nvm

[Anonymous No.5103131]

It's just me reminding you that we Germans are Übermenschen und you Anglos are Scheiße.

[Anonymous No.5103142]

ok mate

[Anonymous No.5103155]

Way to misunderstand Neechee. Also you know Angles are a Germanic people right?

[Anonymous No.5103157]

>>5103142
If the Germans and the Brits were to switch places on the map, Brits would have been ground to dust centuries ago.

[Anonymous No.5103162]

>>5103142
England by itself in WWI would have gotten wrecked and even more so in WWII.
Only thing you are sucking cock of other countries for protecksh,
dont even care about how you went about in Ireland, the country is just as shit as yours.

[Anonymous No.5103166]

>>5103157
Pretty dumb of you not to invade us when you had the chance then. You're good workers I'll grant, but you have no imagination.

[Anonymous No.5103169]

oh yeah well my dad could beat up your dad faggote

[Anonymous No.5103178]

>>5103162
So? If I have mates who back me up I'll still win when you go into sperg-rage and attack me. We put ourselves into the winning situation, you lost.

[Anonymous No.5103183]

>>5103131
>we
You can't write in German, unlike Nietzsche, and he claimed to be Polish to avoid such nationalism, which is a pretty far way to go. Here is a brief history of Poland:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=-UL8MCgwTlk

[Anonymous No.5103188]

>>5103142
>comparing the set of all territories ever under British rule with the German Empire at one moment of its history (and not even the most glorious)
>taking pride in conquering vast areas of snowy/dusty wasteland like Austrialia and Canada

The only thing you have going for yourself is India and that's because you fucked they in the back with vicious tactics.

[Anonymous No.5103195]

It's just me reminding you that I am und you Spooks are Scheiße.

[Anonymous No.5103196]

>>5103188

[Anonymous No.5103202]

There is some thing that all of you are haunted by and is strengthened precisely because it is taboo and that is that all men secretly love hitler and germany.
All men also know that Paris and France is a shit hole for plebs.

[Anonymous No.5103211]

>>5103202
Vichy pls you sell hand creams

[le trole faec ಠ_ಠ !Avm1fqtITk No.5103215]

>>5103183
>to avoid such nationalism

You retard. Do you know what Nietzsche even meant when he said he hated nationalism, or is it a boogeyman you use to "prove" Nietzsches views are you own?

Nietzsche openly advocates the creation of a neoRoman state, as he says it's conducive to the creation of übermenschen. In case you didn't know, this is why the Nazis called themselves the third reich.

The nationalism he hated was the nationalism that kept Europe divisive and fractious, not the sort of nationalism that you think of (pride in ones heritage)

But please, do go on about how lefty nietzsche was

[Anonymous No.5103217]

Anglos are Germanics and close ethnically to Germans, even fucking Hitler acknowledged this and tried to join up with Britain. Nietzsche was NOT a racist, he was anti-German, considered himself Polish, admired the Jews and hated modern European culture of Apollonian decadence. He probably wasn't even human, but a neanderthal leftover.

[Anonymous No.5103232]

>>5103215
actually it was because they claimed to be the third german empire plebbbbbbbbbb fag

[Anonymous No.5103233]

>>5103217
Yeah but it's fun to tease the krauts about their failures.

[Anonymous No.5103234]

>>5103215
I thought third Reich was;
First Reich; Holy Roman Empire
Second Reich; Created in 1800s, the German Empire which fought in WWI

[Anonymous No.5103242]

>>5103234
That's the case.

Tripfags are scum as usual.

[Anonymous No.5103244]

>DURR Nietzsche was Polish and liked France much more than Germany and bleh and blah and blablabla
What matters is there is no English thinker of the Caliber of Nietzsche, Hegel, Heidegger, Kant or Karl Marx. There is no poet even remotely as good as our Rilke or Christian Wernicke. There is no direction of design that looks remotely as good as our Bauhaus. We have Kultur. You have nothing whatsoever. Neither Ludwig van Beethoven, nor Dürer, nor even an Ottomotor.

>>32031286
What matters is there is no English thinker of the Caliber of Nietzsche, Hegel, Heidegger, Kant or Karl Marx. There is no poet even remotely as good as our Rilke or Christian Wernicke. There is no direction of design that looks remotely as good as our Bauhaus. We have Kultur. You have nothing whatsoever.

>>5103217
You are ethnically close to the loo.

[Anonymous No.5103249]

>>5103233
And those "krauts" have been busy building an economic powerhouse, taking fuckloads of immigrants in, properly taking part in the european union etc.
while "Little" Britain can't get their heads 'round the 21st century and have right wing lunatics nearly winning seats in parliament.
Also; your prime minister thinks an 80 year old woman is the messenger of god and provides her with millions of tax payers POUNDS, not euros you hedonistic backwater fucks.

[Anonymous No.5103258]

>>5103244
>no poet on Rilke tier
>what is Shakespeare, Marlowe, Byron, etc.

[le trole faec ಠ_ಠ !Avm1fqtITk No.5103260]

>>5103234
Sorry, yes, but the Romans were the ideal reich that the Germans aspired to

Read up on it.

[le trole faec ಠ_ಠ !Avm1fqtITk No.5103271]

>>5103242
>I can recite meaningless facts
>therefore the meaning behind the statement is wrong

The Romans were still the "ideal" reich in the German view bro. Which is the point; it doesn't matter which reich were numbered

[Anonymous No.5103277]

>>5103215
Did you learn about Nietzsche from the History Channel or is the trip a legit comment on content?
Nietzsche advocates for what most Westerns have argued for since Jesus, trying to make the world a better place through an instructive hierarchy. It would be more akin to his criticisms of Jews in power than his praises of them out of power the interpretation the Nazis appropriated from his works. A neoRoman state in the sense the Nazis believed in was a fabrication separate to Nietzsche's concept of hierarchy and, combined with an interpretation which thinks blonde means only blonde and disregards the skill measure and potential for downfall inherent in the role of downgoing, was nothing more than hubris.

>this is why the Nazis called themselves the third reich.
I can't even.

[Anonymous No.5103281]

>>5103260
The Romans were no Ideal Reich. But Germany borrowed a lot from the Romans. And German law till this day is a translation of the Roman law left by Gaius. Truely the Germans have inherited the cause of Rome, of the sole cultured nation in the entire world.

[Anonymous No.5103292]

>>5103258
Byron is Eminem pre.
It's pretty well known his fame is greater than his skill.

[Anonymous No.5103300]

>>5103244
I'm not saying the Germans are not amazing people. I'm saying that even Nietzsche knew the Overman was a spook and that Germans are closer to the slave race because they always follow a pattern of following some gay-ass leader who leads the country straight off a cliff after expending millions of German lives and using loads of resources, then working their asses off MORE while in peacetime and simply repeating the cycle. Not to mention even when they're in pre-wartime super society like National Socialist Germany it's always moralfag and Christian as fuck. The deluded way American media portrays Nazi Germany, as a amoral powerhouse with gas mask soldiers inhabited by crazy scientists with free reign to experiment on people would be more Nietzschean than the flower hugging national socialists. Germans follow orders, this is why they can make their nation so shiny, but no ubermenschen are being born there.
>>5103281
>the people that destroyed it, and all of Europe as a result, inherited it
top kek

God fucking DAMNIT I wish the Ancient Greeks were still around.

[le trole faec ಠ_ಠ !Avm1fqtITk No.5103314]

>>5103277
>trying to make the world a better place through an instructive hierarchy

Can you cite texts? In the Beyond Good and Evil chapter on German spirit, Nietzsche makes it very clear that the divisiveness of Europe is a blight and the creation of a powerful state is necessary for the creation of übermenschen. He just didnt think this was possible for the Germans, not that it would be "bad" because of some racist claptrap.

Study what reich even means. Reich basically means the structure of the Roman Empire, and that was a large goal of hitler

[Anonymous No.5103316]

>>5103271
>I can recite meaningless facts
>the existence of the Holy Roman Empire
>a meaningless fact

Ok brah

>The Romans were still the "ideal" reich in the German view bro.

I never denied that (what's the point in denying the obvious ?). I denied that the Nazis called their regime the Third Reich because of Nietzsche.

Also there would be no point in talking about a "third" Riech if there weren't two other before. So the reference to previous German Empires still matter.
Of course any European empire is going to try to cash on the appeal of the Roman empire. But the whole construction of the Third Riech is a consequences of the previous war with France, which happened under the previous Reich.

>>5103281
>And German law till this day is a translation of the Roman law left by Gaius.

All European law is in great part a translation from the Roman law.

[le trole faec ಠ_ಠ !Avm1fqtITk No.5103322]

>>5103281
"Reich" means fairly accurately an empire; the Roman Empire was the largest and was idealized by Germans I general. It's just a mistake to think that Nietzsche was some cosmopolitan junky; he clearly thought a powerful right-wing state was a good thing. Just not the Germans and not with antisemitism.

[Anonymous No.5103325]

Are you ready for the truth? World War II was fabricated by both God and the Jews (Lucifer's bitches). It's all part of his program. Hitler never planned on finishing the Reich, he was setting up events for the TRUE Reich which will come in 2027. Pretty much every major event in history has been a result of Christ and Lucifer's chess game.

[le trole faec ಠ_ಠ !Avm1fqtITk No.5103330]

>>5103316
Did the old reichs call themselves by that name during their reign, or was that post hoc historiography?

[Anonymous No.5103333]

>>5103322
You don't even speak any German. fuck off.

[Anonymous No.5103338]

>>5103142
>muh empire

You managed to subjugate a bunch of savages, congratulations.

Come, tell us how you slew
Them ol' Arabs two by two;
Like the Zulus, they had spears and bows and arrows;
How you bravely faced each one,
With your sixteen pounder gun,
And you frightened them poor natives to their marrow.

[Anonymous No.5103342]

>>5103325
yeah everyone knows that plebaine

[le trole faec ಠ_ಠ !Avm1fqtITk No.5103347]

>>5103316
> I denied that the Nazis called their regime the Third Reich because of Nietzsche.

You're right

The point still stands, though, that many of the conditions of the Nazi empire were not "bad" to Nietzsche. People try far too hard to divorce his views from nazi views

It's an occupational past time to try and make nietzsche as left wing as possible

[Anonymous No.5103353]

>>5103325
SCREENCAP THIS POST OR BE DOOMED

[Anonymous No.5103357]

>>5103347
I think it's "past time" you fucked off, pleb idort

[Anonymous No.5103359]

>>5103314
> In the Beyond Good and Evil chapter on German spirit, Nietzsche makes it very clear that the divisiveness of Europe is a blight and the creation of a powerful state is necessary

This is an old staple of modern (as in non-ancient) European thought since at least Dante. The only thing new (and indeed the very thing the Nazis borrowed from Nietzsche) is the idea of the Übermensch.

The Nazis trying to emulate to Romans was a consequence of them trying to get back at their defeat in WWI and at the economic crisis by borrowing from older successful nations (Rome but also previous German Empires). Every time an European country try to rearm itself into international relevance, you can bet it will model itself after both the Roman Empire and previous examples of empires from that country (or at least it will pretend to do so). You don't need a Nietzsche to do that. Nietzsche simply provided the eugenic twist, which is itself retarded when you consider that Nietzsche would have despised the Nazis if he had been sane.

The civil society and political constitution of the Reich are not those of the Roman Empire. The very idea of one political party organised around the same rhetoric taking up all states bodies is a recent one. Hitler wasn't emulating the organization of the Roman Empire, he was borrowing its symbols.

[Anonymous No.5103374]

Why did Italy stop helping Germany in WWI?

[Anonymous No.5103381]

>>5103325

Off with you

[Anonymous No.5103393]

>>5103347
>The point still stands, though, that many of the conditions of the Nazi empire were not "bad" to Nietzsche.

I'd say some of them were aligned on his writings (and not just a misreading of his writings). The idea of race as something significant is not repulsive or even alien to this.

However, I don't think you need to try very hard to divorce Nazis from Nietzsche. As much as they could have agreed on a few points, the very pillars of Nazism were things Nietzsche wrote against.

For instance
>antisemitism
As much as he derails (and not only derails, he also praises) slave morality, the harshest words in Geneaolgy of Morals are for the antisemites. He also said that he liked the Old Testament much better than the New Testament because in the former he "find[s] a people".

>german nationalism
Nietzsche criticized the "German über alles" mentality as stupid (also in Genealogy of Morals).

>populism and appeal to resentment
Nazism is a populist movment that appeals to the resentment of the middle class. This is a big no-no for Nietzsche as resentment is the hallmark of slave morality. According to Nietzsche's own diagnosis Nazism is slave morality masquerading as master morality.

>idea of supremacy grounded on a centralized state
Nietzsche makes the distinction between master morality and the übermensch (something that escaped the Nazis). More importantly, the übermensch is self-determined, not obedient to a hierarchy or an idea of "national pride". In Thus Spake Zarathustra, the protagonist says "I see many soldiers, but too few warriors". The SS were soldiers, not warriors. Nietzsche also said (perhaps in Genealogy of Morals) that "everything the state ever had, it stole", which is not in line with the Nazi idea of giving to the motherland.

[Anonymous No.5103404]

>>5103347
>It's an occupational past time to try and make nietzsche as left wing as possible

It's rather stupid to try to fit Nietzsche into modern political labels, I agree. He despised the left of his time (and would despise the modern mainstream left even more) but I'm not sure he would have much respect for right-winger either.

Democracy politics (as far as I'm aware) were a circus to him (and no of the most praise-worthy kind). And most our alternatives to democracy nowaday run on populism, which is like democracy without the good parts.

[Anonymous No.5103414]

>>5103325
I seriously hope this is some post-modernist humor that satirizes the mongoloids that unironically believe this. Seek help if you're one of those, and fuck off to leddit/r/tinfoil or /x/

[Anonymous No.5103417]

>>5103374
Italy began to view the war as something Germany could not possibly win, and thought that if they joined the Allies, the Allies would let them take land from Austria-Hungary in a treaty. In practice, they did receive land from Austria-Hungary, but not nearly as much as they expected.

[Anonymous No.5103429]

>>5103314
The chapter where he illustrates Germany's inferiority complex because they believe Jews to be stronger than them, and how shit will inevitably result in the same kind of divisiveness. You sound like the kind of European he said would be doing this shit, it's pretty spooky. Reich does roughly translate to Empire. You will no doubt be surprised that the Romans were not the only people in history to have an empire, but you are gaining German points according to Nietzsche if you didn't. You can self score.

[Anonymous No.5103432]

>>5103381
>implying I'm /pol/
Just green-pilled

[Anonymous No.5103442]

>>5103404
he was a nazi in the most vulgar sense of the word and the only reason he did not want to associate with german nationalist is that he was too emotionally retarded to associate with anyone at all. He is best summarised with "/pol/"

>To refrain mutually from injury, from violence, from exploitation, and put one's will on a par with that of others: this may result in a certain rough sense in good conduct among individuals when the necessary conditions are given (namely, the actual similarity of the individuals in amount of force and degree of worth, and their co-relation within one organization). As soon, however, as one wished to take this principle more generally, and if possible even as the FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLE OF SOCIETY, it would immediately disclose what it really is—namely, a Will to the DENIAL of life, a principle of dissolution and decay. Here one must think profoundly to the very basis and resist all sentimental weakness: life itself is ESSENTIALLY appropriation, injury, conquest of the strange and weak, suppression, severity, obtrusion of peculiar forms, incorporation, and at the least, putting it mildest, exploitation;—but why should one for ever use precisely these words on which for ages a disparaging purpose has been stamped? Even the organization within which, as was previously supposed, the individuals treat each other as equal—it takes place in every healthy aristocracy—must itself, if it be a living and not a dying organization, do all that towards other bodies, which the individuals within it refrain from doing to each other it will have to be the incarnated Will to Power, it will endeavour to grow, to gain ground, attract to itself and acquire ascendancy—not owing to any morality or immorality, but because it LIVES, and because life IS precisely Will to Power. On no point, however, is the ordinary consciousness of Europeans more unwilling to be corrected than on this matter, people now rave everywhere, even under the guise of science, about coming conditions of society in which "the exploiting character" is to be absent—that sounds to my ears as if they promised to invent a mode of life which should refrain from all organic functions. "Exploitation" does not belong to a depraved, or imperfect and primitive society it belongs to the nature of the living being as a primary organic function, it is a consequence of the intrinsic Will to Power, which is precisely the Will to Life—Granting that as a theory this is a novelty—as a reality it is the FUNDAMENTAL FACT of all history let us be so far honest towards ourselves!
>Nietzsche
>Beyond Good and Evil
>1886

[Anonymous No.5103458]

>continentals

[Anonymous No.5103459]

That's cool and all but remember Hitler? I know you guys hate talking about it but Hitler Hitler Hitler.

[Anonymous No.5103462]

>>5103432
>World War II was fabricated by both God and the Jews (Lucifer's bitche
Not even that, just some legitimate fucktard with psychopathic delusions. I'm sure you're going to break down at any second and start spouting shit about annunaki, indigo children and general new age bullshit.

[Anonymous No.5103463]

>>5103459
He was an Austrian. We are his very first victim!

[Anonymous No.5103469]

>>5103459
>im trolling u guys so hard XD
>>>/b/
You're so new it hurts.

[Anonymous No.5103471]

>>5103459
No, but I remember Godwin. After she got married she wrote Frankenstein.

[Anonymous No.5103472]

>>5103442
>he was a nazi in the most vulgar sense of the word

Nazism wasn't a thing until Nietzsche list his sanity. The excerpt you posted is not specifically Nazi. Most Western European nations at the time had built themselves on exploitation and violence, no matter their ideologies.

A society that relies on a strong sense of hierarchy and obedience to authority doesn't exactly falls in line with the idea that

>put one's will on a par with that of others: this may result in a certain rough sense in good conduct among individuals when the necessary conditions are given (namely, the actual similarity of the individuals in amount of force and degree of worth, and their co-relation within one organization)

should not be lauded but avoided. The paragraph quoted above describes the Nazi society pretty well. Germany under Nazism is much more akin to an anthill than to an aristocracy.

[Anonymous No.5103473]

>>5103469

What about Hitler makes me new?

[le trole faec ಠ_ಠ !Avm1fqtITk No.5103474]

>>5103359
Sure, I would agree that the Nazis weren't inspired to make an empire because of Nietzsche. Right now I'm talking about whether Nietzsche would have liked the nazis based on what he wrote

Of course, as is often the case, the people who witness fascism are the strongest opponents, so if he lived that long he might have hated it. Who's to say

[Anonymous No.5103477]

>>5103462
>annunaki

What's that ? The name is pretty spooky. Would be spooked/10

[Anonymous No.5103488]

>>5103473
The fact that you think anyone here is offended by Hitler, post some retard-tier bait, and spout Hitler as a meme, and have the mentality of a /b/tard. You're not only new, but you're an idiotic piece of shit. /lit/ deserves better shitposters than droll shitstains like yourself. Again, fuck off to /b/, subhuman.

[Anonymous No.5103492]

>>5103474
>so if he lived that long he might have hated it. Who's to say

I give several reasons here >>5103393 for why that is likely the case. It's worth noting that Nietzsche said Napolean was half-slave half-master for his will to conquer fueled by populism and appeal to herd mentality. Hitler is no different, except for his huge resentment that crystallize into antisemitism-both things that Nietzsche despised.

[le trole faec ಠ_ಠ !Avm1fqtITk No.5103493]

>>5103393
Good points. I have to wonder, though, how many things, such as
>According to Nietzsche's own diagnosis Nazism is slave morality masquerading as master morality.
Is inherent to nazism itself and not just to the Machiavellian strategies used to gain power--I mean, in the end, hitler did have hegemonic control. I think it's possible that the "warrior" ideal that Nietzsche advocates just doesn't work in modern society

I didn't know Nietzsche spoke again "Deutschland über alles", even if it wasn't in those terms specifically. I know he didn't think the German people were capable of being masters, at least

[Anonymous No.5103494]

>>5103488

>The fact that you think anyone here is offended by Hitler

Well you sound pretty upset about it so score one for me.

[le trole faec ಠ_ಠ !Avm1fqtITk No.5103500]

>>5103404
Sure, I agree. I think American conservatism is the number one modern group he would despise

I wonder how astute Nietzsches readings of Machiavelli were? He denounced Christianity but claimed the formation of a master state was good, despite these two ideas being semi-contradictory in modern times

[le trole faec ಠ_ಠ !Avm1fqtITk No.5103516]

>>5103429
Yeah, the chapter where he claims antisemitism is stupid because Jews are very smart. It's a good chapter

I think people idealize the Romans because they maintained the largest and longest empire (even if contemporary historians would disagree); not that they were the only empire

[Anonymous No.5103518]

>>5103494
I'm offended by how low can human stupidity be, and how retards of your caliber refuse to be contained in /b/, not to mention that /lit/ used to have good shitposters like Quentin, D&E, and several other clever anonymous posters.

Kill yourself, retard. People like you is why /lit/ is shit nowadays.

[Anonymous No.5103531]

>>5103518

haha, go to bed, Quentin, stop fellating yourself anonymously.

[le trole faec ಠ_ಠ !Avm1fqtITk No.5103533]

>>5103492
Would it be possible to rule like that? Without appealing to the populace? I don't think you can do that anymore

[le trole faec ಠ_ಠ !Avm1fqtITk No.5103536]

>>5103492
I don't think it's right to say he "despised" antisemitism, he more thought that it was stupid and self-destructive because the Jews were clever and powerful

[Anonymous No.5103551]

>>5103516
It was one of the crass appropriations of the past and future he talked about. The Nazis manufactured "Roman" architecture, statues, and symbols to create a fictional archaeology which would produce the former empire. They filmed people digging up "empire"-like statues they'd carved and buried themselves, to prove they would become an empire. Nietzsche probably would have described them like people who hate The Secret c/o Oprah Book Club describe that now.

[Anonymous No.5103555]

Wow, continentals argue about the dumbest things.

[Anonymous No.5103560]

>>5103531
Still adamant about /b/-tier shitposts, huh? What are you even doing on this board you fucking philistine? Fuck off already.

[Anonymous No.5103562]

>i am better because i am me

[jeremy meeks No.5103563]

>>5103414
>satire is 'post-modernist humor'

[Anonymous No.5103571]

>>5103563
Protip:
Satire is used as a verb, not a subject.

[Anonymous No.5103572]

>>5103560
not him but you seem to be way too emotionally invested in this shitty internet message board

consider suicide

[Anonymous No.5103574]

>>5103560

I'm here because I sensed that a Tumblrite was here and it would be easy to troll, looks like I found you.

[Anonymous No.5103579]

>>5103571
P
L
E
B
I
A
n

[Anonymous No.5103586]

>>5103493

1/2
> I think it's possible that the "warrior" ideal that Nietzsche advocates just doesn't work in modern society

You could say he tries to find how one can leverage the condition of modern society to become greater than a warrior, instead of just accepting the ambian slave-morality.

>Is inherent to nazism itself and not just to the Machiavellian strategies used to gain power--I mean, in the end, hitler did have hegemonic control.

That's a good point. If you consider that the heads of the NSDAP were cynics fooling people into thinking they were nationalist, then this would apply. In this case the likes of Hitler and Göering would be either old-style cynical masters or ascetic priest slave-herders. In the latter case, amusingly enough, that would make them akin to rabbis.

>I know he didn't think the German people were capable of being masters, at least

He said something along the lines of "the German people is the more fit to raise all kinds of European mandarins", but that's not really a praise.

>>5103500
>I wonder how astute Nietzsches readings of Machiavelli were?

That's an interesting question but I have no clue on this. You can see a progression (so to speak) between the Prince and Genealogy of Morals: the Prince is about how you ought to behave according to the conditions of ruling (ruling demands to be cunning and violent and sometimes forgiving, so be cunning and violent and sometimes forgiving) while the Genealogy is about how the structure of "ought" changed over time and how this can lead you to devise your own moral imperatives.


>I think people idealize the Romans because they maintained the largest and longest empire (even if contemporary historians would disagree)

They also are a key point in the formation of the European identity, and this is this identity that modern empire want to claim for themselves. Harboring an aquila on your banners is a statement: "we are the heirs of all that is great, powerful and daunting in European history". It's an old trick. Even the US did it.

>Would it be possible to rule like that? Without appealing to the populace? I don't think you can do that anymore

Probably not. Which is probably a hint that Nietzsche's Übermensch is not about ruling, or more precisely, ruling is not his highest goal.

[Anonymous No.5103590]

>>5103536
2/2
He was pretty dismissive of antisemites. The core of his dismissal, I think, is that the antisemites don't realize that they are as Jewish as anyone else. The role of the Jews (Nietzsche even calls that a deed in GoM) was to introduce slave morality to the world. Since the antisemites wallow in resent ("the Jews did it !", It's not my fault, it's the Jews !", "The Jews are evil and I'm not jewish, so I must be good !") they are typically engaging slave morality. That is to say the very thing that takes Jews apart from other peoples. Which means the antisemite is by definition a particular case of jewish morality. Being an antisemite is just another way to be a slave like everyone else, if one wants to steer clear of the jewish influence in european culture (according to Nietzsche) one has to either engage in master morality (which nowadays is always muddled with some slave morality) or create another morality. That last part is precisely the task of becoming the übermensch.

I'm going to eat now. But that was a pretty good discussion, thanks for that.

[Anonymous No.5103592]

Nietzsche didn't spend whole aphorisms slagging off Germany for nothing.

[Anonymous No.5103597]

>>5103572
The reason its shitty its because of faggots and retards of your caliber. I'd suggest to you to kill yourself as well, but you're already brain dead.

>>5103574
Boy, more /b/tard responses. I've been browsing /lit/ for four years. I know tumblr is the summer topic for you morons, but you're just digging yourself further with every post. If you think being a simplistic retard is akin to trolling then you have a very warped sense of trolling, or at the very least you consider people mocking you as "trolling".

[Anonymous No.5103606]

>>5103597

Is it Summer? I don't go outside. If you think writing big sentences is akin to telling people you, uh, well you are a Tumblrite so I guess it all fits.

[Anonymous No.5103610]

>>5103597
nope ion fact you will find it's shitty because of autistic who spend 4 years of their lives on it wasting away worthlessly

[Anonymous No.5103616]

>>5103610
*autistic virgins, please forgive the oversight

[Anonymous No.5103623]

>>5103610
>>5103616
>not sure if autistic or postmodern
>probably will never matter
What's an
>ion fact
anon?

[Anonymous No.5103624]

>>5103606
You aren't even trying anymore, are you /b/fag? Fuck off already. You're not fit even to shitpost. At least try to pretend to be smart and shitpost about Sasha Grey in the future.

>>5103610
Nice sentence structure, underaged retard. Also oh no, I spent 4 years discussing and educating myself on literature, philosophy and sociology! But man, I'm sure getting told by some droll clown that masturbates to anime daily and thinks /b/ is epik. Get more butthurt, kid.

[le trole faec ಠ_ಠ !Avm1fqtITk No.5103634]

>>5103586
I definitely agree that the übermenschen aren't also masters; Nietzsche described Goethe as a prototype for übermenschen and he was not a master of a whole lot.

I see what you mean about antisemitism--it is a form of slave morality, because it absolutely means resentment toward the Jews because they actually are superior people, not for the opposite--people who are weaker are beneath the contempt of masters. Given this reasoning I suppose you could then say Nietzsche despised antisemitism.

I wonder what Nietzsche truly thought of the United States. He didnt speak much about the subject, didnt he?

[Anonymous No.5103636]

>>5103623
the latter

an ion fact is like a regular fact but with a different charge, this is basic stuff

[Anonymous No.5103640]

>>5103624
you are a pseudointellectual plebian philistine

and in addition, a faggot

[Anonymous No.5103643]

>>5103624
I mean fucking seriously, "spent 4 years discussing and educating myself on literature, philosophy and sociology!"

kill youslef

[Anonymous No.5103647]

>>5103624

Sasha Grey is relevant though she wrote a book this is where we discuss books.

[Anonymous No.5103649]

>>5103640
>plebian
>he just types a dull string of buzzwords in hopes of being offensive
This is what the modern /lit/ shitposter is like. A person that has the mentality of a 15 year old. I just don't understand why these subhumans don't stay in their containment boards. Why /lit/ of all places?

[Anonymous No.5103655]

>>5103647
i wish skin diamond wrote a book, she's also into degrading porn but also hard bsdm and she's a hell of a lot hotter and is better at blowjobs and fucking, sasha grey is so unerotic, which i guess is why she has to pay a marketing firm to do viral marketing on 4chan for her

[Anonymous No.5103656]

>>5103647
So fucking new.

[Anonymous No.5103657]

>>5103178
True. Germany was the autist fat kid who finally got gang raped after picking on too many kids.

[Anonymous No.5103666]

>>5103649
just because you dress your childish insults with stodgy overly proper diction doesn't make them any less childish

you just said that buzzwords weren't offensive then proceeded to rattle off
shitposter
15-year-old
subhumans
containment boards

you are a faggot

[Anonymous No.5103670]

>>5103215
>good
Except Prussian/Treitschke wet dream was part of his nightmare

[Anonymous No.5103672]

>>5103656

So fucking bootybothered.

[Anonymous No.5103676]

>>5103666
Yes, I'm sure being a 15-year old is considered a buzzword. So is the concept of containment board, subhumans, and shitposters. Jesus, you're dense. Why can't you kill yourself already?

[Anonymous No.5103677]

>>5103666
>Antichrist appears in Nietzsche thread
>seems suspiciously Christian

[Anonymous No.5103681]

>>5103393
Very good
>>5103586
>>5103590

[Anonymous No.5103684]

>>5103655

Whenever Sasha Grey is getting her face fucked, she looks dead inside. And when she occasionally says something like "Oh yeah, murder my throat" in a monotone, unenthusiastic voice, it becomes obvious that she's miserable. It's no wonder she quit porn. All that shit about sexual liberation was to disguise her frailty.

[Anonymous No.5103688]

>>5103684

Sounds like every porn star ever.

[Anonymous No.5103693]

>>5103676
fine, I'll grant that the 15 year old thing is more a meme than a buzzword, but if you don't see how containment board and shitposter are buzzwords, I don't know what to tell you (besides the fact that you're an idiot)

I just assumed "subhuman" was a pol meme or something like that

and you're only telling me to kill myself because I told you to in the first place, try to be a little more original please

OH AND BY THE WAY, the only reason I'm writing such shitty run-on sentences is because the keyboard I'm using doesn't have a period (or slash or colon) key

so go fuck yourself, in other words

[Anonymous No.5103710]

>>5103693
>nd you're only telling me to kill myself because I told you to in the first place, try to be a little more original please
literal 15 year old facebook faggot response. CTRL + F "kill yourself" and I'm the first person that used it, if anything. Anyway, it's absolutely irrelevant, even if you are a immature idiot that is only able to repeat what he sees other posts, you're still a dense moron that would be better off dead.

[Anonymous No.5103734]

>>5103710
nope I said it first, try searching "suicide" instead

thusly, therefore, consequently, it is in fact you who are the immature idiot

cheacmate

QED

how old are you, by the way (I'm actually 14, not 15, idiot)

[Anonymous No.5103739]

what the fuck is this thread

[Anonymous No.5103758]

>>5103734
Here's your post you blithering mongoloid:

>>5103572
>07/06/14(Sun)17:00:05

Here's my post:
>>5103518
>07/06/14(Sun)16:45:42

You didn't even had to look at the time. Just at the post order. Even a legitimate down sydromed kid could see this. I'm starting to feel bad about calling such a disgustingly stupid human being idiotic. I'm starting to think you have a mental disability. I hope you never reproduce or force people to put up with your stupidity.

>>5103739
/b/tards shitposters getting lynched out of /lit/

[Anonymous No.5103771]

>>5103131
Go out into public in Germany displaying that picture in public and see what happens fascist scum.

[Anonymous No.5103776]

>>5103771
He's gonna get his viewpoint respected and the muslims living there will be scandalized. I serioudsly hope you don't believe Germans are edgy socipathic faggots like yourself

[Anonymous No.5103781]

>>5103758
oh, well, I never read that post

and when I searched for "kill yourself" it skipped over that post and went to the next one where you said it, since I had already searched for suicide and had gone further down the page

so we both independently came up with the incredibly witty response of telling each other to kill themselves

which is all just a long-winded way of saying that you're still a faggot

[Anonymous No.5103782]

>>5103776
Why don't you look up what happens to people who display swastikas in Germany in public.

You will get arrested and gangraped in prison.

[Anonymous No.5103789]

>>5103782
That sounds like a great fetish. I wonder why /lit is not more hooked on "please take my swastika" or things of that ilk.

[Anonymous No.5103790]

>>5103781
I'm starting to feel second hand embarrassment from your cringe-worthy posts. Sorry if I don't continue the attention you desperately crave, dense subhuman. You should at the very least fuck off this board and come back in a few years, if you ever stop being so idiotic. There's facebook, reddit, and a surplus of other websites that are retard-friendly.

[Anonymous No.5103797]

>>5103758
and you're still the one who volunteered this gem

"I spent 4 years discussing and educating myself on literature, philosophy and sociology!" on a message board for autistic anime fans

and followed that up by saying

"I'm sure getting told by some droll clown that masturbates to anime daily and thinks /b/ is epik. Get more butthurt, kid."

and you call me childish

how uncouth

how little self awareness

you are pathetic

[Anonymous No.5103805]

>>5103790
I suppose you're right

leaving here would be a better way of spending my time than lingering on here for four precious years of my life