[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 130 KB, 450x450, poonani.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5471086 No.5471086 [Reply] [Original]

Daily reminder than transsexuals are just men with collapsed sexualities.

There's literally nothing special about it. It's nothing more than a man's sexuality breaking under a point of failure and thus turning inward upon itself. Women, for whatever reason or subjective/subconscious perception, are no longer viably existential in the 'outside world', and therefore, in order for the subject to compensate, he goes to the only place possibly left; inside. Hence the sexual object becomes the sexual subject and transsexuality is the result.

Let this be a lesson to any of you faggots considering becoming one of these lost causes yourself. Think about why you'd want to do it. You'd want to pursue it primarily on the basis that it's some 'special' type of thing concerning your identity or the newfound revelation thereof.

But it's not. It's just failure.

>> No.5471092

>>>/lgbt/ >>>/r9k/

not /lit/erature

>> No.5471097

books

>> No.5471098

>>5471092
yes /lit/ discussion of phenomenological aspects of gender.

>> No.5471101

now i almost want to be a woman op.
i'll just stick to making fun of them in drag on weekends

>> No.5471109

The only reason you would post this is if you struggled with these desires yourself. This is about your own collapsed sexuality.

Do you want to talk about it a little bit? Remember, you're anonymous.

>> No.5471113

Why should I care? In my whole life I've only ever met one transsexual person. My conversation with him/her/it went like this:

>Hey, do you know what's the homework for tomorrow?
>>Yeah, it's [insert details here]
>Okay, thanks.

>> No.5471122

>>5471086
>for whatever reason
Really scientific analysis there mate, no projection at all. Keep on with your insecurities.

>> No.5471132

>>5471092
just because a philosophical discussion refers to a sexual minority does not mean that it has to occur in "gay" boards. Your response to the post makes me feel that you are uncomfortable with this topic, perhaps it has aroused some uncertainty within you?

>> No.5471134

What about people like Chris-chan who see themselves as lesbians in male bodies?

>> No.5471138
File: 101 KB, 777x777, Candy_on_her_death_bed-777x777.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5471138

>>5471113
You must have talked with a least half a dozen in here. People who don't like to be treated by their gender are specially interested in websites where no one has gender.

>> No.5471140

>>5471113
were you the one [inserting details] or was she?

>> No.5471142

>>5471132
This isn't the philosophy board. This is the literature board.

>> No.5471144
File: 88 KB, 400x660, 9936a80b64e28950cf109b502a4d12d2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5471144

>>5471134
The word seems to be "transbian" as in transexual lesbian.

>>5471140
This is getting lewd.

>> No.5471164

>>>/lgbt/

>> No.5471188

>>5471086
>Pseudo-Freudian psycho-dynamics from some guy on the internet

I am sure you know a lot more about transsexualism than the majority of the modern psychological community and or transsexual community. Have you even done any research on GID, gender, or even taken a psych 101 course?

Also, what is your explanation for FtMs?

>> No.5471234
File: 9 KB, 186x271, poonani2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5471234

>>5471188
One will still fall short in understanding the dynamics of human sexuality when relying purely upon "science" and community college psyh 101 courses.

>> No.5471258

>>5471188
and curiously you refer to me as a 'guy'-- an interesting assumption.

>> No.5471263

Daily reminder that snow is white. Daily reminder than 1+1=2.

Is your mind blown yet, OP?

>> No.5471268

>>5471263
my mind is blown by the responses my post has received

>> No.5471310

>>5471258
I assumed this was spill over from /pol/ and also 'guy' can be a general term.

You still haven't responded to any of my points or questions

>> No.5471320

>>5471138
Candy Darling is my transwaifu

>> No.5471329
File: 220 KB, 700x675, 009_candy_darling_theredlist.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5471329

>>5471320
If she just had been a decent actress...

>> No.5471350

>>5471086
>Everyone should have the same chance to get ahead
We already did that. What you see today is a world crafted in the image of the winners of that competition long ago.

>> No.5471366

>>5471329
>>5471320
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5eUVJHQYZjQ

>> No.5471781

>>5471366
did warhol ever make any good movies?

>> No.5471809

i think it's necessary for the sjw crowd to drastically simplify everything because an actual understanding could lead to criticism and it's easier to just make things black and white and label people who disagree bigots

>> No.5471818

>>5471781
He never did anything good except help america look good in the art world long enough for more decent artist to be publicize in the old continent.

>> No.5471837

>>5471818
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/modern-art-was-cia-weapon-1578808.html

>> No.5471920

>>5471086
>collapsed sexualities

say what now?
is that like when you are about to slide it in to your cute little trap boyfriend from behind, and they say something like "oh shit i forgot to get a carton of milk while i was in the supermarket earlier" and then you get distracted and it goes floppy, and you have to make do with rubbing one out and squirting the sticky all over their butt cheeks and the tops of their stockings? and then you have to lick it off as it trickles over their balls?

or is that something different?

>> No.5471946

>>5471920
Traps are failed males and only failed males lust after them.

What's not to get?

>> No.5471953

>>5471132
how is it a philosophical discussion though, it's a social/psychological discussion and it belongs to lgbt

also see >>5471109

>> No.5471954
File: 134 KB, 480x640, fac64745dd73d0fc6b0949118307d47c.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5471954

>>5471920
Why would you remember something like that at that moment?
I think it's more like when you are already being penetrated and you start worrying if you cleaned yourself properly and you worry, so you accidentally clamp a little bit and it's all good an happy for the boy but you remember when dogs get trapped together and you worry even more and it becomes painful for both so you have to clean his dick with a wet tissue and suck on it.

>> No.5471989

>>5471946
> What's not to get?

in your case? the point, apparently

>> No.5472018

>>5471954
oh, that

i was thinking it would also be like when Juliet (i think that would be a nice name for a trap boyfriend) would be lying on his back on the bed and you are standing by the bed and squeezing in and out and you're already up to the vinegar strokes, and you're wondering whether to cum inside or pull out and shoot over his tummy, or maybe on his feet (especially since he'd be wearing those cute little heels) and you're kind of grunting, and suddenly you remember that the wall between your place and your neighbour's place is really thin, and you can hear them watching that episode of The Walking Dead where you find out the Governor keeps fishtanks full of zombie heads and suddenly you think of the phrase "giving head" and you start laughing and shrivel up and you have to let Juliet cum in your mouth by way of apology

it's a minefield, for sure

>> No.5472025

>>5471946
based comment
/thread

>> No.5472031

>>5471086
>hyphenated-gender
Can't be done, and actual transvestites//those born intersex don't need company or want cross dressing psychos diluting their identity with insane narcissistic delusions about one's identity.

>> No.5472035

>>5472018
If love be rough with you, be rough with love. Prick love for pricking and you beat love down.

>> No.5472051
File: 66 KB, 333x500, 3ce1c4ad995859b77a0aacd32176a192.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5472051

>>5472035
i'm not even sure that makes any sense, but here is an emu anyway

>> No.5472060

What about FtM?

Also, who cares what gender people identify with anyway?

>> No.5472078
File: 115 KB, 451x606, plankton_evil_by_fionalover-d4312mu.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5472078

>>5471086
Ha, I created this thread several hours ago primarily for the purpose of offending snobby liberal intellectuals. Where better to find snobby liberal intellecturals than /lit/.
I know an Anon had earlier replied to this thread claiming that this discussion belonged at /lgbt/.. Ha, that may be true but I'm sure /lbgt/ is less sensitive.

>> No.5472082

>>5472078
epic troll, friend

>> No.5472089

>>5472078
This thread is 1/8th of /lgbt/ all the time.

>> No.5472100

>>5472078
Good job? I dunno what you want. Do you want to be edgy and cool? Because it's not like transphobia is uncommon.

>> No.5472120

>>5472100
no.. I just enjoy offending ivory tower types.

>> No.5472122

>>5472120
Wow, you sound fun.

>> No.5472127

>>5472120
You think transexuals are in an ivory tower?

>> No.5472130

>>5472100
"I will make fun of a group of people and laugh at the snobs that try to defend them. Haha I totally caught them red-handed not hating those that are different from them, haha"

>> No.5472134
File: 3.18 MB, 2400x3000, untitled.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5472134

>>5472120
You sir are a gentlemen and a scholar. A true renaissance man. Shine on you crazy diamond.

>> No.5472143

>>5472078

master of ruse

>> No.5472154

not literature

>> No.5472156

>>5471086
>>>/pol/

you're right, but it doesn't belong here faggot

>> No.5472162
File: 9 KB, 180x280, index.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5472162

>>5472130
>>5472100

What would you do if somehow, someday your precious science deduced that my post was actually the truth?
Yes I know I'm answering a question with a question..

>> No.5472178
File: 7 KB, 265x191, images.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5472178

>>5472100
for the record.. I am absolutely in love with trans women, or whatever the politically correct term for them is. I've almost reached a point in which my love for trans women/traps has eclipsed my appreciation for real women.

>> No.5472190

>>5472162
I am still wondering how saying things that make people defend transsexuals identity from the common perception that their identity is invalid 'offending ivory tower types'

>What would you do if somehow, someday your precious science deduced that my post was actually the truth?
I don't think it would necessarily even matter, they are people that deserve to be treated with humanity, but luckily modern science and modern psychology support that GID is a valid phenomena, not a 'collapsed sexuality'. Thats like asking how you would react if science proves that diseases really are caused by offending god and or committing sins

>> No.5472192

>>5472162
What would you do if someday your precious science deduced that actually people who troll anonymous imageboards were stupid morons?

Also 'precious science' has been used as a tool to persecute minorities in the past, I don't know what you're complaining about. Also you still haven't explained how FtMs work in your scenario.

>>5472178
OK, so you also objectify transwomen sexually. Good to know, I suppose.

>> No.5472206

>>5472190
You're telling me that I can keep on sinning and my flu won't come back!? that's great news!

>> No.5472227

>>5472190
poor analogy at best..
>>5472192
your emotions are running high, so high that I believed they obscured the point I was trying to make. Or possibly I wasn't clear enough.

>> No.5472230

>>5472227
You obviously wasn't clear enough.