[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 195 KB, 603x401, questions.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5106737 No.5106737[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

so whats the difference between philosophical anthropology and the shit heidegger and satre did?

>> No.5106744

heidegger never traveled and sartre lived his whole life in a library

do you even understand what anthropology as a discipline or sub-discipline purports to be? or what the term "field-work" means?

son of a bitch. philosphers ask the most idiotic of all possible questions

>> No.5106749
File: 30 KB, 265x324, fg.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5106749

>>5106744
>philosophical anthropology

>> No.5106755

>>5106737
>>5106744
wtf is going on?

>> No.5106760

>>5106744
are you sure you're not confusing things here?

>> No.5106801

>>5106737
Reading Being and Time right now so let me see if I can help. Heidegger's all about laying out the fundamental *ontological* constitution of Dasein. He's not analyzing "human beings", "the human condition", "human nature", or anything like that. What he's about is looking at the basic structure of "being-there", which is the sort of being that we have. It's an analysis of Dasein (being-there) as such.

You're familiar with Heidegger's idea of facticity, right? Philosophical anthropology is the study of how we ontically carry out our existence in this or that way.

>> No.5106808

>>5106801
this helped.

thanks anon