[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 950 KB, 1000x669, 1409520182584.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5375462 No.5375462[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/sep/01/rotherham-child-sex-abuse-difficult-questions

The most dangerous foot binder in Ancient china has written a new article

>> No.5375474

does zizek live in the uk?

>> No.5375479

What would happen if Stallman and Zizek had a baby?

>> No.5375482

Surprisingly lucid.

>> No.5375486

>>5375482
agreed. easily the best piece on the rotherham rapes that i've read so far.

>> No.5375511

>>5375486
I'm from Rotherham. I would have preferred him to have simply said, "get the Pakis out".

>> No.5375515

>>5375511
lol do you have sisters or female cousins?

>> No.5375517

>And we should approach the Rotherham events in exactly the same way: we are dealing with the “political unconscious” of the Pakistani Muslim youth – not with chaotic violence, but with a ritualised violence with precise ideological contours: a youth group that experiences itself as marginalised and subordinated taking revenge on vulnerable women of the predominant group.

I don't think that the pakis feel marginalized at all. I see them around here driving about in sports cars like they own the place. There is nothing about them that suggests they feel oppressed. If anything they are the more confident group around, the most likely to produce bullies.
Zizek is just wrong here. It's not about revenge on the predominant group. It's more like they view themselves above white girls and therefore can do what they want with them. It's more contempt and indifference than vengeance.

>> No.5375524

>>5375486

there's another article I saw (I can't remember where, maybe a blog or small website) which basically called out the Guardian feminists for not denouncing the rotherham awfulness as "rape culture".

Holy lol, when it's middle class / upper middle class white males we get tonnes of articles about "rape culture".

>>5375511

Have you seen the below?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2738957/

>> No.5375528

>>5375462
Its kind of insane that "the most dangerous man in the vest" has to be the one to say we should consider all possible angles. /pol/ could give a similar analysis, albeit with at least one Ben Garrison cartoon in the side bar.

>> No.5375530

>>5375524
>Holy lol, when it's middle class / upper middle class white males we get tonnes of articles about "rape culture".

it's funny because this demographic is probably the least likely to perpetrate sex crimes. feminists are cowards and contemporary leftism inherently entails cognitive dissonance

>> No.5375531

>>5375462
fuck this i cant stop reading it in his voice

>> No.5375536

>>5375515
Yeah, none of them were involved. Around where I am there are the white villages and a paki village on the edge. There's a few white girls that live there, maybe some of them were molested, I do not know. However, it sounds like it was generally happening more around a place called Clifton which is on the other side of Rotherham from where I live.

My driving instructor, when we used to drive through paki neighbourhoods, used to always joke, "let's play 'spot the white person'." In other words, there are sections of Rotherham that are slices of Pakistan. There is no dominant non-dominant group in Rotherham as a whole, because it is highly segregated. The pakis own the taxi business around here and that's apparently how they've been grooming kids.

>> No.5375545

>>5375536

How commonly accepted was the belief that it was happening? I read that Nick Griffin said about 10 years ago or something that it was common knowledge.

>> No.5375552

>>5375462
Where is multicultural Hitler when you need him?

>> No.5375588

>>5375517
>And we should approach the Rotherham events in exactly the same way: we are dealing with the “political unconscious” of the Pakistani Muslim youth – not with chaotic violence, but with a ritualised violence with precise ideological contours: a youth group that experiences itself as marginalised and subordinated taking revenge on vulnerable women of the predominant group.

He's right with it being the "political unconscious" though. It is a political message when Pakis are raping white kids, but it's not "boo, we poor marginalized immigrants revenge ourselves on our oppressors", it's, "we're taking over, this is our country now." If you want more evidence of the latter, look up the pakis that go about claiming they want "Sharia Law" for Britain. These people are not emasculated or oppressed; they are full of confidence, they are running amok, they are empowered by our socialist government which is happy to make cuckolds of the native Britons. They are the real criminals behind this. Our parliament needs cleansing. The BBC and the Guardian and the rest of the media faggots which have been complicit in forcing multiculturalism i.e. cuckoldry, down the people's throats need to be dismantled. The problem is, if it gets worse we are looking at a situation where a popular uprising could happen which institutes a crude "white power" ethos which I do not want. But what are the alternatives? Wait for the government to continue cuckolding us until the muslims have so great numbers here that they literally can just take over the country by force? War is coming to Europe, and there are three main powers, viz. the Jewish-Masonic governments, the liberals, that want an internationalist order based on materialism/liberalism; the muslims that want to bring the world under Allah's law; the cuckolded, demoralized, depressed, degraded natives who don't have any religion anymore, any connection with their heritage or culture, who are squeamish about protecting their kin because they have been schooled from an earlier age that "dat's racist!". I actually suspect that as soon as their is an awakening in consciousness among the natives in Europe and in America that Christianity will suddenly become very attractive to them again; as soon as they recognize their atheism as being a tool of demoralization and emasculation in the hands of their Jewish-Masonic oppressors they will throw their fedoras in the garbage and take up the cross. If that doesn't happen they will just become pagans/Hitlerians, social Darwinists that put the whites at the top of the food chain. People are going to be looking at the history of Crusades over the next couple of decades with new eyes. Getting Crusader imagery out in the public sphere is going to be a big part of revitalizing the native Europeans. Their muslim enemies will wake them up to the fact that they are a race and they need to defend themselves.

>> No.5375597

>Then there are the serial rapes and murders of indigenous women in western Canada, close to reservations around Vancouver, belying Canada’s claim to be a model, tolerant welfare state: a group of white men abduct, rape and kill a woman, and then deposit the mutilated body just within the reservation territory, which puts it legally under the jurisdiction of the tribal police who are totally unprepared to deal with such cases. In these examples, the social dislocation due to fast industrialisation and modernisation provoked a brutal reaction from males who experience this development as a threat.

You lost me, Zizi. Why would white men be threatened specifically by tribal women being driven by industrialism? If it was racist in nature they should have started beating up men they saw wandering the streets.

>> No.5375613

>>5375588
The Jewish-Masonic governments themselves could go full authoritarian/Stalin mode in order to keep on oppressing the natives will stemming back the radical muslim tides. Don't think it will work though. The country to watch is France, I think. What happens in France will determine a lot. The French are the sharpest, the most intellectual; whereas in England our skinheads are dumb brutes, the French skinheads are also part-time intellectuals.
My ideal scenario is that the French spread propaganda that the La Revolucion was a Jewish-Masonic operation that lead to cuckolding of the French people and the destruction of their Catholic heritage, and the reaction to that will be a Catholic revival. French has been a key nation in Catholicism from almost the start. Think of Charlemagne. The French King was called "the most Christian king" for centuries.

Plus, there are prophecies going back over a thousand years that say that a great king will come out of France and conquer Europe, converting Britain to the Faith in the process.

>> No.5375614

>>5375588
As /pol/-ish as you are, you are still more correct than Zizek, who looks like a complete outcast in the leftist field on this issue. I almost think Zizek doesn't know who he supposedly stands with on the Left, but there sure as hell isn't anyone much agreeing with him much besides the growing UKIP.

Cultural Relativism is looking rather ironic/meta right now, because no other culture but ours believes in it. We could very well see the West conquered, as it were, by out-breeding and immigration. Isn't it only 50 years before most European countries are primarily "minorities"?

>> No.5375615

>>5375597
weren't the victims white women, they were just being buried in reservations?

>> No.5375624

>>5375597
He has a tendency to over analyze when it could help his argument. Think of it as an example that isn't very important to the message that is trying to be communicated.

>> No.5375628

>>5375613
And the consensus among Catholic prophecy buffs is that there will be a short triumph of the Church (which will include the actions of this "Great Monarch") before the Antichrist comes. In other words, the Antichrist is not coming until the Catholic Church experiences a great triumph (according to these prophecies). A lot of Christians, particularly Protestants, think that the Antichrist is coming any day now, that the time is fully ripe.

>> No.5375630

>>5375588

I think Islam / Middle East / 3rd world culture is shit, of course, but there was nothing legal about what happened. Yeah political correctness perpetuated by the BBC / Guardian contributed to the lack of action.

I think the ironic thing is that the laughable as fuck jihadists in London have done nothing to affect my life but it's the government that has been constantly attacking civil liberties. The government is like 90+% composed of people who went to famous as shit private / public schools and great universities - the exact things which are symbols of the UK's civilised nature and superiority compared to most of the world.

I agree islam is shit but I can't be assed hearing people moan about multiculturalism ruining anything. Everything bad that happens to the UK is self-inflicted. This paki / islam / other culture / outsider blaming is always a red herring.

>> No.5375638

After that all Zizek needs now is a permanent column in The Spectator

>> No.5375639

New Labour's immigration policy was literally treason.

>> No.5375659

>>5375630
>Everything bad that happens to the UK is self-inflicted. This paki / islam / other culture / outsider blaming is always a red herring.

It is the affliction. There was a recent piece on stormfront users and members of other such groups. Turns out, they aren't ignorant about other races. They are usually well read and live in areas of above average minority populations. Multiculturalism, as it is currently taught and practiced, is a destructive ideology.

Look at this, its so blatantly true: sociologists were trying to say that the police were racist when the reports came in years ago. Social workers refused to help the abused. The police stopped filing reports. Even families were hesitant to do anything. It smacks of brainwashing.

>> No.5375662

>>5375614
>Isn't it only 50 years before most European countries are primarily "minorities"?

Oh and excuse me any lurkers, it wasn't 50 years but about 20 (at least for England).

>> No.5375663

>>5375659
>Turns out, they aren't ignorant about other races. They are usually well read and live in areas of above average minority populations.

Which makes them more reliable than the other white people who live in the exact same areas without being inbred redneck retards... why?

>> No.5375664

>>5375614
>As /pol/-ish as you are

I grew up as an average liberal. There were pakis in my school and I was friendly with them. I was close to a black guy before he returned to Jamaica. Point is, I don't have a horror of other skin colours; these are purely political considerations.

>Cultural Relativism is looking rather ironic/meta right now, because no other culture but ours believes in it. We could very well see the West conquered, as it were, by out-breeding and immigration. Isn't it only 50 years before most European countries are primarily "minorities"?

It may seem /pol/-ish to believe that this was ALWAYS the point of Cultural Relativism, viz. emasculate the natives, but there is some truth in it. Granted, muliculturalism / cultural relativism has been supported largely by a group of well-meaning folk who sincerely believed in the ideals of the Enlightenment, in universal human brotherhood, in tolerance, etc. (these are all Masonic virtues essentially; the Masons were the pioneers in this field). However, behind these well-meaning folk there is a small core of Machiavellians that knew full well all along that mixing creeds, cultures, races, etc., would mean the end of what remained of Christendom, and those Machiavellians you find primarily in the Synagogue and Masonic lodges. Again, I don't despise Jews because they are Jews; it's just a political reality that Jews have a hatred for "goyim" and a repugnance for Christianity, and that they have been all too happy to see the dilution and destruction of Christendom over the last five centuries. The Jews are behind this, but not without the consent of the goyim. In fact, it's gentile intellectuals that began the whole decline into liberalism and the enlightenment, the Jews just helped it along because they knew that it would also mean the end of Christendom.

>> No.5375668

Guess Zizek's finally found his true calling in writing meandering moralizing articles like everyone else.

>> No.5375672

>>5375663
Read
>http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/13/opinion/sunday/seth-stephens-davidowitz-the-data-of-hate.html?_r=0

They read the New York Times, novels, pop culture entertainment, etc. Its mostly young people joining, which granted could be edgy teenagers, but not in these numbers. Do these sound like retarded Rednecks to you? Is our defense going to continue to be "the other side is ignorant", even as these... can we even say incidents? Is 1400 young girls raped without any help not an atrocity? Are we really going to make no attempt at thinking this one over?

>> No.5375679

>>5375672
Oh and another "neat" little gem: KKK members have better education than average Americans. The "retarded redneck" stereotype isn't true anymore.

>> No.5375681

>>5375679

>Better education

Almost everyone on planet earth is retarded. Education just means "job skill" nowadays.

Wish educated would go back to meaning "polymath/genius/expert" instead of "degree".

>> No.5375694

>>5375630
A better word for multiculturalism is materialism. Multiculturalism relativizes all faiths and beliefs, etc., so that in the end the only thing people share is their common need for food and material goods. Multiculturalism is materialism/liberalism. It's the idea that, "it doesn't matter what you believe, as long as you are a nice person".
Multiculturalism doesn't ruin anything if you think that the goal of life is to be well fed, well dressed, and "have a good time". But multiculturalism is the death of culturalism, i.e. faith, religion, belief. This is why the Muslims can't tolerate it, they, or at least a number of them, are still too zealous with their faith. The liberal creed is, "there is no right or wrong way to live, as long as you are not hurting anybody else" - that creed is not Christian, it is not Muslim; if you are a Christian or a Muslim you have to be against that creed.
Another problem with the creed is that it will eventually become this, "it doesn't matter what you believe, as long as you believe what a nice person believes"; this is how liberal democracies become socialist dictatorships.

> The government is like 90+% composed of people who went to famous as shit private / public schools and great universities - the exact things which are symbols of the UK's civilised nature and superiority compared to most of the world.

Those famous schools don't teach "culture" or "civilization" anymore. Those private schools just train the kids how to become active liberals in political life later on. Same with the Universities.

>> No.5375704

>>5375694
If Oxford and Cambridge were houses of fine culture and civilization they would be turning out proud and noble gentleman with conviction, not conniving little "bourgeois" that know how to sell their shit to the stupefied public. Those Universities aren't British anymore, if by British we mean valourizing Britain. Britain isn't British anymore. It's an enlightened multicultural utopia that is going to be integreated into the world government, the brotherhood of man that joins hands together despite differences in colour and creed. "God save the Queen" - God and the Monarchy have no relevance in the political life of Britain today except as memorials.

>> No.5375716

>>5375597
this is pure speculation re the perps

and tone it down with the racism

>> No.5375747

>>5375663
the more contrarian you are the smarter you are, didn't you learn that in school?

>> No.5375756

yeah, the left is completely useless right now in Europe except for south Europe.

We need to break the EU in 2, leaving the south countries as an extension to africa and closing any north country.

It will fix southern economies fast and it will fix northern societies fast too. FMI won't allow it though

>> No.5375761

FTL

>> No.5375763

>>5375761
faster than light?