[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 214 KB, 1600x807, fiftyshades.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5715529 No.5715529 [Reply] [Original]

This book has gotten reaaaally popular even amongst men in 2014 and it is going to have even its own movie.

My sister has started recently reading it and I don't actually know how bad (perverted) the book is? She's just 14.

Is it really just for dem sluts?

>> No.5715549

>>5715529
She's going to have an abusive boyfriend.

>> No.5715553

>>5715529
your sister is a slut, lel

>> No.5715576

I read some excerpts posted here once, they were quite literally laughably bad.

>> No.5715625

>>5715529

Your sister will learn to like being tied up and fucked in the ass roughly while being called a slut and a whore... congrats?

>> No.5715637

>>5715576

It is, but it should still be mandatory reading for all women because >>5715625

>> No.5715649

>>5715549
>>5715553
>>5715576
fml

>>5715625
Wait, so is it really just about some hardcore masochism sex or some edgy shit?
Damn, it is really popular lately (last 1.5 year), so there has to be more into it, like romantic stuff?

>> No.5715657

>>5715649

>so there has to be more into it

That's why it's so insidious, it teaches to equate physical, sexual and emotional abuse with romantic feelings. Yes, there's romance, which is how the wimminz get roped in, then the book goes "he fucks you in the ass without lube while choking you with a belt because he loves you", "he ties your tits together with rope until they turn blue because he loves you"

I'm all for this indoctrination because that shit gets me off, and also I have no sisters and my mom's dead, but I can see why you're worried though.

>> No.5715711

>>5715529
If I were you I'd advise your parents not to allow her to read it, especially not at 14.

It's not necessarily just that it's erotic, it's that it portrays the more kinkier side of sex horribly inaccurately. Much of what goes on in the books is actually emotional and physical abuse disguised as BDSM, and they practice BDSM without any of the necessary cautions or regards for safety.

BDSM can be practiced healthily, but this book only showcases a very unhealthy abusive relationship disguised as BDSM, and unintentionally too. It's not criticizing abuse, it tries to make it look positive.

Do not let an impressionable young teen read this. Hell young teens should probably not even be allowed to read accurate portrayals of BDSM, but that's a different discussion entirely.

It's just not a healthy book.

>> No.5715721

Hey, OP. Is your sister fit?

>> No.5715727

She's a kid, get her Moore's Lost Girls instead.

>> No.5715734

>>5715721
Seriously though, OP. Is she fit? Would you if you had to?

>> No.5715743

>>5715657
Ughh, gross that even teenagers read it.

>>5715711
Yeah, I thought so. Even the simple idea of her reading anything brutalsex-related makes me disgusted considering her age.

>>5715721
Well she isn't /fit/ by their standarts, but she works out and is slim.

>>5715734
I would probably, LOL. If she didn't remember it though.

>> No.5715744

>>5715743
I didn't mean fit that way, m8. May you share some pics, OP? Be a bro.

>> No.5715746

>>5715744
this isn't /b/ you moron, fuck off

>> No.5715748

>>5715746
Fuck off, I'm talking to OP, I just want him to share some untraceable qt pics of his sis

>> No.5715765

Hey, OP. Share some untraceable pics of your qt sis.

>> No.5715775

I know a girl who cheated on her husband with six different men after she read these books because she wanted an exciting sex life like the books potray.

Stop your sister while you can OP

>> No.5715780 [DELETED] 

>>5715775
Don't listen to this guy, OP.

Please share qt pics of your sis and make sure we can't trace them. Please, OP be a bro.

>> No.5715793

Just get the book on tape.

Gilbert Gottfried Reads 50 Shades of Grey
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5K1RcKJVbHA

>> No.5715797

>>5715775
why should he care? he is not going to marry his sister

>> No.5715805

>>5715797
You don't know that

>> No.5715809 [DELETED] 

Op didn't deliver with sister pics so op is a fag

>> No.5715823

I don't even touch this book when I see it in stores, I don't know the kind of filthy hands that have been on it. Feel like I'll get an STD or something.

>> No.5715825

>>5715529
I wrote a Modern Family fanfiction about Alex getting abused. If I change the names do I get money and a movie?

>> No.5715831

>>5715823
You don't touch many books with that reasoning.

>> No.5715886

>>5715657
The sex in the book isn't that hardcore at all. And he never calls her a slut/whore etc

>> No.5715918

>>5715823

std's are for people that get laid

>> No.5715993

>>5715529
It's flat out porn. Badly written porn. Make sure you set up a hidden cam to get all the hot bating sessions she's going to do with it, though.

>> No.5716072

>>5715743
>Even the simple idea of her reading anything brutalsex-related makes me disgusted considering her age.

Well like I said it's not just inappropriate because it depicts kinky sex, it's inappropriate because it depicts kinky sex in a very dangerous way.

These are not the books young teens should learn what sexual relationships are supposed to be like from. This will give her a very unhealthy image of what sexual relationships, especially involving "kinky" sex, are supposed to look like and could possibly even set her up for a lifetime of abusive relationships.

It's not just inappropriate for a girl her age, it's dangerous.

>> No.5716080

You guys sound like the book burners that plague PTA meetings.

They are just words. Poorly written useless words.

>> No.5716096

yall are acting like yall didnt jerk it to unhealthy hardcore porn at 14

>> No.5716102

>>5715529
I'm sure she's already watched far nastier porn than what's going to be in 50 shades.

>> No.5716106

>>5716096

I did not. I started jerking it to bra advertisements at the back of my mother's old copy of Vogue magazine. From there, I transitioned into staring at my neighbour unloading groceries. I finally landed on Playboy Special editions which were ample until internet finally arrived.

>> No.5716108

>>5716080
Sorry but this is a dangerous book for a young pubescent girl to get ideas about what sex and relationships are supposed to be like from.

Books influence people, especially young people. Unless OP wants his sister to grow up dating abusive assholes he should probably put a stop to this.

In fact, whoever gave or sold her that book broke the law and could possibly be facing several years in jail if reported. This is literally illegal.

>> No.5716143

She'll date jerks anyway. Who cares.

>> No.5716150

>>5716108
Plato pls go

>> No.5716161

>>5716143
She'll date jerks but if she reads this and gets the idea that it's how things are supposed to be then she won't realize that the people she's dating are jerks.

She'll start thinking abuse is normal.

>> No.5716165

>>5716108
Ayn Rand, Jacqueline Susann, Harold Pinter, Edward Albee, and Leave it to Beaver will also give someone dangerous ideas about what sex and relationships are supposed to be like.

Let everyone of every age read what they want as long as you talk to them about it. Don't be so afraid of words and don't assume people can't learn to think because they're young.

>> No.5716192

>>5715793
I wish this was real

>> No.5716210

OP, do you ever jerk it to her fb or that of her friends ?

>> No.5716212

OP here, I don't see any reason to why should I post my sister, how she looks has nothing to do with the topic. She's just a normal 14y/o 7/10 (imo) girl.

Also
>>5716108
Do I do as this guy told me? I don't really know the details of the book but can it manipulate my sister that much? I will probably talk to her about it or something.

>> No.5716222

>>5716210
:D I actually did once

>> No.5716224

>>5716222

Trips confirms

>> No.5716229
File: 50 KB, 861x931, 1410007109707.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5716229

>14 year old reading Fifty Shades
holy shit what are you doing

>> No.5716245

>>5716165
>Ayn Rand, Jacqueline Susann, Harold Pinter, Edward Albee, and Leave it to Beaver will also give someone dangerous ideas about what sex and relationships are supposed to be like.

Well, see, the difference here is that all of those portray abuse as a negative things and their works are criticizing it (except Ayn Rand and I don't know anything Leave it to Beaver so maybe).

The Fifty Shades series essentially revolves around how fucking cool and erotic and fun being in an abusive and manipulative relationship is. It's not abuse, it's "kinky"!

Let her read it when she's older if she wants, but right now this isn't the book you want a young sexually confused girl to get ideas from. God forbid she actually tries anything described in the book because if so she could end up seriously hurt, physically and perhaps even emotionally. The characters in the book do not practice BDSM in a safe sense at all.

>> No.5716246

>>5716224
Nah, I am not tripfag actually, I just felt the need to post that smiley when talking about her generation

>>5716229
She told me right now that her friend gave her the advice to read it and that she doesn't regret that she started reading it.
She has been reading it since she came home for at least 2 hours now, lol.

>> No.5716275

>>5716246
Did her friend lend it to her? Where did she get this book?

Regardless either you or your parents should get her to stop reading it and explain to her why it's inappropriate.

>> No.5716285

>>5716246

Its not suitable for a 14 year old.


My cock, however. Would be fine.

>> No.5716302

>>5716275
She bought it.

I tried that already and she told me that she enjoys it and there is no way I will stop her. She says there is nothing wrong with people doing more hardcore sex and other childish argument..

>>5716285
go jerkoff buddy,

>> No.5716308

>>5716246
this OP

tell on her

>> No.5716313

>>5716302

Foreigner detected. ABORT.

>> No.5716319

>>5716302
Get her a book on safe bdsm practices? Idk man.

>> No.5716342

>>5715743
>I would probably, LOL. If she didn't remember it though.

OP has a thing for his sister, maybe she'll get horny while reading the book and want to experiment. Enjoy your time in prison.

>> No.5716354

>>5716308
>>5716319
I am going to tell our parents right now what's happening and I will keep u updated. I must go out for a while though, so I will report right after I come back.

>>5716313
? I am not a foreigner.

>>5716342
I mean if you saw her ass in the panties, you wouldn't mind goign to the prison too.

>> No.5716360

>>5716354
>I mean if you saw her ass in the panties, you wouldn't mind goign to the prison too.


You baiting us, OP. You forsaken scoundrel.

>> No.5716367

>>5716360
I think this whole thread is some elaborate hoax that will ultimately lead to OP having sex with his sister

>> No.5716368

>>5716245
The Fountainhead depicts an infamously romancitized rape, but that doesn't really matter. If you're intelligent enough to understand that Albee is satirizing relationships in Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?, you're intelligent enough to read The Fountainhead or 50 Shades of Grey and recognize that it's not an ideal relationship, whatever Rand or EL James thinks.

There are people who think Huck Finn and the Randy Newman song "Sail Away" are racist. There are guys who started fight clubs after watching the movie Fight Club. That doesn't mean we should keep teenage boys from watching it, or young girls from reading 50 Shades, or anyone from reading, watching or listening to anything.

>> No.5716369

>>5715809
>Pedophilia
>Hebephilia
You don't live in Ancient Greece and you are not a character in the Bible. Why can't you be a neurotypical and lust after people your own age?

>> No.5716370

>>5716354
YOU FUCKING DICK.

WHERE ARE THE PICS OF YOUR SIS?

>> No.5716380

>>5716369
His sister is my age, dumbass.

(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)

>> No.5716388

>>5716380
>Admits to being underage
MOOOOOOOOOOOOOODDDDDDDDSSSSSSS

>> No.5716404

>>5716388
I'm actually average age here.

>> No.5716420

>>5716369
>>5716404
>>5716380
Are you a woman? Would you like to date?

>> No.5716445

>>5716404
>Says he's 14
>'That's the average age here'
Wow, then I must be an outlier. Time to sign off.
go to bed, babbies

>> No.5716455

>>5716368
>The Fountainhead depicts an infamously romancitized rape

I know that, that's why I said Ayn Rand was the exception in that list.

>If you're intelligent enough to understand that Albee is satirizing relationships in Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?, you're intelligent enough to read The Fountainhead or 50 Shades of Grey and recognize that it's not an ideal relationship, whatever Rand or EL James thinks.

I agree but the thing is that Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf? is not something simple enough for the average 14 year old to be able or even want to read in the first place. 50 Shades is.

>That doesn't mean we should keep teenage boys from watching it, or young girls from reading 50 Shades, or anyone from reading, watching or listening to anything.

Then those boys are idiots since they misinterpreted Fight Club so it's their own fault. The problem with 50 Shades is when young girls who read it interpret it *correctly*. The message it's sending is that abuse isn't abuse, it's kinky fun. You got date raped? That's just kinky fun! Your boyfriend beats you? Wow how kinky!

It's not suitable for kids that young to read.

>> No.5716472

>>5716455
And also yeah again there's the chance she might actually try something out of the book, which will likely end up with her getting seriously injured.

People in the BDSM community say that the three things you're supposed to keep in mind when doing that kind of stuff is to do it safe, sane, and consensually. The characters in 50 Shades ignore that completely and do the exact opposite.

>> No.5716512

The guy is a rich emo who give her a ton of gifts to fuck her asshole.

Just like in real life. There are people who built their life using the anus wisely

>> No.5716630

So what instead would be a damn fine book that actually portrays a legitimate and sane BDSM relationship?

>> No.5716642

>>5716512
if there's anal, i'll read it

>> No.5716646

>>5716630
Consensual Sadomasochism: How To Talk About It and Do It Safely by William A. Henkin, PhD. & Sybil Holliday

>> No.5716649

>>5716630
>sane BDSM
oxymoron, degenerate

>> No.5716868

>>5716455
I just don't think taking a book away from someone who wants to read it--even someone pretty young--is likely to have any better effect than just letting them read it and decide for themselves what they think. (Preferably, say, if I was their parent, also talking to them about it.)

At least, my null hypothesis would be that there's no difference between the two in terms of likelihood she'll be in an abusive relationship later, and I think the onus should be on the censorship advocates to prove that there is. (Censorship here not in the legal sense, but in the "get that book away from my sister!!" sense)

>> No.5718517

I found a photo on her facebook that isn't that fappable and can't be reverse searched - so here you are, hornfags.
https://fbcdn-sphotos-c-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xfp1/v/t1.0-9/10559737_286088968250120_541829340646574169_n.jpg?oh=d925c9b70e2f2a1c3bb0c00a0c040351&oe=551A14B0&__gda__=1424125483_a9f2a18ad14d8d331c593630cb4faac8

Also I told her that I am going to tell our parents and she started to be really sad and have that sad-dog-face and told me she'll do anything I want if I won't tell the parents (they are strict so I understand).
What to do? I don't wanna be a jerk and really just tell parents, also I don't want my sister to read these books.

I mentioned that she should read other books about masochism/sex, that are safe for her, but she told me that all girls her age read just this book so there is no reason to read others.

>> No.5718530

Ah shit.
your sister looks like 25 yo and is ugly as a sin.

>> No.5718560

>His pointer finger circled my puckered love cave. "Are you ready for this?" he mewled, smirking at me like a mother hamster about to eat her three-legged young.

>"INSIDE ME" I gasp, and all the muscles in my belly clench. My inner goddess is doing the dance of seven veils

>> No.5718561

>>5718517
>those shorts

She's already getting ass fucked, she won't have anything that wouldn't happen to her already by reading this

>> No.5718563

Wait? are you guys saying 14 is too young to read this shit?

By that age she's probably already seeing lots of internet porn. I'd be worried if an 8 year old read 50 shades, but stop acting like teenagers aren't swimming in porn.

>> No.5718565
File: 1.04 MB, 1111x1600, 1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5718565

OP, 50 shades of shit was originaly a Twilight fanfic, that's why it's so popular. It really has no substance, the "I'm a vampire get away from me im such a bad boy", was replaced by "I'm a sadist get away from me I'm such a bad boy". The author clearly has no idea of what she's writing, her portrayal of sadomasochism is so fucking bland and tame that it's ridiculous how overblown the character reactions are.

>getting tied up
>spanking

Wow, such a fucking brutal guy, he's clearly a monster.

I would say it's normal for her to be interested, but if she was already interested in Twilight I would say it's too late, just let her be and wait for the best, maybe get her into some good shit that touches a similar subject.

>> No.5718572

>>5715529

The people who buy it at my work don't really seem like big readers and even they hardly ever come back to get the 2nd or 3rd volume so it must be really awful. I read 50 pages of the first one just so I would have evidence to back me up when I argued with people over it.

I once got in an argument with my mate's gf who was an English major and was arguing that it encouraged literacy. I found out later she just secretly wanted to read it. Such a dumb fuck

>> No.5718573

>>5715529
Your sister is irreversibly corrupted, cleanse her

>> No.5718599

>>5715529
>and it is going to have even its own movie
Uh, even 'Battleship', the game, has its own movie.

The bar for being made into a movie is pretty fucking low nowadays, like, below-the-ground low.

>> No.5719662
File: 91 KB, 625x417, 50-shades.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5719662

It's a book for older women into domination fantasies,OP, which means 99% of women out there.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/25/magazine/25desire-t.html?pagewanted=all&_r=1&

The generally accepted therapeutic notion that, for women, incubating intimacy leads to better sex is, Meana told me, often misguided. “Really,” she said, “women’s desire is not relational, it’s narcissistic” — it is dominated by the yearnings of “self-love,” by the wish to be the object of erotic admiration and sexual need. Still on the subject of narcissism, she talked about research indicating that, in comparison with men, women’s erotic fantasies center less on giving pleasure and more on getting it. “When it comes to desire,” she added, “women may be far less relational than men.”
Yet while Meana minimized the role of relationships in stoking desire, she didn’t dispense with the sexual relevance, for women, of being cared for and protected. “What women want is a real dilemma,” she said. Earlier, she showed me, as a joke, a photograph of two control panels, one representing the workings of male desire, the second, female, the first with only a simple on-off switch, the second with countless knobs. “Women want to be thrown up against a wall but not truly endangered. Women want a caveman and caring. If I had to pick an actor who embodies all the qualities, all the contradictions, it would be Denzel Washington. He communicates that kind of power and that he is a good man.”

After our discussion of the alley encounter, we talked about erotic — as opposed to aversive — fantasies of rape. According to an analysis of relevant studies published last year in The Journal of Sex Research, an analysis that defines rape as involving “the use of physical force, threat of force, or incapacitation through, for example, sleep or intoxication, to coerce a woman into sexual activity against her will,” between one-third and more than one-half of women have entertained such fantasies, often during intercourse, with at least 1 in 10 women fantasizing about sexual assault at least once per month in a pleasurable way. The appeal is, above all, paradoxical, Meana pointed out: rape means having no control, while fantasy is a domain manipulated by the self. She stressed the vast difference between the pleasures of the imagined and the terrors of the real. “I hate the term ‘rape fantasies,’ ” she went on. “They’re really fantasies of submission.” She spoke about the thrill of being wanted so much that the aggressor is willing to overpower, to take. “But ‘aggression,’ ‘dominance,’ I have to find better words. ‘Submission’ isn’t even a good word” — it didn’t reflect the woman’s imagining of an ultimately willing surrender.