/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.4968195]

>Hegel popularized obscurantism and advocated the totalitarian state.
>Schopenhauer advocated pessimism and misogyny.
>Marx inspired an ideology that lead to the death of tens of millions of people and is now destroying values.
>Stirner advocated selfcenteredness and general asshattery.
>Nietzsche pushed moral aestheticism, a love for violence and ego and antipathy toward truth, law, and compassion, and inspired fascism and teen rebellion.

Why was 19th century philosophy the worst thing to happen to the world?

[Anonymous No.4968203]

>>4968195
*19th century German philosophy, that is.

[Anonymous No.4968214]

>>4968195
>and inspired fascism and teen rebellion

made me laugh

[Anonymous No.4968227]

>>4968195
Stirner is cool. His philosophy makes the most sense.

[Anonymous No.4968234]

Because industrial revolution made serfs redundant

[Anonymous No.4968235]

>popper popularized search for seeds of evil and totalitarianism in every philosopher except conservative liberals
why was post-ww2 pop-philosophy the worst thing to happen to the world?

[Anonymous No.4968237]

>>4968195
fall of christendom

[Anonymous No.4968241]

>>4968227
>Stirner is cool.
saged

[Anonymous No.4968269]

>Wittgenstein just argued with himself about shit nobody except him cared about for 50 years

BASED WITT
A
S
E
D

W
I
T
T

[Anonymous No.4968334]

>>4968195
>The moment you realize Stirner's philosophy is connected to Ayn Rands shitty book

The circle of /lit/ is closed.
Shit goes into beauty and beauty into shit.

[Anonymous No.4968345]

>>4968195
>Nietzsche pushed moral aestheticism, a love for violence and ego and antipathy toward truth, law, and compassion, and inspired fascism and teen rebellion.

you might as well said "I've never read any Nietzsche in my life."

[Anonymous No.4968353]

>>4968345
Always the first to be whiteknighted. He would be flattered.

[Anonymous No.4968358]

>>4968195
The funny thing is that most of those things happened because so few people actually read their works.

[Anonymous No.4968362]

>>4968195
Good thing Hume killed any argument of causation long before them or I'd need to post individual refutations of your faggotry, OP.

[Anonymous No.4968366]

>>4968353
he wouldn't give a nice slippery fart to be whiteknighted.

[Anonymous No.4968371]

>>4968195
>destroying values
Why are old values intrinsically good?

[Anonymous No.4968381]

>>4968366
That's what he'd want you to think.

[Anonymous No.4968384]

>>4968371

Because they're tried and tested.

[Anonymous No.4968394]

>>4968384
Appeal to tradition. It is not intelligent to call a thing intrinsically good just because it is still around. It is a mistake to assume the old way of doing things cannot be mistaken, cannot be improved, cannot be criticized.

[White Noise !!0iXqCzhwn1d No.4968414]

>>4968195

>>Hegel popularized obscurantism and advocated the totalitarian state.

Implying totalitarianism is not the only way to discipline the cattle that is humanity

>Schopenhauer advocated pessimism and misogyny.

Implying pessimism wouldnt give you better results that optimism and implying misogyny wouldnt make stacy thundercunts pussy wet as all bodies of water.

>Marx inspired an ideology that lead to the death of tens of millions of people and is now destroying values.

The only true statement here.

>Stirner advocated selfcenteredness and general asshattery.

Implying the world is anything but what YOU experience.

>>Nietzsche pushed moral aestheticism, a love for violence and ego and antipathy toward truth, law, and compassion, and inspired fascism and teen rebellion.


Implying violence is not the only answer to humanitys corrupted DNA and genetic defects.

[Anonymous No.4968421]

>>4968371
They're better than ones manufactured by pretentious leftists who just want to control others.

[Anonymous No.4968428]

>>4968421
When you say better do you mean to imply that in every context, and in every way imaginable "old values' (still loosely defined) will still always be better than the values of leftists?

[Anonymous No.4968431]

>>4968384
>I don't understand history

[Anonymous No.4968432]

Stirner advocated gliding through life like the base angel of glory. You need to reread him, OP.

[Anonymous No.4968437]

>>4968394

Not just anything can replace values that have proven their effacy. The effectiiveness of new values need to be demonstratd before they can be adopted. I'm not saying never change, but conservatism is better than blind progressivism.

[Anonymous No.4968457]

>>4968428
Better than the ones uniquely leftists, yes. Before bringing up fascism, Lenin was their influence.

[Anonymous No.4968462]

>>4968437
>The effectiiveness of new values need to be demonstratd before they can be adopted.
This is a contradictory statement

I am not implying either that there isn't a space to ever rely on conservative values, but it is a mistake to exalt the past as better by merit of it being still here, or to not explore through thought ways in which to improve.

[Anonymous No.4968477]

>>4968457
fascism is criticized because it is uniquely born out of capitalism in decline. The soviet union was actually an improving and growing (though still backward) capitalist country before they leaped to socialism.

I think your way of thinking is far to radical and your axiom is prone to paralysis by outdated ideas, and destined to get lost in the neoliberal world. Unless your old values are capitalist, in which case, old values will keep you on top for as long as we ride out the status quo.

[Anonymous No.4968488]

>>4968414
You sound like a sociopath

[Anonymous No.4968490]

>>4968195
>>4968195
>basing your retarded claim on retarded shit because you're too retarded to understand these guys

[Anonymous No.4968504]

>>4968334
Stirner wrecked the classical subject, you dork. He basically anticipated poststructuralism, minus the obscurantist bullshit.

[Anonymous No.4968506]

History is formed by economic forces, not the ravings of dead Germans.

Maybe you should read more Marx.

[Anonymous No.4968508]

>>4968381
>tfw you get the picture reference
It's the little things /lit/... I've come a long way.

[Anonymous No.4968509]

ITT
>conservatives and liberals in full retard mode
I'm ignorant, but this level of stupidity worries me.
being unable to understand shit is what makes the world unlivable

[Anonymous No.4968523]

>>4968506
What is this simplistic and reductory idea if not the result of the raving of one of the most utmostly German dead people?

[Anonymous No.4968554]

>>4968523

It's the only rational way to approach history, and was born not out of a German peculiarity but industrialisation.

But hey, if you need to pretend that individuals matter go ahead. Not like it will make a shred of difference to anyone, because you don't.

[Anonymous No.4968557]

>>4968414
>Implying totalitarianism is not the only way to discipline the cattle that is humanity

implying humans are cattle
implying they need to be disciplined

>Implying pessimism wouldnt give you better results that optimism and implying misogyny wouldnt make stacy thundercunts pussy wet as all bodies of water.

implying pessimsim and optimism have any effect on the outcome other than how you feel about it
implying misogyny gets women wet and not chauvinism

>The only true statement here.

implying all other ideologies haven't committed similar crimes
implying the 'destruction of values' can even be verified as true

>Implying the world is anything but what YOU experience.

implying your experiences are coherent
implying there are no elements of the world that you do not experience

>Implying violence is not the only answer to humanitys corrupted DNA and genetic defects.

implying /pol/

i can do this all day bitch

[Anonymous No.4968566]

>>4968421
>leftists who just want to control others
As opposed to right wingers who just want to control people's sexuality, and gender identity, and their thoughts, and monitor their communications, and dictate that all social interaction be through approved, traditional paths, and want to control everyone through debt and minimum wage positions with no social safety net that forces workers to accept whatever position is offered in order to survive?

[Anonymous No.4968575]

>>4968557

>implying humans are cattle

i dont understand what MASSES means and i never read history

>implying pessimsim and optimism have any effect on the outcome other than how you feel about it

The feel is more important than the outcome, goddamn retard.

>implying misogyny gets women wet and not chauvinism

chauvanism = whiteknight / beta orbitter

said the virgin neckbeard.

>implying all other ideologies haven't committed similar crimes

Purging the earth from the scum that is jews is not a crime but a service to humanity.

>i can do this all day bitch

Youre the living proof of the validity of my ideas.

[Anonymous No.4968579]

>>4968353
To be fair, if you're summing nietzsche up into broad categories of what he likes and doesn't like then you're an idiot

[Anonymous No.4968585]

>>4968488
Sociopaths will save society

[Anonymous No.4968591]

>>4968506
>a dead 19th century German philosopher/economist

Retard

[Anonymous No.4968594]

>>4968566
So you oppose leadership

[Anonymous No.4968599]

>>4968566
Much of this is result of leftist infection of the right, because the right has allowed itself to be stepped upon and pulled along to whatever 'progressive' ends.

They wish to create an omnipotent state in which 'intellectuals' reign supreme and mold citizens to their liking and the right is not doing much of anything to stop it.

[Anonymous No.4968601]

>>4968227
Maybe as a theoretical, but in reality it would translate fucking terribly into humanity.

[Anonymous No.4968612]

>>4968575
>i dont understand what MASSES means and i never read history

implying im not incredibly well read on world history
implying the average human is not far more intelligent than they were even a hundred years ago
implying treating them like cattle in the modern age won land your head on a stick

>The feel is more important than the outcome, goddamn retard.

implying the feel is important
implying the outcome is not always of ultimate importance

>chauvanism = whiteknight / beta orbitter

implying you've ever met an actual chauvinist
implying you've ever met someone who knows how to be charming
implying all chauvinists are white knights

>said the virgin neckbeard.

implying insults lend validity yo your argument
implying they dont just so how devoid of intelligence you actually are

>Purging the earth from the scum that is jews is not a crime but a service to humanity.

implying jews aren't statistically the most intelligent and productive minority
implying jews dont constitute part of humanity
implying mass murder is ever justified

>Youre the living proof of the validity of my ideas.

implying im not the average person
implying your ideas have validity
implying you have any idea who i am

implying you responded to all my points
implying /pol/

[Anonymous No.4968619]

>>4968599
>the lefts wants to control people!
>so does the right
>They aren't real right! Its a psyop only true rightwing people are the ones who are correct!
I think, before you decend into the abyss of left/right to never return, you should come up with concrete conceptions of freedom and rights, and discover the paradox in which they exist. I think it would do a lot of good for your idea of freedom and your value of liberty.

[Anonymous No.4968623]

>>4968599


not trying to create an omnipotent state ruled by supreme intellectuals is irresponsible.

[Anonymous No.4968624]

>>4968566
Right wingers cannot into structuralism and will claim any inconsistencies in their ideology is liberals
>>4968599
Case and point.

[Anonymous No.4968632]

>>4968594
Yes.
But that's not here nor there, the specific claim was that the left is tyrannical, which is true, but it is no more or less tyrannical than the right.

>>4968599
Tips tinfoil helmet.

[Anonymous No.4968648]

>>4968619
The left wants to control people.
The right wants people to stop doing what they don't like.

Both suck but one is definitely worse.

>>4968623
Yeah, those Communist regimes run sure were great.

[Anonymous No.4968652]

>>4968612

>hurrrrrrrrrr i read all the books yet i dont understand average human is actually more dangerous and stupid than cattle

>hurrrrrrrrr i dont understand psychology 101 and the fact that the feel derermines the outcome.

>hurrrrrr i dont know what chauvanism means i spout shit that i dont know about.

>hurrrrrrr im JIDF

>hurrrrr durrrrr /pol/ is the only place ive ever seen talking about this stuff. 4chan is the only website on the internet hurrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

[Anonymous No.4968660]

>>4968648
I am not much of a fan of ideology to begin with but I think you are a real fool if you think the left and the right are two homogenous groups.

[Anonymous No.4968698]

>>4968652
>hurrrrrrrrrr i read all the books yet i dont understand average human is actually more dangerous and stupid than cattle

implying there aren't countless examples of the masses taking their destiny into their own hands
implying leaders and elites create history and not the other way around

>hurrrrrrrrr i dont understand psychology 101 and the fact that the feel determines the outcome.

implying feels determined the outcome of history
implying feels determine the outcome of experiments
implying feels determine anything

>hurrrrrr i dont know what chauvanism means i spout shit that i dont know about.

implying i dont know what chauvinism means
implying you have any basis to make the claim of shit spouting
implying what you just said makes any sense without a comma

>hurrrrrrr im JIDF

implying /pol/

>hurrrrr durrrrr /pol/ is the only place ive ever seen talking about this stuff. 4chan is the only website on the internet hurrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

implying your not 100% /pol/lack
implying the minority of people who accuse those they are arguing with of being 'JIDF' isnt so small it is completely safe to assume the are /pol/lack-stormfag material

implying your piss-poor attempt at strawmanning provided any real response to half my points

[Anonymous No.4968705]

>>4968554
top life denying

"Whenever men are equals, happiness is nowhere to be found."

[Anonymous No.4968742]

>>4968698

>implying there aren't countless examples of the masses taking their destiny into their own hands

implying there have ever been a single victorious revolution throughout the history which wasnt a puppet show performed by the jew elites and other elites involved to make their profit through revolutions and taking over other countries.

>implying feels determined the outcome of history

implying its not the feel of hatred towards nazi germany made by jews that is changing our history by making new or refurbished stupid shill movements like feminism and cultural marxism.

>implying i dont know what chauvinism means

implying you know

>implying /pol/

implying moot

>implying your not 100% /pol/lack

implying i am

[Anonymous No.4968800]

>>4968742
>implying there have ever been a single victorious revolution throughout the history which wasnt a puppet show performed by the jew elites and other elites involved to make their profit through revolutions and taking over other countries.

implying you know anything about the french revolution
implying you know anything about the Haitian revolution
implying you know anything about the rose revolution
implying you know anything about the Romanian revolution
implying you know anything about Yugoslavia in WW2
implying you know anything about the spanish revolution
implying you know anything about the mexican revolution
and so on, and so forth

>implying its not the feel of hatred towards nazi germany made by jews that is changing our history by making new or refurbished stupid shill movements like feminism and cultural marxism.

implying feminism had anything to do with jews or nazi germany
implying cultural marxism is a thing
implying peoples feeling of hatred towards nazi germany was created by the jews
implying history isnt written by the victors

>implying you know

implying, correctly, that you lack the capacity to come up with an actual response to my point

>implying moot

implying 4 chan

>implying i am

implying i dont have overwhelming evidence to back up my claim of you being a /pol/lack
implying there isnt evidence in your post for you being a /pol/lack

[Anonymous No.4968803]

>>4968698
>implying feels determine the outcome of experiments
Emotions are a big component of human cognition.
They play a great part in psychological and economical experiments.

>implying feels determined the outcome of history
They also had their roles to play during history.
Whether a military leader was angry or calm at a given moment surely had an impact on the subsequent military events at that time and place.

>implying feels determine anything
If they don't determine anything, then they don't exist. Neuroscience disagrees.

[Anonymous No.4968834]

>>4968803
because your response was coherent and wasnt fulled with /pol/ im assuming you not >>4968742

>Emotions are a big component of human cognition.
>They play a great part in psychological and economical experiments.

yes that is true, but i was more referring to scientific experiments, emotions dont effect how calcium reacts with hydrochloric acid, etc

>They also had their roles to play during history.
>Whether a military leader was angry or calm at a given moment surely had an impact on the subsequent military events at that time and place.

indeed, they do have their place, and maybe my language was a bit harsh, really i mean they weren't an overwhelming factor, or the only factor.

>If they don't determine anything, then they don't exist. Neuroscience disagrees.

yeah on that point i went too far

[Anonymous No.4968858]

>>4968834
>yes that is true, but i was more referring to scientific experiments
Scientific experiments on cognition are performed every day.
Ever heard of a fMRI?

>emotions dont effect how calcium reacts with hydrochloric acid, etc
They do in biological systems. How do you think emotions happen if there's no molecular processings responsible for them within the brain?
Emotions have influences on hormone levels, skin temperature, hue (it's called blushing), humidity, muscle movements...

[Anonymous No.4968879]

>>4968858
>Scientific experiments on cognition are performed every day.
>Ever heard of a fMRI?
dammit, i mean in chemical and physical experiment. you know, experiments on any material besides humans.

>They do in biological systems. How do you think emotions happen if there's no molecular processings responsible for them within the brain?
>Emotions have influences on hormone levels, skin temperature, hue (it's called blushing), humidity, muscle movements...

that's not exactly the same, and emotions dont change how the chemical reactions involved take place, they cause hormone release introducing new chemicals into the mix and thus causing a different reaction to take place.

[Anonymous No.4968906]

>>4968800

>french revolution

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Jews_in_France#The_Revolution_and_Napoleon

http://www.orthodoxchristianbooks.com/articles/336/-jews,-masons-french-revolution/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OPaYDRjvW3c


also these posts :

>>4968834
>>4968879

Prove that youre a really really stupid person and as you said, an average sheep amongst the cattle. Might as well end your life now.

[Anonymous No.4968917]

>>4968879
>that's not exactly the same, and emotions dont change how the chemical reactions involved take place
If an hormone is involved in a chemical reaction and you increase the level of that hormone, then yes you change that chemical reaction.

>they cause hormone release introducing new chemicals into the mix and thus causing a different reaction to take place.
There's no "new" chemicals in the body, besides xenobiotics which are foreign.
Emotions happen all the time, it's a flow. The chemical reactions of the bodies are regulated, homeostasy, and one of the many possible regulations is an emotional state triggered by your perceptions integrated to the previous internal state.
Some of that internal state makes what you are, what you think, your personality.
There's no separate compartment that would contain your emotions.
Emotions are just different modes of general functioning of your whole brain (learning, memory, calculus, attention, perception and so on and so forth).

[Anonymous No.4968943]

>>4968906
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Jews_in_France#The_Revolution_and_Napoleon
>http://www.orthodoxchristianbooks.com/articles/336/-jews,-masons-french-revolution/
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OPaYDRjvW3c

implying because one group benefited they caused the whole thing
implying the jews had anything to do with the early stages of the revolution
implying any of these are reputable historical sources (wikipedia sort of is, but it really doesnt support your argument if you bothered to read it)

>youre a really really stupid person and as you said, an average sheep amongst the cattle

implying such a claim on such shaky grounds can stand without explanation
implying you're a special snowflake
implying you even have an argument besides name-calling any more

[Anonymous No.4968955]

>>4968943

>confronted with facts
>talks shit

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sokdL-0iV9s

[Anonymous No.4968965]

>>4968917
>you change that chemical reaction
you change the starting conditions, which essentially makes it a different reaction.

>Emotions are just different modes of general functioning of your whole brain
yes of course, but what im pointing out is that emotions dont effect everything (by which i mean literally everything), as was previously claimed by /pol/ dude, they only effect what goes on inside the human body, and what the human body does, to some extent.

[Anonymous No.4968982]

>MUH CULTURAL MARRRRGGGZISM
>Nietzsche or moral aestheticism had anything to do with teen rebellion.

[Anonymous No.4968986]

>>4968624
>case and point
>using an eggcorn
>ever

[Anonymous No.4968989]

>>4968965
>you change the starting conditions, which essentially makes it a different reaction.
Changing something makes it different. Semantics.

>they only effect what goes on inside the human body, and what the human body does, to some extent.
Indeed. So it's entirely relevant to human history.
What happens inside your brain is literally the most important thing on earth for you, according to biology.
Science-based ethics are best ethics, because Carl "Blazeit" Sagan.

[Anonymous No.4968997]

>>4968652
Man, not even the guy your replying to, that's my first post ITT, but you either accept the masses as a form of human manifestation in history / accept the masses as cattle or you accept the will of the individual and how each and every one of them will act in a determined situation

[Anonymous No.4968998]

>>4968195
>general asshattery

ohohoho

[Anonymous No.4969002]

>>4968955
>confronted with facts
>talks shit

implying one wikipedia page, a dubious at best link to an article on history, and a tinfoil tier video on history lead to an objectively true interpretation of history and disprove all other, far better put forward, more detailed explanations of events, based on far more in depth study and put forward by people and groups which have dedicated their lives to the topic.
implying i have been confronted with any facts that supported your argument
implying anyone would consider my response shit-spouting

>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sokdL-0iV9s

implying this is not the video that best represents your opinion and how you have put it forward https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yCNuElO1bUA

[Anonymous No.4969029]

>>4968989
>Changing something makes it different. Semantics.
from a scientific standpoint, if you change the starting conditions of a chemical reaction, you have not changed the outcome of the original chemical reaction, the outcome of the original chemical reaction will remain the same as science is based on the assumption that under the same conditions the same outcome takes place. modifying the starting conditions, therefore, is to modify the reaction. to go back to the example of how emotions dont effect how calcium reacts with hydrochloric acid, it doesn't matter what mood you're in, if you pu calcium in hydrochloric acid the same thing happens as would otherwise.

>What happens inside your brain is literally the most important thing on earth for you
indeed, but in terms of human history there are many other factors just as important as human emotion that have had an effect on its outcome

[Anonymous No.4969066]

>>4969029
>from a scientific standpoint, if you change the starting conditions of a chemical reaction, you have not changed the outcome of the original chemical reaction, the outcome of the original chemical reaction will remain the same as science is based on the assumption that under the same conditions the same outcome takes place. modifying the starting conditions, therefore, is to modify the reaction.
No, from a chemical standpoint.
We're talking about biological systems.
Cells work with structural changes in proteins during transduction pathways, so a given enzyme can take different paths depending on the conditions it's in.
For example a certain level of agonist will activate a receptor but a higher level might deactivate it and cause the internalization of that receptor and its removal from the cell membrane, effectively decreasing the amount of signal. All of this is probabilistic of course.

So X1 amount of ligand might give reaction Y which is the transduction pathway, while X2 amount leads to a change in conformation with an inactivation/a suractivation/a dimerization/a translocation...
See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allosteric_enzyme
Hemoglobin is the classical example: one subunit takes in 1 O2 with a given cinetic, but it facilitates the capture of a second O2 by a second subunit, and so on. You start with Hg but as Hg gets more and more oxydized, the reaction at each subunit is different, in relation to the other subunits, despite the identity of these subunits...

[Anonymous No.4969070]

>>4968334
Stirner was borderline communist.

[Anonymous No.4969107]

>>4969066
firstly, you are right that on a biological level emotions have a bearing on how everything in the human body takes place.

however at this point we're almost out of sight of the original premise of the debate, whether or not emotions have an effect on basically everything. in biological terms, they do, in chemical terms they only do so inside the human body and i dont really see any disagreement between us on this point.

im going to go to bed now, nice talking with you.

also with regards to you
>>4968989
since you haven't responded to my last post and your post consisted basally of 'i am right, here's a rap-metal song' i consider myself to have defeated you in that you have abandoned any attempt at reasoned debate on any of the points discussed other than whether the french revolution was a jewish conspiracy, which speaks very well of your overall viewpoint.

here's a rap song about how much better i am than you: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RQ6VStjxhBs

[Anonymous No.4969125]

>in biological terms, they do

Admit you are defeated and go to sleep already faggot.

[Anonymous No.4969136]

>>4968585
Society will cure sociopaths.

[Anonymous No.4969170]

>>4969136

my dick will cure your mom.

[Anonymous No.4969598]

Holy shit what the fuck happened in this thread.

[Anonymous No.4969635]

>>4969170

#REKT

[Anonymous No.4969959]

Explain how the average Pleb has heard of let alone be effected by the writings of Hagel, Schopenhauer, and Stirner

[Anonymous No.4969987]

Sometimes I wonder if Jesus & co knew more than we think they did and that they deliberate guarded us from Truth. Satan is Enlightenment embodied.

[Anonymous No.4970003]

>>4969959
i'd argue the nazis used master/slave in favor of master, and the commies in favor of slave.

[Anonymous No.4970026]

ITT: shitposting general

[Anonymous No.4970033]

>>4970026
Every philosophy thread is retard. Stirner spam, tripfags, intentionally bad grammar shitposts, and then OP makes another one while this is still on page one.

moot needs to sentence them and the religionfags on every board into exile in the form of /ph/

[Anonymous No.4970041]

>>4968195
you only had to listen

[Anonymous No.4970925]

>>4968195
>pessimism
>bad
nah

[Anonymous No.4970932]

>>4970041
Why is Kierkegaard such a pretty man, /lit/? All of his pictures look so handsome and sweet.

[Anonymous No.4970938]

>>4970033
>/ph/
>Not the acids and bases board

[Anonymous No.4971064]

>>4970932
No he doesn't.
This isn't even a caricature. They show him as an elusive hunchback.

[Anonymous No.4971068]

>>4968508
um... that's not even a lit thing

[Anonymous No.4971777]

The 19th century was the last century of philosophy. Afterwards it was made obsolete by science.

[Anonymous No.4971781]

>>4971777
>The 19th century was the last century of philosophy. Afterwards it was made obsolete by science.

g8 b8 m8 I r8 it a 8888/8.jpg

[Anonymous No.4971786]

>>4970003
How does the average pleb get affected by nazism?

[Anonymous No.4971789]

>>4971781
There is no philosophy after the 19th century.

[Anonymous No.4971792]

>>4971064
I saw the tumbnail and thought this was le Spooksface man

[Anonymous No.4971801]

>>4971064
How can you not love his simultaneously smooth and rectangular face? His wide eyes? His blown back hair? He's the qtest philosopher of all time.

[Anonymous No.4972506]

If only Kant hadn't died.

[AnelCrest !m9jxTLhLcw No.4972829]

>>4968601
>Implying you get what he says.

[Anonymous No.4972844]

>>4971801

and to think that he died a virgin