[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 167 KB, 326x574, wittgensteinReadinGroup.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5496724 No.5496724 [Reply] [Original]

Hey guys,

We have out wittgenstein reading group going on in about 8 hours. We are meeting at 6pm GMT in irc.freenode.net #4chanWittgenstein. Here is the pastebin of last meeting if you are interested: http://pastebin.com/ffgZXkFf..

>> No.5496763

>>5496724
But what are you reading of his?

>> No.5496774

How many fucking Witty reading groups does /lit/ intend to create? And why always him?

For fuck's sake, you are /lit/, you are the future (eheh, tep kok), you are all the next gens of this world!

Talk about edgy things, not what teachers are already talking about. Otherwise I'd better go to uni fof that (eh eh, pep tok).
Tell me about cutting-eye things, /lit/. Tell me about dat dere Somnium Scipionis, tell me about the based Book of the Law, tell me about the late D.G. Leahy and Foundations (eh eh, kep tok), and yes, I said yes, now it reminds me that website, yes, to this end, I must underline the phallicism endemic to the dialectics of penetration routinely deployed in descriptions of pictorial space and the operations of spectatorship.

Yes /lit/, pls, do dat.

>> No.5496782

>>5496763
Were reading On Certainty, this week we are discussing sections 401 to 550

>> No.5496784

>>5496782
We have a local group here IRL, we're reading PI

>> No.5496786

>>5496774
none of these pretentious cunts are capable of fully comprehending Wittgenstein's work anyways

>> No.5496805

>>5496786

You do not sound less pretentious than them.

>Fully understand someone's work.
>Implyong.
>Eheh pot kek.

What the fuck is that even? Even do you Heidegger?
Seriously, you jus need to get the point. You obviously didn't read Witty. Only scholars pretend they work in order to fully comprehend some work. And are they closer? Ahahah, just read papers, it's always that never-ending war between all the uni factions of this world.

Oh, and:

>Fully comprehending.
>Wittgenstein.

Pick one.

>> No.5496811

>>5496805
I rectify:

>Fully
>Comprehending
>Wittgenstein

Pick two.

>> No.5496886

>>5496811
I pick "Fully" and "Wittgenstein"

>> No.5496926

>>5496811
I pick fully Wittgenstein, because he was kind of hot.

>> No.5497375

>>5496784
COPENHAGEN

>> No.5497638

How can you people read so much Wittgenstein?
I got sick of him after reading Tractatus, Blue and Brown, and Philosophical Investigations. And I can't get over the fact that nothing but TLP is published by him.

>> No.5497654

>>5496811
I pick ">" and Fully

>> No.5500103

Welp, Meeting 4 finished.

Next week is our last of On Certainty. If you are coming next week please read sections 551 through 676.

Pooka brought up the idea of continuing on with some other material, such as Remarks on Colour. I am definitely down. Id like to see our little group grow and evolve.

Like always if you have any agenda items for next meeting. feel free to email me.