[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 3.35 MB, 4000x3549, 1405550806143.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5166440 No.5166440[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Maybe some of you in /lit/ will enjoy this, which I made for /pol/ but has been slid to page 10 by shitposts of degeneracy and other trivia. Here is your "/lit/ guide to right-wing literature" in three torrents for three file formats. I was able to find 91% of the books (all but 5 of them) in this image. Let me know if you have an ebook of any of the missing ones.

epub (for all e-readers except amazon kindle):
http://thepiratebay.se/torrent/10600685
magnet:?xt=urn:btih:dea421ab1a5a4697debd473300b19c216327ee5d&dn=%2Flit%2F+guide+to+right-wing+literature+%28assembled+by+%2Fpol%2F%29+in+epu&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.openbittorrent.com%3A80&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.publicbt.com%3A80&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.istole.it%3A6969&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fopen.demonii.com%3A1337

azw3 (for amazon kindle):
http://thepiratebay.se/torrent/10600691
magnet:?xt=urn:btih:99ceea950ef607060748cdd154df4193de561f50&dn=%2Flit%2F+guide+to+right-wing+literature+%28assembled+by+%2Fpol%2F%29+azw3&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.openbittorrent.com%3A80&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.publicbt.com%3A80&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.istole.it%3A6969&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fopen.demonii.com%3A1337

pdf:
http://thepiratebay.se/torrent/10600681
magnet:?xt=urn:btih:f1ed087f173c98d3423a89c9129b51cd12c2a93e&dn=The+%2Flit%2F+guide+to+right-wing+literature+%28assembled+by+%2Fpol%2F%29+in&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.openbittorrent.com%3A80&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.publicbt.com%3A80&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.istole.it%3A6969&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fopen.demonii.com%3A1337

>> No.5166447

>complains about degenerates
>posts links to theft

>> No.5166449

it amuses me that people think these hastily done "charts" with "guides" or "essentials" are actually guides.

the /mu/ification of consumption of "media" on 4chan continues i guess.

>> No.5166467

>>5166449
Not to mention, most of the writers on that chart would likely despise the idea of color-coded guides that pigeonhole their work.

>> No.5166469

>Harrison Bergeron

>right-wing aristocratic/elitist lit

You get that that story is making fun of the "equality means dragging us all down to the bottom" rhetoric, right?

>> No.5166503

>>5166449

Only a plebeian would say this.

>> No.5166511

>>5166447
You cannot steal numbers. I am literally sharing long strings of binary numbers.

>>5166449
You're full of shit and you know it.

>>5166467
Probably; oh well.

>>5166469
I disagree completely.

>> No.5166546

>>5166440
I was just looking for The Republic in epub. Thank you for saving me a google search OP. I'll probably save Demons by based Dosty but the rest can go in the trash.

>> No.5166550

>>5166440
>torrents to right wing literature
>Kurt Vonnegut
>wat

>> No.5166564

>>5166511
You do realize that Vonnegut was the left wing darling right?

>> No.5166591

>>5166503
No, he's right. We don't need little insecure babies ruining our board with their charts. /mu/ is a board of fourth grade clique mentality, weak narcissists who beg for a higher authority to tell them what to like.

>> No.5168076

>>5166440
>TED KACYNSKI WAS RIGHT ABOUT EVERYTHING

You realize he was an anarcho primitivist right, the polar fucking opposite of Right Wing

>> No.5168469

>>5166511
>You cannot steal numbers. I am literally sharing long strings of binary numbers.
>You cannot steal atoms. I am literally changing the location of large, arbitrarily-arranged groups of atoms.
>You cannot murder elements. I am literally just plunging a knife into the midst of many elemental atoms which happen to be bonded to each other to form cells which just happen to form a superstructure that displays some emergent properties.
>You cannot cut matter. I am literally using my knife to sever the bonds between some of the atoms in this cake, and so I have not actually cut the cake itself.

>> No.5168494

>>5168469
>You cannot cut matter. I am literally using my knife to sever the bonds between some of the atoms in this cake, and so I have not actually cut the cake itself.

That's not what happens when you cut cake.

>> No.5168498

>>5166440
>The Master and Margarita
>'Right-wing literature'

2American4me

>> No.5168542

>>5166440
hello OP
would you be so kind as to include a brief tutorial on how to filter out any threads that include "right-wing literature" in future OPs you post with this topic

it'd be really helpful to us to a majority of users on /lit/

>> No.5168601

>>5168542
Just hide this thread and keep your mouth shut. Stop being so sensitive.

>> No.5168617

>>5168469
>sever atoms while cutting cake
Nigger what

>> No.5168664

>>5168494
>>5168617
Guys he probably meant molecules. Just relax. And further, the bonds between them. Not atoms or molecules themselves.

Anyway, on topic, why is there no ayn Rand on this picture??

>> No.5168696

>>5168664
If I recall the anon who created the infographic built it based on recommendations in a /lit/ thread. Most /lit/ users dislike Rand because her books are watered down versions of other writer's ideas, and thus nobody recommended that she be included.

I'm more skeptical about the "apolitically nietzschean" category, if something is Apolitical it can't exactly be Right Wing at the same time

>> No.5168704

Its funny because whilst Plato was intrinsically right wing he expressed a distaste for extreme hierarchy.

Just a pretty poor defense for conservatism, which by its very nature opposes literary creativity and has historically shunned contemporary movements, whether they were during the 18th or 21th century.

>> No.5168765

which books are missing from the torrents?

>> No.5168768

>>5168704
>whilst Plato was intrinsically right wing he expressed a distaste for extreme hierarchy.

Where did he do this?

>> No.5169599

>>5166440
Is the Chaim Potok book on there the result of a suble troll?

>> No.5169603

>>5166440
>blake
>right wing

pfhahahahahahha God you people are dumb

>> No.5170234

I notice there aren't any women included in your picture, OP. Care to explain?

>> No.5170254

>>5170234
>who is Savitri Devi

>> No.5170259

>>5170234
he could have at least included Savitri Devi

>> No.5170265

>>5170259
Savitri Devi is there bro

>> No.5170329

Please don't post or post about stuff from here on other websites. Thank u.

>> No.5170402

>>5168498
It is def reactionary traditionalism

>> No.5170423

ITT: guy posts links to books based on a chart hastily collated by one guy while chatting with likeminded people who were interested in books they felt were related and wanted to share with others, and also four dozen sanctimonious "DOSTOEVSKY WASN'T A NAZI! XDDD" nothingposts

the last five iterations of this thread had the same shit

>> No.5170428

>>5170423
>guy posts chart he didn't put enough effort into and it's a mystery why people are dismissing it

>> No.5170450

this classification does nothing but promote vague label-thinking.

conservatism, from being a word that encapsulated Enlightenment concerns for rights and freedoms against external authorities, has been hijacked by 'right-wing' movements and used to describe powerful states, corporate tyrannies, all to enforce moral and socio-political hierarchies upon others.

as for the color-labels, most of them don't say anything. others don't even belong to any side of the left-right wing framework.

also, many of the authors listed would be horrified to be labelled as right-wing.

I'm sorry, but you've wasted time and probably deluded yourself into thinking that your categorization is helpful.

>> No.5170452

>>5170428
did you miss this dynamic in the last five iterations

>english undergrad: DOSTOEVSKY ISN'T A NAZI XDDDD
>informed person: he was radically tsarist and nationalistic in a time when that was virtually unknown in the intelligentsia
>undergrad: TS ELIOT WASN'T A NAZI XDDD
>informed person: [horrendously elitist quote about guessing plebs from eliot epistles]
>etc.

or the fact, again since you seem to be stupid, that it was hastily collated mostly just to share ideas and foster discussion. yes, it's outdated. its flaws were noted by its creator when he was creating it. he didn't know most of the titles. but the thread was very successful - i.e., lots of people were interested in sharing this stuff - and the picture has probably inspired lots of reading and fostered lots of discussion.

somehow, it manage to achieve its explicit goals despite not being perfect to your autistic specifications and peer review!!! maybe because the creator was just a dude trying to share & discuss books earnestly instead of a pleb like u

>> No.5170476

>>5170450
They are all explicitly anti egalitarian. Stop wasting your time attempting verbose attacks that barely hide the fact your just upset people think differently then you

>> No.5170481

>>5170452
>it was hastily collated
>it's outdated
>its flaws were noted by its creator when he was creating it. he didn't know most of the titles

again, and you wonder why people are dismissing it?

btw, nobody cares about your sentimental ideas of how inspiring you want this shit chart to be.

>> No.5170514

>>5170476
>all explicitly anti egalitarian.

you really can't be serious. also, it's not that people think differently than me that upsets me, it's that vague labels usually make people think they think differently than me that upsets me.

>> No.5170532
File: 286 KB, 500x375, 02e.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5170532

>>5168542
>majority of users of /lit/
Because you know us all, right?

Also:
>implying I didn't just see a lot of peers while downloading the pdf torrent, which was completed faster than most torrents of that size, not to mention most eBook readers will go for the epub version

>> No.5170537

>>5170452
The man is not the work and the work is not the works.

>> No.5170579

>>5166469
Then that's right wing. Left wing is about equality.

>> No.5170585

>>5170579
You have reading comprehension problems.

>> No.5170598

>>5168704

Conservatism shunned down contemporary, literary movements? Not really, some authoritarians who simultaneously were conservative did, but not out of their conservatism.

By the way, is Plato a most right-wing minded philosopher in history? I'm neutral towards politics to be honest, but I scanning through his ideas I came to conclusion he really was. Maybe Heidegger comes close in terms of traditionalism and overall "right-wingery".

>> No.5172040
File: 58 KB, 499x496, 1405774546740.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5172040

>>5166440
Demons slaps the right-wing just as well as the revolutionary ideas.

>> No.5172181

>>5166440
>The Cantos
>William Blake
every time

>> No.5172380

>>5172181
>implying Ezra Pound was not an anti-semite
>implying William Blake was not a religious nut

It's like you can't even read the tags.

>> No.5172413

>>5172380
because neither anti-semitism or religious nuttery are inherently right wing

>> No.5172424

>>5166440
which are missing and how did you convert the files. i have found many of these only in pdf, if the epubs are some shitty rip i'm just going to be pissed off
of course, nice effort anyway, the people ripping on this are just boring (is it perfect? no? throw it out!)

>> No.5172428

>>5172040
Actually Demons slap the polite, bourgeois version of conservatism which allows revolutionary ideas to thrive

>>5170598
Yes, I believe that Plato may be one of most right-wing minded (As you call it...) philosophers in history. I'd add also add Hobbes

>> No.5172434

>>5172413

I agree that William Blake is out of place, but Ezra Pound was a facist so I believe he fits really well.

>> No.5172436

>>5172413
>yes, we know right-wing is a vague and contradictorily-applied term, that's why we have a key

It's like you can't even read.

>> No.5174428
File: 760 KB, 1180x1024, judenfrei reading list.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5174428

What about this one?

>> No.5174459

>>5174428
Hedges' book wouldn't be /pol/ stuff, as it's quite lefty.

>> No.5174479

>>5174459
I could see how his idea of a society in decline could fit into /pol/s narrative

>> No.5174487

>>5174479
Funny how /pol/'s solution is to double-down on capitalism and/or black the blacks and Jews.

So enlightened.

>> No.5174493

>>5174487
Typo: blame* the blacks and Jews.

>> No.5174581

>>5174487
you sound mad

>> No.5174595

>>5174581
No. /pol/acks make me laugh.

How could I possibly be angered by such a pathetic bunch of neckbeards?

>> No.5175493
File: 146 KB, 527x800, 79Wu5ud.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5175493

>>5174595
Because they make more sense then whatever shitty political ideology you adhere to

>> No.5175505

Kaczyunski wasn't right-wing in any meaningful sense. He specifically said he was not interested in being political, he critiqued a leftist psychology as a modern disease.

>> No.5175514

>>5175505
I should add that he wants us to live like like what the right calls inferior races.

>> No.5175518

>>5175505
They grasp at these straws, you see.

>> No.5175850

For somebody who is relatively new to the topic of "political" philosophy, I find OP's chart very useful - now if only there was a left wing chart.

>> No.5175854

>>5175518
You prove the unabomber was correct every time you post, retard.

>> No.5175889

>>5172380
The Cantos is terminally incoherent, and Blake was a heretic and utopian socialist.

>>5175505
Ted is still alive and writing, why the past tense?

>> No.5175929

>>5168704
>Just a pretty poor defense for conservatism, which by its very nature opposes literary creativity
So what was Shakespeare's deal?
Is his half-sympathetic disgust for the rabble (e.g. poison seller in R&J, the mob in JC, the plebeians in Coriolanus) proof that he filched his poetry from some lost Latin manuscript?

>> No.5175947

>>5170450
>conservatism, from being a word that encapsulated Enlightenment concerns for rights and freedoms against external authorities, has been hijacked by 'right-wing' movements and used to describe powerful states, corporate tyrannies, all to enforce moral and socio-political hierarchies upon others.
...Uh, maybe in Buttfuck, Virginia, where the spirit of God moved over the face of the vapours, and said, "Let there be politics," sometime around 1750.

The Enlightenment was all about promoting the power of the rabble. Conservatism simply became a new name of the status quo after the Revolution, and then for the even more vulgar status quo after the Communist insurgencies, then for the even more pink status quo after the victory of the Jews in 1945 (to speak broadly and polemically,) then after 1969, and so on and so forth.

Your definition of conservatism does nothing but promote pouting reluctance, never action or integrity.

>> No.5175950

>>5175929
Shakespeare borrowed heavily from Plutarch (via Thomas North's translation) for JC and Coriolanus, but in any event I don't think his plays can tell us much about his political views.

>> No.5176011

>>5175950
So Shakespeare was not an innovator?
He did add in details to the story of Coriolanus that make it suspiciously parallel the peasant revolts in the Midlands shortly before it was written and acted, revolts that would not have been terribly sympathetic to Shakespeare, a land owner.

>> No.5176672

Anybody have some examples of fascist literature?

>> No.5176688

Ugh, I remember reading some book from what I believe was a conservative political analyst and it was pretty good, but neither the name of the book nor the author are coming to me. It was about 500 pages long, somewhere about 70 pages in he addresses the issue of peak oil and the energy crisis in general. It came out somewhere during the Bush administration, and the cover was black with white text of the title and the author name above and below a picture in the middle of I think the House of Representatives or Congress or something. I also think there was maybe an orange border around the picture. Ring any bells to anyone?

>> No.5176693

>fascist
>right wing
oh boy here we go

>> No.5176694

>>5176693
>implying

>> No.5176697

>>5176694
u know shit bout politics am i right

>> No.5176726

>>5176693
i bed he wears a fenora

>> No.5178886

>>5176693
this nigga right here

fascism isnt right wing

only in american media it is

>> No.5179615

>>5174487
Gassing the niggers and Jews would solve SO many of our problems. Don't pretend like this isn't true.

>> No.5179924

This is really quite a bit better than previous such guides, but it's really weird to see René Guénon, Pat Buchanan, and the Unabomber on a single ideological list.

>> No.5179943
File: 53 KB, 500x477, smoking.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5179943

I am "far right-wing" in the 1789 sense.
OP's list is probably a troll list (I hope).

>Welcome to the Monkey House by Kurt Vonnegut

Why...?

>> No.5179953

God I hate you people.

>> No.5180889

>>5178886
>>5178886
>fascism isnt right wing
>only in american media it is
Bullshit.

Republicanism was't right wing till the parties flipped, but the Fascist manifesto is just a lie to get support. the fascism we speak of is the historical, in practice fascism.

>>5179943
>1789
The President and CEO for the Kids Who Like Kings or Something, Evola Kid?