 116 KB, 1536x651, N06171_10.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732043

Three Studies for Figures at the Base of a Crucifixion. 1994.

>> No.5732047

>>5732043
1944*

>> No.5732056
File: 2.16 MB, 3264x2448, image-2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732056

The Physical Impossibility of Death in the Mind of Someone Living. 1991.

>> No.5732065

The Card Players. 1894-1895.

Notice the irregularities in everything. It really makes you question how things appear.

There is a reason Cézanne is studied by philosophers.

Highest selling artwork ever, estimated at between $250 million and $300 million.

>> No.5732066
File: 1.19 MB, 3930x2434, Waterhouse,_John_William_-_Saint_Cecilia_-_1895.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732066

>>5730849

>> No.5732068

>>5731192
> But you can't be the first one to have the idea to paint squares and call it art.
You're missing the point of 'Black Square'. Malevich painted successively more and more abstract versions of Christian icons, finally culminating in the 'Black Square'. It represents a kind of ultimate atheist/nihilist icon. (Also, there's the fact Jewish culture frowns down upon non-abstract representations in art; Malevich is the kind of dude who you'd think to be Jewish. In fact he was squarely Polish, but whatever.)

tldr: 'Black Square' is witty and elaborate fedora-tipping, but still not art.

>> No.5732070
File: 482 KB, 1526x1276, Paul_Cézanne,_1892-95,_Les_joueurs_de_carte_(The_Card_Players),_60_x_73_cm,_oil_on_canvas,_Courtauld_Institute_of_Art,_London.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732070

>>5732065

>> No.5732085
File: 73 KB, 684x720, 163089_118188304920334_100001874965270_127062_5767574_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732085

>>5731749
They're Russian. Serge Marshennikov.

>> No.5732087

goddamn pleb city in here

ok ok i get it - everything before 19th century was shit. ok fine

>> No.5732091
File: 78 KB, 720x479, 2008True Blues.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732091

Dogs Playing Poker

>> No.5732095

>>5732056
this caught me off guard and freaked me out when I saw it in person

>> No.5732106
File: 121 KB, 500x634, 1413658129437.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732106

>> No.5732108

>>5732068
It is art, it's just worthless trash of an excuse for art and whoever made it should probably end their life.

>> No.5732129
File: 389 KB, 1166x1565, deniskostromitin.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732129

>>5731117

denis forkas kostromitn

>3edgy5me but i like it

>> No.5732139

>>5731428
Pretty sure I saw this at an art museum when I was around ten, I kind of became obsessed over it. It seriously got me into watching porn. Thanks painting, I don't know where I'd be without you.

>> No.5732197

>>5732087
No, not everything. There are some good 20th-century artists -- Deineka and Rockwell Kent, for example.

You wouldn't know anything about that, however, since you are an illiterate faggot who confuses performance and making 'statements' with visual art.

>> No.5732205

>>5731159
>>5731165

I honestly don't get these ones.

Where is the talent or the innovation? I know its cliche to say this but how the fuck is this art?

>> No.5732209

>>5732205

>talent
>innovation

Experience the work, you fucking moron

>> No.5732215

>>5732209
What is there to experience? It's a couple of blocks of colour.
Don't give me this 'use your imagination to create an emotion' bullshit.

>> No.5732217

>>5732215

What is color to you? What is a form and is it married to its referents? Who the fuck are you?

>> No.5732219

>>5732205
>>5732215
After the advent of photography, painting for the most part shifted from technical to conceptual.
Adjust to this fact and ask again later.

also, what kind of asshole do you have to be to look at Black Square and not feel something other than butthurt obviously

>> No.5732221

>>5732217
Why are you so angry?
The work is bland and formulaic, a child could have created it. There is no artistic talent.
It has no merit.
It is pure pretentiousness.

>> No.5732231

>>5732221

Why is blandness a negative quality?
What system are you borrowing your notions of utility and merit from?
What makes you qualified to make a value judgement about anything?

Seriously, what do you think art is?

>> No.5732238
File: 394 KB, 1600x1355, The Temptation of Saint Anthony 2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732238

>> No.5732239

>>5732221
>The work is bland and formulaic
not then and still not now
>a child could have created it.
so what?
>There is no artistic talent.
what is artistic talent?
>It has no merit.
what is merit?
>It is pure pretentiousness.
Just because you don't like it, and just because you have to think to understand it, doesn't make something pretentious

>> No.5732243
File: 391 KB, 1861x2663, Girl With a Pearl Earring.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732243

>> No.5732246
File: 372 KB, 790x1125, Ancient of Days.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732246

>> No.5732248

>>5732209
>Experience the work, you fucking moron
I've seen 'Black Square' in person multiple times. He didn't bother buying quality paints for the thing, it looks like shit and is in bad shape today.

'Black Square' is literally a troll, you moron.

>> No.5732250
File: 148 KB, 826x1000, A Shy Peasant.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732250

>> No.5732253

>>5732219
Painting was never technical, you illiterate troglodyte.

>> No.5732255

>>5732248

>no quality paints
>bad shape
>troll

Are you a teenager?

>> No.5732260

>>5732239
autism

>> No.5732262

>>5732253
Care to explain? Or am I to just believe you that painting prior to the 19th century wasn't mostly about technique because you say so
>>5732260
gee however can I come up with a riposte to such a witty and incisive statement.

>> No.5732263
File: 140 KB, 651x900, William Blake.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732263

>> No.5732266

>>5732260

Define this word for the class, please

>> No.5732268
File: 367 KB, 843x1035, Art Connoisseur.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732268

>> No.5732272

>>5732268
Rockwell was a hack fraud

>> No.5732277
File: 921 KB, 1600x1067, Church History.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732277

>> No.5732289

>>5732255
I have no idea what you're trying to say.

You're an illiterate idiot who thinks replying with an 'experience the work' is a good retort to a criticism of 'Black Square'.

Hint: anybody who actually _had_ experienced 'Black Square' would know that it's a) a tiny little painting b) it's shoddily done, with poor materials and cheap-ass paints and c) he did lots of copies of it.

>> No.5732290
File: 139 KB, 703x1080, Ben Shahn - Third Allegory.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732290

>> No.5732296

>>5732262
>Or am I to just believe you that painting prior to the 19th century wasn't mostly about technique because you say so
Dude, you literally, literally don't know the first thing about art history. Let it drop, you're out of your league and making an ass of yourself.

>> No.5732298
File: 566 KB, 1646x695, Three Studies for Figures at the Base of a Crucifixion.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732298

>> No.5732301
File: 99 KB, 1067x797, The Yellow Cow.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732301

>> No.5732303

>>5732289

Why are you judging the quality of a work on the materials used, as if you can divine intentionality outside of your own conception of what's being communicated. Pedestrian shit

>> No.5732306
File: 270 KB, 1024x714, The Dream of the Fisherman's Wife.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732306

>> No.5732309

>>5732296
>The invention of photography had a major impact on painting. In the decades after the first photograph was produced in 1829, photographic processes improved and became more widely practiced, depriving painting of much of its historic purpose to provide an accurate record of the observable world. A series of art movements in the late 19th and early 20th centuries—notably Impressionism, Post-Impressionism, Fauvism, Expressionism, Cubism, and Dadaism—challenged the Renaissance view of the world. Eastern and African painting, however, continued a long history of stylization and did not undergo an equivalent transformation at the same time.
>much of its historic purpose to provide an accurate record of the observable world.
>accurate
>record
>purpose
wow so much knowledge, I'm so well read, look at me go
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Painting#History

>> No.5732315
File: 462 KB, 1026x1403, Librarian.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732315

>> No.5732317
File: 131 KB, 500x367, Simon Kenny Salvation.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732317

>>5732209
I experience it and it's dull
So much nothing, so much dead end. The exit door of the gallery means more to me than those. The paint on ANY wall painted white or blue etc. is as artistic and meaningful.

>>5732238
>>5732250
Here's some art.

>> No.5732319
File: 259 KB, 1600x1421, Grunewald - Crucifixion.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732319

>> No.5732321
File: 1.32 MB, 1316x1612, El_Greco_-_The_Burial_of_the_Count_of_Orgaz.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732321

>> No.5732322
File: 155 KB, 608x750, Allegory of Chastity.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732322

>> No.5732326

>>5732321

noice

>> No.5732330
File: 1.68 MB, 1256x2355, Bookworm.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732330

>> No.5732338
File: 116 KB, 640x899, 640px-Montesquiou,_Robert_de_-_Boldini.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732338

>> No.5732339

>>5732309
I dare you to name one pre-20th-century artist who was mostly about technique rather than concept. Just one will do.

>> No.5732340
File: 37 KB, 317x500, Grasshopper.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732340

>> No.5732343

>>5732303
>as if you can divine intentionality outside of your own conception of what's being communicated.
Malevich was as clear as he could be about his intent and meaning.

'Black Square' is a joke and a troll.

>> No.5732345

>>5732338

the classiest of all classy gentlemen

>> No.5732346
File: 395 KB, 1100x906, peasant s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732346

Heidegger uses Van Gogh's 'Peasant Shoes' as an example in his essay 'The Origin of the Work of Art'.

>> No.5732347
File: 156 KB, 410x455, klimt1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732347

>> No.5732349
File: 2.11 MB, 4921x2361, Wheatfield With Crows.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732349

>>5732346

fav painting of van gogh

>> No.5732352

>>5732339
Is this the part where I'm baited into saying all art pre-20th century is devoid of purpose, thought, emotion, and ideas, and that it is all rote technical trash? Gee I did not see that coming at all

Da Vinci

>> No.5732359
File: 557 KB, 1280x830, Otto Dix Der Krieg.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732359

>>5732315
Arcimboldo is one of my favorite Renaissance painters, everything he did was great.

>> No.5732365

>>5732359

Based Anon. Otto Dix was incredible. Brutal and beautiful.

>> No.5732366

>>5732349
whats the name of that book that talks about how the context of the painting changes it for the viewer

>> No.5732375

>>5732366
not sure, but deleuze talks about that im pretty sure

>> No.5732379
File: 228 KB, 386x349, Solar Dance.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732379

>>5732366

ummmm....maybe this?

>> No.5732397
File: 2.54 MB, 2010x1484, the-crucifixion-in-the-isenheim-altarpiece-by-mathis-gothart-grc3bcnewald-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732397

>>5732365
He is my favorite Weimar painter. His art was so bold in its depictions of interwar Germany yet he engages seriously with the German artistic tradition.

>> No.5732405
File: 111 KB, 394x547, lilith.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732405

>> No.5732407

>>5730969

this is one of my fave futurist peices. i litterarly lol'd in class when we saw the slide. it looks like its from out of the inkwell

>> No.5732408
File: 235 KB, 549x435, music.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732408

>> No.5732411

>>5732359

very polished for dix. is this a later peice? i could never tell him and the other guy apart, but maybe georg groz ebcomes more painterly later on.

>> No.5732416
File: 63 KB, 550x551, between.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732416

Here's something I made. Hope you guys like it.

>> No.5732421

>>5732416
care to explain it?

>> No.5732425
File: 86 KB, 600x410, Otto Dix Der Krieg 1924.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732425

>>5732411
Painted from 1929-32, so just near the end of the Wiemar era. But he did do a set of drawings in 1924 also entitled Der Krieg.

>> No.5732433
File: 318 KB, 1516x1536, William Turner - Peace - Burial at Sea (1824).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732433

>> No.5732437
File: 192 KB, 660x822, Pablo Picasso - Sylvette (1954).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732437

>> No.5732443
File: 143 KB, 700x920, Pablo Picasso - La Lecture (1934).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732443

>> No.5732444
File: 686 KB, 3000x1705, 1414377508916.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732444

>> No.5732447
File: 1.60 MB, 1129x1535, Da_Vinci_Vitruve_Luc_Viatour2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732447

>>5732352
No, this is the part where you make a fool out of yourself and fail to produce a single artist. (Because you're so utterly illiterate about art.)

> Da Vinci
Kek. Forgot that even a bottom-feeding pleb like yourself would be able to remember da Vinci. (Mostly due to the Dan Brown book, of course.)

But no, da Vinci was a renaissance humanist and almost all of his work is strongly conceptual.

Picrelated, his most important contribution to art, is an obvious example.

>> No.5732448
File: 438 KB, 2024x2718, James Abbott McNeill Whistler - Nocturne in Black and Gold The Falling Rocket (1874).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732448

>> No.5732449

>>5732433
Now that's a painting I'd like to see in person

>> No.5732451
File: 1.04 MB, 2348x2945, Vincent van Gogh - Terras bij nacht (1888).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732451

>> No.5732453
File: 133 KB, 800x623, Claude Monet - Soleil levant (1872).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732453

>> No.5732462
File: 88 KB, 640x515, Armand Guillaumin - Sunset at Ivry (Soleil couchant à Ivry) 1873.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732462

>> No.5732502

>>5732197
>20th-century
>before 19th century

astute observations professor

>> No.5732516
File: 43 KB, 696x872, Nietzsche-by-munch.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732516

>> No.5732522
File: 122 KB, 497x357, hitler - kirche.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732522

>> No.5732542

>>5732447
well, I guess that's one persons opinion about da vincis most important contribution.
its worth noting that his paintings are in fact know for their technique: thin washes that he applied over the course of years. now that's being focused on technique. Vermeer, for another example also had a decent amount of technique/construction going on with how the paint goes up, I recall correctly. im not saying their art has no ideas, but I am saying that your slant and prioritization on what is conceptual might be a little loosey goosey.

>> No.5732562

>>5731626
god, I love Manzoni.
rhymes with pony.

>> No.5732565

>>5732066
Not my favourite painting of him. But Waterhouse is a god.

>> No.5732567

>>5732451
this is one of my favourite paintings

i dont know what it is but it makes me feel all warm inside

>> No.5732573
File: 3.11 MB, 1870x1430, 499+14918.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732573

>> No.5732577
File: 616 KB, 988x768, 3671.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732577

>> No.5732578
File: 653 KB, 782x604, Vincent_Willem_van_Gogh_076.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732578

The GOAT Van Gogh

>> No.5732580
File: 154 KB, 800x498, 239414.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732580

>> No.5732583
File: 474 KB, 1446x962, 2647941.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732583

>> No.5732587
File: 3.63 MB, 3028x4585, 7278337.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732587

>> No.5732593
File: 788 KB, 1239x1749, 14798161.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732593

>> No.5732597
File: 372 KB, 978x1280, 946141.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732597

>> No.5732598 [DELETED] 
File: 42 KB, 500x671, Agostino Arrivabene 43.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732598

I really like his stuff too, he had to do that album cover for Behemoth before I herd of him which is a shame.

>> No.5732599
File: 359 KB, 1000x658, 1414507265488.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732599

>> No.5732601
File: 77 KB, 640x798, 94510721594722.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732601

>> No.5732606
File: 160 KB, 1400x999, 1414509829786.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732606

>> No.5732609
File: 122 KB, 756x1000, 64765125.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732609

>> No.5732610
File: 423 KB, 1600x1212, Jorge González Camarena - la fusión de dos culturas.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732610

>>5731136

I keep hearing Nerdrum's work is supposed to be really conservative but it's so absurd and conservative I just don't see it.

>> No.5732611

>>5730849
>that hypersexualisation

DELETE THIS

>> No.5732613
File: 42 KB, 500x671, Agostino Arrivabene 43.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732613

>>5732129
I really like his stuff too, he had to do that album cover for Behemoth before I heard of him which is a shame.

>> No.5732614
File: 1.77 MB, 2182x1264, 69549419.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732614

>> No.5732628
File: 213 KB, 1024x803, 234545.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732628

>> No.5732636
File: 416 KB, 1280x907, 1280px-Thetriumphofdeath.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732636

>> No.5732637
File: 2.24 MB, 2691x1463, Última_Cena_-_Da_Vinci_52.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732637

>>5732542
>its worth noting that his paintings are in fact know for their technique
False. Painting is a very technical artform, so of course important artists also innovated the technical aspects of painting as well.

However, da Vinci is certainly _not_ important because he 'applied thin washes'. Da Vinci is important because he was a major example of renaissance humanist ideology, and his life and art followed his beliefs.

Picrelated is his second most important contribution to art, and is also a highly conceptual and symbolic piece. (Compared to traditional religious art of the previous centuries it is almost shockingly humanist and decidedly non-Christian.)

>> No.5732677

>No one likes Manet

Plebs.

>> No.5732678

>>5731416
ooooh yes i looooove upper-class values

>> No.5732700
File: 102 KB, 800x624, 800px-El_Greco_-_Laocoon.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732700

Why is there no love for mannerism? We'd have no baroque without it.

>> No.5732701

>>5732611
heh

0/10

>> No.5732705
File: 1.19 MB, 2503x3023, 60.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732705

rembrandt's self-portraits are among my favourite paintings. this one in particular has always moved me, he looks at you and he sees you completely, he is godlike but still overwhelmingly human, imposing and comforting at the same time

>> No.5732710
File: 45 KB, 240x320, disgusting..jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732710

>>5732041
I can fully appreciate that style of painting because I am artist myself, but for some reason or another, that colour rendering style/technique has always repulsed me. Almost as if I have some sort of negative memory closely associated with that colour palette/rendering/technique or what-have-you. Especially on book covers - if I saw a painting like that on a book cover, I'd immediately assign the word "shit" to it even though I know it is wrong. Wot?

>> No.5732714
File: 2.05 MB, 2938x3722, 45895.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732714

>> No.5732725
File: 787 KB, 1646x1200, Rembrandt_Harmensz._van_Rijn_-_Portret_van_een_paar_als_Oud-Testamentische_figuren,_genaamd_'Het_Joodse_bruidje'd_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732725

>>5732705
rembrandt knew how to paint humans. the jewish bride - pic related - is the superlative example.

i hope i find love like this one day

>> No.5732727

>>5732705
>>5732725
haha faggot

>> No.5732729

>>5732700
because /lit/ doesn't know anything about art

>> No.5732730
File: 319 KB, 1280x956, 78783897378.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732730

>> No.5732732
File: 287 KB, 1280x761, 164894.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5732732

>> No.5732736

>>5732730
that expression is laughably promiscuous

im more inclined to slap her than sex her

>> No.5732740

>>5732736
Nobody really cares what a fat neckbeard on 4chan is "more inclined" to do.

>> No.5732747

>>5732736
That's precisely why this painting is interesting..

>> No.5732763

>>5730997
wow that is beautiful

>> No.5732800

>>5732714
I really like this one.
Why have I never seen paintings like this in museums or textbooks? So many works ITT give me emotional sensations, something I've never had in an actual museum.

>> No.5732811

>>5731204
A long as white comes out on top, I'm happy.

>> No.5732816

>>5731428
Would have been better if she'd actually been aroused.

>> No.5732826

>>5732800
Jean-Léon Gérôme is probably one of my favorite painter too
>>5732583
>>5732580
See also : The Duel After the Masquerade, Diogenes, The Death of Caesar, Cave canem war prisoner in Rome and Summer Afternoon on a Lake

>> No.5732834

>>5732444
There's something very unconvincing about those waves. Too neatly formed, or something.

>> No.5732837

>>5732834
True, but Richelieu looks So, Fucking, Badass

>> No.5732842

>>5732837
True dat

>tfw image limit reached

>> No.5732939

>>5731639
few of the cans supposedely exploded because of pressure of gas inside. NOt sure whether its true or not but if it is Duchamp is master trolle XDDD #1

>> No.5732952

>>5732939
>Duchamp
wut

>> No.5733041

Please make a new thread, someone

>> No.5733052

>>5733041
There, you lazy fuck. >>5733051

>> No.5733111

>>5732007

Painted from photographs

>> No.5733117

>>5732043

Try 50 years earlier

>> No.5733315

>>5732710
You have identified your bias, now seek to either understand or remove it.

>> No.5733730

>>5731165
Teacher talked about this one at uni last week, she said it brought tears to her eyes the first time she saw it.

>> No.5733736

>>5732347
Got to see this in person. Better than the recent Tut exhibit.

>>5732421
How pretentious of you! Can't you see the dynamism at play in the loose forms? Just running your eyes along its surface you can glimpse the autodidactic message of the impermanence of existence on the multiple characters faces.

>> No.5733886

>>5732939
Just kill yourself already.

>> No.5734083

>>5732243
personal favorite

>> No.5734428

>>5731196
This does nothing on a computer screen.

As far as Klein was a pompous asshole, his blue can make you feel like a bee in front of a gigantic, wide open, consenting perfumed flower

>> No.5734436

>>5731428
The head has been found last year.

She was ugly, Courbet did good by just keeping this portion of the original painting.

>> No.5734471

>>5731174
>that ballroom floor
hnng

>> No.5734533

>>5732272
this

>> No.5734541

>>5732338
is this the proust character

>> No.5734599

>>5733730

>women
>knowing anything about art

>> No.5734607

>>5732272
>>5734533
>Political agendas in an art thread.
Autismal

>> No.5734657

>/lit/
>knowing anything about art
lol

>> No.5734682

>>5734657
>/lit/
>appreciating anything

[insert.denigration]

>> No.5734727

>>5732610
There's one hand too many.

>> No.5734743

>>5732205
it means the marginalization of the black race by the white men
obviously you're just too stupid to get it

>> No.5735366

>>5734743
In Soviet Russia?

Guess again

>> No.5735554

>>5732366
I think derrida touches on that. Don't know in what book though

>> No.5735599

>>5735366
>implying artist are limited to their own culture
Guess again

>> No.5735667

>>5735599
>implying implications
Soviet Russia in 1915-1918, bunch of suprematist fags fooling around with shapes.

>not even implying your ethnocentrism

>> No.5736112

>>5735667
>implying it was fooling around and not deliberate
kill yourself

>> No.5738198

hold this thread I will download these all when I get home