[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 130 KB, 452x640, whatbooksarefor.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5216695 No.5216695[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

http://www.theonion.com/video/new-kindle-helps-readers-show-off-by-shouting-titl,36568/

I like how they only mention books that any semi-intelligent member of /lit/ would be embarrassed about liking.

>> No.5216700

>>5216695
lel

>> No.5216706

>tells everyone on the train I am reading Murakami
it would be a woman saying this

>> No.5216736

>>5216695

A perfect representation of the average /lit/ anon, with the only difference that those actors looked all employed and not skeleton skinny.

>> No.5216740
File: 64 KB, 441x495, 1403677973886.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5216740

>>5216695
>also infinite jest

>> No.5216757

I laughed at how much this felt like a direct jab at /li/.

>> No.5216758

how can one man hold all dose books

>> No.5216768

>>5216695

The entire philosophy of /lit/ condensed in that video; i'm just happy it exist.

>> No.5216788

>it's silly, but whatever
this is gold Jerry

>> No.5217107
File: 843 KB, 1278x744, Screen Shot 2014-07-31 at 12.12.07 AM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5217107

>>5216695

I'm always impressed by how solid the jokes are that The Onion puts into the news ticker.

>> No.5217119

>>5216695
>implying you should be embarrassed about liking A Confederacy of Dunces

Fuck off, shitdick.

>> No.5217134

>>5217119

They probably cited it since it's getting pretty in vogue with the kids going for a degree in literature.

>> No.5217143

>>5217119
What? They were saying that about "Inferno" by Dan Brown.

>> No.5217145

http://youtube.com/watch?v=Q4PC8Luqiws

>> No.5217146

>>5217107
And to think, I never even noticed them.

That is indeed a solid joke.

>> No.5217148

>>5216758
I fucking lol'd I do not know why

>> No.5217155
File: 79 KB, 625x568, Screen shot 2014-07-31 at 2.29.22 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5217155

"I love the feeling of paper in your hands as you angle the cover for everyone to see."

The Onion isn't satire, it's a news outlet from the future.

>> No.5217175
File: 83 KB, 241x228, 1367013221365.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5217175

>tfw you get #roasted by The Onion

>> No.5217186

http://www.theonion.com/articles/study-finds-college-still-more-worthwhile-than-spe,36576/

>> No.5217191

>>5216695
That's because the skit was written by a terrible, pretentious hipster who has terrible, hipster friends.

>> No.5217196

>>5217191
those people are probably a better authority on what will impress people than us, though, honestly

/lit/core only impresses /lit/

>> No.5217395
File: 19 KB, 638x359, 1396991516333.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5217395

>>5217191

>> No.5217419

whats wrong with breakfast of champions?

>> No.5217431

>>5217196
>/lit/core only impresses /lit/

it really doesn't

>> No.5217718 [DELETED] 

>>5217395
le epic reddit reaction image friend XD

Did you just come in?? : / /lit/ is like 4chan only more polite like ever1 says rite?

>> No.5217874

>>5216695

For a second I thought Stormdancer said Stupidmancer.

>> No.5217888

If you're embarrassed by liking any of these books, you're even worse than the try-hards who brag loudly about reading them.

>> No.5217889

>>5217718

you can practically smell the insecurity wafting off you

>> No.5218615
File: 248 KB, 513x646, Dawn.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5218615

Such venom! Fellow forum-browsers, I query: Why does any public intellectual activity immediately cause the general public to resort to accusations of pretension? Reading is not an inherently pretentious act, even such tomes as The Iliad or Gravity's Rainbow are applauded for the entertainment one derives from the act of processing their plot, prose, and text. Consider, could this video satire simply be an expression of its makers' insecurities? He seems to be offended just by the simple act of reading a novel in front of others!

Like most of The Onion's videos and articles, it is a decent quip but its execution was overlong and clumsy.

>> No.5218654

>A Confederacy of Dunces, by John Kennedy O'Toole
>John Kennedy O'Toole
>O'Toole
People say that

>> No.5218671

>>5217718
you are very salty

>> No.5218674

>>5218654
That Is Part Of The Joke.

>> No.5218679

>>5217196
/lit/core would impress most college professors if you are reading them as an undergraduate. /lit/, however, will call you an uneducated pleb.

>> No.5218703

>>5218674
>That Is Part Of The Joke
That's why I said 'People say that'.

>> No.5218762

>>5216695
>also reading infinite jest
>also reading infinite jest

Lol

>> No.5218973

>>5217395
Not mad, disgusted.
The Onion's attempts at cultural commentary always serve to reveal how isolated from reality their writing staff is and how solipsistic their worldview is.

>> No.5219017

>>5218973
>how solipsistic their worldview is.
You're an idiot.

>> No.5219028

>>5217718
Fuck off

>> No.5219060

>>5218973
bazinga

>> No.5219085

>>5219017
They believe that the only reason anyone reads or owns books is so that the great and mighty writers of Onion will feel humbled by the superior intellectual credibility of the reader.
That is solipsism.

>> No.5219103

>>5219085
no they don't, where the hell did you get that idea

>> No.5219136

>>5218973
is everything solipsistic?

>> No.5219142

>>5219136
They don't understand solipsism

>> No.5219255

>>5218973
solipsism isn't synonymous for selfish or self centered.

>> No.5219321

>>5218615
A solid question asked pompously so everyone ignored it. Maybe it's America's ingrained anti-intellectualism.

>> No.5219704
File: 825 KB, 1147x1663, ThomasPynchonGoesFishing.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5219704

>INFINITE JEST INFINITE JEST INFINITE JEST INFINITE JEST INFINITE JEST INFINITE JEST INFINITE JEST INFINITE JEST INFINITE JEST INFINITE JEST INFINITE JEST INFINITE JEST INFINITE JEST INFINITE JEST INFINITE JEST INFINITE JEST INFINITE JEST INFINITE JEST INFINITE JEST INFINITE JEST INFINITE JEST INFINITE JEST INFINITE JEST INFINITE JEST INFINITE JEST INFINITE JEST INFINITE JEST INFINITE JEST INFINITE JEST INFINITE JEST INFINITE JEST INFINITE JEST INFINITE JEST INFINITE JEST INFINITE JEST INFINITE JEST INFINITE JEST INFINITE JEST INFINITE JEST INFINITE JEST INFINITE JEST INFINITE JEST INFINITE JEST INFINITE JEST INFINITE JEST

>> No.5221316

>>5219085
Are you fucking retarded?
The point of the article was to poke fun at pretentious people.

>> No.5221351

>>5218615
>>5219321
>missing the point
>implying they were making fun of people who read in public and not the types who do it in order to gain attention

>> No.5223406

>>5216695
>I like how they only mention books that any semi-intelligent member of /lit/ would be embarrassed about liking.

Joyce and Vonnegut? So you're saying there are no semi-intelligent people on /lit/.

You're not too far off, kiddo.

>> No.5223409

>>5219704
It's his shoes that get me every time.

>> No.5225273

>>5216695
Why is the Demon Cycle, Prince of Thorn Trilogy and Night Angel Trilogy included with those trash?

>> No.5225957

does anyone else always try and hide the cover of their book when they're reading in public?
i don't want people judging me, and i don't want them thinking that i'm a pretentious poser