/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.5235469]

I'm planning writing a novel with a high function manchild as the main character. It would sell or sjw and emotive people are complete hypocrites and don't read about it?

[Anonymous No.5235477]

>>5235469
>a novel with a high function manchild as the main character
Autobiography, eh?

[Anonymous No.5235483]

>>5235469
>I'm planning writing a novel with a high function manchild as the main character. It would sell or sjw and emotive people are complete hypocrites and don't read about it?

what

are you an idiot?

[Anonymous No.5235488]

it's high functional

[Anonymous No.5237422]

>>5235469
Curious Case of The Dog in The Night or whatever it's called.

[Anonymous No.5238869]

>>5235469
I can't help but notice that the phe/per example uses both phe and per to mean the same thing. "phe's pet is per goldfish" is equivalent to "His pet is his goldfish."

[Anonymous No.5238874]

>>5235469
>neutral
>neutral
>neautral
>neutral
>neutral
what is this

[Anonymous No.5238938]

>>5238874
>2014
>not understand that gender is a social construct and can change is any moment

neutrality is the future, like switzerland or austria

[Anonymous No.5238950]

>>5238869
>>5238874

I'm in favor of being identified by a pronoun that doesn't differentiate people from the simple mass of humanity. It would never need to change or vary with usage and could be used by anyone. Since it would not be gendered, it wouldn't need to differentiate in any other way either and would avoid awkwardnesses if my sex, preferences class or cultural identity was masked in some way.
The word would mean "member of the anonymous mass" and would be "massa" short for mass-anon. It would be used like this:

"Would massa like more cream in massa's coffee?" "Can I get the door for massa?" "What is massa's opinion on that?" see how easy it is? now uncomfortable nervousness about offending me or anyone like me with an unintentional gaucherie.

[Anonymous No.5238970]

>>5238938
>>not understand that gender is a social construct and can change is any moment

Social constructs are spooks.

[Anonymous No.5238972]

>>5238950

[Anonymous No.5238984]

>>5238950
>"Would massa like more cream in massa's coffee?"
>"Yes'uh"

[Anonymous No.5238993]

>>5238984
grats on adding nothing to the joke

[The cats No.5239007]

>>5238938
>That pic
No matter how many times I see these things I laugh. How many of these do you think are just autistic NEETs from /pol/ trolling twitter?

[Anonymous No.5239026]

>>5238993
He's actually from reddit.

[Anonymous No.5239031]

>>5238993
Thanks ;D

[Anonymous No.5239032]

>>5238938
>lacking reading comprehension
>neautral