[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

File: 13 KB, 220x165, Yoshinoya_Shop.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

4968312

Anonymous Tue Jun 3 17:51:14 2014 No.4968312 [DELETED]

[DELETED]

[Reply] [Original]

I often see this on /lit/, what exactly is considered "babby's first serious literature" etc?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 3 17:54:17 2014 No.4968323 File: 1.88 MB, 728x2680, difficulty tiers.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 3 18:04:16 2014 No.4968364 >>4968323 working my way up from that entry level

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 3 18:06:03 2014 No.4968373 >>4968364 How desperate for validation are you? Jesus. Just read what you want. Don't use these stupid lists, especially from /lit/ as anything more than a rough guide. Most of them are nonsense.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 3 18:07:17 2014 No.4968380 >>4968323 This list is bullshit. Calling Faulkner "hard" or even "moderate" is almost as absurd as putting Moby Dick and War and Peace on the same level. The Ultimate Mode should be entry tier and every thing else should be scrapped.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 3 18:08:57 2014 No.4968385 >>4968373 not very desperate at all. i am using it as a rough guide, i dont know how my post indicated otherwise.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 3 18:10:09 2014 No.4968388 >>4968373 He's not OP.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 3 18:15:36 2014 No.4968417 OP here. If you're familiar with other boards, I guess what I'm asking is what makes something "entry level".

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 3 19:13:57 2014 No.4968666 >>4968417 Accessibility. What is the easiest literature to read.