[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 16 KB, 211x288, otto-rank[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5621081 No.5621081 [Reply] [Original]

Who are some interesting psychoanalysts besides Freud?

>> No.5621585

Lacan

>> No.5621677

>>5621081
Melanie Klein

>> No.5621693

Donald Winnicott

>> No.5624084

my dick

>> No.5624092

Slavoj Žižek

>> No.5624107

>>5624092
Zizek just suck lacan dick.
dont count.

>> No.5624543

>>5621081
Jung

>> No.5624576

>>5624092
he's not a psychoanalyst you retard.

>> No.5626251

>>5624576
He's heavily influenced by psychoanalysis though so...

>> No.5627488

bump

>> No.5627499

Jacques Green. Disciple of Lacan who later went rogue.

>> No.5627577

>>5621693
Love his work!

Also, anybody who posts on 4chan would benefit greatly from Guntrip's Schizoid Phenomenon: Object Relations and the Self.

And if you think it is about schizophrenia then, well, you may be too far gone.

>> No.5627597

>>5624576

http://www.egs.edu/faculty/slavoj-zizek/biography/

>> No.5627628

>>5626251
>He's heavily influenced by psychoanalysis though so...
>>5627597
>http://www.egs.edu/faculty/slavoj-zizek/biography/

A psychoanalyst is someone who practices psychoanalysis, which Zizek doesn't. Minimum prerequisite for this is having undergone Lehranalyse (don't know that Zizek has done this) and depending on how orthodox you are, having a degree in medicine (or psychology, these rules differ in various associations).

>> No.5627653

>>5621081
I took notes about /lit/'s recommendation of how to progress with psychoanalysts:

freud-->jung-->reich-->lacan-->deleuze-->guatari(-->klein, winnicot, adler, fromm, marcuse, laing)

>> No.5627660

>>5627653
No it's
>hegel->stirner->freud->gross

>> No.5628537

>>5627653
thanks

>> No.5629203

>>5621081
Can't go wrong with Jung

>> No.5629219

>>5621081

Lev Vygotsky

>> No.5630421

Cornelius Castoriadis

>> No.5630454

>>5627653
you can skip jung.

>> No.5630796

bump

>> No.5630831

>>5627653
Solid order there. But I would not want to stop anyone from reading some of the later authors sooner. Winnicot's transformational object is a relatively simple idea to understand and yet I think it has profound impact.

Also Fromm's Escape from Freedom. Solid list overall.

May I ask your thought's on Object-Relations? Have you read Guntrip? I just find his word so modern, like it was written today! Especially with social media and all, I think it allows for so much schizoid-like behavior.

>> No.5630856

>>5630831
*Transitional object

>> No.5630864

>>5627653
>>5630454
Jung is pretty easy to read. You can check him while you read something else or in the bus, it really doesn't require to drop everything to get him.
You might want to give some time to Lacan, though. He's one of those people that to this day people analyze and write about. A companion book would be a good thing, I actually heard good things about Zizek's take.

>> No.5630874

>>5621081
reich

>> No.5632209

>>5627628
He has, he is qualified to practise psychoanalysis, he just doesn't want to.

>>5627653
this, except jung and reich are pretty much shit, apart from one or two reich books, but you better read them for completion, in terms of quality of thought I'd rank more like
freud>lacan>deleuze>klein>marcuse>fromm>guattari and the rest is kind of pleb tier

>> No.5632239

>>5632209
>he is qualified to practise psychoanalysis
according to the standards of which association?

>> No.5632250

>>5632239
the millerian/lacanian association, he has a phd in psychoanalysis from Paris VIII that he got under Miller and he was in psychoanalysis with Miller

>> No.5632297

>>5632250
okay... I still don't think that calling a Lacanian who doesn't practice (has never practiced?) psychoanalysis a 'psychoanalyst' is not very accurate.